Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "preparatory proceedings," wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Model postępowania przygotowawczego w projekcie noweli Kodeksu postępowania karnego Klubu Poselskiego Ruch Palikota
A model of preparatory proceedings in the bill to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as submitted by the “Palikot’s Movement” Deputy’s Club
Autorzy:
Skorupka, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11881328.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Code of Criminal Procedure
investigating judge
bill
Opis:
The subject of the analysis is to examine the proposal for adoption of the institution of investigating judge which would be the judicial authority for the review of the legality of the functioning of prosecutor’s office and the Police in the preparatory stage and responsible for consolidating evidence for the court. The author makes remarks of historical nature and provides a comparative‑law survey on the functioning of investigative judges. The proposed solution is an alternative to a model in which the court (in a one‑judge bench) makes certain procedural decisions in the preparatory proceedings and examines complaints against decisions and other actions carried out by a public prosecutor, or other prosecuting authority, and also implements other actions in relation to evidence at this stage of proceedings. The author is positive about the proposal. His opinion is justified by the following arguments: the extension of the scope of tasks of the court in the preparatory proceedings as compared to those currently existing, stressing the status of judicial review of preparatory proceedings, providing a reliable and critical control of preparatory proceedings, as well as guaranteeing the pursuit of lawful investi gation by a judge responsible for the preparatory proceedings.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 11-23
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Differentiation of solutions in view of the public prosecutor’s supervision over preparatory proceedings in criminal and tax off ence cases based on selected provisions of the code of criminal procedure and the penal fiscal code from the perspective of good law characteristics
Autorzy:
Kluczyński, Mariusz Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/45220300.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-11-18
Wydawca:
Akademia Policji w Szczytnie
Tematy:
clarity of law
good law
differentiation of solutions
coherence of law
Public Prosecutor’s supervision
Code of Criminal Procedure
Penal Fiscal Code
Opis:
This article is an attempt to show the consequences of differences in regulations on Public Prosecutor’s supervision over proceedings as provided for by the Penal Fiscal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, from the perspective of good law characteristics. On the basis of selected regulations, the author attempts to demonstrate that the marginal supervision of the Public Prosecutor over the investigation in the penal fiscal proceedings as provided for in the legislation contradicts the clarity, coherence and effectiveness of law. The differentiation between solutions adopted in this respect gives rise to problems with normative regulations based on the Penal Fiscal Code and makes the regulations inconsistent with other legislation: the Act of 28 January 2016 — Law on the Prosecutor’s Office and the Act of 17 June 2004 — on complaint regarding infringement of the party’s right to examine the case in preparatory proceedings conducted or supervised by a prosecutor and court proceedings without unreasonable delay. Further, in the content of the article the author refers to selected legislation applicable also to investigation regulated by the penal fiscal proceeding regulations. They serve as an example to demonstrate the thesis that the differentiation introduced in this respect in the legislation is entirely unreasonable as compared to the related regulations of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The analysis of those regulations proves that there is no system-related or legal argumentation that would justify this kind of exceptions. In the conclusions drawn on the basis of the analyses carried out in the article, the author states that the introduction of different regulations in the Penal Fiscal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure as regards the Public Prosecutor’s supervision over the investigation conducted by the financial authority responsible for preparatory proceedings and some exceptions in respect of investigations does not fulfil the requirements of good law.
Źródło:
Przegląd Policyjny; 2021, 143(3); 356-366
0867-5708
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Policyjny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies