Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Thucydides" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
    Tytuł:
    The Tradition of the Ionian Colonisation of Asia Minor: Remarks on the Sources
    Autorzy:
    Kuciak, Jakub
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/638031.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    colonisation
    Ionia
    Athens
    Euripides
    Thucydides
    Herodotus
    Opis:
    This article discusses the tradition of the Ionian colonisation preserved in ancient literary sources. The author focuses on the time and circumstances in which the view that the Athenians were responsible for the Ionian colonisation emerged. He also examines whether there is any support in the sources for the opinion expressed by some historians that such a belief was already strong in the Archaic period.
    Źródło:
    Electrum; 2013, 20; 9-22
    2084-3909
    Pojawia się w:
    Electrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dwa modele postrzegania historii. Herodot Cypriana Norwida i Tukidydes Zbigniewa Herberta
    Autorzy:
    Barszcz, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/971957.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-05-13
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Cyprian Norwid
    Zbigniew Herbert
    Herodotus
    Thucydides
    history
    historiosophy
    Opis:
    The article presents and compares historiosophical conceptions of Cyprian Norwid and Zbigniew Herbert based on particular notes and pieces of both poets. It shows that the author of Vade-mecum sees history by – say – methodology of Herodotus, and the author of Pan Cogito creates vision of history like in Thucydides’s one. Both perspectives are valuable and stem from different original presuppositions, nonetheless both of them lead to the same aim, which is understanding of mechanisms ruling human history.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Humanistyczny; 2020, 64(1 (468)); 19-32
    0033-2194
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Humanistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Socjolog w świecie tekstu
    The Sociologist in the World of Text
    Autorzy:
    Gacek, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1372767.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-09-21
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Thucydides
    sociology of literature
    sociology of politics
    Tukidydes
    socjologia literatury
    socjologia polityki
    Opis:
    In this essay the author reflects on a monograph by Krzysztof Łęcki, Według Tukidydesa. Rozważania socjologa literatury nad ‘Wojną peloponeską’ [According to Thucydides: Reflections on the Sociological Literature about The Peloponnesian War] (2019), and seeks themes in it that extend beyond the sociology of literature. He concludes that Łęcki’s analysis convincingly adds to the body of knowledge on Thucydides’s text in philosophy and the sociology of politics. The book touches on many themes relevant to historical sociology or the sociological (and politological) understanding of rules governing the mechanisms of politics and international relations.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2020, 64, 3; 233-239
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ethnographic Trailblazers: Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Burk, Matthew
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138659.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Ethnography
    Classical Greek
    Herodotus
    Thucydides
    Xenophon
    Symbolic Interaction
    Anthropology
    History
    Pragmatism
    Generic Social Process
    Opis:
    While ethnographic research is often envisioned as a 19th or 20th century development in the social sciences (Wax 1971; Prus 1996), a closer examination of the classical Greek literature (circa 700-300BCE) reveals at least three authors from this era whose works have explicit and extended ethnographic qualities. Following a consideration of “what constitutes ethnographic research,” specific attention is given to the texts developed by Herodotus (c484-425BCE), Thucydides (c460-400BCE), and Xenophon (c430-340BCE). Classical Greek scholarship pertaining to the study of the human community deteriorated notably following the death of Alexander the Great (c384-323BCE) and has never been fully approximated over the intervening centuries. Thus, it is not until the 20th century that sociologists and anthropologists have more adequately rivaled the ethnographic materials developed by these early Greek scholars. Still, there is much to be learned from these earlier sources and few contemporary social scientists appear cognizant of (a) the groundbreaking nature of the works of Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon and (b) the obstacles that these earlier ethnographers faced in developing their materials. Also, lacking awareness of (c) the specific materials that these scholars developed, there is little appreciation of the particular life-worlds depicted therein or (d) the considerable value of their texts as ethnographic resources for developing more extended substantive and conceptual comparative analysis.  Providing accounts of several different peoples’ life-worlds in the eastern Mediterranean arena amidst an extended account of the development of Persia as a military power and related Persian-Greek conflicts, Herodotus (The Histories) provides Western scholars with the earliest, sustained ethnographic materials of record. Thucydides (History of the Peloponnesian War) generates an extended (20 year) and remarkably detailed account of a series of wars between Athens and Sparta and others in the broader Hellenistic theater. Xenophon’s Anabasis is a participantobserver account of a Greek military expedition into Persia. These three authors do not exhaust the ethnographic dimensions of the classical Greek literature, but they provide some particularly compelling participant observer accounts that are supplemented by observations and open-ended inquiries. Because the three authors considered here also approach the study of human behavior in ways that attest to the problematic, multiperspectival, reflective, negotiated, relational, and processual nature of human interaction, contemporary social scientists are apt to find instructive the rich array of materials and insights that these early ethnographers introduce within their texts. Still, these are substantial texts and readers are cautioned that we can do little more in the present statement than provide an introduction to these three authors and their works.
    Źródło:
    Qualitative Sociology Review; 2010, 6, 3; 3-28
    1733-8077
    Pojawia się w:
    Qualitative Sociology Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Just war in the classical world: Grece and Rome
    Autorzy:
    Bermúdez Vázquez, Manuel
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/431234.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
    Tematy:
    just war
    Peloponnesian war
    Roman imperialism
    Cicero
    Thucydides
    wojna sprawiedliwa
    wojna peloponeska
    imperializm rzymski
    Cyceron
    Tukidydes
    Opis:
    'War is hell’ is one of the mantras used to offer an explanation for the lack of ethical guidance in the radical antagonism involved in that human conflict known as war. Throughout the history of mankind, there has been an effort to introduce ethical considerations in war-waging. However, humanity has assisted, defenseless, to the greatest injustices and disasters once and again. This situation highlights the problematic issues and paradoxes of the concept of “just war”. Our purpose here is to analyze the origins of this concept in the Greek ethical reflection during the Peloponnesian War and in the justification of the Roman expansion during the founding of the Roman Empire.
    Źródło:
    Studia Philosophiae Christianae; 2017, 53, 3; 41-54
    0585-5470
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Philosophiae Christianae
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Les maladies infectieuses donnent naissance à la philosophie
    Autorzy:
    Nakatomi, Kiyokazu
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130131.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    corona virus (SARS-CoV-2)
    pandemic
    Athens disease
    Thucydides
    Ebola
    Socrates
    nothingness
    benevolence of Confucius and philia of Aristotle
    principle of nothingness and love
    Biocosmological Association.
    Opis:
    In January 2020, the corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) spread around the world. More than 14.95 million people have been infected and about 610,000 have died on July 23, 2020 (Mainichi Japan Journal). In Japan, a state of emergency has been declared, refraining from going out and demands for store closings have been implemented. In Japan, more than 27,881 people have been affected and 1,003 have died. These numbers represent more than 3.90 million people infected and around 140,000 deaths in the United States, but with the likelihood that this will increase by tens of thousands in no time, we must be vigilant. I wrote this document with caution and for future consideration. In terms of infectious diseases and philosophy, the ‘Athens disease’ (circa BC430) in Thucydides’s “History of the Peloponnesian War” is famous when Socrates was 40 years old. There are several theories about this infection, but I guess it is Ebola hemorrhagic fever. The tragedy is said to have killed 1,000 of the 4,000 soldiers. The infectious disease and the war lasted for about 30 years. As a result, all of Greece was burned, pillaged, murder became routine, and people experienced despair, darkness and nothingness. At this background, the Greeks sought justice, peace, love and human ideals. Then the philosophy was established. In front of the wonders of nature, humans are powerless and nothing like Pascal also said. Socrates experienced and learned the nothingness of this situation in military service, so he grasped and explained the ignorance. His theory led to Plato, Aristotle and the height of Greek philosophy. This continues in modern times. The tribulation of an infectious disease gave birth to philosophy. The corona virus is also a crisis of the human race in the world, but it is a sign of the emergence of a new philosophy, where it has started.
    Źródło:
    Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2020, 2(37); 131-141
    1898-8431
    Pojawia się w:
    Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Infectious diseases bear Philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Nakatomi, Kiyokazu
    Czarnecki, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2050204.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    corona infectious virus (COVID-19)
    pandemic
    illness of Athens
    Thucydides
    Ebola
    Socrates
    nothingness
    benevolence of Confucius and philia of Aristotle
    principle of nothingness and love
    Biocosmological Association
    Opis:
    On January 2020, the corona virus has spread worldwide. 6.06 million people are affected and about 370,000 died on June 1, 2020. In Japan, a state of emergency was declared, refraining from going out and requests for store closures were implemented. In Japan, more than 17,580 people have been affected and 910 have died. These figures are less than 1.77 million people infected and about 100,000 deaths in the United States but because it is a sensitive feeling that this will increase by tens of thousands in a short period of time, we must be alert. I wrote this paper with caution and for future reflection. Regarding infectious diseases and philosophy, the ‘illness of Athens’ (circa BC430) in “History of the Peloponnesian War” of Thucydides is famous, when Socrates was 40 years old. There are several theories about this infection, but I assume it is Ebola hemorrhagic fever. The tragedy is said to have killed 1,000 of the 4,000 military personnel. The infectious disease and the war continued for about 30 years. As a result, the whole of Greece was scorched, plundered, murder became routine and people encountered despair, darkness and nothingness. At this bottom, the Greeks sought justice, peace, love and human ideals. Then philosophy was established. Before the wonders of nature, humans are powerless and nothing as Pascal also said. Socrates experienced and learned nothingness from this situation in military service, so he seized and explained ignorance. His theory led to Plato, Aristotle and the heyday of Greek philosophy. It continues in the modern times. The tribulation of an infectious disease gave birth to philosophy. The corona virus is also a crisis of the human race in the world, but this is a sign of the emergence of a new philosophy. Or it has begun.
    Źródło:
    Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2020, 4(39); 131-140
    1898-8431
    Pojawia się w:
    Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The ‘Archeology’ of historiography as a rhetorical agon. On the juxtaposition of hellenic writers in the Epistula ad Pompeium by Dionysius of Halicarnassus
    „Archeologia” historiografii jako retoryczna gra. O porównaniu greckich autorów w „Liście do Pompeiusza” Dinizjosa z Halikarnasu
    Autorzy:
    Sinitsyn, Aleksandr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2033826.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-28
    Wydawca:
    Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
    Tematy:
    Dionysius of Halicarnassus
    “A Letter to Pompeius”
    historiography
    rhetoric
    early Greek historians Hellanicus
    Charon
    Herodotus
    Thucydides
    Xenophon
    Philistus
    Theopompus
    style
    syngraphers
    Plato
    philosophy
    ancient Greek orators Lysias
    Demosthenes
    literary criticism
    polylogue
    agon
    influence
    Dionizjos z Halikarnasu
    „List do Pompeiusza”
    historiografia
    retoryka
    wcześni historycy greccy – Hellanikos
    Herodot
    Tukidydes
    Ksenofont
    Filistos
    Teopompos
    oratorzy
    Lysias
    Demostenes
    krytyka literacka
    Opis:
    Dionysius of Halicarnassus in his short theoretical treatise entitled “A Letter to Pompeius” (Epistula ad Pompeium) presents an exciting discussion on rhetoric mastership and scholarship written in an epistolary genre. The treatise begins with critical remarks Dionysius once addressed to Plato. The author admits to his addressee (Cn. Pompeius Geminus) that he is enchanted by Plato’s dialogues. From the trio of Greek speech-makers who are recognized as the most brilliant in this respect – Isocrates, Plato, and Demosthenes (such was Dionysius’s selection) – the Halicarnassean rhetorician deliberately dwells on Plato (Lysias, Isocrates, Demosthenes and other Greek orators are the subject of his other aesthetic works). Embarking on a wider discussion, Dionysius repeatedly points out that these studies are always aimed at establishing the truth. The longest chapter, 3 compares works of the first Greek historians and the mastery of their style. Dionysius points out the rivalry of the many masters of the genre, but the main characters of the chapter are Herodotus and Thucydides. The “father of history” (Dionysius’ contemporary and paragon) surpasses the Athenian historian on all counts examined by the author. This article examines συγγραφεύς / συγγραφεῖς or συγγραφή occurring in the Pomp. by Dionysius of Halicarnassus. The rhetorician, when referring to Herodotus, Thucydides (ch. 3), Theopompus (ch. 6), Hellanicus, Charon (3.7) and the Greek historians en masse (6.7), calls them “syngraphers”. Dionysius uses the word συγγραφή only as applied to historical works of Theopompus of Chios (6.2, 3, 6). The article also draws upon the Halicarnassian philologist’s other works in which he mentions syngraphers-historians, who are set off against poets and orators. Dionysius regards the words συγγραφεύς, ὁ ἱστορικός, ἱστοριογράφος as equivalent and interchangeable. In this work, Dionysius examines different styles of ancient writers. Here, by examining the works by the authors of the 5th and 4th centuries BC (written three to four centuries before his time) he seems to be performing a peculiar experiment of theoretical “archaeology”. But the rhetoric and philological “archaeological” study conducted by Dionysius of Halicarnassus reveals not only his scholarly interest in the analysis of works of the writers of the past, but also his focus on the present – both in literary and cultural aspects. Plato is under the influence of Thucydides, but Thucydides is inferior to Herodotus, Herodotus produces works that surpass those of Charon and Hellanicus, while Theopompus is superior in style to Demosthenes himself and surpasses Isocrates – the “most brilliant” rhetoricians of the past. By presenting this gallery of names, Dionysius shows comparison as agon – of styles, genres, authors, their subject matters, intensive narrative, and he himself contends with the writers of the past. Seeing mastery of rhetoric as a peculiar agon stretching over centuries and across the agon of rhetoricians, philosophers and historiographers, Dionysius identifies the circle of best writers, and himself joins it. He claims that in the scholarly rhetoric “the truth is dearer still” and establishes the criteria to judge the classic writers. And the critic realizes that he will be judged according to the same (his own) criteria
    Dionizjos z Halikarnasu w teoretycznym traktacie zatytułowanym „List do Pompejusza” zawarł dyskusję na temat retorycznego mistrzostwa i nauki. Traktat rozpoczynają krytyczne uwagi Dionizjosa, adresowane do Platona. Autor przyznaje jednak, iż jest zachwycony dziełami Platona. Pośród trzech greckich mówców, uznawanych za najwybitniejszych – Izokratesa, Platona, Demostenesa – Dionizjos z Halikarnasu celowo studiuje Platona. Prowadzi szeroką dyskusję. Dionizjos wielokrotnie podkreśla, że wskazani autorzy mają na celu ustalenie prawdy. Najdłuższy rozdział oznaczony jako 3, dotyczy historyków greckich i stylu ich prac. Dionizjos zauważa rywalizacje mistrzów, ale głównymi bohaterami rozdziału stali się Herodot i Tukidydes. Dinozjos zauważa, że „ojciec historii” przewyższa ateńskiego historyka. Prezentowany artykuł dotyczy użycia słowa συγγγραφεύς. Słowa tego retor użył w odniesieniu do Herodota, Tukidydesa, Hellanikosa i innych historyków. Dionizjos wskazuje na styl autorów, tematykę ich prac.
    Źródło:
    Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia; 2021, 67; 89-115
    0065-0986
    2451-0300
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies