Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Liwiusz" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
„Nec Hercules contra plures”. Literacki aspekt Liwiańskiej debaty nad zniesieniem lex Oppia (AUC 34, 1-8)
“Nec Hercules contra plures”: The Literary Aspect of the Debate for Repeal of the Lex Oppia in the Ab Urbe Condita (34, 1-8) by Livy
Autorzy:
Dziuba, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2119687.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Liwiusz
historiografia
Marek Porcjusz Katon
kobieta
Lex Oppia
mowa
Livy
historiography
Marcus Porcius Cato
woman
speech
Opis:
One of the most essential features of Roman historiography is the rhetoric. Historians differently understood the most renowned law in history which was expressed by Cicero in „De legibus I, V”: opus oratorium maxime. The extent and the way of applying rhetorical elements in a text depended on writer’s skills and literature fashion of the epoch. Livy was one of the most eminent rhetors in the times of August. Thus, it is not astonishing that rhetorical device was used. Among another thing, it contained the agon of politicians. One of them is the subject of a consideration in this article. In such dispute, which was in fact a verbal duel, two politicians took part – consul Marcus Porcius Cato and not known tribune Lucius Valerius. The subject of contestation was abolition of the law Lex Oppia which was enacted in 215 BC during the Second Punic War. This act in a reasonably restrictive way limited the women’s expenses on luxury goods. Livy’s text regarding the debate is the oldest and the most extensive work concerning the course of agon. On the other hand , it is only known that such debate took place and may be it was connected with a serious social discussion and also that Cato took part in it. Livy, who gave the debate attention in first eight chapters of XXXIVth book also made from it well-elaborated literary episode in rhetorical sense. In the beginning and in the end of the work historian described the situation which took place on the streets of Rome – procession of courageously and unconventionally behaving women. In centre of episode there was oratorical duel between politicians. The figure of Cato was created as a model of conservative politician, the defender of mores maiores, who by means of words was fighting with willfulness of women. Lucius Valerius is a conciliatory politician whose arguments are similar to the women’s methods of persuasion. Livy withstand the feminine way of speaking used by Valerius with Cato’s military vocabulary. Since it is known with no doubt that the Cato’s speech is a historians display of rhetorical abilities. Furthermore, their substantial value ought to be analyzed in the context of moral politics of August not as a republic narration.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2011, 58-59, 3; 73-87
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Retoryka militarna w deskrypcji zachowań kobiet. Na podstawie tekstów Cycerona i Liwiusza
Military Rhetoric in the Description of Women Behaviour. On the Basis of the Texts of Cicero and Livy
Autorzy:
Dziuba, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1929083.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Liwiusz
Cyceron
Katon Starszy
Klodia Metelli
retoryka
mowa
kobieta
Livy
Cicero
Cato the Elder
Clodia Metelli
rhetoric
speech
woman
Opis:
The article analyzes the original and rare Roman military phraseology found in preserved works of literature, inscribed in the convention of invectives against women. As it is testified by the preserved fragments of the Law of the Twelve Tables the Roman civilization divided the space of men’s activities (politics and war) from the space of women’s activities (home and family) quite early. Literature imbued with didacticism supported this division by creating archetypal figures of ideal representatives of both the genders. In the course of development it worked out a stereotyped phraseology that served describing virtutes feminae and, separately, men’s virtues, corresponding to the spaces ascribed to them. Any breaking with the order established by tradition (mores maiorum) and law encountered severe reprimands, which, however, remained in the rhetoric convention of vituperatio. The two texts by outstanding rhetors: Livy – Cato the Elder’s speech against the repeal of the Oppian law (AUC 34, 2-4) and Marcus Tullius Cicero’s speech Pro Caelio that are analyzed here supply examples of the use of military phraseology, that is phraseology usually used for describing typically men’s activities, in descriptions of women’s behavior. In the case of Marcus Porcius Cato’s speech vocabulary belonging to the sphere of military science (agmen, expugnare, obsidere, coniuratio, seditio) serves inducing fear in the men listening to him. In this way, by using the threat of seizing power in the republic by women, the consul motivated patres familias to act and not to yield to women. In the case of Cicero’s speech military rhetoric was used to ridicule and embarrass Clodia Metelli as a credible witness for the prosecution in the trial of Marcus Caelius Rufus. Aggressive, and at times obscene humor was supposed to divert the listeners’ attention from the defense’s lack of arguments concerning the substance of the trial. The original military phraseology used by both the authors serves definite practical aims. What is more, its artistic dimension is decidedly pushed into the background. Cicero’s and Livy’s surprising idea allows, on the one hand, to appreciate their ingeniousness in the field of rhetoric, their conscious rejection of conventions, and on the other, helps the contemporary reader of ancient texts realize the fact that men of the period of the Republic found it difficult to keep women within the limits imposed by tradition. They were forced to reach for sophisticated verbal argumentation in order to convince the judges and politicians (in both these groups patres familias prevailed) about a real threat posed by the ones in their charge.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2012, 60, 3; 75-95
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies