Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Drozdowski, Mariusz R" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Polityczne przyczyny powstania Chmielnickiego w opiniach szlachty Rzeczypospolitej
Polish Nobility’s Opinions on the Political Reasons behind the Khmelnytsky Uprising
Autorzy:
Drozdowski, Mariusz R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2154609.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Zaporozhian Cossacks
Khmelnytsky Uprising
Ukraine
Russian statenobility
integrity
Commonwealth
Opis:
The article discusses the political reasons for the Khmelnytsky Uprising, as they were expressed in the opinions of the nobility of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The outbreak of the Cossack insurrection led by Bohdan Khmelnytsky with the beginning of 1648, which from the first moment stimulated the broad strata of Ukrainian society and quickly transformed into a national liberation war, provoked terror in broad circles of the nobility. An additional factor influencing the mood of the noblemen was the growing awareness of Khmelnytsky’s political ambitions, the implementation of which was a deadly threat to the current political system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Therefore, the main part of the publication is devoted to discussing the views of the nobility on the subject of political motives underlying the Cossacks’ armed resistance against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. These opinions fundamentally influenced the noblemen’s assessment of the nature of the uprising. Detailed analysis is presented concerning such sources as correspondence, lauda, and sejmik instructions as well as occasional and journalistic literature. It is emphasised that there was a conviction among the nobility of the Republic of the political motives of the Cossack uprising. This conviction was based mainly on the news coming to the noblemen about Khmelnytsky’s aspirations to separate Ukraine and build an independent state entity, referred to by the nobility as the Russian Principality. Understanding of the emancipatory aspirations of the insurgents by the gentry had a huge impact on the shape of the Republic of Poland’s policy towards the events in Ukraine in the second half of the seventeenth century. Consequently, one of its main goals was to stop the movement that posed a threat to the wholeness and existence of the state.
Źródło:
Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie; 2019, 6; 67-81
2353-5644
2451-2958
Pojawia się w:
Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Historia wojen domowych w Polsce Alberta Viminy, w przekładzie Krzysztofa Żaboklickiego, pod redakcją, ze wstępem i komentarzami Teresy Chynczewskiej-Hennel, Instytut Badań nad Dziedzictwem Kulturowym Europy, Białystok 2017, ss. 284
Autorzy:
Drozdowski, Mariusz R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2156692.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09-27
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Vimina
war
Commonwealth
Ukraine
Cossack
Khmelnytsky Uprising
Opis:
The review concerns an edition of Albert Vimina’s work "History of civil wars in Poland" ("Historia delle guerre civili in Polonia") by Teresa Chynczewska-Hennel. Th e edition consists of two main parts. The first, which is an extensive introduction, was devoted mainly to the description of Albert Vimina’s biography. The second part contains "The History of Civil Wars in Poland", which consists of five books on 196 pages. The main part contains descriptions of the struggles of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth with the Zaporizhian Cossacks in the years 1648-1651. The following three parts, attached to "The History of Civil Wars in Poland", are also related to the author’s personal observations. As I have already mentioned, the reviewed edition is published in Poland for the first time and it has been prepared with knowledge of editorial art and in accordance with the recommendations of the publishing manual. It must be emphasized at this point that what clearly distinguishes it from the Lithuanian edition from 2012 is, above all, the excellent translation and extensive set of footnotes. In conclusion, it must be said with certainty that we have received a very successful edition and, what is worth emphasizing, not the last one in the publisher’s output.
Źródło:
Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie; 2021, 8; 237-246
2353-5644
2451-2958
Pojawia się w:
Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jacek Szymala, Powstanie kozackie 1648–1658. Studium z historii wizualnej, seria „Historia w mediach”, t. 2, red. prowadzący Jacek Szymala, red. serii Ewa Kowalczyk, Piotr Kurpiewski, Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków 2019, 351 ss.
Jacek Szymala, Powstanie kozackie 1648–1658. Studium z historii wizualnej, series “Historia w mediach”, t. 2, red. Jacek Szymala, red. serii Ewa Kowalczyk, Piotr Kurpiewski, Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków 2019, 351 pp.
Autorzy:
Chynczewska-Hennel, Teresa
Drozdowski, Mariusz R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2154672.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-08-26
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Zaporozhian Cossacks
Khmelnytsky Uprising
movie
computer games
visual art
Opis:
The position deserves attention, as it opens a discussion on the important phenomenon of visual culture history, which is currently widely discussed among many researchers. A historian, even if he is not an art historian, often analyses iconographic art in his work. After all, we are dealing with a different type of perception of the described reality, one which accumulates the ability to synthetically capture it using at the same time both the historian’s and film expert’s skills. Jacek Szymala sets himself an ambitious goal – to create a model, “a set of tools helpful in the future research of historians, especially modern historians, going beyond traditional historiography”. The author brilliantly shows that history is not only a collection of past facts and events but lives in its visual dimension, becoming a continuation of history itself. It is only important that, as far as possible, every viewer or reader can and should remain exactly as critical as in the process of interpretation of any historical source that “lies on the table” in the workshop of a good and reliable historian. The author is absolutely right when he writes that: “[...] these monuments, skulls, or paintings should serve as a warning and reflection, and not be the cause of mutual hatred, stereotyping, and prejudices”. Jacek Szymala’s book will definitely serve future researchers of this fascinating topic.
Źródło:
Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie; 2020, 7; 268-279
2353-5644
2451-2958
Pojawia się w:
Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies