Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "multiple-criteria decision analysis" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Project Portfolio Scheduling as a Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Problem
Autorzy:
Krzeszowska, Bogumiła
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/591823.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna Podejmowanie decyzji Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Decision making
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple-criteria decision making
Opis:
A new methodology for project portfolio scheduling problem has been presented in this paper. This methodology delivers information about project portfolio schedule, which is important for project portfolio managers. The methodology consists of three steps: multiple-criteria mathematical model building, finding non-dominated solutions and choosing one solution from the Pareto set as the final solution. In the first step a multiple-criteria mathematical model for project portfolio scheduling problem is built. Three criteria are considered in the model: the penalty for projects delays minimization, the penalty for resources overusage minimization and NPV maximization. Disadvantage of proposed mathematical model is a big amount of variables, which is J×T×P. In cases when we will have larger projects or larger planning horizon the number of variables will be huge. That is why activities aggregation was proposed. It reduces a number of variables in given model. It also delivers a general information about project portfolio schedule, which is more important for project portfolio managers. In the second step a set of non-dominated solutions is identified by using an elitist evolutionary algorithm. As research shows using an external set with the best solutions in each generation increases an algorithm efficiency. In the third step the LBS procedure is used to identify the final solution. The LBS procedure proposes is a way of learning-oriented interactive search for the best compromise solution for the decision maker. This procedure makes the comparison of non-dominated solution in the decision phase relatively easy. So this step will not burden the decision maker too much. For the future work, the procedure presented in this paper will be applied to the problem described in the section two, and given results will be compared with the current situation in the company.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 137; 69-82
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evaluating the negotiation template with sipres – a fusion of the revised Simos’ procedure and the ZAPROS method
Autorzy:
Górecka, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578576.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Negocjacje
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple-criteria decision making
Negotiations
Opis:
In a negotiation process, building a negotiation offer scoring system consistent with the preferences of the decision-maker is a very intricate task. A variety of methods can be used to develop such a negotiation support tool, e.g. SAW and TOPSIS, but they have several disadvantages. In this paper the issue of evaluating the negotiation template using a novel tool called SIPRES is discussed. The algorithm proposed employs the key notions of the revised Simos' procedure and ZAPROS method to elicit the negotiator's preferences over some reference solutions. On the one hand, it allows decision-makers to define their preferences in a simple and effortless way and provides a straightforward yet effective method for analyzing the trade-offs between the alternatives using selected reference alternatives only (the ZAPROS-like approach). On the other hand, the revised Simos' procedure applied in the method allows determining the cardinal scores for the alternatives. The scoring system obtained this way makes it possible to conduct a sophisticated symmetric and asymmetric negotiation analysis. An illustrative example presented in the paper concerns the European Union's multiannual financial framework negotiations.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2015, 10; 48-64
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Structural Analysis of Problems in Public Relations
Autorzy:
Michnik, Jerzy
Adamus-Matuszyńska, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578614.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza strukturalna
Public relations
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Multiple-criteria decision making
Structural analysis
Opis:
The literature on the activities of public relations (PR) is getting richer. Also, numerous empirical studies on the PR process, methods and techniques are conducted, as well as analyses on the effectiveness of PR and ethics in this field. There is a relatively small number of studies that examine decision-making processes by PR practitioners. Despite numerous discussions on the issue of decision-making, methods of decision making in public relations are not a subject of research and debate. Most decisions in this area are probably made unsystematically and in a very individual way. However, the introduction of effective methods, proven in other areas, which support decision making practice related to communication processes, can help to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the organization in the field of building relationships with the stakeholders. The authors show how the use of cognitive maps and the WINGS method can help PR consultants to choose a PR strategy in situations which can seriously jeopardize the organization's reputation.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2015, 10; 105-123
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Concept of Risk Dominance in MADM with No Inter-Criteria Information
Autorzy:
Wolny, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578495.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza ryzyka
Informacja w podejmowaniu decyzji
Ryzyko
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Information in decision making
Multiple-criteria decision making
Risk
Risk analysis
Opis:
This paper deals with the analysis of a multiple attribute decision making problem with no inter-criteria information. The problem is studied as a multiplayer, non-cooperative coordination game. Each equilibrium in the game corresponds to a decision variant. To choose a variant the general theory of equilibrium selection in games is used. The relation of risk dominance, introduced by Harsanyi and Selten (1988), is applied. In the method proposed a key element is to determine the reference point (status quo situation) - the least desirable situation with respect to each criterion separately. The method proposed supports decision making as regards selection and ordering.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2015, 10; 185-194
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Application of the Generalised Distance Measure to Location Selection During Order-Picking
Autorzy:
Dmytrów, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578508.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza symulacyjna
Taksonomiczna Miara Atrakcyjności Lokalizacji
Uogólniona miara odległości
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Generalised Distance Measure
Multiple-criteria decision making
Simulation analysis
Taxonomic Measure of Location’s Attractiveness
Opis:
When a shared storage system is used, the selection of locations from which products should be picked becomes a significant decision problem. Every storage location can be described using several criteria, such as: storage time, distance from the I/O point, degree of demand satisfaction, the number of other products to be picked near the analysed location, or others. Based on such criteria, a synthetic variable can be created to rank all these locations; the highest-ranking one is selected. Such a ranking is created using the Generalised Distance Measure (GDM); the selected locations and the picker’s route based on them are compared to the results obtained using the Taxonomic Measure of Location’s Attractiveness (TMAL). Both route length and picking time are compared. Also, the influence of the system of criteria weights within each method on the route length and the picking time is analysed using simulation methods.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2018, 13; 103-115
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies