Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "parliament" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Opinia dotycząca podstaw prawnych udziału Sejmu we współpracy parlamentów narodowych państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej w sprawie procedury „zielonej kartki” oraz udziału we współpracy parlamentów narodowych państw członkowskich UE z Parlamentem Europejskim w zakresie oceny skutków regulacji unijnych
Opinion on the legal basis for the participation of Parliament in cooperation of the national parliaments of the Member States of the European Union on the procedure for “green card” and the participation in cooperation of the national parliaments of EU Member States with the European Parliament on the EU Regulatory Impact Assessment (BAS-WAPEiM-815/15)
Autorzy:
Pawłowski, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223678.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
legislative initiative
parliament
European Parliament
Sejm
European Union
Opis:
The opinion points out that the rules and procedures of Sejm’s international cooperation, especially contacts within the European Union, must be regulated by the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Currently, both EU law and national law allow the Sejm to cooperate with the European Parliament on impact assessment of European Union legislation, involving the transfer to the European Parliament of the possessed materials relating to the exercise of EU law. It is advisable to regulate the cooperation on the basis of Article 9 of the Protocol (No. 1) and – prior to the adoption of the said regulation – the cooperation should be based on the structure of COSAC.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 2(46); 113-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The European Parliament in view of the development of the EU Security and Defence Policy after the Lisbon Treaty
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1963321.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Parliament
security
defence
European Union
Opis:
This article analyses the position of the European Parliament on the priorities for the development of the EU Common Security and Defence Policy. The issues covered by this policy after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty remained the domain of intergovernmental cooperation mechanisms. Despite the changes made to the Lisbon Treaty to unify the Union’s external relations by removing its pillars and expanding CSDP tasks, the role of the EP in its creation has not increased in line with its expectations. In accordance with the provisions of the TEU, decisions on the operation of the CSDP shall be adopted by the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy or from a Member State. As a result of such Treaty arrangements, the EP is unable to play such a role in the area of CSDP that would correspond to the importance of this body in the EU’s institutional system. Therefore, the main instrument for the implementation of the EP policy in the area of CSDP remain resolutions in which this body calls for the inclusion of transnational cooperation mechanisms in it. By expressing its position in resolutions, the EP advocates for the development of a strong, unified CSDP based on defined European security interests, as well as the development of a pan-European approach to the issues covered by this policy.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2018, 9; 123-136
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The position of the European Parliament on the European Unions Energy Security Policy
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1963322.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Parliament
security
energy
European Union
Opis:
Ensuring the energy security is currently one of the EU’s top priorities. The EU energy policy, after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, is regulated by Article 194 TFEU, which guarantees a solid legal basis for European Union actions in this area on the basis of the Community method. The European Parliament, within the scope of its Community competences, as a participant in the decision-making process, contributes to shaping the face of the EU energy policy. Furthermore, by adopting nonlegislative resolutions, the EP expresses its position on the most crucial issues included in this policy and has an indirect influence on its shape. The aim of this article is the analysis of the content of these resolutions and presentation of the EP’s opinion on the challenges facing the EU in the field of energy. It should be highlighted that the European Parliament is the EU body with a strong emphasis on a supranational approach to energy security. The European Parliament prefers the view that all Member States, in a spirit of solidarity, must take actions to guarantee the EU’s common energy security. In favour of a common, integrated European energy market, the EP puts great emphasis on the necessity to implement ambitious climate policy objectives within its framework, the key element of which is the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2018, 9; 112-122
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia o wniosku dotyczącym dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie jednoosobowych spółek z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością
Opinion on the Proposal for a D irective of the European Parliament and of the Council on single‑member private limited liability companies (COM (2014) 212 final)
Autorzy:
Cieślik, Ziemowit
Sobolewski, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
directive
European Parliament
company
European Union
Opis:
The proposal for directive aims at unifying the principles of the establishment of limited liability companies in all Member States. The authors claim that the proposal deserves support, but some of its provisions raise doubts because they do not serve the primary purpose. They also note that the Council of Ministers submitted to the Sejm a draft position on the proposed directive, failing to comply with the statutory time limit of 14 days.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 156-165
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Relations between European Parliament with the national parliaments of the EU member states
Autorzy:
Marszałek-Kawa, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026865.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
national parliaments
European Parliament
European Union
Opis:
According to Montesquieu tripartite system, formed in the European constitutionalism, the organs of authority, in a democratic state, affect each other in an inhibitory way, balancing mutually. Traditionally, it is understood that the executive power is performed by the Head of State (monarch, president) and government, legislative power belongs to the parliament, whereas the judicial power is exercised by independent courts. Analyzing the political reality of member states it is necessary to note, that the executive participates in the national legislative processes more actively, for example, through executing constitutionally granted right of legislative initiative (usually together with deputies), by issuing acts with the power of law, or incorporating Community directives into the internal legal order.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2010, 39; 45-71
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Position of European Parliament on the Migrant Crisis in Europe
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031528.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
European Parliament
crisis
migration
refugees
European Union
Opis:
The migrant crisis in Europe, which reached its zenith in 2015, made EU politicians realize the urgent need for a more effective migration policy that would rely more on supranational cooperation. Absence of this policy triggers migrant influx to Europe, in particular of unqualified labour force, and enhances illegal migration from which organized criminal groups profit enormously. Moreover, uncontrolled migration processes give rise to a number of social, economic, political and cultural problems all across the EU, and thus nurture the Eurosceptic mood. This leads to societal negation of the European integration project and provides fertile soil to the spread of radicalism and xenophobia. The aim of the study is to capture the position of European Parliament on recent migrant crisis. The Parliament, a democratically legitimate body, which claims the right to represent European societies, advocates adoption of systemic EU approach to migration which should be based on the respect of human rights and creation of legal migration pathways for refugees and workers needed by Europe. The solution of the present migrant crisis is sought by the EP in moving towards a common, comprehensive European immigration policy and enhanced solidarity of EU member states in response to increased influx of refugees from conflict zones.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2016, 7; 183-194
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wybór posłów do Parlamentu Europejskiego w powszechnych wyborach bezpośrednich (2020/2220(INL) – 2022/0902(APP))
Election of deputies to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (2020/2220(INL) – 2022/0902(APP))
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Fryźlewicz, Marcin
Jaroszyński, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/9241497.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
European Parliament
international agreement
European Union
elections
Opis:
The adoption of the draft regulation constitutes a further step in the development of the electoral procedure for elections to the European Parliament. It will replace the 1976 Council Decision and the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage annexed to that Decision. The authors set out concerns relating to, inter alia, the proposed institution of an EU-wide constituency and common provisions for election campaigns. Further doubts are raised regarding the proposal to fix uniformly the voting day for EP elections and the institution of a ‘temporary MEP’. In the draft position of the RP, the Council of Ministers “assesses the draft regulation negatively, due to the contradiction of some of the solutions proposed in the proposal with the legal order currently in force in the Republic of Poland”.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2023, 1(77); 137-155
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
European Parliament Election: Why do Poles not Vote?
Autorzy:
Marszałek–Kawa, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2028128.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Elections
European Union
European Parliament
Parliamentary Elections
Opis:
A study of the Euro-barometer performed at the end of January and beginning of February 2009 showed that not even 34% of the surveyed in all the 27 countries of the European Union declares the desire to cast their vote in the approaching election to the Euro-community. 15% of the respondents answered that they would de! nitely not vote in the coming election. The participation in the European Parliament Elections has fallen from election to election. This tendency persists and no signs of improvement of the situation can be seen. In 1994, 56.8% of the entitled to vote participated in the elections in all the member countries. Ten years later, only 45.6% of voters cast their votes. New member countries with low level of interest in European matters have considerably contributed to the fall in the level of legitimisation of the European Parliament.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2009, 38; 104-111
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ewolucja Parlamentu Europejskiego jako instytucji w ustawodawstwie Unii Europejskiej oraz status jego członków – wybrane zagadnienia
The evolution of the European Parliament as an institution in the legislation of the European Union and the status of its members – selected issues
Autorzy:
Marczyńska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/941008.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-04-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Parlament Europejski
mandat
poseł
immunitet
wyborcy
Unia Europejska
European Parliament
mandate
member of the Parliament
immunity
voters
European Union
Opis:
Artykuł przedstawia ewolucję Parlamentu Europejskiego od początku jego kształtowania się jako instytucji Unii Europejskiej. PE zaczął się tworzyć już w 1949 r. na sku- tek przemian jakie następowały w wyniku powstawania Europejskich Wspólnot. Jego pierwowzorem było Zgromadzenie Konsultacyjne Rady Europy, które zostało powołane w 1949 r. Ponadto, jego początków upatruje się w Traktacie Paryskim z 18 kwietnia 1951 r., na mocy którego powstała Europejska Wspólnota Węgla i Stali. Status deputowanych do Parlamentu Europejskiego wyznaczony jest mocą postanowień, Decyzji Rady Unii Europejskiej dotyczącej wyboru członków Parlamentu Europejskiego w powszechnych wyborach bezpośrednich (76/787/EWWiS, EWG, Euratom), Protokołem w sprawie przywilejów i immunitetów Wspólnot Europejskich, Regulaminem Parlamentu Europejskiego oraz Decyzją Parlamentu Europejskiego w sprawie przyjęcia statusu posła do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest ukazanie przemian, jakie od początku tworzenia się PE, następowały w ustawodawstwie UE, w odniesieniu do samego PE, oraz jak ustawodawstwo to ukształtowało mandat jego członków. Podstawową tezą przedmiotowego artykułu jest, jak wyglądał proces ewolucji PE na przestrzeni lat, jak zmieniała się jego pozycja w systemie instytucjonalnym UE oraz jak z biegiem lat regulowano kwestię mandatu i statusu jego deputowanych. Artykuł stanowi o ewolucyjnej pozycji ustrojowej PE oraz statusie jego członków. Analiza dotyczy kilku wybranych problemów związanych z kształtowaniem się w ustawodawstwie UE, instytucji wolnego mandatu posła do PE, na przestrzeni lat.
The article presents the evolution of the mandate of a Member of Parliament from the beginning of its development as an institution of the European Union. PE began to take shape already in 1949 due to the changes that followed as a result of the formation of the European Communities.It is believed that, its benchmark was a Consultation Assembly of the Council of Europe which was brought into being in 1949. Moreover, its beginnings can be associated with Paris Treaty signed on 18 April 1951. Under this treaty the European Union of Coal and Steel was created. European Parliament Deputies` status was assigned by the Decision of Council of the European Union concerning an election of members of the European Parliament in general elections (76/787/EWWiS, EWG, Euratom), Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, the Regulations of the European Parliament and the European Parliament decision on the adoption of the status of Members of the European Parliament. The purpose of this article is to show the changes that have since the beginning of the formation of the EP followed in EU legislation, in relation to the EP and how legislation is shaped mandate of its members. The basic thesis of this article is how the process of evolution PE over the years, has changed its position in the EU institutional system, and how over the years, regulated the issue of the mandate and status of its deputies. The article is also of evolutionary political position of the EP and the status of its members. The analysis, applicable to several common problems associated with the evolution of EU legislation, the institution of free mandate of MEP over the years.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2016, 2 (30); 133-152
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
European Parliament Position on EU Cyber Security and Defense Policy
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1963344.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
cyber security
cyber defense
European Parliament
European Union
Opis:
Ensuring cyber security in scope of cyber defense is currently among the top priorities of the EU Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP). Matters included in scope of cyber defense are a competence of the Member States and cooperation at EU level in this area is governed by decisions of the EU Council based on unanimity. This means that the European Parliament (EP) in the field of cyber defens acts only as an opinion-forming body expressing its position through the adoption of non-legislative resolutions. The aim of the article is to analyze the content of these resolutions and present the EP’s opinion on the challenges facing the EU in the field of cyber defense. It should be stressed that the EP is the EU body that strongly emphasizes the need for a common EU approach to these issues. Given that the area of cyber defence is subject to intergovernmental cooperation mechanisms, the EP considers that the EU needs to develop not only cooperation and coordination mechanisms at the level of its institutions, but also to take action to enhance the EU’s capability to counter cyber threats. These significant cyber defense capabilities should be essential elements of the CSDP and of the development of the European Defense Union, as it is becoming increasingly difficult to counter cyber attacks for the Member State level alone. The role of the CSDP should be to ensure that the EU, in cooperation with NATO, has an autonomous strategic capability to act in the field of cyber defense.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2019, 10; 122-133
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Democratic legitimacy in common commercial policy of European Union – evolution of European Parliament’s role
Autorzy:
Czermińska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2231705.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-29
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
Common Commercial Policy
European Parliament
European Union
trade agreements
Opis:
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims to present the principles of decision-making, distribution of competences regarding the common commercial policy (CCP), with attention given to the evolution of European Parliament’s (EP) role and to identify actions taken by the EP in relation to the CCP. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Due to the Member States’ delegation of powers to the supranational level and decision-making procedures, allegations that there is no democratic legitimacy in the European Union are of particular relevance to the CCP. In this context, special importance is given to the role of the European Parliament and powers vested in it, especially over the past years. The article employs an analytical and descriptive method. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The first part presented decision-making principles for the EU’s common commercial policy. Next, the evolution of the European Parliament’s role in the shaping of the CCP was discussed. Finally, the last part gives attention to the EP’s actions in practice and attempts to assess what was a decisive factor behind the Parliament’s specific position. RESEARCH RESULTS: The Treaty of Lisbon increased the formal powers of the European Parliament with regard to the CCP, but at the same time, diminished the role of Member States’ national parliaments (which was due to the fact that the CCP coverage was extended and the scope of the EU’s exclusive competences was broadened). The research conducted has revealed that the EP is more and more often taking advantage of its position in the shaping of the EU commercial policy. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the fact that the role of the European Parliament in the decision-making process has increased, the issue of a democracy deficit in the shaping of the CCP, which was raised in the pre-Lisbon Treaty period, is currently becoming less formally legitimate.
Źródło:
Horyzonty Polityki; 2022, 13, 44; 47-69
2082-5897
Pojawia się w:
Horyzonty Polityki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union: A Diagnosis and Some Modest Proposals
Autorzy:
Sadurski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706890.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
legitimacy
democracy
European Union
European Parliament
European Citizens’ Initiative
Opis:
Debates and controversies about the democratic legitimacy of the EU have of course accompanied the Union from the very beginning. The “democratic paradox” of the EU exists because while committing itself to promote and scrutinize democracy in its member states, in candidate states, and in third states with whom it enters into contact, it does not display equivalent democratic features in its own functioning. Some commentators tried to define the problem out of existence; by pointing out that the EU is not a state-like polity, they argued that state-specific criteria of legitimacy, such as representative, participatory or deliberative democracy, do not apply. They postulated outcome-based or, at best, public reasons based, conceptions of legitimacy as applicable to the EU, and concluded that it satisfies those standards. But this argument is based on a non sequitur: from the statement that the EU is not a state (not even a quasi-federation or federation in statu nascendi) it does not follow that it should not be judged by the standards of democratic legitimacy. The EU is a complex, untidy polity which amalgamates inter-governmental and supranational elements in its constitution, and therefore this article postulates a bifurcated approach to democratic legitimacy. In so far as the EU contains inter-governmental elements, indirect legitimacy is all that is required, i.e., democratic legitimacy of governments representing their respective states in the Council. The second face of the EU – its supranational character – calls for democratic legitimation of its institutions, in particular, in accordance with the promise contained in Art. 10 TEU, proclaiming representative democracy in the institutional setup of the EU. This requires changes to the electoral system of the EP in order to provide incentives for a more trans-European electoral process; strengthening of the supervisory role of the EP over the Commission; the strengthening of the role of the EP with regard to legislation, and endowing it with the competence of legislative initiative. Overall, the idea is for the institutional setup to resemble a canonical model of separation of powers and inter-institutional accountability, with the EP in a dominant position. Additionally, the first gesture towards direct democracy in the EU, the European Citizens’ Initiative, should be strengthened, both by upgrading the status of successful initiatives and by lowering thresholds and administrative requirements.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 9-44
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Perspektywa finansowa Unii Europejskiej 2007–2013 oraz kierunki rozwoju polityk wspólnotowych
EU financial perspective 2007–2013 and the directions of development of the community policies
Autorzy:
Urbański, Radosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2032714.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Financial Perspective
European Union
cohesion policy
structural funds
European Parliament
Opis:
The progressive process of European integration has shaped and developed the policy of the European Community. The structural policy meant the Community intervention in the economic structures of the Member States. This policy, however, did not include the Community interventions in a social structure. The concept of the regional policy appeared in the 30's of the twentieth century and it was used only at the state level. The cohesion policy for 2007–2013 has aimed at the increase of economic growth and employment in all regions and cities of the European Union. It has been implemented mainly by two structural funds, namely: the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF). In the perspective of 2007–2013 the differences between the legal bases for the operations of the European Regional Development Fund and the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund have been blurred. In November 2013, the European Parliament adopted a budget for 2014– –2020. For the first time the multiannual financial framework for the EU will actually lower than the previous ones.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2013, 18; 247-265
1643-6911
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stanowisko Parlamentu Europejskiego wobec problemu proliferacji broni masowego rażenia i terroryzmu międzynarodowego
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/642021.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
European Parliament
European Union
terrorism
proliferation
weapons of mass destruction
Opis:
The paper presents the stance of the European Parliament (EP) on the gravest threats to the security of the EU, in particular, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the issue of international terrorism. Prevention of these threats lies predominantly within the competence of EU member states and its intergovernmental bodies. Such situation is implied by the fact that these issues fall within the scope of EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) within which intergovernmental collaboration mechanisms play a dominant role. This means that the EP’s role in the shaping of EU’s policy on the prevention of weapons of mass destruction proliferation and international terrorism is limited and basically confined to the expression of non-binding opinions in its resolutions. However, relevant resolutions passed by the EP, though not binding in legal terms, have political significance and allow the EP, in contrast to other EU’s institutions, to articulate its position in an unequivocal and clear way. This is possible since the EP is the only supranational EU institution that has democratic legitimacy and can claim the right to exercise parliamentary control over the EU’s policy with respect to the prevention of the gravest threats to European security. This is particularly vivid as it comes to the fight against terrorism which is also the subject of interest for the common space of freedom, security and justice which employs intragovernmental collaboration mechanisms.
Źródło:
Przegląd Strategiczny; 2016, 9; 211-222
2084-6991
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Strategiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wkład parlamentów regionalnych i lokalnych w kontrolę przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli Komitetu Regionów
Contribution of regional and local parliaments to monitoring of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, with particular reference to the role of the Committee of the Regions
Autorzy:
Jaśkowski, Marek
Krawczyk, Kaja
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2194656.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliament
region
Committee of the Regions
European Union
subsidiarity principle
Opis:
The Polish Constitution does not provide for the existence of regional parliaments with legislative competences in Poland. The chambers of the Polish Parliament are therefore not obliged to hold consultations under Article 6 of the Protocol on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality. However, members of self-governing representative bodies are members of the EU’s Committee of the Regions, which can bring an action before the Court of Justice of the EU for violation of the principle of subsidiarity by an EU act and can also take a position on the compliance of EU action with the principle of subsidiarity as an advisory body.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 3(75); 99-108
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies