Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Procedure Code" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10
    Tytuł:
    Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją przepisów ustawy – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego w zakresie terminu do wniesienia skargi o wznowienie postępowania
    Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of provisions of the Act – the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to deadline for bringing a complaint regarding for resumption of proceedings
    Autorzy:
    Spyra, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216087.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Code of Civil Procedure
    Opis:
    In his position, the Sejm requested the Constitutional Tribunal to state that to the extent, in which provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure provide for a three-month period for filing complaint concerning the resumption of proceedings in case the judgment was based on a counterfeit or falsified document, and to the extent that the failure to meet this deadline results in the rejection of the complaint, conform to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, an allegation of a disproportionately short deadline is unjustified, as the deadline of three months to perform a specific procedural activity is one of the longest ones provided for in the Polish civil procedure and does not differ from the ones provided for in the civil procedural laws of other European countries. The practice of application by common courts of the provision in question also justifies the position indicating conformity to the Constitution.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 263-278
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 5/14
    Sejm draft position on the case concerning the application of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights on the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ref. No. K 5/14)
    Autorzy:
    Iwański, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6586928.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Code of Criminal Procedure
    Opis:
    In the proposed draft position the author claims that the challenged provisions do not exclude the possibility of participating in the meeting of the appellate court. However, admitting the possibility of limiting the participation of the accused, or his counsel, in such meetings of appellate court, they affect the scope of use of that right. This matter affects both the right of the defense in both the material sense (attending the meeting) and the formal one (limitations on actions of the defender). One should recognize that the provisions at issue, as far as they do not guarantee the accused or his counsel the right to participate in the meeting of the court hearing the interlocutory appeal against the ruling on the application, repeal or change of preventive measures other than pre-trial detention and property collateral, is incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution. According to the author, it is also reasonable to apply for discontinuance of the proceedings in relation to the remaining scope of the application due to the inadmissibility of rendering the judgment.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 253-287
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt P 12/14
    Sejm draft position on case ref. no. P 12/14
    Autorzy:
    Tomaszewska, Agnieszka
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223430.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitution
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Code of Civil Procedure
    Opis:
    The position of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerns Article 207 § 3 second sentence in conjunction with § 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP), establishing a procedure for consent by order of the president for bringing further writings preparatory to pleading in the course of the case, and Article 207 § 4 CCP which provides the possibility of an oral hearing of the parties in closed session before the first hearing, if the president call upon the parties to submit additional clarification on the issue, in terms of their compliance with Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution, which establishes the right to a court hearing. In the author’s view, there should be declared compliance of the above provisions of the Act with the Constitution because in the challenged Article 207 § 4 CCP the lawmaker uses the plural to describe the addressee of the norm, so from this provision it follows an obligation to inform about the meeting and the possibility of participation of both parties, as well as entities acting as a party. Moreover, in support of the declaration of compliance of Article 207 § 3 the author presents the fundamental principles of civil process, such as the concentration of the evidence, judicial consideration of the case without undue delay, and the duty of the court and the parties to smoothly and timely completion of the proceedings. Motion has been made for cancellation of the case due to inadmissibility of the judgment on the basis of Art. 39 para. 1 subpara. 1 of the Constitutional Tribunal Act.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 246-266
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 28/12
    Sejm’s draft position on the case ref. no. SK 28/12
    Autorzy:
    Tomaszewska, Agnieszka
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12295440.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Code of Civil Procedure
    civil law procedure
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    The opinion presents Sejm’s draft position in the proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal in relation to the constitutional complaint (ref. No. SK 28/12) concerning the Code of Civil Procedure. The author claims that the challenged Article 378 §1 of the Code, to the extent that it requires the court of second instance to take into account – by the operation of law – the nullity of legal proceedings resulting from improper authorization of an attorney only within the “scope of appeal”, is consistent with Article 45 (1) and Article 77(2) of the Constitution.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 300-316
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 46/12
    Draft position of the Sejm on the case Ref. No. SK 46/12
    Autorzy:
    Oplustil, Krzysztof
    Herbet, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11879113.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Civil Code
    Code of Administrative Procedure
    compensation
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    The article addresses the imputed inconsistency with Polish Constitution of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure which require application of Article 160 of the Code of Administrative Procedure in the wording valid before 30 September 2003 in relation to claims for compensation of damages, including lost benefits as a result of an administrative decision issued before 1 September 2004. The authors claims that the questioned provision of the Code of Civil Procedure is inconsistent with Article 77 (1) in conjunction with Article 2 and Article 32 of the Constitution and is not inconsistent with Article 21 (1) and Article 64 (1) and (2) of the Constitution.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 229-273
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją art. 767 3a Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego w zakresie, w jakim nie przewiduje skargi na orzeczenie referendarza w przedmiocie skargi na czynności komornika sądowego
    Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of Article 767 3a of the Code of Civil Procedure as regards the lack of possibility to appeal against a court referendary’s decision regarding complaint regarding bailiff’s activities
    Autorzy:
    Spyra, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215758.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    enforcement proceedings
    Code of Civil Procedure
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    According to the author of the proposed Sejm’s draft position the indicated provision, being the subject of the Warsaw District Court’s question of law, conforms to the Constitution. Court referendaries perform tasks related to legal protection, other than in administration of justice. In case of filling a complaint against a court referendary’s decision in enforcement proceedings, the court shall hear the case as a court of second instance, in accordance with the provisions on appeals. The complaint against the decision may be appealed only in cases, in which a court decision may be appealed. Proceeding complaints against bailiff’s activities does not constitute “a case” with the meaning of Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution. The legal norm, pursuant to which it is not possible to appeal against the court referendary’s decision on the complaint regarding bailiff’s activities, does not infringe the constitutional principle of procedural /justice.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 219-240
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zgodność z Konstytucją przepisów Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego w zakresie podstaw wniesienia skargi kasacyjnej do Sądu Najwyższego
    Assessment of the conformity to the Constitution of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to the grounds for lodging a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court
    Autorzy:
    Miaskowska-Daszkiewicz, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216083.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Code of Civil Procedure
    cassation appeal
    Opis:
    The constitutional review was carried out on the limitation of grounds for lodging a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court. The applicant claims that the Supreme Court cannot verify the correctness or independently establish the facts on which the running of the limitation period depended. The Sejm applied to the Constitutional Tribunal for a finding that the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure in question conforms to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, the proceedings initiated by a cassation appeal do not constitute an instance control resulting in a full re-examination of the case. However, it is aimed at examining the legality of judgments issued by courts of second instance. The evaluation criteria are the so-called grounds of cassation indicated in the Code of Civil Procedure. The Sejm recognizes that in the given case it cannot be reasonably asserted that the constitutional guarantees related to the right to a fair procedure and to obtain a court judgment have been violated. The findings allow for the conclusion that the applicant did not refute the presumption of constitutionality of the regulation in question.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 3(67); 304-319
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 19/15
    Sejm draft position on case ref. no. SK 19/15 concerning the Geological and Mining Law
    Autorzy:
    Gromek, Zbigniew
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216590.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    geology
    mining
    Code of Administrative Procedure
    judiciary
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    In the proposed draft position the author claims that the contested article of the Act – Geological and Mining Law is compatible with Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution. The decision approving the concession for the extraction of minerals from the deposit is related to environmental decision - the arrangements on the environment protection and environmental impact of the project, contained in the environmental decision are binding on the entity awarding concessions. Environmental decision are subject to oversight both the appellate and court proceedings. The author argues that the instruments provided for by the legislature ensure protection of the interests of owners of property adjacent to that on which projects negatively affecting the environment (including neighbourhood) are carried out.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 2(50); 231-257
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją RP przepisów Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego umożliwiających referendarzom sądowym orzekanie w przedmiocie ustanowienia pełnomocnika z urzędu
    Assessment of the conformity to the Constitution of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the right to issue a decision by a court referendary on the appointment of an ex officio attorney
    Autorzy:
    Esmund, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2196843.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Code of Civil Procedure
    court
    court referendary
    Opis:
    In the Sejm’s position on the constitutional complaint it was stated that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure Act are constitutional to the extent in which they make the appointment of an ex officio representative dependent on the determination by the court referendary or the court of the need for such an appointment, grant the court referendary the right to rule on the appointment of an ex officio representative, and to the extent in which they recognise the court examining the complaint against the decision of the court referendary as the court of second instance.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 3(71); 317-354
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dopuszczalność dowodów – wniosek Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich (sygn. akt K 27/16) dotyczący ustawy – Kodeks postępowania karnego
    Admissibility of evidence – request of the Ombudsman (K 27/16) regarding the Act – Code of Criminal Procedure
    Autorzy:
    Pogłódek, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211820.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Code of Criminal Procedure
    Constitutional Tribunal
    “fruit of the poisonous tree”
    material truth
    Kodeks postępowania karnego
    Trybunał Konstytucyjny
    "owoce zatrutego drzewa"
    prawda materialna
    Opis:
    The object of the Constitutional Tribunal’s review is Article 168a of the Code indicating the reasons of inadmissibility of evidence. The draft Sejm’s position contains a conclusion that the above provision is consistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The applicant (the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights) claims that the challenged provision expresses an absolute obligation to include any evidence in the Polish criminal trial, regardless of how it was collected, including evidence obtained in violation of the prohibitions on collecting evidence. In the justification of the Sejm’s draft position it was stated that the purpose of the amendment was to ensure that the offender would be held criminally responsible and that any innocent person would be released from this liability in any situation where material evidence could be subject to exclusion only due to a defect in the procedure for obtaining it.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 1(57); 227-268
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies