Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Multiple criteria decision making" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
On a Sequential Decision Process Where Offers Are Described by Two Traits
Autorzy:
Ramsey, David M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578618.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Podejmowanie decyzji
Poszukiwanie pracy
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Decision making
Job search
Multiple-criteria decision making
Opis:
This article presents a model of searching for some resource, e.g. a job, whose value depends on two quantitative traits. The decision maker observes offers in a random order and must accept precisely one offer. Recall of previously observed offers is not possible. It is assumed that the value of an offer is a linear function of these two traits, which come from a bivariate normal distribution. We consider the following four strategy sets: i) the decision on whether to accept an offer is based purely on the first trait, ii) any decision is only made after observing both traits, iii) after observing the first trait, the decision maker can either immediately accept, immediately reject or observe the second trait and then decide, iv) after observing the first trait, the decision maker can either immediately reject or observe the second trait and then decide. The goal of the decision maker is to maximize his expected reward, where the reward is equal to the value of the offer selected minus the search costs. The optimal strategy from each of these four sets is derived. An example is given.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2015, 10; 141-154
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Project Portfolio Scheduling as a Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Problem
Autorzy:
Krzeszowska, Bogumiła
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/591823.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analiza wielokryterialna Podejmowanie decyzji Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Decision making
Multicriteria analysis
Multiple-criteria decision making
Opis:
A new methodology for project portfolio scheduling problem has been presented in this paper. This methodology delivers information about project portfolio schedule, which is important for project portfolio managers. The methodology consists of three steps: multiple-criteria mathematical model building, finding non-dominated solutions and choosing one solution from the Pareto set as the final solution. In the first step a multiple-criteria mathematical model for project portfolio scheduling problem is built. Three criteria are considered in the model: the penalty for projects delays minimization, the penalty for resources overusage minimization and NPV maximization. Disadvantage of proposed mathematical model is a big amount of variables, which is J×T×P. In cases when we will have larger projects or larger planning horizon the number of variables will be huge. That is why activities aggregation was proposed. It reduces a number of variables in given model. It also delivers a general information about project portfolio schedule, which is more important for project portfolio managers. In the second step a set of non-dominated solutions is identified by using an elitist evolutionary algorithm. As research shows using an external set with the best solutions in each generation increases an algorithm efficiency. In the third step the LBS procedure is used to identify the final solution. The LBS procedure proposes is a way of learning-oriented interactive search for the best compromise solution for the decision maker. This procedure makes the comparison of non-dominated solution in the decision phase relatively easy. So this step will not burden the decision maker too much. For the future work, the procedure presented in this paper will be applied to the problem described in the section two, and given results will be compared with the current situation in the company.
Źródło:
Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 137; 69-82
2083-8611
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Decision Makers Preferences, Airport Gate Assignment Problem and Multiobjective Optimisation
Autorzy:
Kaliszewski, Ignacy
Miroforidis, Janusz
Stańczak, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578518.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Porty lotnicze
Transport lotniczy
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Air transport
Airports
Decision making
Multiple criteria optimization
Multiple-criteria decision making
Opis:
We present an application of a methodology we developed earlier to capture a decision maker's preferences in multiobjective environments to a notorious problem in the realm of Air Traffic Management, namely the Airport Gate Assignment Problem. The problem has been modelled as an all-integer optimisation problem with two criteria. We have implemented this methodology into the commercial solver CPLEX and also into an Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimisation algorithm and we have solved with them a numerical instance of the Airport Gate Assignment Problem for a couple of decision making scenarios.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 84-100
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selection of Academic Conferences Based on Analytical Network Processes
Autorzy:
Gür, Şeyda
Hamurcu, Mustafa
Eren, Tamer
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578560.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Analytic Network Process (ANP)
Conferences
Decision making
Multiple-criteria decision making
Analityczny proces sieciowy
Konferencje
Podejmowanie decyzji
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Opis:
Academic conferences are platforms established by scientists to provide broad access to their research. For this reason, it is important to have influential researchers presenting plenary talks and for the scientific community in that field to submit their work. Various organizations and academic institutions organize hundreds of academic conferences a year. Academics have to select conferences to attend, since it is not possible to participate in every conference. Conference selection takes into account such factors as: the registration fee, subject of the conference and its appropriateness, conference language and the deadline for submission. We consider the specific criteria that academics use to choose conferences and effective decision-making in this field. In this study, we use an approach based on analytic network processes (ANPs) to appropriately choose a conference based on multiple criteria.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2016, 11; 51-62
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the Valuation of Real Options
Autorzy:
Targiel, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578548.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Opcje realne
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Programowanie dynamiczne
Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Zarządzanie projektem
Decision making
Dynamic programming
Multiple criteria optimization
Multiple-criteria decision making
Project management
Real options
Opis:
Traditional project evaluation is based on discounted cash flow method (DCF) with Net Present Value (NPV) as the main measure. This approach sometimes leads to the abandonment of profitable projects, because the DCF method does not take into account the role of managerial flexibility. The Real Options Valuation (ROV) method takes into account future situations in the valuation, assuming that the project is properly managed. The Project Manager shall have the right to take action as appropriate. A widely used method for the valuation of real options is the binomial tree method (CRR), proposed by Cox, Ross and Rubinstein. It takes into account one state variable. In many real problems, however, many factors should be considered. This leads to a multi-criteria decision-making problem. This paper presents an extension of the CRR method for several state variables.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 129-142
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Preference-Driven Multiobjective Optimization Using Robust Ordinal Regression for Cone Contraction
Autorzy:
Kadziński, Miłosz
Słowiński, Roman
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578592.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Tematy:
Odporne metody statystyczne
Optymalizacja wielokryterialna
Podejmowanie decyzji
Decision making
Multiple criteria optimization
Robust statistical methods
Opis:
We present a new interactive procedure for multiobjective optimization problems (MOO), which involves robust ordinal regression in contraction of the preference cone in the objective space. The most preferred solution is achieved by means of a systematic dialogue with the decision maker (DM) during which (s)he species pairwise comparisons of some non-dominated solutions from a current sample. The origin of the cone is located at a reference point chosen by the DM. It is formed by all directions of isoquants of the achievement scalarizing functions compatible with the pairwise comparisons of non-dominated solutions provided by the DM. The compatibility is assured by robust ordinal regression, i.e. the DM's statements concerning strict or weak preference relations for pairs of compared solutions are represented by all compatible sets of weights of the achievement scalarizing function. In successive iterations, when new pairwise comparisons of solutions are provided, the cone is contracted and gradually focused on a subregion of the Pareto optimal set of greatest interest. The DM is allowed to change the reference point and the set of pairwise comparisons at any stage of the method. Such preference information does not need much cognitive e ort on the part of the DM. The phases of preference elicitation and cone contraction alternate until the DM nds at least one satisfactory solution, or there is no such solution for the current problem setting.
Źródło:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2013, 8; 67-83
2084-1531
Pojawia się w:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies