Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Multiple criteria optimization" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Preference-Driven Multiobjective Optimization Using Robust Ordinal Regression for Cone Contraction
Autorzy:
Kadziński, Miłosz
Słowiński, Roman
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578592.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Odporne metody statystyczne
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Decision making
Multiple criteria optimization
Robust statistical methods
Opis:
We present a new interactive procedure for multiobjective optimization problems (MOO), which involves robust ordinal regression in contraction of the preference cone in the objective space. The most preferred solution is achieved by means of a systematic dialogue with the decision maker (DM) during which (s)he species pairwise comparisons of some non-dominated solutions from a current sample. The origin of the cone is located at a reference point chosen by the DM. It is formed by all directions of isoquants of the achievement scalarizing functions compatible with the pairwise comparisons of non-dominated solutions provided by the DM. The compatibility is assured by robust ordinal regression, i.e. the DM's statements concerning strict or weak preference relations for pairs of compared solutions are represented by all compatible sets of weights of the achievement scalarizing function. In successive iterations, when new pairwise comparisons of solutions are provided, the cone is contracted and gradually focused on a subregion of the Pareto optimal set of greatest interest. The DM is allowed to change the reference point and the set of pairwise comparisons at any stage of the method. Such preference information does not need much cognitive e ort on the part of the DM. The phases of preference elicitation and cone contraction alternate until the DM nds at least one satisfactory solution, or there is no such solution for the current problem setting.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 67-83
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Decision Makers Preferences, Airport Gate Assignment Problem and Multiobjective Optimisation
Autorzy:
Kaliszewski, Ignacy
Miroforidis, Janusz
Stańczak, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578518.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Porty lotnicze
Transport lotniczy
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Air transport
Airports
Decision making
Multiple criteria optimization
Multiple-criteria decision making
Opis:
We present an application of a methodology we developed earlier to capture a decision maker's preferences in multiobjective environments to a notorious problem in the realm of Air Traffic Management, namely the Airport Gate Assignment Problem. The problem has been modelled as an all-integer optimisation problem with two criteria. We have implemented this methodology into the commercial solver CPLEX and also into an Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimisation algorithm and we have solved with them a numerical instance of the Airport Gate Assignment Problem for a couple of decision making scenarios.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 84-100
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the Valuation of Real Options
Autorzy:
Targiel, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578548.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Opcje realne
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Programowanie dynamiczne
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Zarządzanie projektem
Decision making
Dynamic programming
Multiple criteria optimization
Multiple-criteria decision making
Project management
Real options
Opis:
Traditional project evaluation is based on discounted cash flow method (DCF) with Net Present Value (NPV) as the main measure. This approach sometimes leads to the abandonment of profitable projects, because the DCF method does not take into account the role of managerial flexibility. The Real Options Valuation (ROV) method takes into account future situations in the valuation, assuming that the project is properly managed. The Project Manager shall have the right to take action as appropriate. A widely used method for the valuation of real options is the binomial tree method (CRR), proposed by Cox, Ross and Rubinstein. It takes into account one state variable. In many real problems, however, many factors should be considered. This leads to a multi-criteria decision-making problem. This paper presents an extension of the CRR method for several state variables.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 129-142
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies