Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Russian politics" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
    Tytuł:
    How the natural resource curse contributed to the autocratic developments in Russian politics since the fall of the USSR
    Autorzy:
    Serres, Dominic
    Lehtosalo, Lotta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/10491231.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-06-30
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    Russia
    Russian Federation
    energy
    natural resources
    Russian politics
    Russian economy
    Opis:
    The natural resource sector has become a dominant part of the Russian economy and thus affected the political developments of the state greatly. Understanding of the interplay of Russian politics and economics after the fall of the Soviet Union is integral for understanding why Russia has developed steadily into a more autocratic direction during the past few decades. The phenomenon through which we will be analyzing the intertwining of political and economic spheres of Russia is the natural resource curse concept. We seek to understand what factors have contributed to Russia’s failure to avoid the natural resource curse and give examples on how the natural resource curse manifests itself especially in today’s Russia political reality. Does the abundance of natural resources contribute to the emergence of a hyper-presidential, autocratic regime in Russia?
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2023, 2(38); 37-50
    1643-6911
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    History as an Apology for Totalitarianism
    Autorzy:
    Nowak, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956288.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Russia
    USSR
    Communism
    Russian ideology
    politics of history
    Imperialism
    Opis:
    This article discusses selected publications which reinterpret Russian history in a spirit of rehabilitating the Soviet past and highlighting the USSR’s role as a vehicle for Russia’s assumed historical role (including Utkin 1993, Utkin 1999a, Utkin 1999b, Solzhenitsyn 1995, Solzhenitsyn 2001–2002, Mel’tyukhov 2001, Narochnitskaya 2005c, Narochnitskaya 2005a, Mitrofanov 2005). In addition to this, it contextualises them with initiatives undertaken by the Russian Federation’s government (including the standardisation of history textbooks’ content and the activities of the Presidential Commission to counteract attempts to falsify history to the detriment of Russian interests). The points of view presented here, which are considered representative for a certain part of the historical discourse in contemporary Russia, integrate Russia’s totalitarian period (the USSR from 1917 to 1991) into the course of its broader history, as the basis of an interpretation which accepts a priori statements regarding the sense of Russia’s history and her role in world history. Among the observed trends, this text highlights the approval of certain features of the communist dictatorship as corresponding to Russian ideology; the adaptation of Soviet ideology to Russia’s policy of memory; the emphasis on ideological, political and military confrontation with the Western world as a permanent feature of Russian history; and the reinterpretation of Russian history in such a way as to continuously justify all the actions of the Russian state over the centuries, both externally (interpreting Russian aggression and imperialism as a means of defence against her enemies, liberation, or the reintegration of the Russian community) and internally (presenting terror as a means of defence against an alleged ‘fifth column’, or as the modernisation of the country).
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 311-349
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Politics of History of the Third Polish Republic: ReOrientation (1989–2007)
    Autorzy:
    Nowak, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956456.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Russia
    USSR
    Communism
    Russian ideology
    politics of history
    imperialism
    Opis:
    This article summarises the concepts behind the direction of Polish politics towards Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus and Russia in placing Poland’s new international relations in Central and Eastern Europe due to its historical ties with the countries of the region. A significant verbal role was played by the reception in Polish politics of the doctrine of Mieroszewski and Giedroyc—the so-called ULB (Ukraine–Lithuania–Belarus). It assumed the establishment of special relations with these countries, and, at the same time, waiving claims to territories lost by Poland after 1939. The application of this idea was conditioned by the internal political dynamics of Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, and Lithuania, and their mutual relations that determined the effectiveness of this doctrine. A key role in shaping Poland’s policy towards these countries was played by an “historical factor”—the exchange of mutual declarations concerning the past; this sometimes included the transmission of documentation—for instance the Katyn massacre evidence documents were transferred to Poland in 1990 by the Russian authorities. These actions served as tools of political rapprochement, and they sometimes resulted in opening the way to re-examine previous historical interpretations (especially in Polish–Lithuanian and Polish–Ukrainian relations). The question of investigating the crimes of the USSR against Poles, including above all the Katyn massacre (1940), played an important role in the rapprochement in Polish–Russian relations in the early period of President Yeltsin’s rule. One of the repercussions of implementing this concept and its conciliar priorities in Polish foreign policy and in its internal formal discourse was the suppression of some recently recreated areas of collective memory and currents of historical discourse; this especially concerned Polish–Ukrainian relations, in the context of, among others, the massacre in Volhynia in 1942–1943. Another result was transferring possible settlements to the responsibility of the state and the Polish community—a particular example of which was a resolution of the Polish Senate concerning Operation “Vistula” (Akcja “Wisła” in 1947) that was adopted in 1990.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2020, 2; 225-261
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Myth of the Great Patriotic War in Post-Communist Russian Cinema: Causes, Effects, Perspectives
    Autorzy:
    Tsibets, Ilya
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108325.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Great Patriotic War
    Russia
    Russian cinema
    ideology
    politics of history
    Opis:
    This article is an original attempt to define the main features of the myth of the Great Patriotic War in post-Communist Russian cinema. By combining historical, cultural and film studies, the author defines the reasons for the appearance of the above-mentioned myth and its popularity, and indicates the effects of the ideologisation of an event which has been important for politics of history during the rule of Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin. The article will cite examples of films containing repetitive narrative elements that appear with varying intensity and regularity in the Russian political and public discourse on the Great Patriotic War. The author will also refer to how such films have been received, and will define a potential perspective for the further development of this theme.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2021-2022, 3; 245-271
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Democratization and federalization. A comparative perspective between Russia’s and Spain’s early forays into a federal system
    Autorzy:
    Suárez, Adrián Peñate
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/10492877.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-06-30
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    Russia
    Russian Federation
    democracy
    autocracy
    federal state
    federation
    federal system
    politics
    Opis:
    Undoubtedly, Russia occupies a distinct position within the political landscape, differentiating it from Western democracies that themselves exhibit considerable variation. This uniqueness can be attributed, in part, to Russia’s geographic characteristics, encompassing diverse subdivisions characterized by variations in population, natural resources, territorial expanse, and distance from the central authority. However, what truly distinguishes Russia is its contemporary history and recent experiences with federalization— a framework that has defined its operations since it became the Russian Federation following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The objective of this paper is to analyze the distinctive features of Russian federalism in its early stages, employing a comparative perspective against the Spanish case, in order to ascertain the consequences of the legal, organizational, and territorial arrangements established during Russia’s early democratization period. The focus is to evaluate the implications of these changes on the establishment of a legally-binding democracy and a well-functioning federation, ultimately questioning whether Russia genuinely qualifies for either of these classifications.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2023, 2(38); 51-61
    1643-6911
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Religion of Victory, the Cult of a Superpower. The Myth of the Great Patriotic War in the Contemporary Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation
    Autorzy:
    Domańska, Maria
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108332.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Russia
    the Great Patriotic War
    the Victory of 1945
    politics of history
    the great power politics
    authoritarianism
    World War II
    propaganda
    Russian foreign policy
    Opis:
    The glorification of the Soviet victory over Nazism is the focal point of Russia’s politics of history and an element of the ideological offensive that aims to legitimise Russian great-power ambitions. The narrative centred on the victory has a strong religious, not to say, messianic dimension. It aims to whitewash the dark chapters of Soviet history and legitimise the wars Moscow waged after 1945. According to the contemporary neo-Soviet interpretations, these wars were always defensive and justified by external circumstances. At the same time, distinctly anti-Western rhetoric is becoming more and more perceptible in Russian propaganda. The repeated accusations of “eternal” attempts by the West to destroy Russia and destabilise the global order are intensifying. The official discourse is marked by the nostalgia for the lost empire and the “concert of powers” that was established at the Yalta conference; it also seeks to justify violence as a tool of foreign policy. Its overriding aim is to legitimise the authoritarian regime and Moscow’s contemporary strategic goals, such as the hegemony in the post-Soviet area and the reshaping of the European security architecture. The official narrative is promoted by the state institutions, the educational system, the Kremlin-controlled media outlets and a network of social organisations subsidised by the state. It is also safeguarded by the administrative and criminal law and the apparatus of repression.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2021-2022, 3; 77-125
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prometeizm po prometeizmie. Zarys historii ruchu prometejskiego po 1939 roku
    Post-Promethean Prometheism. An Outline of the History of the Promethean Movement after 1939
    Autorzy:
    Libera, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2156713.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    prometeizm
    imperializm rosyjski
    Rosja
    polityka wschodnia
    emigracja polityczna
    prometheism
    Russian imperialism
    Russia
    eastern politics
    political emigration
    Opis:
    Znaczna część emigrantów politycznych, którzy pojawili siwę międzywojennej Europie, pochodziła z byłego Imperium Rosyjskiego. Składała się ona zarówno z przeciwników nowego państwa bolszewików, dążących do odbudowy imperium carów bez naruszania integralności jego historycznego terytorium, jak i z przedstawicieli narodów, które zostały wcześniej podbite przez Rosję ipo 1917 r. bezskutecznie próbowały odzyskać niezależność, a więc rozbić dawne imperium. Dlatego też chociaż obie grupy były wrogo nastawione do reżimu sowieckiego i zaciekle go zwalczały, w rzeczywistości starały się osiągnąć przeciwstawne cele. Chcąc nadać większą skuteczność swoim działaniom, przedstawiciele drugiej z tych grup zrzeszali sięw organizacjach, które miały mówićw ich imieniu na arenie międzynarodowej i ułatwić osiągnięcie wspólnego celu. Jedną zważniejszych spośród tych organizacji był ruch prometejski. Wokresie międzywojennym zrzeszał on przedstawicieli dwunastu narodówi ludów: Ukraińców, Gruzinów, Azerów, Górali kaukaskich, Tatarów krymskich inadwołżańskich, mieszkańców Turkiestanu, Kozaków dońskich, kubańskich i terskich1 oraz Ingrów i Karelów. Był on wspierany finansowo i organizacyjnie przez władze polskie i funkcjonował przede wszystkim wokresie międzywojennym, chociaż zarówno w czasie II wojny światowej, jak ipo jej zakończeniu podejmowano próby jego reaktywacji. Badania nad prometeizmem cieszą się od kilkunastu lat niesłabnącym zainteresowaniem w kręgach naukowców pracujących w przynajmniej kilkunastu krajach na trzech 1 Należy pamiętać, że większość Kozaków na emigracji była związana z wychodźstwem rosyjskim, a tylko odłamy identyfikujące się z tzw. ruchem wolnokozackim brały udział wruchu prometejskim.
    Źródło:
    Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2022, 39, 1; 40-64
    1427-7476
    Pojawia się w:
    Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Rising Dragon and Wounded Bear: An Analysis of Modern Sino-Russian Political and Economic Relations
    Autorzy:
    Niemczyk, Grzegorz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/420809.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    Russia
    China
    International Relations
    Pipeline
    Energy Cooperation
    Medvedev
    Border Issues
    Russian Far East
    Xinjiang
    Military Relations
    Global Politics
    Asia
    Europe
    Beijing
    Moscow
    Kosovo War
    Opis:
    This article is an empirical analysis of modern Sino-Russian Economic and Political Relations based on past events and present data. This issue has recently been an important question for many scholars. Both countries became neighbours only in 17th century, but the history of their mutual relations is much deeper. At a time when China is rising and its position in world affairs is getting stronger, analysis of its foreign policy towards its neighbour is extremely interesting. On the other side of the fence, a former great power, is becoming less important on the world stage: its actions may be important for the worldwide community. This analysis covers political relations, connections and ties in present times. It also explains some cultural obstacles in a hard way to achieve equilibrium in the relations. The part which covers economic relations tries to prove, that the trade imbalance is in China’s favour and that common border issues are extremely significant for both countries. Last but not least the importance of energy cooperation and the obstacles in building common pipeline are covered.
    Źródło:
    Horyzonty Polityki; 2012, 3, 5; 131-159
    2082-5897
    Pojawia się w:
    Horyzonty Polityki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies