Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "literature of the 20. century" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Constructing Japan: Strategies of the creation of the ‘Japan effect’ in the fiction of Wacław Sieroszewski and Ferdynand Ossendowski
    Konstruowanie Japonii. Strategie tworzenia „efektu japońskości” w utworach Wacława Sieroszewskiego i Ferdynanda Ossendowskiego
    Autorzy:
    Deja, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087596.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literature of the early 20th century
    popular literature
    Japan
    orientalism
    exoticism
    strategies of representation
    the reality effect
    Roland Barthes (1915–1980)
    Wacław Sieroszewski (1858–1945)
    Ferdynand Ossendowski (1876–1945)
    japoniznm
    Japonia
    orientalizm
    egzotyzm
    efekt rzeczywistości
    literatura popularna
    Młoda Polska
    dwudziestolecie międzywojenne
    Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
    Opis:
    This is an analysis of the strategies used to create a perception of Japan, or the ‘Japan effect’ – a term inspired by Roland Barthes ‘reality effect’ (effet de reel) – in the fiction of Wacław Sieroszewski and Ferdynand Ossendowski, two Polish writers who were first to introduce Japan to the Polish general public. Both visited Japan, Sieroszewski in 1903 and Ossendowski in 1921; both were authors of popular fiction set in exotic locations. However, each of them chose a different strategy of presenting the Japanese setting of their stories. While Ossendowski's construction of the ‘Japan effect’ can be described as ‘encyclopedic realism’ (his narrative is stitched up with multiple notes and explanations), Sieroszewski takes a more direct, dramatic approach. Sieroszewski prefers to confront the reader with various exotic ‘props’ and to take him on a journey of discovery of the peculiarities of Japanese behavior, aesthetic values and ways of thinking.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2021, 4; 461-
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Yeży Yankowski vs. Jankowski: a breakup with young Poland and with himself (act I)
    Yeży Yankowski kontra Jerzy Jankowski. Akt zerwania z Młodą Polską i samym sobą (pierwsza odsłona)
    Autorzy:
    Okulicz-Kozaryn, Radosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087964.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literature of the early 20th century
    Young Poland
    Modernism
    Futurism
    Jerzy Jankowski (1887–1941)
    Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)
    Tadeusz Miciński (1873– 1918)
    Leon Choromański (1873–1952)
    Zygmunt Kisielewski (1882–1942)
    Filippo Tommaso Marinetti (1876–1944)
    Jerzy Jankowski
    futuryzm
    modernizm
    Młoda Polska
    krytyka młodopolska
    Tadeusz Miciński
    Leon Choromański
    Zygmunt Kisielewski
    witalizm
    urbanizm
    Opis:
    This article deals with the first phase of Jerzy Jankowski’s severing ties with the Young Poland movement and his access to the futurist avant-garde. His conversion to the new poetic worldview, which he pioneered in Poland, was reflected in his articles and poems published in Widnokrąg [Horizon], a magazine he founded in 1913 to replace Tydzień [The Week], of which he was the main publisher. The rebranding came on top of disagreements between the magazine’s contributors. The divergent views focused on the assessment of Tadeusz Miciński’s novel Xiądz Faust. In May 1913, in his former magazine, Jankowski heaped praises on it. However, the following year, when it came up for debate in the Widnokrąg between Miciński’s aficionado Zygmunt Kisielewski and the skeptically-minded Leon Choromański, Jankowski sought to distance himself from both the emotionalism and the intellectualism of his colleagues. By that time he was absolutely adamant that the antinomies of Young Poland’s high art were a trap. Now that the worship of art striving for timeless perfection would have to give way to an unpretentious concern for ‘fugitive art’, the time was ripe for working out a new aesthetic, centered on the thrilling ‘beauty of big cities’, cabaret, cinema, and modern machines. Jankowski broke with his erstwhile mentor Ferdynand Ruszczyc and Zenon Przesmycki-Miriam, to follow the incomparably more exciting Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. Meanwhile, Choromański made one last attempt to bring the young man back on track by writing an article, in which he argued that Futurism was crude, and shallow, a throwback rather than a modern breakthrough. However, his warnings made no dint in Jankowski’s faith in futurism. For him its triumph was a matter of historical necessity. And, he had already thrown in his lot with the new movement by publishing his first futurist poems, ‘Spłon lotnika’ [‘Pilot in flames’] and ‘Maggi’.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 33-46
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    “I am going to paint your picture, nobody but you, always you”: Portrait paintings of women in the literature of the Young Poland period
    „Będę malował ciebie, tylko ciebie, zawsze ciebie. O kobietach na obrazach w literaturze Młodej Polski
    Autorzy:
    Kamińska, Lidia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087609.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literature of the late 19th and early 20th century
    the Young Poland period
    literature and art
    ekphrasis
    portrait paintings of women
    Stanisław Przybyszewski (1868–1927)
    Kazimierz Przerwa-Tetmajer (1865–1940)
    Jan August Kisielewski (1876– 1918)
    Karol Irzykowski (1873–1944)
    Wacław Berent (1873–1940)
    Stanisław Grudziński (1852–1884)
    Młoda Polska
    kobieta
    obraz
    sztuka
    artysta
    malarstwo
    ekfraza
    Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
    Opis:
    Ekphrases are fairly common in the literature of the Young Poland movement, with descriptions of paintings of women making up a notable portion of such visual representations. This article examines the functioning of the motif of a woman’s portrait in the work of writers of the late 19th and early 20th century, including Stanisław Przybyszewski, Kazimierz Przerwa-Tetmajer, Jan August Kisielewski, Karol Irzykowski, Wacław Berent and Stanisław Grudziński. The analyses, guided by feminist literary theory, focus on the implied artist's control over the painted figure (man over woman, but also the woman artist over the male recipient), the ways in which the work of art can becomes a vehicle of subconscious truths, the correspondences between emotions and colours.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2021, 4; 513-532
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The poetic reception of Rimbaud on the interface of Young Poland and the literature of the interwar period
    Recepcja poetycka Rimbauda jako synapsa Młodej Polski i międzywojnia
    Autorzy:
    Kuczyńska-Koschany, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087997.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literature of the late 19th and early 20th century
    Polish-French literary relations
    Arthur Rimbaud (1854–1891)
    Eliza Orzeszkowa (1841–1910)
    Józef Weyssenhof (1860–1932)
    Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)
    Julian Tuwim (1894–1953)
    Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (1894–1980)
    synapsa
    Jean Arthur Rimbaud
    Młoda Polska
    XX-lecie międzywojenne
    recepcja poetycka
    Opis:
    This article deals with the reception of Arthur Rimbaud’s poetry and his biographic legend by the poets of the last decades of 19th and the first decades of the 20th century, though, in fact, its earliest phase belongs to the literary period of pre-Modernist, anti-Romantic reaction (which described itself by the name Positivism, epitomized by the novels of Bolesław Prus). The process of Rimbaud’s reception proceeded in two dimensions, on the intergenerational level and in dialogue between poets and translators. Interestingly, it acted as a veritable catalyst of changes in the poetics of writers across the spectrum, from the old school (Józef Weyssenhof and Eliza Orzeszkowa) to the modernist avant-garde. The influence of Rimbaud was by no means uniform and went beyond the usual names like Zenon Przesmycki (Miriam), Julian Tuwim or Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz. This article casts its net widely to include representatives of three generations, among them some of the less acclaimed authors.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 17-32
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies