Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "code of civil procedure" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją przepisów ustawy – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego w zakresie terminu do wniesienia skargi o wznowienie postępowania
Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of provisions of the Act – the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to deadline for bringing a complaint regarding for resumption of proceedings
Autorzy:
Spyra, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216087.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Civil Procedure
Opis:
In his position, the Sejm requested the Constitutional Tribunal to state that to the extent, in which provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure provide for a three-month period for filing complaint concerning the resumption of proceedings in case the judgment was based on a counterfeit or falsified document, and to the extent that the failure to meet this deadline results in the rejection of the complaint, conform to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, an allegation of a disproportionately short deadline is unjustified, as the deadline of three months to perform a specific procedural activity is one of the longest ones provided for in the Polish civil procedure and does not differ from the ones provided for in the civil procedural laws of other European countries. The practice of application by common courts of the provision in question also justifies the position indicating conformity to the Constitution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 263-278
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt P 12/14
Sejm draft position on case ref. no. P 12/14
Autorzy:
Tomaszewska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223430.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitution
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Civil Procedure
Opis:
The position of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerns Article 207 § 3 second sentence in conjunction with § 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP), establishing a procedure for consent by order of the president for bringing further writings preparatory to pleading in the course of the case, and Article 207 § 4 CCP which provides the possibility of an oral hearing of the parties in closed session before the first hearing, if the president call upon the parties to submit additional clarification on the issue, in terms of their compliance with Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution, which establishes the right to a court hearing. In the author’s view, there should be declared compliance of the above provisions of the Act with the Constitution because in the challenged Article 207 § 4 CCP the lawmaker uses the plural to describe the addressee of the norm, so from this provision it follows an obligation to inform about the meeting and the possibility of participation of both parties, as well as entities acting as a party. Moreover, in support of the declaration of compliance of Article 207 § 3 the author presents the fundamental principles of civil process, such as the concentration of the evidence, judicial consideration of the case without undue delay, and the duty of the court and the parties to smoothly and timely completion of the proceedings. Motion has been made for cancellation of the case due to inadmissibility of the judgment on the basis of Art. 39 para. 1 subpara. 1 of the Constitutional Tribunal Act.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 246-266
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 28/12
Sejm’s draft position on the case ref. no. SK 28/12
Autorzy:
Tomaszewska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12295440.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Code of Civil Procedure
civil law procedure
Constitutional Tribunal
Opis:
The opinion presents Sejm’s draft position in the proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal in relation to the constitutional complaint (ref. No. SK 28/12) concerning the Code of Civil Procedure. The author claims that the challenged Article 378 §1 of the Code, to the extent that it requires the court of second instance to take into account – by the operation of law – the nullity of legal proceedings resulting from improper authorization of an attorney only within the “scope of appeal”, is consistent with Article 45 (1) and Article 77(2) of the Constitution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 300-316
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją art. 767 3a Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego w zakresie, w jakim nie przewiduje skargi na orzeczenie referendarza w przedmiocie skargi na czynności komornika sądowego
Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of Article 767 3a of the Code of Civil Procedure as regards the lack of possibility to appeal against a court referendary’s decision regarding complaint regarding bailiff’s activities
Autorzy:
Spyra, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215758.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
enforcement proceedings
Code of Civil Procedure
Constitutional Tribunal
Opis:
According to the author of the proposed Sejm’s draft position the indicated provision, being the subject of the Warsaw District Court’s question of law, conforms to the Constitution. Court referendaries perform tasks related to legal protection, other than in administration of justice. In case of filling a complaint against a court referendary’s decision in enforcement proceedings, the court shall hear the case as a court of second instance, in accordance with the provisions on appeals. The complaint against the decision may be appealed only in cases, in which a court decision may be appealed. Proceeding complaints against bailiff’s activities does not constitute “a case” with the meaning of Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution. The legal norm, pursuant to which it is not possible to appeal against the court referendary’s decision on the complaint regarding bailiff’s activities, does not infringe the constitutional principle of procedural /justice.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 219-240
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zgodność z Konstytucją przepisów Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego w zakresie podstaw wniesienia skargi kasacyjnej do Sądu Najwyższego
Assessment of the conformity to the Constitution of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to the grounds for lodging a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court
Autorzy:
Miaskowska-Daszkiewicz, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216083.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Civil Procedure
cassation appeal
Opis:
The constitutional review was carried out on the limitation of grounds for lodging a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court. The applicant claims that the Supreme Court cannot verify the correctness or independently establish the facts on which the running of the limitation period depended. The Sejm applied to the Constitutional Tribunal for a finding that the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure in question conforms to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, the proceedings initiated by a cassation appeal do not constitute an instance control resulting in a full re-examination of the case. However, it is aimed at examining the legality of judgments issued by courts of second instance. The evaluation criteria are the so-called grounds of cassation indicated in the Code of Civil Procedure. The Sejm recognizes that in the given case it cannot be reasonably asserted that the constitutional guarantees related to the right to a fair procedure and to obtain a court judgment have been violated. The findings allow for the conclusion that the applicant did not refute the presumption of constitutionality of the regulation in question.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 3(67); 304-319
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją RP przepisów Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego umożliwiających referendarzom sądowym orzekanie w przedmiocie ustanowienia pełnomocnika z urzędu
Assessment of the conformity to the Constitution of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the right to issue a decision by a court referendary on the appointment of an ex officio attorney
Autorzy:
Esmund, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2196843.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Civil Procedure
court
court referendary
Opis:
In the Sejm’s position on the constitutional complaint it was stated that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure Act are constitutional to the extent in which they make the appointment of an ex officio representative dependent on the determination by the court referendary or the court of the need for such an appointment, grant the court referendary the right to rule on the appointment of an ex officio representative, and to the extent in which they recognise the court examining the complaint against the decision of the court referendary as the court of second instance.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 3(71); 317-354
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 46/12
Draft position of the Sejm on the case Ref. No. SK 46/12
Autorzy:
Oplustil, Krzysztof
Herbet, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11879113.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Civil Code
Code of Administrative Procedure
compensation
Constitutional Tribunal
Opis:
The article addresses the imputed inconsistency with Polish Constitution of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure which require application of Article 160 of the Code of Administrative Procedure in the wording valid before 30 September 2003 in relation to claims for compensation of damages, including lost benefits as a result of an administrative decision issued before 1 September 2004. The authors claims that the questioned provision of the Code of Civil Procedure is inconsistent with Article 77 (1) in conjunction with Article 2 and Article 32 of the Constitution and is not inconsistent with Article 21 (1) and Article 64 (1) and (2) of the Constitution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 229-273
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies