Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Goli Otok" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
W opozycji do Moskwy. Jugosławiańska "droga do socjalizmu" w latach 1948-1956
In Opposition to Moscow. Yugoslav "Path to Socialism" in the Years 1948-1956
Autorzy:
Sokulski, Mateusz
Previsić, Martin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/971765.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
Jugosławia
rok 1956
blok wschodni
Związek Radziecki
polityka
międzynarodowa
represje polityczne
Goli otok
komunizm
Yugoslavia
The Year 1956
Eastern Block
Soviet Union
political repression
international policy
communism
Opis:
Due to political, economic and cultural changes carried out by new communist authorities Yugoslavia became the most communisesed state after the Second World War. Independence of the Yugoslav leader Josip Broz-Tito, who found state interests more important than Soviet one and put a tremendous effort to affirmate Yugoslav position in the international policy, led him to the conflict with entire Eastern Block which remained under Stalin's impact. Soviet leader by using mechanisms from the 30's tended to present Tito as an „internal enemy”. So called Tito-Stalin's split in 1948 forced Yugoslavian leaders to find their own solutions (so called re-reading of Marx) in order to prove their legitimization of power. In the years 1948-1956 by so called self-managament, liberalization and democratization they tried to stay „true communists” that opposes Soviet distortion. In the internal policy they used political repression as the weapon against true or putative pro-soviets in Yugoslavia. 15737 were imprisoned and amongst them 13000 in the most famous camp on the island Goli Otok Repressive methods used against convicted people were focused on re-socialization of imprisoned in order to get rid of alleged or real endangerment. In the foreign policy after split with Soviet block Yugoslavs tended to keep their independent position. Unless at the beginning they found West (first of all USA) as their allies, which made them able to withstand Soviet pressure, Tito was reluctant towards any alliance with Western World as he did not want to abandon communist ideology. After Stalin's death in 1953 both Yugoslavia and USSR were seeking reconciliation after few years of conflict. That was finally fulfilled in 1955 and 1956 through Belgrade and Moscow Declarations. In such situation Tito abandoned any will to go on with political reforms and wanted to maintain predominance of communist party. Therefore he decided to convict and imprison pro-reformist high-ranked politician Milovan Djilas in 1956. Significance of the 1956 year as the crucial for Yugoslav foreign and internal policy may be perceived also in abandoning mass political repression towards pro-stalinists in Yugoslavia. The antagonistic interests of Moscow seeking Yugoslavia to get back to the communist camp and Belgrade being focused on its independent position, persuaded Tito to find its allies amongst the third world states as the counter balance towards Eastern Block and West. The meeting between Tito and leaders of Egypt and India is used to be treated as the first step in the Yugoslav policy in order to create non-align movement as the counter balance towards two main political blocks.
Źródło:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2016, 28; 395-417
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zaboravljanje traume – Goli otok u jugoslovenskoj semiosferi
Forgetting the Trauma – Goli otok in the Yugoslav Semiosphere
Autorzy:
Đurišić Bečanović, Tatjana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52482728.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Umiejętności
Tematy:
zaboravljanje
nulta semiotizacija
Goli otok
logorski hronotop
logorska komunikacija
tabu tema
književna mnemonika
autocenzura
forgetting
zero-degree semiotization
concentration camp chronotope
camp communication
taboo
literary mnemonics
self-censorship
Opis:
U radu se analiziraju semiotički procesi koji se odvijaju pod institucionalnim pritiskom, a dovode do toga da sociokulturna zajednica pamti, odnosno zaboravlja po diktatu aktuelnog režima, što znači da kolektivnom mnemonikom, ponekad i brutalno, upravljaju politički i ideološki centri moći u čijim je rukama, po pravilu, i najveća količina semiotičke moći. Tako je svojevremeno jugoslovenski državni aparat bio usmeren na zaboravljanje Golog otoka, u čemu se oslanjao upravo na institucije sistema, posebno na delovanje svoje obaveštajne službe UDB-e koja je upravljala golootočkim logorom i nametala zabranu njegove tematizacije. Odsustvo iz javnog diskursa trebalo je da rezultira zaboravom, a institucionalno nasilje i proizvedena socijalna fobija da zauvek ućutkaju svedoke. Stoga se u radu traga za manifestacijama najmračnije jugoslovenske tabu teme, uz koju je vezana najveća količina institucionalnog nasilja i represije, čiji je cilj bio zaboravljanje golootočke traume. Iako je književnost najmanje kontrolisan diskurs, o ovoj temi se piše tek godinama nakon zatvaranja logora, u kome je od 1949. do 1956. bilo zatočeno oko 15.000 ljudi. U potrazi za zabranjenom golootočkom tematikom, autorka analizira narativne tekstove Dragoslava Mihailovića (Kad su cvetale tikve 1968. i Goli otok 1990) i Mirka Kovača (Rane Luke Meštrevića 1971).
The paper analyses semiotic processes taking place under the institutional pressure and resulting in the fact that a particular social and cultural community remembers and forgets in accordance with the dictates of the current regime, which means that the collective mnemonic is sometimes even brutally governed by political and ideological centres of authority that generally possess the greatest amount of semiotic power. Therefore the Yugoslav state administration used to be oriented towards forgetting Goli otok, where it relied precisely on the system institutions, particularly on the activities of its intelligence service called UDBA, which handled the camp of Goli otok and imposed a ban on its thematisation. The disappearance from the public discourse was supposed to result in the process of forgetting, while institutional violence and developed social phobia were to silence the witnesses forever. Thus the paper searches for the manifestations of the darkest of Yugoslav taboos, which relates to the greatest amount of institutional violence and repression aiming at forgetting of the trauma of Goli otok. Even though literature is the least controlled discourse, this topic started to be depicted in writing years after the termination of the camp, which incarcerated c. 15000 people from 1949 to 1956. Searching for the forbidden themes of Goli otok, the author analyzes the narrative texts of Dragoslav Mihailović (Kad su cvetale tikve 1968 and Goli otok 1990) and Mirko Kovač (Rane Luke Meštrevića 1971).
Źródło:
Kultura Słowian. Rocznik Komisji Kultury Słowian PAU; 2022, XVIII; 53-65
2451-4985
2543-9561
Pojawia się w:
Kultura Słowian. Rocznik Komisji Kultury Słowian PAU
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies