Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Étienne Gilson" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    MACINTYRE’S GILSONIAN PREFERENCE
    Autorzy:
    Mango, Peter
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507681.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Alasdair MacIntyre
    Étienne Gilson
    Thomism
    Opis:
    Alasdair MacIntyre arrived relatively ‘late’ to Thomism in his philosophical career. One of the many determining influences on his thought has been the Thomist Étienne Gilson. This article examines MacIntyre’s possible motives for embracing Gilson as someone apparently allowing him to identify as an “intellectually fulfilled” Thomist. The author claims that MacIntyre’s arrival to Thomism was a well considered one, an achievement unto itself.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2013, 2; 21-32
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Metodologia historii filozofii w ujęciu wybranych tomistów
    Thomistic account of methodology of history of philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Nowik, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452671.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    metodologia historii filozofii
    tomizm
    Etienne Gilson
    methodology of history of philosophy
    Thomism
    Opis:
    Etienne Gilson relied his concept of doing history of philosophy on Thomistic metaphysics, so it enable him to distinguish between the proper history of philosophy and history of philosophical texts or history of philosophical doctrine; the former concerns philosophical problems disregarding their historical contexts. He referred to the way of studying history of philosophy, which was worked out by St. Thomas Aquinas as well as Aristotle and Alexandrian scholars before him, who were distinguishing between publication, understanding, interpretation and valuation of the text in text studying. Such history of philosophy allows not only to make synthesis within its framework, but also to pose a question on the adequacy of historical solutions of philosophical problems to real being; in that way history of philosophy becomes auxiliary and supporting science.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2012, 1; 173-181
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wpływ Étienne’a Gilsona na filozofię w Polsce
    The Influence of Étienne Gilson on Philosophy in Poland
    Autorzy:
    Gogacz, Mieczysław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075829.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Étienne Gilson
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    tomizm
    Stefan Swieżawski
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    Thomas Aquinas
    Thomism
    Opis:
    After the Second World War, Stefan Swieżawski gave his lectures on the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics at the Catholic University of Lublin. The lectures were based on the approaches and methodologies of Etienne Gilson. In this way, Gilson’s thought came in Polish culture. The influence of Gilson’s thought on Polish philosophers had three tangible effects. First of all, positive knowledge about the Middle Ages as such and in particular the medieval philosophy was more able to penetrate the insightful minds. Secondly, a completely new, different from Aristotelian definition of metaphysics was adopted. The definition was developed by Gilson who based on the texts of Thomas Aquinas. Finally, thirdly, Gilson’s theory of history was creatively developed in Poland philosophy, as a study of the philosophical problems that ancients authors took and which have been elaborated in ancient texts. Pedagogical activity of Swieżawski and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, who in the creative way took over Gilson’s thought, caused that existential Thomism has become one of the most known philosophical trends in Poland. At the end of the Stalinist night in Poland, Swieżawski manager to send to Gilson a series of philosophical works done at the Catholic University in Lublin; the texts concerned the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics. In a response, Gilson encouraged him to step up his efforts to initiate research on the history of Polish medieval philosophy and philosophy of the fifteenth century in Europe. With time, a number of translations of Gilson’s books appeared in Poland. Until today they influence their readers. Today, in 21st century, Gilsonian works are used by the next - after the Swieżawski’s and Krąpiec’s students - Polish generation of Thomists.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 119-128
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Gilson i filozofia
    Gilson and Philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Gogacz, Mieczysław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1810424.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Étienne Gilson
    filozofia
    tomizm
    historia filozofii
    filozofia chrześcijańska
    philosophy
    Thomism
    history of philosophy
    Christian philosophy
    Opis:
    The article considers Gilson’s view on medieval philosophy, the concept of Christian philosophy, the main tendencies of Gilson’s metaphysics in the context of more important biographical data and the documented reception of his works. Gilson as a historian of philosophy is the creator of the view that the proper history of philosophy concerns the history of philosophical problems. Showing them requires that the historian of philosophy was mainly a philosopher, not only a historian and philologist. Thus, the history of schools discussed by the historian and the history of the texts that philologist discusses, does not constitute a proper history of philosophy. They are auxiliary disciplines for history philosophy. Gilson as a historian of medieval philosophy showed the diversity and richness of the themes and themes of the medieval views. He showed that medieval philosophy is a direct source of modernity and that the Middle Ages fulfilled the philosophical achievements of Greece and Rome with the theological reflection. He also claimed that medieval theology and faith caused development of philosophy towards the formation of the metaphysics of existence. As a historian of philosophy, Gilson was the author of the view that Christian philosophy is mainly about the metaphysics of existing being, because the revealed name of God prompted theologians to reflection and they worked out the theory of existence and deepened the problem of being in this way. Agreeing with Gilson that the theory of existence is unusual refinement and fulfillment in the metaphysics of being and it finds a true path to the reality of all beings including the reality of God, we should not however consider this theory as a set of conclusions resulting from the theological explanation of Christian revelation. These conclusions result from the analysis of real individual beings, which is precisely what was shown by Thomas Aquinas who made a philosophical reflection on being and views on the object of metaphysics in the history of philosophy. We can only agree that the theory of existence, applied in theology, expresses the reality of God according to the revelation. As a metaphysician, Gilson introduced the philosophy of the twentieth century metaphysics of existence and became a co-creator with Maritain existential version of Thomism. His concept of Christian philosophy and the necessity of meeting methodological requirements of postulates of positivism is imperfect in this existential version of Thomism and it evokes the need for fidelity as a consistent metaphysics of being existing, showing the reality of Self-existence. Gilson as the theoretician of cognition convincingly questioned idealism, he defended epistemological realism, formulated the theory of cognition of existence and the theory of existential claims. Finally, he mobilized many generations of philosophers to rethink the metaphysics.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 39-52
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Istnienie pierwszym aktem bytu
    Existence as the first act of being
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452489.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    esse
    essentia
    Aristotelianism
    Thomism
    Aristotle
    Avicenna
    Thomas Aquinas
    Étienne Gilson
    arystotelizm
    tomizm
    Arystoteles
    Awicenna
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    Opis:
    From the perspective of existential Thomism, and following Aristotle’s philosophy of being (metaphysics) as the nucleus and keystone of the whole philosophy, seeking there the most important claims of St. Thomas, the article asks the three following questions: 1) What is the novum of Thomistic metaphysics? 2) What was Thomas’ way of thinking that led him to formulate the thesis that existence is the act of being? 3) Would anyone else have discovered the uniqueness of existence if Thomas Aquinas had not done it? The answers to these questions were formulated in reference to Gilson’s views and his concept of the history of philosophy and to the study of the concept of being in the texts of Thomas Aquinas and the historical sources of that concept. 1) Thomas proposed a new understanding of the structure of being, in which existence is the act that makes essence real and constitutes being’s potency, together making a real individual being. Thus, Thomas formulated a new existential theory of being, overcoming the limitations of Aristotle’s theory, and consistently explaining the issue related to esse (a problem that Avicenna and his followers - Parisian theologians of the 13th century could not solve). 2) Thomas Aquinas - with the help of Avicenna’s metaphysics - outdistances Aristotle’s essentialism, perceiving being as composed of existence and essence. Then, examining thoroughly the proposition of the Arab philosopher, he sees there inconsistency of attributing the position of accident to existence. According to Avicenna the element of being considered as the cause of the reality of being became - at the same time, as the accident - an unimportant component of essence. That is why Thomas Aquinas recognized that existence is the act of everything that makes essence, which transcended Avicenna’s theory, and thus he formulated his own existential version of the metaphysics of being. 3) It seems that nobody else but Thomas Aquinas would have put up a thesis that existence is the first act of being. And what would have been if Thomas Aquinas had not done it? It is hard to say as we have no historical data to let us discuss it. Similarly, it is impossible to answer this question even assuming Gilson’s thesis that the detailed claims of a given philosophy are the conclusion of the set of principles adopted at the beginning because Thomas did not have such a set of principles as at the starting point he modified the principles of Aristotle and Avicenna. Would someone else have made the same modifications, thus creating a “Thomistic” set of principles? The history of philosophy analyzes the things that actually happened and left their mark; it has no interest in things that did not take place and leave any trace. This could be an area for historical and philosophical fantasy, if it ever exists, but we try to stay in the field of the history of philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2017, 6; 13-25
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Krótki traktat o szkodliwości języka specjalistycznego w badaniach literackich
    A Short Treatise on the Harmfulness of the Specialist Language in Literary Studies
    Autorzy:
    Wąs, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1807009.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-02-05
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    teoria literatury
    interpretacja
    Étienne Gilson
    Jacques Maritain
    tomizm
    język potoczny
    język specjalistyczny
    człowiek
    wolność
    poststrukturalizm
    literary theory
    interpretation
    Thomism
    colloquial language
    technical language
    man
    liberty
    poststructuralism
    Opis:
    Celem artykułu jest wykazanie szkodliwości przesadnego przywiązania do języka specjalistycznego w badaniach literackich. We wstępie zostaje zarysowany kontekst postawienia tezy. W następnej części przeprowadzona zostaje zwięzła prezentacja obecnej sytuacji studiów literaturoznawczych, to znaczy ich językowego „przespecjalizowania”. Dalej następuje krótki szkic historyczny, mający za zadanie unaocznić specyfikę i naturę tego, co nazywamy tutaj klasycznym modelem wypowiedzi naukowej, szkic obejmujący ramy czasowe od greckiej starożytności do czasów współczesnych i w sposób szczególny poświęcony uwydatnieniu roli, jaką w owym „klasycznym” dyskursie odgrywał i odgrywa język potoczny, żywy, „naturalny”. Wreszcie — próba sformułowania trzech argumentów uzasadniających wyższość modelu „klasycznego” nad „współczesnym” w badaniach literackich. Pracę wieńczą krótkie wnioski, w których próbuje się wykazać potencjalne korzyści praktyczne płynące z przyjęcia proponowanego w pracy stanowiska.
    The aim of the article is to demonstrate the harmfulness of the excessive attachment to the specialist language in literary studies. The introduction outlines the context in which the thesis is formulated. The proceeding part consists of a short presentation of the current situation of the literary studies, namely their linguistic “overspecialization.” The yet proceeding one — of a short historical sketch of what is called here the classic mode of academic diction, ranging from the Greek Antique to contemporary times, with special stress falling upon the role which in this diction was and is given to the colloquial, living, “natural” language.” The third part is an attempt at formulating three theoretical arguments proving the superiority of this “classic” model over the contemporary one in the literary studies. The text closes with an attempt at outlining several practical advantages to be gained by accepting the attitude argued for in the text.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Kulturoznawcze; 2019, 10, 2; 63-85
    2082-8578
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Kulturoznawcze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies