Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "L2 acquisition" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10
    Tytuł:
    A time for consolidation: A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research 1985–1989
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1945100.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on L2 vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1989. Two analyses are presented. The first is a detailed account of the 1989 research on its own terms. The second analysis places this work in a larger context by looking at research published in a five-year window covering 1985–89. The analyses identify important themes in the research and significant sources who are influencing the way the research is developing at this time. The main features of this work are the substantial growth in dictionary and corpus research, and the emergence of Paul Nation as the Most Significant Source in 1989.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2021, 7; 68-85
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Vocabulary research in 1983: A bibliometric analysis
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040154.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabuary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper belongs to a series of studies devoted to L2 vocabulary research which has been published in the last fifty years. It follows on directly from my earlier analysis of the 1982 data, and attempts to broaden the base line on which the later research developed. The paper presents a brief bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research published in 1983. The analysis identifies a number of research clusters that were not present in the 1982 research but will become significant in later years, and highlights the volatility of vocabulary research at this time.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2015, 1; 187-198
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Two steps backwards: A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research in 1984
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040204.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper is the fourth instalment in a series of studies which attempt to plot the way research in L2 vocabulary acquisition has developed over the last fifty years. Earlier papers have analysed the research for 1982, 1983 and 2006 (Meara 2012, 2014, 2015). This paper follows on directly from my analysis of the 1983 research, and it uses the same bibliometric techniques that were used in the earlier papers: the co-citation methodology, first developed by Small (1973) and White and Griffith (1981). The analysis of the 1984 data shows some consolidation of the main research themes, but for the most part the L2 vocabulary research published in this year continues to be made up of small research clusters, sharing few common points of reference.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2016, 2; 139-152
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Steady as she goes? A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research in 1987
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040253.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on L2 vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1987. This year is surprisingly volatile compared with the previous year, 1986, with a very large number of new sources appearing in the maps, and many sources identified in previous years losing their influence in the research papers that make up the 1987 data set. The paper also reports a larger analysis of all the work that appeared in a five year window from 1983–1987. This larger data set is not quite as volatile as the smaller 1987 data set, but it suggests that some sources who dominated the co-citation maps in earlier years are losing their influence.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2019, 5; 103-119
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The British are coming…! A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research in 1988
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040298.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on L2 vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1988. Two analyses are presented. The first is a detailed account of the 1988 research on its own terms. The second analysis places this work in a larger context by looking at the research published in a five-year window covering 1984–88. The analyses identify important themes in the research and significant sources who are influencing the way the research is developing at this time. A particularly important new research theme centred around corpus linguistics appears in the 1988 data, and there are some surprising changes to the list of influential sources.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2020, 6; 111-129
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A new beginning? A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research in 1985
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040233.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on L2 vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1985. This year seems to mark a kind of transition in the field. Unlike the earlier years analysed in this series of papers, 1985 shows signs of a coherent L2 vocabulary research front developing. The number of papers that qualify for inclusion is much greater than in previous years, and the analysis suggests that recognisable research themes are beginning to be clearly articulated.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2017, 3; 136-154
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Laying the foundations: A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research in 1982-1986
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040272.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on L2 vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1986. This year seems to mark a serious consolidation of L2 vocabulary research, with the main themes of future research appearing. The paper also reports a larger analysis of all the work that appeared in a five-year window from 1982-1986. This analysis clearly shows the beginnings of a recognisable research focus on L2 vocabulary acquisition, though this work is influenced by some surprising sources, who do not figure in more recent work in the field.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2018, 4; 108-128
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ground Zero: A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research 1986-1990
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40084945.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric
    author co-citation
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1990. Two analyses are presented. The first is a detailed account of the 1990 research on its own terms. The second analysis places this work in a larger context by looking at research published in a five-year window covering 1986-1990.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2022, 8; 133-151
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Shifting sands: A bibliometric analysis of L2 vocabulary research in 1991
    Autorzy:
    Meara, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40225027.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    vocabulary research
    bibliometric
    author co-citation
    Opis:
    This paper uses a co-citation analysis to examine the research on L2 vocabulary acquisition that was published in 1991. Two analyses based on co-citations in this research are presented. The first analysis provides a context for the 1991 data. It looks at work that was being cited in a five-year window covering 1987-1991. The second analysis is a more detailed account of the 1991 research on its own terms.
    Źródło:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2023, 9; 112-132
    2450-5188
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistics Beyond and Within
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Form-Fokus versus Inhalts-Fokus: Zur Nutzung von CALL+ als Instrument zwecks Bestimmung des optimalen Kontextualisierungsgrades beim L2-Lexik-Lernen
    Form Focus versus Content Focus: On the Use of CALL+ as an Instrument for Determining the Optimal Degree of Contextualization in L2 Lexical Learning
    Autorzy:
    Liedtke, Joachim
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16468497.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-07-09
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
    Tematy:
    L2 vocabulary acquisition
    lexicality
    textuality
    learning efficiency
    L2-Lexikerwerb
    Lexikalität
    Textualität
    Lerneffizienz
    Opis:
    Die Kontroverse Form-Fokus versus Inhalts-Fokus bzw. Lexikalität versus Textualität und die Relevanz des jeweils gewählten Kontextualisierungsgrades des Lehrstoffes für den erfolgreichen L2-Wortschatzerwerb gilt nach wie vor als ungelöst. Während Krashen mit seiner Input-Hypothese (1985 ff.) und die daran anknüpfenden Arbeiten (wie Wu 2010, Yang 2011, Jergerski 2021, Lichtman/VanPatten 2021, Lowen 2021) die inhaltsbezogene Wortschatzarbeit befürworten, plädieren Laufer (u. a. 2009, 2010, 2017a, b), Spada (2011), Shintani (2013), Yang/Shintani/Li/Zang (2017), Kang/Sok/Han (2019), Sima (2019), McLean/Stoeckel (2021), Soodmand (2021) und andere Vertreter der modernen Sprachlehrforschung dafür, der formorientierten Wortschatzarbeit deutlich mehr Aufmerksamkeit zu schenken. Einer der Hauptgründe für diese Divergenz dürfte darin liegen, dass viele empirische Studien nur eine kleine Datenbasis von wenigen Testvokabeln in zudem zeitlich sehr begrenzten Beobachtungszeiträumen erfassen, was verallgemeinerbare Aussagen von vorneherein stark einschränkt. Der vorliegende Beitrag greift dieses Problem auf und diskutiert die Möglichkeiten einer computergestützten longitudinalen Analyse und Optimierung der komplexen Lernkonditionen des L2 Lexikerwerbs. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei die Frage, inwieweit der Kontrast von Kontextisolierung versus Kontextintegration des lexikalischen Lernstoffes die Lerneffizienz und den Lernerfolg beeinflusst. Die in der präsentierten Pilotstudie erhobenen empirischen Daten (basierend auf über 107.000 computergestützt erfassten Lexiklern- u. Reaktivierungsdatensätzen) und deren systematische Analyse belegen, dass die Abhängigkeit der lexikalischen Lern- und Reaktivierungsleistung vom gewählten Grad der Kontextualisierung offensichtlich deutlich geringer ist, als sowohl von Vertretern der Input-Hypothese als auch von Befürwortern der Form-Fokussierung propagiert wird.
    The controversy about form focus versus content focus or lexicality versus textuality and the relevance of the respective chosen degree of contextualization of the teaching material for successful L2 vocabulary acquisition is still considered unresolved. While on the one hand Krashen with his input hypothesis (1985 ff.) and the work that followed him (e.g., Wu 2010, Yang 2011, Jergerski 2021, Lichtman/VanPatten 2021, Lowen 2021) advocate content-oriented vocabulary work, other researchers such as Laufer (et al. 2009, 2010, 2017a,b), Spada (2011), Shintani (2013), Yang/Shintani/Li/Zang (2017), Kang/Sok/Han (2019), Sima (2019), McLean/Stoeckel (2021), Soodmand (2021) and other representatives of modern language teaching research argue for paying much more attention to form-oriented vocabulary work. One of the main reasons for this divergence may be that many empirical studies only cover a small database of a few test vocabulary items in observation periods that are also very limited in time, which severely limits gene- ralizable statements from the outset. This paper addresses this problem and discusses the possibilities of a computer-based longitudinal analysis and optimization of the complex learning conditions of L2 lexicon acquisition. The focus is on the extent to which the contrast of context isolation versus context integration of lexical learning material influences learning efficiency and success. The empirical data collected in the pilot study presented here (based on more than 107,000 computerized lexical learning and reactivation records) and their systematic analysis demonstrate that the dependence of lexical learning and reactivation performance on the chosen degree of contextualization is apparently much lower than propagated by both representatives of the input hypothesis and proponents of form-focusing.
    Źródło:
    Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław; 2023, 23; 81-98
    2084-3062
    2657-5647
    Pojawia się w:
    Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies