Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "European Parliament" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Opinia o wniosku dotyczącym dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie jednoosobowych spółek z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością
Opinion on the Proposal for a D irective of the European Parliament and of the Council on single‑member private limited liability companies (COM (2014) 212 final)
Autorzy:
Cieślik, Ziemowit
Sobolewski, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
directive
European Parliament
company
European Union
Opis:
The proposal for directive aims at unifying the principles of the establishment of limited liability companies in all Member States. The authors claim that the proposal deserves support, but some of its provisions raise doubts because they do not serve the primary purpose. They also note that the Council of Ministers submitted to the Sejm a draft position on the proposed directive, failing to comply with the statutory time limit of 14 days.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 156-165
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia dotycząca podstaw prawnych udziału Sejmu we współpracy parlamentów narodowych państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej w sprawie procedury „zielonej kartki” oraz udziału we współpracy parlamentów narodowych państw członkowskich UE z Parlamentem Europejskim w zakresie oceny skutków regulacji unijnych
Opinion on the legal basis for the participation of Parliament in cooperation of the national parliaments of the Member States of the European Union on the procedure for “green card” and the participation in cooperation of the national parliaments of EU Member States with the European Parliament on the EU Regulatory Impact Assessment (BAS-WAPEiM-815/15)
Autorzy:
Pawłowski, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223678.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
legislative initiative
parliament
European Parliament
Sejm
European Union
Opis:
The opinion points out that the rules and procedures of Sejm’s international cooperation, especially contacts within the European Union, must be regulated by the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Currently, both EU law and national law allow the Sejm to cooperate with the European Parliament on impact assessment of European Union legislation, involving the transfer to the European Parliament of the possessed materials relating to the exercise of EU law. It is advisable to regulate the cooperation on the basis of Article 9 of the Protocol (No. 1) and – prior to the adoption of the said regulation – the cooperation should be based on the structure of COSAC.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 2(46); 113-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Relations between European Parliament with the national parliaments of the EU member states
Autorzy:
Marszałek-Kawa, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026865.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
national parliaments
European Parliament
European Union
Opis:
According to Montesquieu tripartite system, formed in the European constitutionalism, the organs of authority, in a democratic state, affect each other in an inhibitory way, balancing mutually. Traditionally, it is understood that the executive power is performed by the Head of State (monarch, president) and government, legislative power belongs to the parliament, whereas the judicial power is exercised by independent courts. Analyzing the political reality of member states it is necessary to note, that the executive participates in the national legislative processes more actively, for example, through executing constitutionally granted right of legislative initiative (usually together with deputies), by issuing acts with the power of law, or incorporating Community directives into the internal legal order.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2010, 39; 45-71
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Position of European Parliament on the Migrant Crisis in Europe
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031528.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
European Parliament
crisis
migration
refugees
European Union
Opis:
The migrant crisis in Europe, which reached its zenith in 2015, made EU politicians realize the urgent need for a more effective migration policy that would rely more on supranational cooperation. Absence of this policy triggers migrant influx to Europe, in particular of unqualified labour force, and enhances illegal migration from which organized criminal groups profit enormously. Moreover, uncontrolled migration processes give rise to a number of social, economic, political and cultural problems all across the EU, and thus nurture the Eurosceptic mood. This leads to societal negation of the European integration project and provides fertile soil to the spread of radicalism and xenophobia. The aim of the study is to capture the position of European Parliament on recent migrant crisis. The Parliament, a democratically legitimate body, which claims the right to represent European societies, advocates adoption of systemic EU approach to migration which should be based on the respect of human rights and creation of legal migration pathways for refugees and workers needed by Europe. The solution of the present migrant crisis is sought by the EP in moving towards a common, comprehensive European immigration policy and enhanced solidarity of EU member states in response to increased influx of refugees from conflict zones.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2016, 7; 183-194
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wybór posłów do Parlamentu Europejskiego w powszechnych wyborach bezpośrednich (2020/2220(INL) – 2022/0902(APP))
Election of deputies to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (2020/2220(INL) – 2022/0902(APP))
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Fryźlewicz, Marcin
Jaroszyński, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/9241497.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
European Parliament
international agreement
European Union
elections
Opis:
The adoption of the draft regulation constitutes a further step in the development of the electoral procedure for elections to the European Parliament. It will replace the 1976 Council Decision and the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage annexed to that Decision. The authors set out concerns relating to, inter alia, the proposed institution of an EU-wide constituency and common provisions for election campaigns. Further doubts are raised regarding the proposal to fix uniformly the voting day for EP elections and the institution of a ‘temporary MEP’. In the draft position of the RP, the Council of Ministers “assesses the draft regulation negatively, due to the contradiction of some of the solutions proposed in the proposal with the legal order currently in force in the Republic of Poland”.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2023, 1(77); 137-155
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
European Parliament Election: Why do Poles not Vote?
Autorzy:
Marszałek–Kawa, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2028128.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Elections
European Union
European Parliament
Parliamentary Elections
Opis:
A study of the Euro-barometer performed at the end of January and beginning of February 2009 showed that not even 34% of the surveyed in all the 27 countries of the European Union declares the desire to cast their vote in the approaching election to the Euro-community. 15% of the respondents answered that they would de! nitely not vote in the coming election. The participation in the European Parliament Elections has fallen from election to election. This tendency persists and no signs of improvement of the situation can be seen. In 1994, 56.8% of the entitled to vote participated in the elections in all the member countries. Ten years later, only 45.6% of voters cast their votes. New member countries with low level of interest in European matters have considerably contributed to the fall in the level of legitimisation of the European Parliament.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2009, 38; 104-111
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
European Parliament Position on EU Cyber Security and Defense Policy
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1963344.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
cyber security
cyber defense
European Parliament
European Union
Opis:
Ensuring cyber security in scope of cyber defense is currently among the top priorities of the EU Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP). Matters included in scope of cyber defense are a competence of the Member States and cooperation at EU level in this area is governed by decisions of the EU Council based on unanimity. This means that the European Parliament (EP) in the field of cyber defens acts only as an opinion-forming body expressing its position through the adoption of non-legislative resolutions. The aim of the article is to analyze the content of these resolutions and present the EP’s opinion on the challenges facing the EU in the field of cyber defense. It should be stressed that the EP is the EU body that strongly emphasizes the need for a common EU approach to these issues. Given that the area of cyber defence is subject to intergovernmental cooperation mechanisms, the EP considers that the EU needs to develop not only cooperation and coordination mechanisms at the level of its institutions, but also to take action to enhance the EU’s capability to counter cyber threats. These significant cyber defense capabilities should be essential elements of the CSDP and of the development of the European Defense Union, as it is becoming increasingly difficult to counter cyber attacks for the Member State level alone. The role of the CSDP should be to ensure that the EU, in cooperation with NATO, has an autonomous strategic capability to act in the field of cyber defense.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2019, 10; 122-133
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union: A Diagnosis and Some Modest Proposals
Autorzy:
Sadurski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706890.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
legitimacy
democracy
European Union
European Parliament
European Citizens’ Initiative
Opis:
Debates and controversies about the democratic legitimacy of the EU have of course accompanied the Union from the very beginning. The “democratic paradox” of the EU exists because while committing itself to promote and scrutinize democracy in its member states, in candidate states, and in third states with whom it enters into contact, it does not display equivalent democratic features in its own functioning. Some commentators tried to define the problem out of existence; by pointing out that the EU is not a state-like polity, they argued that state-specific criteria of legitimacy, such as representative, participatory or deliberative democracy, do not apply. They postulated outcome-based or, at best, public reasons based, conceptions of legitimacy as applicable to the EU, and concluded that it satisfies those standards. But this argument is based on a non sequitur: from the statement that the EU is not a state (not even a quasi-federation or federation in statu nascendi) it does not follow that it should not be judged by the standards of democratic legitimacy. The EU is a complex, untidy polity which amalgamates inter-governmental and supranational elements in its constitution, and therefore this article postulates a bifurcated approach to democratic legitimacy. In so far as the EU contains inter-governmental elements, indirect legitimacy is all that is required, i.e., democratic legitimacy of governments representing their respective states in the Council. The second face of the EU – its supranational character – calls for democratic legitimation of its institutions, in particular, in accordance with the promise contained in Art. 10 TEU, proclaiming representative democracy in the institutional setup of the EU. This requires changes to the electoral system of the EP in order to provide incentives for a more trans-European electoral process; strengthening of the supervisory role of the EP over the Commission; the strengthening of the role of the EP with regard to legislation, and endowing it with the competence of legislative initiative. Overall, the idea is for the institutional setup to resemble a canonical model of separation of powers and inter-institutional accountability, with the EP in a dominant position. Additionally, the first gesture towards direct democracy in the EU, the European Citizens’ Initiative, should be strengthened, both by upgrading the status of successful initiatives and by lowering thresholds and administrative requirements.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 9-44
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Democratic legitimacy in common commercial policy of European Union – evolution of European Parliament’s role
Autorzy:
Czermińska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2231705.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-29
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
Common Commercial Policy
European Parliament
European Union
trade agreements
Opis:
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims to present the principles of decision-making, distribution of competences regarding the common commercial policy (CCP), with attention given to the evolution of European Parliament’s (EP) role and to identify actions taken by the EP in relation to the CCP. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Due to the Member States’ delegation of powers to the supranational level and decision-making procedures, allegations that there is no democratic legitimacy in the European Union are of particular relevance to the CCP. In this context, special importance is given to the role of the European Parliament and powers vested in it, especially over the past years. The article employs an analytical and descriptive method. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The first part presented decision-making principles for the EU’s common commercial policy. Next, the evolution of the European Parliament’s role in the shaping of the CCP was discussed. Finally, the last part gives attention to the EP’s actions in practice and attempts to assess what was a decisive factor behind the Parliament’s specific position. RESEARCH RESULTS: The Treaty of Lisbon increased the formal powers of the European Parliament with regard to the CCP, but at the same time, diminished the role of Member States’ national parliaments (which was due to the fact that the CCP coverage was extended and the scope of the EU’s exclusive competences was broadened). The research conducted has revealed that the EP is more and more often taking advantage of its position in the shaping of the EU commercial policy. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the fact that the role of the European Parliament in the decision-making process has increased, the issue of a democracy deficit in the shaping of the CCP, which was raised in the pre-Lisbon Treaty period, is currently becoming less formally legitimate.
Źródło:
Horyzonty Polityki; 2022, 13, 44; 47-69
2082-5897
Pojawia się w:
Horyzonty Polityki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Perspektywa finansowa Unii Europejskiej 2007–2013 oraz kierunki rozwoju polityk wspólnotowych
EU financial perspective 2007–2013 and the directions of development of the community policies
Autorzy:
Urbański, Radosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2032714.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Financial Perspective
European Union
cohesion policy
structural funds
European Parliament
Opis:
The progressive process of European integration has shaped and developed the policy of the European Community. The structural policy meant the Community intervention in the economic structures of the Member States. This policy, however, did not include the Community interventions in a social structure. The concept of the regional policy appeared in the 30's of the twentieth century and it was used only at the state level. The cohesion policy for 2007–2013 has aimed at the increase of economic growth and employment in all regions and cities of the European Union. It has been implemented mainly by two structural funds, namely: the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF). In the perspective of 2007–2013 the differences between the legal bases for the operations of the European Regional Development Fund and the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund have been blurred. In November 2013, the European Parliament adopted a budget for 2014– –2020. For the first time the multiannual financial framework for the EU will actually lower than the previous ones.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2013, 18; 247-265
1643-6911
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stanowisko Parlamentu Europejskiego wobec problemu proliferacji broni masowego rażenia i terroryzmu międzynarodowego
Autorzy:
Staszczyk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/642021.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
European Parliament
European Union
terrorism
proliferation
weapons of mass destruction
Opis:
The paper presents the stance of the European Parliament (EP) on the gravest threats to the security of the EU, in particular, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the issue of international terrorism. Prevention of these threats lies predominantly within the competence of EU member states and its intergovernmental bodies. Such situation is implied by the fact that these issues fall within the scope of EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) within which intergovernmental collaboration mechanisms play a dominant role. This means that the EP’s role in the shaping of EU’s policy on the prevention of weapons of mass destruction proliferation and international terrorism is limited and basically confined to the expression of non-binding opinions in its resolutions. However, relevant resolutions passed by the EP, though not binding in legal terms, have political significance and allow the EP, in contrast to other EU’s institutions, to articulate its position in an unequivocal and clear way. This is possible since the EP is the only supranational EU institution that has democratic legitimacy and can claim the right to exercise parliamentary control over the EU’s policy with respect to the prevention of the gravest threats to European security. This is particularly vivid as it comes to the fight against terrorism which is also the subject of interest for the common space of freedom, security and justice which employs intragovernmental collaboration mechanisms.
Źródło:
Przegląd Strategiczny; 2016, 9; 211-222
2084-6991
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Strategiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosunek Polaków do Unii Europejskiej a ich udział w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego
The Attitude of Poles towards the European Union and their participation in the elections to the European Parliament
Autorzy:
Maciejewska-Mieszkowska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/585537.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
frekwencja wyborcza
Parlament Europejski
Unia Europejska
voter turnout
European Parliament
European Union
Opis:
W artykule podjęto zagadnienie stosunku Polaków do Unii Europejskiej w kontekście ich aktywności wyborczej. Specyfika wyborów w Polsce wyraża się bowiem m.in. przez stosunkowo niską frekwencję wyborczą. Przyczyn takiego stanu rzeczy badacze upatrują w wielu czynnikach. Niemniej na szczególną uwagę zasługują, z tego względu właśnie, wybory do Parlamentu Europejskiego, gdyż frekwencja w tych wyborach w Polsce jest jedną z najniższych w całej Unii Europejskiej. Jest to tym bardziej zaskakujące, że jednocześnie zdecydowana większość Polaków deklaruje, iż popiera obecność Polski w strukturach unijnych i nadal, pomimo kryzysu migracyjnego i Brexitu, postrzega to jako jeden z priorytetów w polityce międzynarodowej państwa.
The following article introduces the problem of the attitude of Poles towards the European Union (EU) in the context of their electoral activity. The elections in Poland are characterized by, among others, relatively low voter turnout. There are many different factors to such state of affairs. Nevertheless, the emphasis ought to be put on the election to the European Parliament, as the voter turnout in this particular election in Poland is one of the lowest in the whole EU. It is even more surprising given the fact that the vast majority of Poles declare their support for Poland’s presence in the EU and, despite the refugee crisis and Brexit, still perceive it as one of the priorities in Poland’s foreign policy.
Źródło:
Studia Wyborcze; 2017, 24; 7-18
1898-0082
Pojawia się w:
Studia Wyborcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Petycja do Parlamentu Europejskiego
Petition to the European Parliament
Autorzy:
Boniecka, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/499549.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
petycja
Komisja Europejska
Parlament Europejski
Unia Europejska
petition
European Commission
European Union
European Parliament
Opis:
Artykuł ma na celu przybliżenie instytucji petycji. Została ona stworzona, aby umożliwić nawet pojedynczemu obywatelowi Unii Europejskiej, skargę na postępowanie organów administracji publicznej, które mogą być niezgodne z prawem unijnym. Możliwość złożenia petycji do Komisji Petycji przy PE dało Polakom wstąpienie do Unii Europejskiej w 2004 roku. W pierwszej części artykułu przedstawiony jest sposób rozpatrywania petycji, czyli kto, gdzie i w jaki sposób może petycje złożyć, jak i skąd zasięgnąć informacji o składanych petycjach. Kolejna część to sposób rozpatrywania petycji, gdzie zawarte są informacje odnośnie dopuszczalności petycji, a także jakie działania może wykonać Komisja Petycji w sprawie złożonej już petycji, czyli między innymi możliwość przekazania petycji odpowiedniej Komisji, wydania opinii czy przeprowadzenia wizytacji w danym kraju, gdzie mogło dojść do naruszenia prawa unijnego. Dalej artykuł przybliża sprawy polskie, które rozpatrywała Komisja – jedną z pierwszych, dotyczącą podatku akcyzowego na sprowadzane spoza terytorium auta, jak i jedną z najnowszych, dotyczącą planów budowy odkrywkowej kopalni na Dolnym Śląsku. Podsumowanie artykułu to zwieńczenie informacji w nim zawartych, a także możliwości które daje złożenie petycji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, jak i rozwojowy charakter tej instytucji, wskazując jednocześnie na potrzebę rozpowszechniania możliwości złożenia petycji wśród obywateli Unii Europejskiej.
Petition to the European Parliament aims to introduce the institution of the petition that was created to enable even a single citizen of the European Union to make a claim against the proceedings of public administration authorities, which may have been incompatible with the European law. The accession of Poland to the European Union in 2004 gave the Poles the possibility of petition to the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament. In the first part, the article presents the way of handling the petitions, i.e. who, where and how can submit the petition, also how and where the citizens can receive information on the submitted petitions. Then, the article presents the manner of handling petitions, where the information regarding the admissibility of petitions can be found, as well as possible actions of the Committee on Petitions regarding the submitted petition, i.e. the possibility of submitting a petition to the appropriate Committee, issuing an opinion or organizing a fact-finding visit in a particular country where the breach of the EU law could have occurred, among others. Furthermore, the article describes some Polish cases handled by the Committee - one of the first - on the excise duty levied on cars imported from outside the territory, and one of the newest - on the construction plans of a strip mine in Lower Silesia. The summary is the presentation of information gathered in the article, and the possibilities arising from the submission of the petition to the European Parliament, as well as a progressive nature of this institution, while simultaneously indicating the necessity of promulgating among the EU citizens the possibilities of submitting the petition.
Źródło:
Zeszyt Studencki Kół Naukowych Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UAM; 2014, 4
2299-2774
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyt Studencki Kół Naukowych Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UAM
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stanowisko Parlamentu Europejskiego wobec pomocy humanitarnej
The European Parliament’s position on humanitarian aid
Autorzy:
Kaczmarek, Filip
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/616460.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Humanitarian aid
European Parliament
European Union
Consensus
pomoc humanitarna
Parlament Europejski
Unia Europejska
konsensus
Opis:
The European Union, together with the Member States of this organisation, is the largest donor of humanitarian aid in the world. The European Parliament is one of the EU’s key institutions and the only one of them to be directly elected. The aim of the peper is to examine Parliament’s position on humanitarian aid, from the adoption of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid in 2007 to the end of June 2018. The research method is an analysis of the various forms of Parliament’s activity in the field under examination. One of the conclusions is to define Parliament’s dilemma of trying to reconcile the principles of humanitarian aid with the particular interests of EU Member States.
Unia Europejska wraz z państwami członkowskim tej organizacji jest największym dawcą pomocy humanitarnej na świecie. Parlament Europejski jest jedną z kluczowych instytucji UE i jedyną spośród nich, wyłanianą w wyniku wyborów bezpośrednich. Celem tekstu jest zbadanie stanowiska Parlamentu wobec pomocy humanitarnej, począwszy od przyjęcia Konsensusu europejskiego w sprawie pomocy humanitarnej w 2007 r. do końca czerwca 2018 r. Metodą badawczą jest analiza różnych form działalności Parlamentu w badanym zakresie. Jedną z konkluzji jest zdefiniowanie dylematu Parlamentu, polegającego na próbie pogodzenia zasad pomocy humanitarnej i partykularnych interesów państw członkowskich UE.
Źródło:
Przegląd Politologiczny; 2019, 2; 21-31
1426-8876
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Politologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ewolucja Parlamentu Europejskiego jako instytucji w ustawodawstwie Unii Europejskiej oraz status jego członków – wybrane zagadnienia
The evolution of the European Parliament as an institution in the legislation of the European Union and the status of its members – selected issues
Autorzy:
Marczyńska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/941008.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-04-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Parlament Europejski
mandat
poseł
immunitet
wyborcy
Unia Europejska
European Parliament
mandate
member of the Parliament
immunity
voters
European Union
Opis:
Artykuł przedstawia ewolucję Parlamentu Europejskiego od początku jego kształtowania się jako instytucji Unii Europejskiej. PE zaczął się tworzyć już w 1949 r. na sku- tek przemian jakie następowały w wyniku powstawania Europejskich Wspólnot. Jego pierwowzorem było Zgromadzenie Konsultacyjne Rady Europy, które zostało powołane w 1949 r. Ponadto, jego początków upatruje się w Traktacie Paryskim z 18 kwietnia 1951 r., na mocy którego powstała Europejska Wspólnota Węgla i Stali. Status deputowanych do Parlamentu Europejskiego wyznaczony jest mocą postanowień, Decyzji Rady Unii Europejskiej dotyczącej wyboru członków Parlamentu Europejskiego w powszechnych wyborach bezpośrednich (76/787/EWWiS, EWG, Euratom), Protokołem w sprawie przywilejów i immunitetów Wspólnot Europejskich, Regulaminem Parlamentu Europejskiego oraz Decyzją Parlamentu Europejskiego w sprawie przyjęcia statusu posła do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest ukazanie przemian, jakie od początku tworzenia się PE, następowały w ustawodawstwie UE, w odniesieniu do samego PE, oraz jak ustawodawstwo to ukształtowało mandat jego członków. Podstawową tezą przedmiotowego artykułu jest, jak wyglądał proces ewolucji PE na przestrzeni lat, jak zmieniała się jego pozycja w systemie instytucjonalnym UE oraz jak z biegiem lat regulowano kwestię mandatu i statusu jego deputowanych. Artykuł stanowi o ewolucyjnej pozycji ustrojowej PE oraz statusie jego członków. Analiza dotyczy kilku wybranych problemów związanych z kształtowaniem się w ustawodawstwie UE, instytucji wolnego mandatu posła do PE, na przestrzeni lat.
The article presents the evolution of the mandate of a Member of Parliament from the beginning of its development as an institution of the European Union. PE began to take shape already in 1949 due to the changes that followed as a result of the formation of the European Communities.It is believed that, its benchmark was a Consultation Assembly of the Council of Europe which was brought into being in 1949. Moreover, its beginnings can be associated with Paris Treaty signed on 18 April 1951. Under this treaty the European Union of Coal and Steel was created. European Parliament Deputies` status was assigned by the Decision of Council of the European Union concerning an election of members of the European Parliament in general elections (76/787/EWWiS, EWG, Euratom), Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, the Regulations of the European Parliament and the European Parliament decision on the adoption of the status of Members of the European Parliament. The purpose of this article is to show the changes that have since the beginning of the formation of the EP followed in EU legislation, in relation to the EP and how legislation is shaped mandate of its members. The basic thesis of this article is how the process of evolution PE over the years, has changed its position in the EU institutional system, and how over the years, regulated the issue of the mandate and status of its deputies. The article is also of evolutionary political position of the EP and the status of its members. The analysis, applicable to several common problems associated with the evolution of EU legislation, the institution of free mandate of MEP over the years.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2016, 2 (30); 133-152
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies