Temat: Polesia - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: „Drogi, które idą...” O rzekach Kraszewskiego (wstępne rozpoznanie)
“Roads which move...” On Kraszewski’s rivers (introductory exploration)
Autorzy:: Owczarz, Ewa
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012596.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015-06-01
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:: rzeki
Wołyń
Polesie
nostalgia
gotyckość
nowoczesność
rivers
Volhynia
Polesia
Gothicism
modernity
Opis:: The rivers of Polesia and Volhynia (the Horyn, Styr, Sluch, Pina, Prypiat Rivers and other) are analysed in the present paper as waterways which bring along modernity and carry it further inland on the one hand, and on the other, as guards of patriarchal hierarchies, which according to Orgelbrand’s Encyclopedia, are equivalent to a civilization referred to as moral, affirming simplicity, religion, and selfless relations with others. In the descriptions of places which constitute Kraszewski’s autobiography (travelogues, memoirs, letters, journalistic and fiction works) one may observe a kind of internal tension of the perceiving subject, who continues to value antiquity, but notices with certain nostalgia the anachronism of the world “at the banks of great rivers” and recognises the need for civilizational transformation.
Źródło:: Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo; 2015, 5(8); 231-251
2084-6045
2658-2503
Pojawia się w:: Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Władysław Szafer i Józef Próchnik w debacie o przyszłości poleskiej przyrody
Władysław Szafer and Józef Próchnik in a debate on environmental policy in Pripet Marshes
Autorzy:: Łotysz, Sławomir
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1398912.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-06-30
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii Nauki im. Ludwika i Aleksandra Birkenmajerów
Tematy:: ochrona przyrody
środowisko
Polesie
melioracja
nature conservation
environment
Polesia
land development
Opis:: Shortly after Poland regained its independence in 1918, a law was proposed that would comprehensively protect the environment. The idea was, however, considered somewhat premature, as there was no existing expertise on how it would affect different aspects of social and economic life. The leaders of the environmental movement in the country believed that such a law should not be determined at a negotiating table but arise from everyday practice. How it actually worked out can be seen in the dispute between the State Council for Nature Protection (established in 1925) and the Bureau of Amelioration of Polesia (established in 1928) over the amelioration of Polesian marshes. This was sparked off in early 1929 when the Council began warning of possible negative effects of extensive drainage and demanded that environmental concerns be taken into account by the amelioration engineers. Józef Próchnik, the director of the Bureau, considered this an illegitimate critique of his activities and angrily attacked the Council’s president, Władysław Szafer. Próchnik accused him of misleading the public and creating an unnecessary alarm. This conflict showed the limits of the Council’s own independence and the real position of the environmentalists in the kaleidoscope of power in interwar Poland.
Źródło:: Analecta. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Nauki; 2019, 28, 1; 193-215
1509-0957
Pojawia się w:: Analecta. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Nauki
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Przestrzenie sacrum w Trylogii wołyńskiej Wołodymyra Łysa
Autorzy:: Nowacki, Albert
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1789219.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-12-04
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:: Polesie
mała ojczyzna
sacrum
sanctum
Wołodymyr Łys
tradycja
Polesia
little homeland
Volodymyr Lys
tradition
Opis:: This paper is devoted to the problems of the sacred space in the prose of one of the contemporary Ukrainian writers Volodymyr Lys. The basis for these analyses are three novels that form the co called “Volhynia trilogy” (Jacob’s Century, Solo for Solomiya, and Virgo of Mlynyshche). The analyses of the above-mentioned works allow us to conclude that the writer quite often refers to functioning of category of sanctity which can be divided in a conventional way into several spaces. One of them is undoubtedly the sacralization of Volyn as a “small homeland” of its inhabitants, but the analysis also revealed the use of legends, folk beliefs and frequent references to religious tradition and the belief in God. It can be said that the mysterious relationship between the good and the evil, sin and sanctity is a characteristic feature of Volodymyr Łys’ “Volhynia Saga,” which creates a speciﬁc world where man lives with the God, sensing Him almost physically.
Źródło:: Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia; 2019, 7; 109-120
2299-7237
Pojawia się w:: Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Kwestia narodowościowa na peryferiach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Przypadek Polesia między dwiema wojnami
Autorzy:: Ablamski, Pavel
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/653937.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:: II Rzeczpospolita
Polesie
projekt narodowy
Białorusini
Polacy
Rosjanie
Ukraińcy
second polish republic
polesia
national project
belarusians
poles
russians
ukrainians
Opis:: The territory of Polesia in the interwar period was an area of competition between the national movements of Belarusian, Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian communities. In the Polesia Province, the scope of activity and intensification of national factors were not the same. An influence of the Belarusian movement was seen only in the north of the province, in the districts of Kosów and Prużana. The more active in Polesia Ukrainian movement was the strongest in southern, and south-western districts: of Brześć on the Bug, Kobryń, and Kamień Koszyrski. Russians were the most successful in the cities of Brześć and Pińsk, and in the eastern part of the region, in the neighbourhood of the towns of Łuniniec and Dawidgródek, where influences of the Belarusian and Ukrainian movements were minimal. But the idea of “the great Russian nation” was gradually becoming an anachronism within the borders of the Second Republic of Poland. Poland was an active player in the arena of national affairs in Polesia, as it sought to gain the support of local people through a unification policy of the state apparatus. The apogee of the Polonization action was in 1932–1939, after the office of Polesia voivode was taken by Col. Wacław Kostka-Biernacki. Activists of various national movements in Polesia were actively fought against by the State authorities. The voivodeship administration hampered all non-Polish national agitation among inhabitants of the region. The government of the Second Polish Republic did not succeed in combating civilisational backwardness in Polesia. An average inhabitant of the region was, in the first place, a member of his local rural community and often had no idea that for the State administration he was a Pole, for an Orthodox priest he was a Russian, and for a radical rural intellectual – a Belarusian or Ukrainian. A passive attitude of the majority of local people towards the question of nationality was still common at the end of the interwar period.
Национальный вопрос на окраине Центрально-восточной Европы. Случай Полесья между двумя войнами.АннотацияВ межвоенный период в Полесье имело место соперничество на национальной почве между белорусскими, польскими, русскими и украинскими кругами. В Полесском воеводстве диапазон действий и степень интенсивности упомянутых национальных факторов не были однородными. Влияние белорусского движения было заметно только на севере Полесья в Косовском и Пружанском поветах. У более стихийного украинского движения в Полесье больше всего плацдармов находилось южных и юго-западных поветах – Брестском, Кобринском, а также Каширском. Русские имели самый большой успех в городах – Бресте и Пинске, а также на востоке воеводства в окрестностях Лунинца и Давид-Городка, где влияние белорусского и украинского движений было ничтожно. Однако идея «великого русского народа» в границах Второй Речи Посполитой постепенно становилась анахронизмом.Польша являлась активным игроком на Полесском национальном поле, пытаясь привлечь местное население посредством унификационных действий государственного аппарата. Полонизационная акция достигла апогея в 1932-1939 годах, после вступления в должность Полесского воеводы полковника Вацлава Костка-Бернацкого. Власть последовательно боролась с деятелями отдельных национальных движений в Полесье. Воеводская администрация активно препятствовала ведению всякой непольской национальной агитации среди полещуков.Властям Второй Речи Посполитой определенно не удалось преодолеть огромную цивилизационную отсталость в Полесье. Среднестатистический полещук оставался, прежде всего, членом сельской общины и часто не имел понятия, что для государственной администрации – он – поляк, для православного священника – русский, а для радикального сельского интеллигента – белорус или украинец. Пассивная позиция большинства полещуков по национальному вопросу продолжала быть всеобщим явлением к концу межвоенного двадцатилетия.
Źródło:: Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej; 2017, 52, 2
2353-6403
1230-5057
Pojawia się w:: Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: On the Threshold of Dismissal. Head of the Polesia Province Jan Krahelski in View of the Situation in Polesia in 1932
U progu dymisji. Wojewoda poleski Jan Krahelski wobec sytuacji na Polesiu w 1932 r.
Autorzy:: Cichoracki, Piotr
Dufrat, Joanna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1837737.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:: Polesia
national minorities
Second Polish Republic
Great Depression
Jan Krahelski
Polesie
mniejszości narodowe
II Rzeczypospolita
wielki kryzys
Палессе
нацыянальныя меншасці
II Рэч Паспалітая
вялікі крызіс
Ян Крагельскі
Opis:: In the Second Polish Republic, the culmination point of the huge economic crisis called the Great Depression occurred in 1932. The crisis affected particularly inhabitants of villages, including those dominated by national minorities in eastern provinces. One such region was Polesia. The aim of this text is to answer the question of how the situation of economic collapse was addressed by representatives of the state administration system, one of whom was Jan Krahelski – the Head of the Polesia Province in 1926–1932. At the end of his period in office, he often expressed his views on the condition of the province and the desirable means that could have reduced the consequences of the crisis. The text is based on archival materials acquired from archives of Poland, Belarus, and Russia. Krahelski was an advocate of moderate nationality policy. He refrained from the Polonisation of national minorities and tried not to escalate political repressions almost until the end of his period in office as Head of the province. The radicalisation of social moods combined with the deepening economic collapse forced him to revise his opinion about the methods of ensuring internal security. The analysis of the source materials, for which an important point of reference is also an armed rebellion that occurred on the borderland of the Kashirsky County [the Polesia Province] and the Kovel County [the Volhynia Province], suggests that administrative bodies in the eastern provinces could properly diagnose the general condition of the territory entrusted to them, but at the same time, they did not fully recognise its sources; therefore, they may have been surprised with the collapse of the order.
На 1932 г. прыйшоўся ў II Рэчы Паспалітай апагей т.зв. вялікага эканамічнага крызісу. Гэта паўплывала на становішча жыхароў вёсак, у тым ліку ва ўсходніх ваяводствах, дзе пераважалі нацыянальныя меншасці. Адным з такіх рэгіёнаў было Палессе. Артыкул прысвечаны адказу на пытанне, як рэагавалі прадстаўнікі дзяржаўнага кіравання на сітуацыю эканамічнага крызісу, у тым ліку Ян Крагельскі – ваявода Палесся ў 1926–1932 гадах. У апошнія гады выканання паўнамоцтваў ён неаднаразова выказваў свае погляды на стан ваяводства і неабходныя меры, якія павінны нейтралізаваць наступствы крызісу. Тэкст заснаваны на архіўных матэрыялах, знойдзеных у архівах Польшчы, Беларусі і Расіі. Крагельскі быў прыхільнікам умеранай нацыянальнай палітыкі. Ён адмовіўся ад паланізацыі нацыянальных меншасцей і спрабаваў не ўзмацняць палітычныя рэпрэсіі да канца свайго тэрміну на пасадзе ваяводы. Радыкалізацыя настрояў у грамадстве, звязаная з паглыбленнем эканамічнага крызісу, прымусіла яго перагледзець сваю пазіцыю адносна метадаў забеспячэння ўнутранай бяспекі. Важным пунктам для вывучэння зыходнага матэрыялу з'яўляецца ўзброенае паўстанне, якое адбылося летам 1932 г. на мяжы Кошырскага павета [Палескага ваяводства] і Ковельскага павета [Валынскага ваяводства]. Праведзены аналіз паказвае, што адміністрацыя ўсходніх ваяводстваў магла правільна ацаніць агульны стан падуладнай ёй тэрыторыі, але ў той жа час не магла дакладна распазнаць яго прычыны, у выніку чаго была захоплена знянацку парушэннем парадку.
Na 1932 r. przypadło w II Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej apogeum tzw. wielkiego kryzysu gospodarczego. Odbił się on zwłaszcza na położeniu mieszkańców wsi, także tej zdominowanej przez mniejszości narodowe w województwach wschodnich. Jednym z takich regionów było Polesie. Tekst poświęcony jest odpowiedzi na pytanie, jak w sytuacji załamania ekonomicznego reagowali przedstawiciele administracji państwowej, której przedstawicielem był również Jan Krahelski – wojewoda poleski w latach 1926–1932. Pod koniec okresu sprawowania urzędu niejednokrotnie artykułował on swoje poglądy na temat stanu województwa i pożądanych środków, które powinny zneutralizować skutki kryzysu. Tekst oparty jest o materiał archiwalny pozyskany z archiwów Polski, Białorusi i Rosji. Krahelski był zwolennikiem umiarkowanej polityki narodowościowej. Odżegnywał się od polonizacji mniejszości narodowych i niemal do końca sprawowania stanowiska wojewody starał się nie eskalować represji politycznych. Radykalizacja nastrojów społecznych związana z pogłębiającym się załamaniem ekonomicznym zmusiła go do rewizji stanowiska w kwestii metod zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego. Analiza materiału źródłowego, dla której ważnym punktem odniesienia jest również wystąpienie zbrojne do jakiego doszło w lecie 1932 r. na pograniczu powiatu koszyrskiego (województwo poleskie) i kowelskiego (województwo wołyńskie), wskazuje, że administracja w województwach wschodnich mogła właściwie diagnozować ogólny stan powierzonego jej terytorium, ale jednocześnie niedoskonale rozpoznać jego źródła, w efekcie czego mogła zostać zaskoczona załamaniem porządku.
Źródło:: Studia Białorutenistyczne; 2020, 14; 57-69
1898-0457
Pojawia się w:: Studia Białorutenistyczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Polesia" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język