Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
    Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    Marshal of the Sejm
    petition
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Tryb rozpatrywania przedłożonego przez Radę Języka Polskiego „Sprawozdania o stanie ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017”
    Procedure for considering the “Report on the state of protection of the Polish language in 2016–2017” submitted by the Polish Language Council
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215979.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Polish language
    Sejm committee
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The report, submitted by the Council for the Polish Language, entitled “Language of political information”, contains an analysis of the problem that is narrow in scope. In the light of the current parliamentary practice, the narrow scope of the Council’s reports is typical and this has not been questioned in the course of parliamentary work. The decision of the Culture and Media Committee, resulting in a refusal to consider the document in question, is an expression of negation of the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to recognize this document as a report. Formally, the committee proceedings on the report had not been completed. The Committee should return to examining this document and complete its work, formulating an appropriate opinion.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 69-75
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zgłoszenia wniosku o odwołanie członka prezydium komisji przez posła niebędącego członkiem komisji
    Legal opinion on the admissibility of making a motion to recall a member of a committee presidium by a Deputy who is not a member of the committee
    Autorzy:
    Gierach, Ewelina
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11868274.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    Deputy to the Sejm
    Opis:
    The opinion addresses the question of autonomy of a Sejm committee in the situation when a Deputy who is not its member – exercising his/her right to take part in a committee meeting and making motions – puts a motion to recall a member of the presidium (bureau) of that committee. The author gives her opinion, based on her own interpretation of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, that such motion should be considered admissible, since there is no legal basis that would make that motion illegitimate.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 181-184
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat konsekwencji utraty mandatu przez posła popierającego wniosek o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji (art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu)
    Legal opinion on the consequences of the loss of the mandate by a Deputy who has supported the motion to convene the sitting (Article 152, para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216101.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Sejm committee
    Opis:
    The author is of the opinion that the loss of the mandate by a Deputy, who has supported the motion to convene a sitting of the committee in accordance with Article 152 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, does not affect the effectiveness of the motion, even if it will result in the number of members supporting the motion (putting their signatures thereupon) being less than 1/3 of the committee membership. An obligation to establish the date and time of the sitting of the committee arises at the time of submission of the properly formulated motion, and should be satisfied immediately. It cannot be accepted that the tardiness in the implementation of the obligation, which arose at the time of submission of the motion, could have an impact on its binding efficiency.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 1(49); 59-63
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia w sprawie art. 30 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu RP
    Opinion on Article 30 (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Szmyt, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12232901.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The purpose of the opinion is to examine the possibility of referring the recommendation for election or appointment by the Sejm of individual persons to particular State offices specified in Articles 26, 27–29 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, or dismissal therefrom, to more than one Sejm committee for their opinion thereto. In the author’s view, a flexible interpretation of Article 30 (5) is possible, as it is implied by the wording of that article which does not state that the recommendation is to be referred to “one” committee, so it does not preclude referring it to a greater number of committees.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 70-72
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat skutków prawnych głosowania prowadzącego do odrzucenia projektu uchwały komisji sejmowej
    Legal opinion on the legal consequences of a vote resulting in the rejection of a committee’s draft resolution
    Autorzy:
    Gierach, Ewelina
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543265.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Sejm committee
    bills
    Opis:
    The opinion was drawn up in the context of the work of Sejm committees on the Concept for Town and Country Planning 2030 (Paper No. 169). The author finds the occurrence of procedural inconsistency in the conduct of the committee’s procedures and the ineffectiveness of the election of a Deputy‑Rapporteur. She claims that the formal requirements provided in Article 43 (2) of the Standing Orders for the adoption by the committee of a report on a bill (draft resolution) should also be applied to other committee resolutions relating to reports, information or other documents supposed to be discussed by the Sejm, as well as committee desiderata and opinions. The lack of support from the majority of Deputies participating in the vote does not necessarily mean support for the motion to the contrary. Therefore, in the author’s view, the committees have not finished their work on the above‑mentioned draft resolution.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 113-120
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 157 regulaminu Sejmu
    Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543270.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Sejm committee
    Sejm oversight
    Opis:
    The opinion deals with the exercise of parliamentary oversight functions by Sejm committees. It provides an analysis of whether the representatives of State administration might be held responsible for failure to discharge their duties resulting from Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, Sejm committees have at their disposal the means to enforce only political responsibility. Moreover, as concerns suspension of work on a bill in the event of breach of the obligations specified in Article 157 by the representatives of public administration, the author believes that the legitimacy of such action cannot be assessed in abstracto. The author does not rule out that, depending on circumstances and seriousness of the infringements, suspension of work on a bill may be justified.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 121-124
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat podstaw prawnych i trybu udostępniania informacji Sejmowi i jego organom przez Prezesa Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej
    Legal opinion on the legal basis of and the procedure for the disclosure of information to the Sejm and its bodies by the President of the Institute of National Remembrance
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216077.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Institute of National Remembrance
    Sejm committee
    Standing
    Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The author points out that the principles of, and procedures for, providing information to the Sejm by the President of the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) are specified in the provisions of the Act on the IPN and in the general rules for the acquisition by the Parliament and its bodies of information from representatives of the competent authorities and State institutions contained in the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a Deputy or Senator, and in the Standing Orders of the Sejm. “Heads of other State offices and institutions” are in fact obliged to submit reports and render information, and to participate in committee sittings where matters relating to the scope of their activity are considered. The exception limiting the scope of this duty of the President of the IPN concerns information contained in the so-called classified collection in the archives of IPN, composed of the documents for which the head of the Internal Security Agency and the head of the Intelligence Agency or the Minister of National Defence, respectively, declared that – for a specific period – they cannot be made available to any person apart from the representatives appointed by them, if it is necessary for the state security.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 2(50); 47-51
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie wniosku o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji sejmowej, złożonego w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
    Legal opinion on a motion to summon a meeting of a Sejm committee, submitted under Article 152 (2) of the Standing Orders – in response to in-depth questions
    Autorzy:
    Wrona, Zbigniew
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855243.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    radio and television
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    telecommunications
    Opis:
    The opinion deals with the powers of a Sejm committee to demand that the minister and a member of the State institution provide information about pending administrative proceedings and to require the committee to take position in relation to such proceedings. In the authors’ view, there are no provisions under which the motion would be found inadmissible. The committee may also express its position on the discussed issue which, however, has no binding character, and it cannot impose the content of a solution in pending administrative proceedings.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 60-67
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 70 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu
    Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 70 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Kubuj, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855250.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    Speaker of parliament
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    report
    Opis:
    The opinion deals with the interpretation of the provision which states that the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm may request the committee to express its attitude to the conclusions and remarks made by the legal services of the Chancellery of the Sejm, which have not been taken into consideration, and whether – in this context – it is possible to change the report adopted by the committee. The author argues that the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm provide no grounds for claim that expressing by the committee of its attitude to the conclusions and remarks could take place by way of modification of the report already adopted by the committee. In this situation, it seems that it could only be admissible that the Deputy Rapporteur takes position at the sitting of the Sejm considering the bill or draft resolution in the second reading.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 68-72
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie zakresu uprawnień przedstawiciela Komisji Ustawodawczej w pracach innych komisji nad projektem ustawy – według pytań szczegółowych
    Legal opinion on the scope of the powers of the Legislative Committee’s representative in the work of other committees on the bill – according to the specific questions
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542811.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    legislative proceedings
    lawmaking process
    term of office of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The Deputy who represents the Legislative Committee may participate in the legislative work of a subcommittee set up within another committee but, then, he/she has the status of “regular” Deputy who is not a member of that subcommittee. The author stresses that the status of the representative of the Legislative Committee is specified by the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Moreover, he points out that the Deputy who is both a representative of the Legislative Committee and a member of the committee appropriate for the bill, cannot participate in voting on motions and amendments, which he/she submitted, acting as a representative of the Legislative Committee. There are no obstacles for the Deputy to participate in other votings. During the work of the committee, it should be determined in each case whether the Deputy fulfilling the two above‑mentioned functions acts in the capacity of a member of the committee, or as a representative of the Legislative Committee.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 76-83
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie wniosku grupy posłów, złożonego w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu, o zwołanie posiedzenia Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka
    Legal opinion on a motion to convene a meeting of the Justice and Human Rights Committee, submitted by a group of Deputies under Article 152 (2) of the Standing Orders
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855200.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    Constitution
    parliamentary control
    independence of courts
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The opinion deals with a motion to convene a meeting of a Sejm committee to consider the consequences of a particular court decision. In the author’s view, the subject matter of the motion is outside the scope of a committee’s competence as provided in the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Therefore, the motion is defective and the convening of a committee meeting to consider the abovementioned matter is inadmissible.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 52-59
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies