Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "sejm" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 55
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 157 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543270.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Sejm oversight
Opis:
The opinion deals with the exercise of parliamentary oversight functions by Sejm committees. It provides an analysis of whether the representatives of State administration might be held responsible for failure to discharge their duties resulting from Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, Sejm committees have at their disposal the means to enforce only political responsibility. Moreover, as concerns suspension of work on a bill in the event of breach of the obligations specified in Article 157 by the representatives of public administration, the author believes that the legitimacy of such action cannot be assessed in abstracto. The author does not rule out that, depending on circumstances and seriousness of the infringements, suspension of work on a bill may be justified.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 121-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie art. 30 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu RP
Opinion on Article 30 (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12232901.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine the possibility of referring the recommendation for election or appointment by the Sejm of individual persons to particular State offices specified in Articles 26, 27–29 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, or dismissal therefrom, to more than one Sejm committee for their opinion thereto. In the author’s view, a flexible interpretation of Article 30 (5) is possible, as it is implied by the wording of that article which does not state that the recommendation is to be referred to “one” committee, so it does not preclude referring it to a greater number of committees.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 70-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 10a ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223414.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author provides an analysis of the provisions of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the context of the time period within which it should consider a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm. She points out that the opportunity to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is complicated as compared to the election procedure,. The character of the time limit for consideration of the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is not indicative, but mandatory. From an analysis of the concept of ‘the next sitting of the Sejm, it follows that the consideration of the motion and the putting thereof to a vote at the sitting that is “the first one after 7 days of its submission”.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 71-74
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych uwarunkowań transmisji internetowych z posiedzeń Sejmu, komisji i podkomisji sejmowych
Legal opinion on normative preconditions of Internet broadcasts from the sittings of the Sejm, Sejm committees and subcommittees
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223427.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
public information
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Provision of information about the activities of the Chamber through the Information System of the Sejm is the primary making accessible public information by the Sejm. The express legal basis is given in Article. 202a of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. This provision is, however, brief – and does not specify what information about the operation of the Sejm will be made available through the System and who is responsible for the published materials and their selection. Shaping the mechanism for making accessible public information by the Chancellery of the Sejm, the Sejm assumed that the website only part of the information specified in the Constitution and the Act as public information, will be published. The scope of the information available is determined by the Chancellery of the Sejm. The Standing Orders of the Sejm, however, do not contain any provision forming the basis for recording the sittings of Sejm committees and sub-committees, which would also provide the basis for placing the recordings in the Information System of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 203-212
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 175 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 175 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the specific questions
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6583387.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm
Deputy
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion concerns the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to expel a Deputy from a sitting, taken pursuant to Article. 175 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, such decision is not final, as the Presidium of the Sejm may quash it, having considered an appeal submitted by the Deputy and – on the other hand – is immediately applicable, because the expelled Deputy is obliged to leave the Chamber and abstain from participating in further deliberations until his/her appeal is considered (or until the end of the session of the Sejm, if the Deputy has not submitted an appeal). Therefore, the expelled member does not have the right to participate in voting. Preventing the Deputy expelled from the sitting from “entering the Chamber with the purpose of voting” is necessary in order to respect Article 176 para. 6 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 206-210
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 70 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 70 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855250.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Speaker of parliament
Standing Orders of the Sejm
report
Opis:
The opinion deals with the interpretation of the provision which states that the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm may request the committee to express its attitude to the conclusions and remarks made by the legal services of the Chancellery of the Sejm, which have not been taken into consideration, and whether – in this context – it is possible to change the report adopted by the committee. The author argues that the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm provide no grounds for claim that expressing by the committee of its attitude to the conclusions and remarks could take place by way of modification of the report already adopted by the committee. In this situation, it seems that it could only be admissible that the Deputy Rapporteur takes position at the sitting of the Sejm considering the bill or draft resolution in the second reading.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 68-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat zakresu kontroli Sejmu nad Prokuratorem Generalnym
Legal opinion on the scope oversight exercised by the Sejm over the Public Prosecutor General
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216075.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitution
Public Prosecutor General
Public Prosecutor’s Office
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm
Opis:
In the author’s view, the existing provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm do not contain loopholes that might reduce the effectiveness of actions taken by the Sejm in the exercise of the oversight of the Public Prosecutor General. There is no need to amend the Standing Orders of the Sejm to “align” this act to the provisions of the Law on the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The scope of oversight exercised by the Sejm over the Public Prosecutor General in the current constitutional framework system is based on the assumption Public Prosecutor General may use all oversight instruments which serve the exercise of control over the activities of the organizational system subordinate to the Council of Ministers. The author proposes to consider the simplification of the rules allowing the committee meeting to be held in camera when its subject concerns information subject to legal protection.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 2(50); 61-81
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia art. 152 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu – powiadomienie członków komisji o posiedzeniu komisji
Interpretation of Article 152 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – notification to committee members about a committee sitting
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215773.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
committee of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Notification to committee members about a committee sitting (date and agenda) should take place at least three days before the sitting, unless the meeting was convened as a result of decisions taken at the sitting of the Sejm. The discussed rule allows each member of the committee to plan a calendar of activities taking into account all individual responsibilities. The author emphasizes that with Article 152 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm causes a few interpretation concerns, what indicates a need of its amendment.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 50-55
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tryb zwoływania posiedzeń komisji sejmowych
The procedure for convening sittings of Sejm committees
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211825.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
komisja sejmowa
regulamin Sejmu
Opis:
The power of the presidium of the committee to determine the agenda of a committee sitting is limited only in two cases – a minority request to convene a sitting and an initiative of the Presidium of the Sejm. The chairperson of the committee establishes the agenda of the committee meeting only in the case in which he executes the minority’s request. No provision of the Standing Orders of the Sejm l allows the chairman of the committee to set the agenda for a committee meeting without the involvement the presidium of the committee. Producing minutes documenting a sitting of the presidium is not required, nor there are any procedural requirements regarding the rules for convening these sittings.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 1(57); 174-178
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat zasad udostępniania pełnego zapisu posiedzenia Komisji ds. Służb Specjalnych
Legal opinion on the rules for access to a complete record of the meeting of the Special Services Committee of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216692.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
classified information
Sejm Committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Special Services
Opis:
It does not seem possible to formulate an exhaustive list of instances in which it would be permitted to make access to a complete records of the meeting of the Special Services Committee, marked as classified. Typical examples where such access is allowed include actions by the public prosecutor’s office taken within the framework of criminal proceedings and by special services for the detection of crime or actions related to the conduct of inspection under the Act on the Protection of Classified Information. The Marshal of the Sejm is a body competent for making decisions on the provision of classified documents providing the record of the Committee meeting. The head of one of the special services, who at the invitation of the Committee participated in the committee meeting, has the right to be acquainted with the text “working” or preliminary version of the minutes of the meeting. This, however, does not preclude that the activities of services (subordinate to him) provided for in the Act will require reading of the final text of the minutes marked as classified.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 45-57
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zasady prowadzenia transmisji z posiedzeń Komisji Regulaminowej, Spraw Poselskich i Immunitetowych w Systemie Informacyjnym Sejmu
Rules regarding broadcasting the sittings of the Rules, Deputies’ Affairs and Immunity Committee in the Sejm Information System
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/23352301.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
committee of the Sejm
broadcasting
Opis:
The author notes the existence of a legal loophole in the Standing Orders of the Sejm with regard to the issue of consent for broadcasting committee sittings in the Sejm Information System. The systemic inconsistency between the Standing Orders of the Sejm, the Committee’s Rules of Procedure and the rules set forth in the resolution of the Presidium of the Sejm, on the basis of which broadcasts of committee proceedings are included in the Sejm Information System, makes it fundamentally difficult to resolve the doubts in this regard. By way of interpretation per analogiam, the author assumes that since the chairperson of a committee decides on the presence of media representatives at a committee meeting, it is also up to this body to decide on the broadcasting in the Sejm Information System.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2023, 2(78); 220-230
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia art. 23 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – odwołanie od uchwały Prezydium Sejmu o obniżeniu uposażenia lub diety parlamentarnej
Interpretation of Article 23 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – an appeal against a resolution of the Presidium of the Sejm on decreasing the salary of a Deputy or parliamentary per diem allowance
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215771.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Deputy
Presidium of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Analysis of the matter of decisions that may be taken by the Presidium of the Sejm, considering an application for reconsideration of the case. In the author’s opinion, the scope of possible decisions of the Presidium of the Sejm, made on the basis of the analyzed provision, includes: sustaining the original resolution, repealing it, as well as changing the amount of deprivation of Deputy’s benefits made in the original resolution (in favour of the appealing Deputy).
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 63-67
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko
Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223415.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
Deputy
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 75-82
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Comments on the Amendment of The Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland Dated 26 March 2020
Kilka uwag na temat zmiany Regulaminu Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 26 marca 2020 r.
Autorzy:
Juchniewicz, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1918744.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
sitting
session
regulamin Sejmu
posiedzenie
Opis:
On 26 March 2020, by a resolution adopted on 26 March 2020, the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland were amended to allow the sessions to be conducted using electronic means of remote communication. These amendments raise serious reservations as to their constitutionality. This is due to the fact that the Constitution of 1997 stipulates that the Sejm and Senate shall meet at sessions, while the meeting, being a concept that has been defined, is defined as the assembly of MPs in one place in order to consider the matter under discussion. In addition, as parliamentary practice has demonstrated, the changes introduced have generated a number of problems related to Deputies’ attendance at such remote sessions, participation in debates and casting votes. As a consequence, this may lead to weakening of the legitimacy of the work of the Chamber and a reduction in the capacity to exercise the mandate.
Sejm uchwałą podjętą dnia 26 marca 2020 r. wprowadził do regulaminu Sejmu zmiany umożliwiające prowadzenie obrad z wykorzystaniem środków elektronicznych umożliwiających komunikowanie się na odległość. Wprowadzone zmiany budzą poważne zastrzeżenia co do ich konstytucyjności. Wynika to z faktu, że Konstytucja z 1997 r. stanowi, że Sejm i Senat obradują na posiedzeniach, zaś posiedzenie, będąc pojęciem zastanym, definiowane jest jako zebranie się posłów w jednym miejscu celem rozpatrzenia sprawy będącej przedmiotem obrad. Ponadto wprowadzone zmiany, jak pokazuje praktyka parlamentarna, generują szereg problemów związanych z uczestniczeniem posłów w takich zdalnych posiedzeniach, udziałem w dyskusji i głosowaniach. W konsekwencji może to prowadzić do osłabienia legitymizacji prac izby i ograniczenia możliwości wykonywania mandatu.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2020, 5 (57); 87-98
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 55

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies