Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "COVID-19 pandemics" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Literatura wobec kryzysu epidemii
    Literature in the Face of Epidemic Crisis
    Autorzy:
    Trościński, Grzegorz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27311193.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-14
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
    Tematy:
    epidemics
    pandemics
    literature
    virus
    coronavirus
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    epidemia
    pandemia
    literatura
    wirus
    Covid-19
    Opis:
    Artykuł napisany został jako wstęp do numeru tematycznego „Tematów i Kontekstów” pt. Literatura wobec kryzysu epidemii. Jest to esej omawiający wpływ wirusa Covid-19 na współczesnego człowieka i otaczającą go rzeczywistość. W rozważaniach autor skupił się na wielu aspektach pandemii: medycznych, socjologicznych, filozoficznych, psychologicznych i kulturowych. Ważnym składnikiem rozważań jest  próba uchwycenia uniwersalnych mechanizmów społeczno-kulturowych towarzyszących czasom epidemii, prześledzenie paradygmatów kulturowych i literackich, które realizowane są w aspekcie społecznym i jednostkowym w czasach zarazy, postaw wobec wirusa, drugiego człowieka i samego siebie.
    This article was written as a preface to a thematic issue of „Tematy i Konteksty” entitled „Literature in the face of epidemic crisis„. It is the essay addressing the impact, which COVID-19 virus has had on contemporary man and the reality surrounding him. The author, in his deliberations, focused on many aspects of the pandemic: medical, sociological, philosophical, psychological and cultural. A very important element of the essay is an attempt of capture universal social-cultural mechanisms, which are distinctive to a time of pandemic. Another crucial issue addressed in this essay is tracing the cultural and literary paradigms, which are followed in both social and individual aspects of time of pandemic. The other essential matter which was looked into are people’s attitudes taken towards virus itself, other people and themselves.
    Źródło:
    Tematy i Konteksty; 2021, 16, 11; 15-23
    2299-8365
    Pojawia się w:
    Tematy i Konteksty
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The prevalence and determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers, results of a cross-sectional study in the Silesian Voivodeship
    Autorzy:
    Wojczyk, Marek
    Kowalska, Małgorzata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2203014.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-05-23
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    pandemics
    infection control
    health personnel
    personal protective equipment
    Opis:
    Objectives A significant proportion of healthcare workers (HCWs) had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, which complicated the organization of patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the exact scale of infection prevalence among the group of HCWs is not known, therefore this study aimed to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs in the Silesian voivodeship, Poland, and to define its determinants. Material and Methods The cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 multidisciplinary hospitals in the Silesian voivodeship during the period October 2021–February 2022. The standardized WHO questionnaire Surveillance protocol for SARS-CoV-2 infection among health workers was completed by 242 HCWs. To assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its determinants, such as personal, occupational, and work environment-related conditions and preventive behaviors, the collected data were subjected to statistical analysis. For this purpose, descriptive and analytical statistics (significance of differences in χ² test) were used. Results Almost half (42.6%) of subjects were infected with coronavirus, most frequently care assistants (57.1%) and paramedics (50%). People suffering from chronic diseases were infected significantly more often (p < 0.001). The majority of the infected HCWs declared previous contact with COVID-19 patients (56.3%). Unfortunately, 10.3% of respondents refused to be vaccinated against COVID-19, most often care assistants (38.1%) and nurses (10.6%). The determinants such as sex, age, occupation, place of work (ward), participation in occupational safety and health training, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), or preventive behaviors did not significantly affect the risk of infection (p > 0.05). Conclusions Even though the PPE was used and the percentage of fully vaccinated HCWs against COVID-19 was high (89.7%), the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infected HCWs remains high at 42.6% (95% CI: 40.7–44.5%). The main determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among HCWs were previous contact with infected individuals and the presence of chronic disease.
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2023, 36, 2; 201-213
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary and tertiary healthcare: a comparative cross-sectional study
    Autorzy:
    Aulanko, Ida
    Sanmark, Enni
    Oksanen, Lotta
    Oksanen, Sampo
    Lahdentausta, Laura
    Kivimäki, Anne
    Paju, Susanna
    Pietiäinen, Milla
    Pussinen, Pirkko
    Geneid, Ahmed
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2203020.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-03-02
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    pandemics
    health personnel
    surveys and questionnaires
    cross-sectional studies
    Opis:
    Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected healthcare workers’ (HCWs) health and wellbeing. Most studies on COVID-19 have focused on tertiary healthcare. The aim of this study was to increase the knowledge on the effects of the pandemic on working conditions in tertiary and primary healthcare. Material and Methods The comparative cross-sectional study consisted of an online questionnaire sent to HCWs of the City of Helsinki (primary healthcare) and Helsinki University Hospital (tertiary healthcare). Altogether 1580 HCWs with direct patient contact participated in the study: 895 from tertiary and 685 from primary healthcare. Statistical analysis used SPSS 25 from IBM. The tests used were the χ² test, Fisher’s exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis. Results Primary HCWs were less likely to treat COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.56). However, both groups reported a similar number of COVID-19 infections, primary HCWs 4.9% and tertiary HCWs 5.0%, and workrelated quarantine was significantly more prevalent (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.38–2.79) among primary HCWs. In addition, work-related wellbeing was poorer among primary HCWs than tertiary HCWs in terms of feeling more stressed at work (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.55–4.02), not recovering from work (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39–0.62), reported mental wellbeing below normal levels (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.26–2.00), and increased working hours (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.25–2.12). Conclusions The study demonstrates how the pandemic has affected the wellbeing and working conditions of not only tertiary but also less studied primary HCWs. The authors’ findings suggest that the challenges identified during the COVID-19 pandemic in the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers are even greater in primary care than in tertiary care. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):139–50
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2023, 36, 1; 139-150
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary and tertiary healthcare: a comparative cross-sectional study
    Autorzy:
    Aulanko, Ida
    Sanmark, Enni
    Oksanen, Lotta
    Oksanen, Sampo
    Lahdentausta, Laura
    Kivimäki, Anne
    Paju, Susanna
    Pietiäinen, Milla
    Pussinen, Pirkko
    Geneid, Ahmed
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2188906.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    pandemics
    health personnel
    surveys and questionnaires
    cross-sectional studies
    Opis:
    Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected healthcare workers’ (HCWs) health and wellbeing. Most studies on COVID-19 have focused on tertiary healthcare. The aim of this study was to increase the knowledge on the effects of the pandemic on working conditions in tertiary and primary healthcare. Material and Methods The comparative cross-sectional study consisted of an online questionnaire sent to HCWs of the City of Helsinki (primary healthcare) and Helsinki University Hospital (tertiary healthcare). Altogether 1580 HCWs with direct patient contact participated in the study: 895 from tertiary and 685 from primary healthcare. Statistical analysis used SPSS 25 from IBM. The tests used were the χ² test, Fisher’s exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis. Results Primary HCWs were less likely to treat COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.56). However, both groups reported a similar number of COVID-19 infections, primary HCWs 4.9% and tertiary HCWs 5.0%, and workrelated quarantine was significantly more prevalent (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.38–2.79) among primary HCWs. In addition, work-related wellbeing was poorer among primary HCWs than tertiary HCWs in terms of feeling more stressed at work (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.55–4.02), not recovering from work (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39–0.62), reported mental wellbeing below normal levels (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.26–2.00), and increased working hours (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.25–2.12). Conclusions The study demonstrates how the pandemic has affected the wellbeing and working conditions of not only tertiary but also less studied primary HCWs. Our findings suggest that the challenges identified during the COVID-19 pandemic in the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers are even greater in primary care than in tertiary care.
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2023, 36, 1; 139-150
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies