Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "analiza wielokryterialna" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17
Tytuł:
Analiza procesu negocjacji z wykorzystaniem procedury TOPSIS
The Application of TOPSIS Procedure to the Analysis of the Negotiation Process
Autorzy:
Roszkowska, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/589955.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Negocjacje
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple criteria optimization
Negotiations
Opis:
With respect to the complex nature of negotiation situation, in analysis of the negotiation, mathematical tools of multi-criteria decision making can be used. The aim of the paper is presentation of some applications of the classical TOPSIS method in analysis of the process of negotiation. The TOPSIS method let us to order offers, according to the value of the result of synthesis of multi-criteria evaluation, with respect to their similarities to the most preferable one, assignment of the alternative offers, estimating the value of concessions, or the estimation of the negotiation agreement. The similarity is determined on basis of minimization of distance negotiation offer, to the most preferable, and maximization of distance to the least preferable one.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 138; 95-108
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Interactive Decision Aiding Technique for a New Product Selection Problem
Autorzy:
Michnik, Jerzy
Nowak, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/592928.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Produkt
Decision making
Multicriteria analysis
Product
Opis:
An important part of the innovation management is to select the best new product project from the preliminary large set of potential alternatives. This problem is broadly discussed in the extant literature. Although the qualitative approaches dominate in literature, there are few examples of more formal decision procedures based on multiple criteria analysis. This article brings an example of interactive procedure that can help decision making in the new product development. As to the authors knowledge, such approach has not been proposed so far to the problem of selecting new product. The interactive procedure gives to the DM an opportunity to actively participate in the whole process and observe its development. During the procedure, the DM can disclose his preferences and values of trade-offs. This kind of assessment of differences in importance of criteria is assumed as more reliable then the direct assessment of weights.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 137; 53-68
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Postnegocjacyjna optymalizacja kompromisu negocjacyjnego
Postnegotiation Optimization of the Negotiation Compromise
Autorzy:
Kopańska-Bródka, Donata
Wachowicz, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/585824.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Negocjacje
Teoria gier
Game theory
Multicriteria analysis
Negotiations
Opis:
In this paper we discuss the possibility of applying the various game-theoretic mechanisms to support the postnegotiation analysis of the multi-issue two-party negotiation. We analyze the negotiation problem stucturized and evaluated by parties by means of the simple additive weighting model, which is typical approach implemented in very many negotiation support systems. In particular, we focus on such negotiation processed that result in an inefficient negotiation outcome. We show how to identify the set of efficient solutions for each negotiation problem and then, how to find the efficient improvements of the agreement that the parties have agreed on. We propose a novel mechanism of finding such improvements, that stems from Nash bargaining solution and some previous concepts of Raiffa's potentials of the negotiators. We show an example of how this mechanism works when applied to find an improvement in bilateral negotiation supported by Inspire negotiation support system.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 138; 51-78
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Robust Ordinal Regression Applied to TOPSIS
Autorzy:
Zielniewicz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578516.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Odporne metody statystyczne
Multicriteria analysis
Robust statistical methods
Opis:
This paper proposes a new method for ranking a nite set of alternatives evaluated on multiple criteria. The presented method combines the robust ordinal regression (ROR) approach and the ranking score based on the aggregate distance measure function coming from the TOPSIS method. In our method, the preference model is a set of ad- ditive value functions compatible with a non-complete set of pairwise comparisons of some reference alternatives given by the decision maker (DM). Based on this set of compatible value functions, we dene an ag- gregate function representing relative closeness to the reference point (ideal solution) in the value space. The ranking score determined by this distance measure is then used to rank all alternatives. Calculating the distance in the value space permits to avoid normalization used in TOPSIS to transform original evaluations on different criteria scales into a common scale. This normalization is perceived as a weakness of TOPSIS and other methods based on a distance measure, because the ranking of alternatives depends on the normalization technique and the distance measure. Thus, ROR applied to TOPSIS does not only facilitate the preference elicitation but also solves the problem of non-meaningfulness of TOPSIS. Finally, an instructive example is given to illustrate the proposed method.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 178-196
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wielokryterialne porządkowanie metodą PROMETHEE odporne na zmiany wag kryteriów
A Promethee-based Multicriteria Ranking Robust to Changes of Criteria Weights
Autorzy:
Sobotka, Olena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/588327.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Odporne metody statystyczne
Multicriteria analysis
Robust statistical methods
Opis:
The approach described in article is based on the Linear Partial Information (LPI) by E. Kofler. The robust multicriteria ranking is based on the robust dominance relations, which holds under all admissible combinations of criteria weights. In the article the robust dominance relation is defined and the robust ranking method based on the PROMETHEE outranking relations is proposed.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 163; 209-219
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wielokryterialna ocena procesu kompletacji towarów w magazynie
Multi-Criteria Evaluation of the Order-Picking Process in the Warehouse
Autorzy:
Tarczyński, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/586698.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Gospodarka magazynowa
Realizacja zamówień
Inventory management
Multicriteria analysis
Order processing
Opis:
This paper presents the order-picking problem as a multicriteria task. Using simulation tool 360 variants of solution were generated. The different combinations of the picking zone's shape, the number of forklift trucks and the picker-routing methods were considered. The variants were evaluated by seven criteria and the dominated solutions were removed. Then, using the Electre I method, the number of solutions was even more limited. The paper discusses and presents conclusions how to optimize the order-picking process.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 163; 221-238
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena portfeli konstruowanych na podstawie metody AHP - ujęcie klasyczne i fundamentalne
The AHP Method for Portfolio Selection and Estimation - Classical and Fundamental Approach
Autorzy:
Pośpiech, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/589397.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Papiery wartościowe
Portfel papierów wartościowych
Multicriteria analysis
Portfolio securities
Securities
Opis:
The article presents practical applications of chosen multiple criteria decision making method - AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). The main purpose is to build portfolios on the basis of this method. It is important to make the best decision when there are many alternatives (objects) that are evaluating under differing criteria. AHP is one of multiple criteria decision making methods; it enables to compare considered objects for each criterion and creates a ranking of all the objects. Building a portfolio is a problem of selecting these objects (quoted companies) that have, for example, high return rate and low variance, but also other features, like low β coefficient or high skewness coefficient. To built a portfolio according to the classical approach of using AHP method, all mentioned measures can be considered as criteria. In the other approach - fundamental one, some diagnostic features that characterize financial and economic condition of companies can be used as criteria. Created multiple criteria rankings can help to choose the best listed companies to the portfolio. In the paper, portfolios built on the basis of AHP rankings were estimated. To compare the profit rate of created this way portfolios, a classical portfolio based on Markowitz approach also was appointed. The profit rate of each portfolio designed on the basis of AHP method was over 19,5% and was higher than the profit rate of classical Markowitz one. Besides, the portfolios profit rates estimated for next three months were also better than Markowitz portfolio profit rate what confirms that using proposed approach may bring in interesting results.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 163; 99-112
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykorzystanie idei automatycznego generowania powierzchni indyferencji do budowy systemu oceny ofert negocjacyjnych w systemie wspomagania negocjacji NegoManage
Automated Generation of Indifference Surfaces for the Formation of Negotiation Offers Scoring System in the Negotiation Support System NegoManage
Autorzy:
Brzostowski, Jakub
Wachowicz, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/589695.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Negocjacje
Teoria oczekiwanej użyteczności
Expected utility theory
Multicriteria analysis
Negotiations
Opis:
In this paper we discuss the mechanism for building the negotiation offers' scoring system by means of the automatically generated indifference surfaces. We introduce the classic approach based on trade-off analysis first , that derives from multiple attribute value theory and present its application for the simplest case of two- and three-criteria decision problem. Then we analyze its generalization for the cases with more than three decision criteria, which involves also the interaction with decision maker. Finally we present the models software implementation that is applied in the negotiation support system called NegoManage.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 138; 31-50
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evaluating the negotiation template with sipres – a fusion of the revised Simos’ procedure and the ZAPROS method
Autorzy:
Górecka, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578576.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Negocjacje
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple-criteria decision making
Negotiations
Opis:
In a negotiation process, building a negotiation offer scoring system consistent with the preferences of the decision-maker is a very intricate task. A variety of methods can be used to develop such a negotiation support tool, e.g. SAW and TOPSIS, but they have several disadvantages. In this paper the issue of evaluating the negotiation template using a novel tool called SIPRES is discussed. The algorithm proposed employs the key notions of the revised Simos' procedure and ZAPROS method to elicit the negotiator's preferences over some reference solutions. On the one hand, it allows decision-makers to define their preferences in a simple and effortless way and provides a straightforward yet effective method for analyzing the trade-offs between the alternatives using selected reference alternatives only (the ZAPROS-like approach). On the other hand, the revised Simos' procedure applied in the method allows determining the cardinal scores for the alternatives. The scoring system obtained this way makes it possible to conduct a sophisticated symmetric and asymmetric negotiation analysis. An illustrative example presented in the paper concerns the European Union's multiannual financial framework negotiations.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2015, 10; 48-64
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Project Portfolio Scheduling as a Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Problem
Autorzy:
Krzeszowska, Bogumiła
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/591823.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna Podejmowanie decyzji Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Decision making
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple-criteria decision making
Opis:
A new methodology for project portfolio scheduling problem has been presented in this paper. This methodology delivers information about project portfolio schedule, which is important for project portfolio managers. The methodology consists of three steps: multiple-criteria mathematical model building, finding non-dominated solutions and choosing one solution from the Pareto set as the final solution. In the first step a multiple-criteria mathematical model for project portfolio scheduling problem is built. Three criteria are considered in the model: the penalty for projects delays minimization, the penalty for resources overusage minimization and NPV maximization. Disadvantage of proposed mathematical model is a big amount of variables, which is J×T×P. In cases when we will have larger projects or larger planning horizon the number of variables will be huge. That is why activities aggregation was proposed. It reduces a number of variables in given model. It also delivers a general information about project portfolio schedule, which is more important for project portfolio managers. In the second step a set of non-dominated solutions is identified by using an elitist evolutionary algorithm. As research shows using an external set with the best solutions in each generation increases an algorithm efficiency. In the third step the LBS procedure is used to identify the final solution. The LBS procedure proposes is a way of learning-oriented interactive search for the best compromise solution for the decision maker. This procedure makes the comparison of non-dominated solution in the decision phase relatively easy. So this step will not burden the decision maker too much. For the future work, the procedure presented in this paper will be applied to the problem described in the section two, and given results will be compared with the current situation in the company.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 137; 69-82
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dwukryterialny model wyznaczania struktury produkcji przedsiębiorstwa na podstawie teorii ograniczeń
Two-Criteria Model of Product Mix Based on the Theory of Constraints
Autorzy:
Wrodarczyk, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/590640.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Przedsiębiorstwo
Teoria ograniczeń
Decision making
Enterprises
Multicriteria analysis
Theory of constraints
Opis:
Production structure problem, also known as product mix problem (PMP) has been in the area of interest of many researchers. Among many different ways to solve this problem, theory of constraints (TOC) is one of the more frequently chosen ones. However this solution is not universal and in some cases does not generate an optimal solution. In this paper a multi-criteria integer model has been introduced to enhance the concept. Thanks to a thorough analysis of the problem, model can be used both in the companies that have identified the one and only constraint as well as companies that characterize with multi-constraint environment.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 163; 239-252
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykorzystanie podejścia quasi-hierarchicznego w wielokryterialnym drzewie decyzyjnym
An Application of Quasi-Hierarchical Approach in Multiple Criteria Decision Tree
Autorzy:
Nowak, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/589593.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji w warunkach ryzyka
Decision making under conditions of risk
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple criteria optimization
Opis:
Drzewo decyzyjne jest efektywnym narzędziem opisu dynamicznych procesów decyzyjnych w warunkach ryzyka. Korzystając z niego dąży się zwykle do wyznaczenia rozwiązania optymalizującego wartość oczekiwaną rozważanego kryterium decyzyjnego. Stosunkowo rzadko narzędzie to jest wykorzystywane do rozwiązywania problemu wielokryterialnego, w którym decydent jest zainteresowany realizacją kilku wzajemnie konfliktowych celów. W pracy przedstawiono metodę pozwalającą na rozwiązanie problemu opisanego wielokryterialnym drzewem decyzyjnym za pomocą podejścia quasi-hierarchicznego. Zakładamy, że decydent jest w stanie określić hierarchię kryteriów oraz określić, w jakim stopniu można pogorszyć optymalną wartość kryterium o wyższym priorytecie w celu poprawy wartości kryterium o niższej wadze. Sposób działania metody zilustrowano przykładem opartym na danych umownych.
Decision tree is an effective tool for describing dynamic decision making processes under risk. It is usually used to identify the solution optimizing the expected value of the analyzed criterion. However, it is relatively rarely used when multiple conflicting criteria are considered. In the paper a quasi-hierarchical approach is used to solve a problem represented by a multiple criteria decision tree. It is assumed that the decision maker is able to define a hierarchy of the criteria and specify how much the optimal value of a more important criterion can be decreased in order to improve the value of a less important criterion. A numerical example is presented to show the applicability of the procedure.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2014, 208; 59-73
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Identifying Strategic Development Objectives for European Union States Using the Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach: The Case of Poland
Autorzy:
Zaras, Kazimierz
Marin, Jean-Charles
Trudel, Bryan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578598.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Cele strategiczne
Rozwój ekonomiczny
Unia Europejska
Economic growth
European Union
Multicriteria analysis
Strategic objectives
Opis:
The use of the dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA) to help identify and prioritize strategic political, economic, sociological and technological (PEST) objectives for European Union (EU) countries is presented. The countries are first grouped into three categories: [A] those that are doing well according to the selected indicators; [B] those that need support to acquire category A status; [C] those ranked the lowest and needing special support with regard to the criteria considered. The categories correspond to tertiles within the average ranking of all EU countries. DRSA then provides decision rules based on PEST needs in order to improve the development and classification of the country. We conclude that by using this methodology, the EU could identify the strategic objectives to be given priority in order to stimulate its economic development or to improve the economic and sociological status of any country in the union. The case of Poland, a category C country from an economic perspective, is of particular interest.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2019, 14; 144-156
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dwukryterialny rozmyty model łańcucha krytycznego w projekcie - podstawy teoretyczne
The Bi-Criterial Fuzzy Project Critical Chain Model - Theoretical Principles
Autorzy:
Błaszczyk, Paweł
Błaszczyk, Tomasz
Kania-Błaszczyk, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/588209.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Łańcuch krytyczny
Modele kosztów
Modele matematyczne
Cost models
Critical chain
Mathematical models
Multicriteria analysis
Opis:
The aim of this research work was to develop an optimization model for the problem of time-cost trade-off, taking into account the impact of the planned tasks or activities of contractors on the project. As a methodological basis for the proposed model the concept of critical chain E. Goldratt, which introduces the behavioral aspect of estimating the time steps in the project, but does not indicate the specific methods of quantification estimations. The presented model assumes the possibility of quantifying the workload of the project components in a set of fuzzy numbers and the ability to extract from these estimates reasonable and acceptable level of risk of non-compliance and security allowances, administered only to increase the safety assessment. The mechanism operates on optimization of decision variables representing the amount of work assigned to each resource in order to minimize the criterion function summarizing the direct costs of the activities in the project the costs of acceleration (or delays).
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 135; 9-25
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Re-Calculation of Happy Planet Index Using DEA Models
Autorzy:
Jablonsky, Josef
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578570.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna
Jakość życia
Metody statystyczne
Podejmowanie decyzji
Quality of life
Decision making
Statistical methods
Multicriteria analysis
Opis:
Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an aggregated index that measures the extent to which each nation produces long and happy lives per unit of environmental input. The HPI uses global data on life expectancy, experienced well-being, and ecological footprint to rank countries. The last HPI report was published in 2012 and it contains data for 151 countries from all continents. The aim of the paper is to re-calculate the HPI using DEA models and other multiple criteria decision making techniques and compare the results obtained results. MCDM methods evaluate alternatives (countries) according to the set of criteria with respect to given preferences. Most of them allow ranking of alternatives according to aggregated indices defined by various methods. DEA models compare the countries with the best performers in the data set and measure the efficiency of transformation of multiple inputs into multiple outputs. Even though they are based on different principles than MCDM methods they allow ranking of evaluated units according to their efficiency or super-efficiency scores. The paper analyzes both methodological approaches and compares their results.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 56-66
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies