Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "EU enlargement" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    EU–Turkey Accession Negotiations: Towards a Diplomatic Failure?
    Autorzy:
    Osiewicz, Przemysław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/952079.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
    Tematy:
    European Union
    European integration
    EU enlargement
    Turkey
    Opis:
    The ongoing EU–Turkey accession negotiations are probably the most complex talks related to the enlargement process in the EU’s history. Although they were initiated in 2005, so far both sides have managed to provisionally close only one out of 35 negotiation chapters. What’s more, the bilateral relations between the EU and Turkey are growing more and more tense. The most recent developments only prove that the talks may grind to a halt. It seems that both sides are tired of the endless negotiations and unexpected events, like the 2016 coup d’état in Turkey. The main aim of this article is to analyse the current political developments related to EU–Turkey negotiations in detail and find answers to two research questions. Will Turkey and the European Union face a diplomatic failure? What are the potential short-term scenarios?
    Źródło:
    Yearbook of Polish European Studies; 2017, 20; 153-168
    1428-1503
    Pojawia się w:
    Yearbook of Polish European Studies
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Single Market Enlargement and Technical Barriers to Trade: Revisiting the Evidence
    Autorzy:
    Hagemejer, Jan
    Matuszczak, Łukasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29431172.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2024-03-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
    Tematy:
    European integration
    EU enlargement
    gravity model
    technical barriers to trade
    Opis:
    EU enlargements have given new EU member states access to the European Single Market. While tariff liberalisation was already completed at the time of enlargement, technical regulations were subject to different sectoral approaches, including harmonisation and mutual recognition. We employ a structural gravity model estimated using sectoral trade data from 1987 to 2020 to assess the trade effects of these measures. We find that trade expansion, particularly exports of the NMS to the incumbent EU members, has been stronger in the sectors covered either by the Old Approach (full harmonisation) or the New Approach (essential requirements) than in sectors covered by mutual recognition. The New Approach has been more effective when coupled with mutual recognition at the sector level than with either approach alone. Our results imply that the TBT harmonisation has had a heterogenous impact on different sectors (the most important for low-tech industries was the Old Approach, while for high-tech, it was the New Approach).
    Źródło:
    Central European Economic Journal; 2024, 11, 58; 79-96
    2543-6821
    Pojawia się w:
    Central European Economic Journal
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    European Union and European Integration Aspirations of Ukraine: Lost Possibilities and Sceptic Moods
    Autorzy:
    Hissa, Oleksandra
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/519608.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
    Tematy:
    EU enlargement
    Euroscepticism
    European integration
    European Neighbourhood Policy
    Eastern Partnership
    Opis:
    The article deals with the problems of European integration. The Eurosceptic moods of the EU concerning the European integration of Ukraine are researched. The polls on European citizens’ opinion concerning enlargement are investigated. The interviews of European leaders concerning the enlargement are analyzed.
    Źródło:
    Historia i Polityka; 2014, 12(19); 57-65
    1899-5160
    2391-7652
    Pojawia się w:
    Historia i Polityka
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Proces rozszerzenia Unii Europejskiej na obszar Bałkanów Zachodnich jako wyzwanie dla przyszłości integracji kontynentu
    The European Union’s Western Balkans Enlargement as a Challenge for the Future Integration on the European Continent
    Autorzy:
    Koźbiał, Krzysztof
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/901755.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Finansów i Biznesu Vistula
    Tematy:
    Bałkany
    rozszerzenie UE
    integracja europejska
    Serbia, Albania
    Czarnogóra
    Macedonia
    Bośnia i Hercegowina
    Kosowo
    Western Balkans
    EU enlargement
    European integration
    Serbia
    Albania
    Montenegro
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Kosovo
    Opis:
    Rozszerzenie Unii Europejskiej w kierunku Bałkanów pozostaje procesem niedokończonym. Szanse na członkostwo mają Serbia, Czarnogóra, Albania, Północna Macedonia, być może także Bośnia i Hercegowina oraz Kosowo. Aby mogło do tego dojść, muszą one jednak sprostać określonym wyzwaniom. Rok 2018 będzie być może w przyszłości określany jako przełom, gdyż po wielu latach Bruksela powróciła do spotkań na szczycie z państwami regionu, przedstawiając nową agendę integracyjną i perspektywę członkostwa w UE Serbii i Czarnogóry w 2025 r. Wydaje się, że jest to ostatni moment na włączenie tych państw w orbitę zainteresowań Unii, tym bardziej że inni gracze (Chiny, Rosja, Turcja) także angażują się w tej części kontynentu.
    The enlargement of the European Union towards the Western Balkans remains an unfi - nished process. Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, and Northern Macedonia, perhaps also Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, have perspective for membership. For this to happen, however, they must meet specifi c challenges. The 2018 will perhaps be referred to as a breakthrough since after many years Brussels has returned to summit meetings with the countries of the Western Balkan region and it has been presenting a new integration agenda and the prospect of EU membership of Serbia and Montenegro in 2025. This seems to be the last moment to include these countries, which are in the orbit of the Union’s interests. This is even more important for the EU as other players (China, Russia, Turkey) are also involved in this part of the continent.
    Źródło:
    Społeczeństwo i Polityka; 2019, 3(60); 129-144
    1733-8050
    Pojawia się w:
    Społeczeństwo i Polityka
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Proces rozszerzenia Unii Europejskiej jako cel operacyjny polskiej prezydencji w Radzie Unii Europejskiej
    The European Union enlargement process as an operational objective of the Polish Presidency in the Council of the European Union
    Autorzy:
    Węc, Janusz Józef
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/506358.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
    Tematy:
    European Union
    European integration
    Polish Presidency of the EU Council
    The European Union enlargement process
    Opis:
    On balance the performance of the first Polish EU Council Presidency in the matter of the enlargement process of the European Union seems to be positive. The Polish Presidency effectively implemented the five main functions of a Presidency: the agenda-setting, brokerage, management, coordination and internal representation in the contacts with the governments of member states and the institutions of the European Union. The most important aspect was that it managed to implement almost all the operational objectives typically required for the enlargement process. Despite the objections and doubts expressed by the governments of many member states, conditioned mainly by the debt crisis of the Eurozone and the need for internal and external consolidation of the European Union, the Polish Presidency managed to maintain the concept of enlargement as an important element on the EU’s agenda. On 5 December 2011, on the initiative of the Polish Presidency, the General Affairs Council agreed a new approach to the accession negotiations involving the earliest possible opening of the most contentious negotiation chapters, including fundamental rights and policies pertaining to the area of freedom, security and justice. Employing the agenda-setting function, the Polish Presidency was the co-author of the Group Presidency programme and the author of the country’s Presidency programme and both documents provided the foundation for Poland’s activity in the process of enlargement of the European Union. The most important achievements of the Polish Presidency resulting from the implementation of the brokerage, coordination and management functions concerned Croatia, Iceland, Serbia and Montenegro. The Polish government finalised the work on the text of the accession treaty with Croatia and brought about the signing of the treaty on 9 December 2011. It also accepted the agreements referring to the status of Croatia in the transition period; that is, until the treaty becomes fully effective. The Polish Presidency also gave a significant impetus to the accession negotiations with Iceland, by opening seven negotiation chapters and concluding six. The achievement of the Polish Presidency towards the endeavours of the countries of the Western Balkans to gain accession to the European Union was the opening of procedures leading to Serbia being granted candidate country status, although the formal decision was taken on 28 February 2012 by the General Affairs Council under the chairmanship of the Danish Presidency. In addition, the politically crucial enlargement conclusions of the General Affairs Council for Montenegro, on the basis of which the European Council announced that a decision would be taken on the commencement of accession negotiations in June 2012, were achieved during the Polish Presidency. Taking into account that some member states were critical of the steps taken to normalise relationships between Serbia and Kosovo, the balanced conclusions of the Council, in the part referring to Serbia, should also be taken as a success for the Polish Presidency. Although the Polish Presidency suffered a few failures it is worth emphasising that they resulted mainly from the attitude of other member states such as Greece or the negligence of the third party countries in the enlargement process – in the cases of Turkey, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo. The Polish government, like the others since 2009, failed to overcome the opposition of Greece to the commencement of accession negotiations with Macedonia, although other member states fully supported the concept. The Polish Presidency, like the Belgian and Hungarian Presidencies, was unable to open any new chapter in the accession negotiations with Turkey. However, the reasons were the lack of progress in the implementation of the process of reforms by the Turkish government, the still unsolved controversial issues with Cyprus, the growing assertiveness of Turkey in the foreign policy arena and the unfavourable attitude towards the accession of Turkey to the Union by some member states. Nonetheless, the Polish Presidency achieved an agreement with other member states for a positive agenda in the relations between the Union and Turkey, which led to a relatively balanced text relating to Turkey in the conclusions of the General Affairs Council on 5 December 2011. The reason for the lack of achievement in the enlargement process with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo was the limited progress in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria made by these countries. Therefore, these countries still remain only as states which aspire to be members of the European Union. Balancing all the stated successes and failures it should be emphasised that the Polish Presidency gave new impetus to the enlargement process of the European Union. This was visible in the proposal by the Polish government and its acceptance by the General Affairs Council of a new methodology for conducting future accession negotiations, the significant advancement of the accession negotiations with Iceland, the opening of the procedure for granting candidate country status to Serbia and establishing the political requirements for the commencement of accession negotiations with Montenegro. In addition, the Polish government signed the accession treaty with Croatia and accepted the agreements regarding the country’s status in its relationships with the European Union in the transition period until the accession treaty is fully implemented.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2013, 4; 73-87
    1733-2680
    2451-0610
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies