Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Borders" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13
Tytuł:
Spory graniczne Etiopii z państwami sąsiednimi. Niekończąca się wojna
Ethiopian border disputes with its neighbors: the endless war
Autorzy:
Gemechu, Degefe
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/566884.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Instytut Nauk Politycznych
Tematy:
Ethiopia
Borders
Opis:
Ethiopia shares its frontiers with 5 countries: Sudan, Eritrea, Kenya, Somalia, and Djibouti. It has border disputes with all above mentioned countries. However, the nature and the extent of the problem vary; based on the specific relations with individual country. This article focuses on the major Ethiopian wars of border with Somalia and Eritrea. The politics of post-independence Somalia during the early 1960s was dominated by public opinion to unify all areas populated by ethnic Somalis into one country, to realize the concept of "Greater Somalia". Somalia has border dispute with Ethiopia especially Ogaden, in the South East of the country. Somalia started the border war with Ethiopia in February 1964. The conflict was ended by fast and successful intervention of the Organization of African Unity. The second war of Ogaden erupted in July 1977. Somalia decided to invade Ogaden, when internal political problems in Ethiopia were intensified, after emperor Haile Selasse was over thrown by the military. The Superpowers were also involved in the war; The Soviet Union and its allies supported Ethiopia and the United States, the Somali side. During the second war of Ogaden, about 8,000 Somali soldiers have been killed. In the aftermath of the war more than 400 000 civilians have been displaced. Ethiopia won both, the first and the second war of Ogaden. The war between Ethiopia and Eritrea over the border dispute started in May 1998 and ended in December 2000. Tens of thousands of people have lost their life in the conflict. Different sources have provided different numbers of victims of war on both sides. Approximately from 70 000 to 100 000 from the Ethiopian side and 30 000 Eritreans have lost their life. The Organization of African Unity (OAU), and the United Nations, the United States of America and other countries have actively involved in the peace process to stop the war. After two years of war, both parties agreed to form an independent boundary commission whose decision would be final and binding. In accordance with the treaty of Algiers, Eritrea accepted the April 2002 decision by an international Boundary Commission delimiting its borders with Ethiopia; but Ethiopia rejected it. The Security Council on 31 June 2000, by its resolution 1312 established the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE), to verify the cessation of hostilities Agreement and assist in planning peace keeping. The Security Council of the UN unanimously adopted resolution 1827, on 30 July 2008, which terminated the mandate of the United Nations mission in Eritrea and Ethiopia. This decision came after Eritrea imposed restrictions on UNMEE, which could not carry out its mandate tasks. So far, there is no solution for the disputed areas, which means a war can be erupted again at any time.
Źródło:
Forum Politologiczne; 2010, 10 - Przestrzeń i granice we współczesnej Afryce; 353-371
1734-1698
Pojawia się w:
Forum Politologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Granice i narodowy porządek rzeczy a uchodźcy afrykańscy
The borders and national order of things and African refugees
Autorzy:
Ząbek, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/566974.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Instytut Nauk Politycznych
Tematy:
Borders
Africa
Refugees
Opis:
This article aims to draw attention, perception that refugees generally as a people passive, abrasion of specificity of culture, places and history, they do not necessarily have to reflect that. In the refugee camps sometimes arise very aware of their subjectivity refugee communities. Anthropologist Aristide Zolberg calls them "The New Palestinians", or "Refugee-Warriors". They create refugee identity and culture, aimed at returning to their country, to gain power, just like real Palestinians are threat to the existing political status quo and the existing borders and governments.
Źródło:
Forum Politologiczne; 2010, 10 - Przestrzeń i granice we współczesnej Afryce; 403-413
1734-1698
Pojawia się w:
Forum Politologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przyszłość państwa i granic w Afryce. Alternatywny punkt widzenia
The future of the African state and borders. An alternative perspective
Autorzy:
Trzciński, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/566722.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Instytut Nauk Politycznych
Tematy:
Africa
State
Borders
Ifeanyi Menkiti
Opis:
In this article I present and critically analyze the main ideas of the Nigerian thinker, Ifeanyi A. Menkiti, on the problem of African borders for the future of the African state. Menkiti appears to consider that the basic condition for the successful coexistence of the various groups of peoples (ethnic groups, tribes) occupying the states of Africa is for relations between them to rest on equitable principles. Justice, in his opinion, should involve the fair and equitable division amongst peoples of the burdens and benefits of living in a common state. To realize this ideal, he proposes the creation in Africa of morally neutral, minimalist managerial states, in which the competencies of the regional authorities would be increased at the cost of the central government. He bases his plan in part on the ideas of John Rawls, especially on his 'law of peoples'. Close analysis of Menkiti's views shows that his vision of the managerial state is only a temporary solution, which is to lead to the peaceful dismemberment of the current post-colonial model of multi-ethnic states functioning within the old colonial borders. The basic value of Menkiti's thought rests in his reversal of the usual perspective on African states, as he considers that maintaining territorial integrity or achieving unity should no longer be considered a paramount necessity.
Źródło:
Forum Politologiczne; 2010, 10 - Przestrzeń i granice we współczesnej Afryce; 243-262
1734-1698
Pojawia się w:
Forum Politologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Różnorodność w pojmowaniu granic i własności ziemi w Republice Czadu
Diversity in recognition of borders and ownership of lands in the Republic of Chad
Autorzy:
Różański, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/566770.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Instytut Nauk Politycznych
Tematy:
Republic of Chad
Borders
Conflicts
Opis:
The article shows accidentalness in construction of the borders in the Republic of Chad. On close examination to mark out the ground no one respects neither local tradition nor the cultural differences.Origin of the strong centralized country (French example) was not based of changing the mentality of understanding "our land" or "our territory" as over tribal an exclusive proprietary. At the same time there were not any trials neither to fall into line between the tribes over the land ownership nor to understanding with the preferred model of private ownership or country ownership. There is misunderstanding and conflict between the local long time honoured laws - customs - regarding ownership of lands and the law of the state. The conflict on the law of land is not the only one. We ought to count also differences based on different cultural, religious groups and their profession (shepherd and farmer) and their migration on impact of armed conflicts. The large part of the conflicts regarding the land ownerships might be resolved on the bases of the existing tribal rights as well as the state law.
Źródło:
Forum Politologiczne; 2010, 10 - Przestrzeń i granice we współczesnej Afryce; 319-336
1734-1698
Pojawia się w:
Forum Politologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Experiencing Boundaries: Basotho Migrant Perspectives on the Lesotho-South Africa Border
Autorzy:
Kelly, Melissa
Moletsane, Malilimala
Coetzee, Jan K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108156.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-01-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Lesotho
Borders
Belonging
Work
Everyday Life
Opis:
The Lesotho-South Africa border is regarded as highly porous with many Basotho migrants seizing work and educational opportunities in South Africa, while simultaneously maintaining strong ties to family members, businesses, and land in Lesotho. The fact that Sesotho is spoken on both sides of the border is one of the particular factors that has made it possible for people to move back and forth with relative ease. The border nevertheless remains an important political and socio-cultural barrier in the lives of those crossing it. While some have managed to acquire the permits that enable them to cross the border freely and take up formal work, others occupy a precarious legal status, which limits their housing and employment prospects. Moreover, the lives of all African migrants in South Africa have been affected by growing xenophobic violence in recent years. This has reinforced distinctions between insiders and outsiders, and limited the opportunities migrants have to experience belonging to South African society. Despite these emerging dynamics, the ways in which the border is perceived by migrants — as both a physical barrier between countries and as a social barrier distinguishing peoples — has yet to be explored. Drawing on narrative interviews conducted with Basotho migrants living in Bloemfontein, South Africa in a variety of legal and employment circumstances, this paper aims to highlight the meaning of the border in the migrants’ day-to-day lives.
Źródło:
Qualitative Sociology Review; 2017, 13, 1; 92-110
1733-8077
Pojawia się w:
Qualitative Sociology Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Limite, confine, frontiera: il trauma della guerra in Granice świata di Kazimierz Wierzyński
Limits, borders, boundaries: the trauma of war in Kazimierz Wierzyński’s Granice świata
Autorzy:
Ciccarini, Marina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28407888.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Associazione Italiana Polonisti (AIP)
Tematy:
Borders
Boundaries
Limits
Trauma
Granice świata
Wierzyński
Opis:
This article analyses the short story collection Granice świata (“The Limits of the World”) by Kazimierz Wierzyński. It emphasises two war narratives, namely The Patrol and Sentence of Death, in which the firstperson narrator (the author himself) experiences extreme events. Wierzyński’s characters commit terrible atrocities, and the writer describes their ruthless and unexpected reactions to highly distressing episodes.
Źródło:
pl.it / rassegna italiana di argomenti polacchi; 2023, 14; 48-63
2384-9266
Pojawia się w:
pl.it / rassegna italiana di argomenti polacchi
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Myths of territory and external borders in the EU’s contemporary idea and Europe in the Middle Ages
Mity terytorium i granic zewnętrznych w Unii Europejskiej i średniowiecznej Europie
Autorzy:
Vitale, Alessandro
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/650529.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Granice
Unia Europejska
spójność terytorialna
średniowiecze
Borders
EU
territoriality
territorial cohesion
Middle Ages
Opis:
Dyskurs nad polityką zagospodarowania przestrzennego w Unii Europejskiej nabrał ostatnio charakteru „terytorialnego”, zwłaszcza po kryzysie migracyjnym. Mimo, iż terminologia dotycząca tej dziedziny polityki bywa niejednoznaczna, to pojęcia terytorium oraz terytorialności są de facto coraz bardziej powszechne w dyskursie nad organizacją przestrzeni europejskiej (czyli UE). W rzeczywistości pojęcie terytorialności wyraźnie przyćmiło powszechne pojęcie „przestrzeni europejskiej”, które zostało opracowane na początku lat 90. ubiegłego stulecia. Zasadniczo dominująca koncepcja przestrzenna UE przyczynia się do zaostrzenia budowy terytorialnej przestrzeni europejskiej. Zarówno idea spójności terytorialnej, jak i ciągłości terytorialnej zapewnia odpowiedni wgląd w pojęcie terytorialności w ramach „dyskursu europejskiego”, a co za tym idzie wyraźnie pokazuje stopień akceptacji narzędzi rozgraniczających (w ramach polityki i praktyki), a także ostrą dychotomię wewnętrzną/zewnętrzną oraz wykorzystanie terytorium jako elementu wsparcia dla zunifikowanej jednostki politycznej. W związku z tym pragmatycznym pojęciem terytorialności, wizja Unii Europejskiej jako „nowego imperium”, charakteryzującego się zmiękczeniem granic i podziałem władzy politycznej pomiędzy wieloma wielopoziomowymi politykami, stała się co najmniej nierealna. Z drugiej strony Europa zawsze wyróżniała się otwartością na pozostałą część świata. Nigdy też nie była wyraźnie odgraniczonym kontynentem lub wydzieloną stałą granicą całością i zawsze charakteryzowała się przesunięciami przestrzeni politycznych. Średniowiecze w Europie charakteryzowało się nachodzeniem na siebie podzielonych struktur władzy i często kontrowersyjnych jurysdykcji, bez obudowy terytorialnej i jasnego pojęcia granicy. Dostrzeżenie wymiaru ponadnarodowego otwiera nowe możliwości badawcze i oferuje nowe sposoby pojmowania problemu.
The European spatial development policy discourse has recently taken a “territorial” character, especially after the migrant crisis. Even if the terminology regarding this policy field remains ambiguous, territory, or territoriality, has become de facto an increasingly prevalent notion in the discourse on the organization of “European” (i.e. EU’s) space. In fact, the notion of territoriality and the prevalent “territorial” discourse produced an evident eclipse of the widespread notion of “European space” that had been developed in the early 1990s. Basically, the spatial predominant conception of the EU contributes to an emergence of a sharpened territorial building of the European space. The idea of both territorial cohesion and territorial continuity provides relevant insights into the notion of territoriality in the “European discourse” and consequently clearly shows how are accepted the tools of hard bordering (as policies and practices) and the sharp inside/outside dichotomy, typical of a “Westphalian memory” and of an use of territory as support for a unified political unit. Due to this pragmatic notion of territoriality, the idea of the EU as a “non-Westphalian new empire”, characterized by softening of borders and sharing of political power across multiple and multilevel politics, became at least unrealistic. On the contrary, Europe has always been distinguished by its openness to the rest of the world. It has never been a clearly demarcated continent or a fixed bordered entity and it has always been characterized by shifting spatialities of politics. The Middle Ages in Europe were characterized by overlapping, divided authority structures and often contentious jurisdictions, without territorial containments and a clear notion of the border. The comprehension of the transnational dimension opens new avenues of research and offers new modes of understanding.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica; 2016, 26
1508-1117
2353-4826
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies