Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "polish jews" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Głowiński: tożsamość prozą (od początku)
Głowiński: identity in prose (from the beginning)
Autorzy:
Kuczyńska-Koschany, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1533389.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Michał Głowiński
identity
autobiographical writing
memory
Polish Jews
Holocaust
Opis:
The article is an attempt to reach the first statements and texts by Michał Głowiński, relating to Jewish identity in Poland, the condition of a child of the Holocaust, the trauma of a Holocaust survivor, and the situation of an intelectual. The author of the article tries to demonstrate continuity of all creative gestures, from the frist writings and statements, signed with pseudonyms, through Czarne sezony [The Black Seasons] and their continuations, to the autobiographical Kręgi obcości [Circles of strangeness]; the continuity is seen in the perspective of identity. The author is also interested, in the given subject scope, in Głowiński’s spatial obsessions (especially claustrophobia and phantasmagoria). The stake of literary “self-therapy” is in the most crucial things: truth of oneself, memory, self-identification.
Źródło:
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka; 2013, 22; 119-129
1233-8680
2450-4947
Pojawia się w:
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Grand Illusion? The Phenomenon of Jewish Life in Poland after the Holocaust in Lower Silesia
Autorzy:
Ilwicka, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/668297.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
Polish Jews
German Jews
communism
Holocaust
survivors of the Holocaust
Lower Silesia
Polska
Jacob Egit
Opis:
The Jewish Life in Poland inLower Silesia began with the end of World War II. Survivors from the local concentration camp in Gross Rosen created the first Jewish committee and, with German Jewish survivors, started a new chapter in the post war history of Lower Silesia. The fact that only 10% of the Jews from the whole population overcame the extermination should be borne in mind. There is a related branch of research that seeks to determine how long Jewish life continued in Europe, where and under what conditions. In the last few years, we have become aware of the extent to which Jews actually built new possibilities after World War II in Poland, 1945–1968. In fact, the prevailing popular image of post–war Jewry is a simplistic one that divides the Jewish population into basic groups: the assimilated Jews of Russia; the “Jewish Jews” of Poland and other western areas, annexed to the Soviet Union, who sought to preserve at least some aspects of Yiddishkayt (Jewishness); and the traditional Jews, who remained devout.In the period of 1945–1950, the Jews created the most important center of Jewish Life in Europe, in terms of culture, industry, education and intellectual life. A stabilization period of the Jewish settlement began with the autumn of 1946. The softening of emigration rules and the closure of the Polish borders in the winter of 1947 helped Jews fully concentrate on the Jewish life in Poland. At that time, political, social, economic and cultural activities continued to be carried out on a large scale. In 1946, 16,960 Jews were registered in Wrocław. With the change of the policy towards the Jewish community by the communist government of Poland, the Jewish settlement in Wrocław slowed down and eventually, at the beginning of the 70’s, Jewish life in the Lower Silesia disappeared from the cultural map of the local landscapes.Even though some of the Jewish settlers remained in the Lower Silesia to continue Jewish life in this territory, the community never became as strong and influential as it was at the beginning of the settlement. 
The Jewish Life in Poland inLower Silesia began with the end of World War II. Survivors from the local concentration camp in Gross Rosen created the first Jewish committee and, with German Jewish survivors, started a new chapter in the post war history of Lower Silesia. The fact that only 10% of the Jews from the whole population overcame the extermination should be borne in mind. There is a related branch of research that seeks to determine how long Jewish life continued in Europe, where and under what conditions. In the last few years, we have become aware of the extent to which Jews actually built new possibilities after World War II in Poland, 1945–1968. In fact, the prevailing popular image of post–war Jewry is a simplistic one that divides the Jewish population into basic groups: the assimilated Jews of Russia; the “Jewish Jews” of Poland and other western areas, annexed to the Soviet Union, who sought to preserve at least some aspects of Yiddishkayt (Jewishness); and the traditional Jews, who remained devout.In the period of 1945–1950, the Jews created the most important center of Jewish Life in Europe, in terms of culture, industry, education and intellectual life. A stabilization period of the Jewish settlement began with the autumn of 1946. The softening of emigration rules and the closure of the Polish borders in the winter of 1947 helped Jews fully concentrate on the Jewish life in Poland. At that time, political, social, economic and cultural activities continued to be carried out on a large scale. In 1946, 16,960 Jews were registered in Wrocław. With the change of the policy towards the Jewish community by the communist government of Poland, the Jewish settlement in Wrocław slowed down and eventually, at the beginning of the 70’s, Jewish life in the Lower Silesia disappeared from the cultural map of the local landscapes.Even though some of the Jewish settlers remained in the Lower Silesia to continue Jewish life in this territory, the community never became as strong and influential as it was at the beginning of the settlement.
Źródło:
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II; 2014, 4, 2
2391-6559
2083-8018
Pojawia się w:
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Żniwo „Złotych żniw
Harvest of “Golden Harvest”
Autorzy:
Sułek, Antoni
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373656.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011-11-22
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish-Jews relations
Holocaust
Jan Tomasz Gross
stosunki polsko-żydowskie
zagłada Żydów
Opis:
The article is an attempt to assess a social impact of the book “Golden Harvest”, published at the beginning of 2011 by Jan Tomasz Gross and Irena Grudzińska-Gross. The authors of the book have revealed facts, scale and motives of participation of the Polish citizens in killing and robbing Jews in the Nazi-occupied Poland. They have demonstrated that the scale of Jewish homicide was broader than hitherto described, and argued that it was greater than the scope of help provided to the Jews. The book triggered a fiery public debate in Poland. Based on the research polls the Author of the article demonstrates that the impact of “Golden Harvest” is quite complex. The book and the debate did activate the social memory concerning violence, burglary and killings of the Jews. Supposedly, they also persuaded some scarce number of Poles that such facts, quite numerous, did happen and made a significant number of Poles think that it might have been so. The discussion did not, however, change an overall and valuating opinion about the attitude of Poles towards Holocaust. The Author tries to explain why the book’s effect was far less spectacular than its authors had expected. The answer is looked for in the attitudes of Poles and the type of beliefs that were to have been changed as a result of publishing “Golden Harvest”, as well as in the specific features of the book and the debate triggered by it.
Źródło:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2011, 55, 4; 247-261
2300-195X
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Da Polônia ao Brasil (1933-1945): memórias dos refugiados do nazismo e sobreviventes do Holocasto
From Poland to Brazil (1933-1945): Memories of Refugees from Nazism and Holocaust Survivors
Autorzy:
TUCCI CARNEIRO, Maria Luiza
SIUDA-AMBROZIAK, Renata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486035.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Brasil
Polônia
antissemitismo
judeus poloneses
Holocausto
refugiados
Brazil
Polska
anti-Semitism
Polish Jews
Holocaust
refugees
Opis:
O artigo tem como objetivo divulgar os testemunhos dos poloneses de origem judaica que buscaram refúgio no Brasil, fugindo das perseguições nazistas ou como sobreviventes do Holocausto, no pós-guerra. Do ponto de vista metodológico, referindo-se aos estudos sobre a memória e esquecimento na história oral, as autoras concentram-se na pesquisa biográfica dos depoentes, especialmente nas situações descritas e entendidas como rupturas – mudanças dramáticas no percurso da vida dos entrevistados como: judeus na Polônia; refugiados; e, fi-nalmente, brasileiros.
The article aims to disclose the testimonies of Polish Jews who sought refuge in Brazil fleeing Nazi persecutions or as post-war Holocaust survivors. From the methodological point of view, referring to the studies on memory and forgetfulness in oral history, the authors focus on the biographical research of the interviewees, especially in the situations described and understood as ruptures: dramatic changes over the course of their lives as: Jews in Poland; refugees; and, finally, as Brazilians.
Źródło:
Revista del CESLA. International Latin American Studies Review; 2017, 20; 165-190
1641-4713
Pojawia się w:
Revista del CESLA. International Latin American Studies Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Introducing Teenagers to a Dialogue with Judaism as the Task of School Catechesis
Autorzy:
Kostorz, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/668299.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
Catholicism
Judaism
catechesis
dialogue
teenagers
Polish Jews
German Jews
communism
Holocaust
survivors of the Holocaust
Lower Silesia
Polska
Jacob Egit
Opis:
This analysis proves that introducing teenagers to a dialogue with Judaism is one of catechesis’s tasks. This task has been outlined in the post-conciliar documents of the Catholic Church. It underlines the spiritual ties between Catholic people and the Jews and promotes forming an attitude of openness towards followers of the Mosaic religion. It also contributes to mitigating anti-Semitism among Catholic teenagers. At the same time, it raises interest in Jewish traditions and culture. In the religion syllabus in lower and post-secondary schools we can come across numerous references (mainly indirect) to Judaism. The focus on passing honest knowledge about Judaism can be also clearly visible. In this way, formation of the cognitive element of inter-religious dialogue takes place. On the other hand, less attention is devoted to other components of this attitude such as the emotional and behavioural elements. That is why there is a demand to complete the lacking elements by watching films and having discussions. The above mentioned multimedia materials called “The religion lesson” have been prepared to satisfy this need.Great importance is also attached to creating situations that allow Christian teenagers to participate in meetings with the Jews. It can be organized in the form of Days of Judaism and panel discussions with Jews and distinguished contemporary theologians and philosophers. Open meetings with representatives of Judaism are a great opportunity to perceive the Jews as “older brethren in the faith”. They let young people discover the cultural wealth and vision of Judaism and teach teenagers respect for the religious beliefs of the Jews. Thereby, they can contribute to the change of mentality of young participants of catechesis in their approach to Judaism. It is worth referring to the works of Jewish culture in these activities. It is the cultural heritage that comprises a great reference point to showing the strong Judaic roots of Christian culture. Thus, it is necessary, for the topics in Judaism proposed for religious syllabuses and catechetical material to be closely connected with organizing meetings of young Catholics with followers of the Mosaic religion. Only this kind of experience can contribute to an authentic inter-religious dialogue.
Źródło:
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II; 2014, 4, 2
2391-6559
2083-8018
Pojawia się w:
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Moja winnica…: autobiografia czy auto(tanato)grafia?
My Own Vineyard...: Autobiography or Auto(thanato)graphy?
Autorzy:
Kuczyńska‑ Koschany, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699576.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Miriam Akavia
autobiografia
auto (tanato) grafia
Żydzi polscy
Zagłada
ocaleńcy
Jacques Derrida
Aleksandra Ubertowska
autobiography
auto(thanato)graphy
Polish Jews
Holocaust
survivors
Opis:
The article is an attempt at a creative reading (one that employs figures and other works by the discussed writer) of Miriam Akavia’s autobiography entitled My Own Vineyard.... Indicated in the title of the article, the most significant theoretical reference here is Aleksandra Ubertowska’s Holokaust. Auto (tanato) grafie. This article uses the Derridean notion of quasi-genre modified by Ubertowska to interpret an important identity-related work by Akavia, a writer whose formative experience was the Holocaust.
Artykuł jest próbą twórczej lektury (przy wykorzystaniu materiału ikonicznego, a także innych utworów czytanej autorki) autobiografii Miriam Akavii pt. Moja winnica. Najistotniejszym aspektem teoretycznym, zasygnalizowanym w tytule szkicu, pozostaje książka Aleksandry Ubertowskiej Holokaust. Auto (tanato) grafie. Tekst to zastosowanie zmodyfikowanej przez Ubertowską Derridiańskiej kategorii quasi-gatunkowej do interpretacji istotnego dzieła tożsamościowego autorki, której przeżyciem formującym była Zagłada.
Źródło:
Narracje o Zagładzie; 2018, 4; 234-244
2450-4424
Pojawia się w:
Narracje o Zagładzie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Manipulacje Jana Tomasza Grossa na temat relacji polsko-żydowskich
Autorzy:
Składowski, Henryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2007382.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Jan Tomasz Gross
„Die Welt”
Deutschlandfunk
Polish-Jewish relations
Holocaust
Polish-German relations
the Jews
the Germans
the Polish
Muslim refugees
Opis:
Jan Tomasz Gross in the article published on the German „Die Welt” daily’s website and also in the interview he gave in February 2016 for the German broadcast station Deutschlandfunk (DLF), stated that during WW2 the Polish killed between 25.000 – 30.000 Germans and many times more Jews, since only 40.000 survived on the Polish territory. Gross is not a historian, but a sociologist, he writes his own historic essays instead of dissertations based on documents. Hence, he airs erroneous information. The scientific studies show, that during WW2 the Polish killed between 60 to 80 thousand German soldiers, police officers and officials who had exerted terror and repression. On the other hand, about 100 thousand Jews survived Holocaust on the territory of Poland only thanks to the aid of the people. In the historic evaluation of Polish-Jewish relations, Jan Tomasz Gross by airing erroneous information went beyond a border of confabulation. Such actions performed by Gross can only be compared to the ahistorical and false terms “Polish death camps”, which have been used in the German press and other mass media, and Gross “conformed” to the German model of evaluation of the Polish nation. But the WW2 executioner, that is Germany, are not entitled to use such a term towards their victim, that is Poland. Therefore, the Germans, having murdered about 6 million Polish citizens, are the last ones who should instruct us on the issue of accepting Muslim refugees, as they have no moral right to it.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2016, 21; 107-121
1643-6911
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies