Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Neoplatonism" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
    Tytuł:
    Koinon and koinônia: A Particular Case of Participation in John Philoponus
    Autorzy:
    Granata, Daniele
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633438.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Neoplatonism
    Philoponus
    Categories
    participation
    Plato
    Aristotle
    koinon
    Opis:
    The aim of this study is to discuss an original philosophical contribution made by Philoponus, who in In Cat. 18, 14–22 equates koinon in its most peculiar meaning with the concept of koinônia understood as a particular case of Platonic methexis. First, the paper analyzes the passages where the Neoplatonic commentators of the Categories distinguish four distinct meanings of the Aristotelian concept of koinon. Subsequently, this article emphasizes the differences between Philoponus’ hermeneutical suggestions and those of the other commentators. Philoponus clarifies that while every koinon is methekton, Aristotle’s koinon is characterized by the fact that the participation is ex isou and kata meros. Thus, koinônia, according to Philoponus, is a particular case of methexis, where everyone participating in something participates in it equally and singly. The example cited by Philoponus to explain Aristotle’s koinon is that of men participating equally and singly in human nature. The study concludes with a discussion of the relationship among the concepts of koinon, koinônia and methexis.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2018, 9, 1; 101-120
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Practice of ὀνοματοποιεῖν: Some Peculiar Statements in the Ancient Neoplatonic Commentators on Aristotle
    Autorzy:
    Granata, Daniele
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633546.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Categories
    Rethoric
    actuality and potentiality
    Neoplatonism
    Aristotle
    Opis:
    This paper shows the role of ὀνοματοποιεῖν in Neoplatonism and how this practice is ruled by an onto-logical canon. While ὀνοματοποιεῖν itself means the making of a brand new name, its usage is manifold. As Aristotle explains in Rh. III 2, poets take advantage of ὀνοματοποιεῖν to catch the undefined and give it a recognisable image, by means of a metaphorical name. In science, this practice, codified by Aristotle, is twofold: ὀνοματοποιεῖν meant both to re-semanticize words wellknown and to create names ex novo for things not discovered or studied yet. After analysing ὀνοματοποιεῖν’s recurrence in Aristotle, I illustrate that, according to Neoplatonic Commentators, impositio can be, both natural and technical, only of things in actuality, having a solid consistency. Intermediates between contraries, presumed relatives and powers as qualities are nameless – as  Philoponus notices in his In Categorias – since they haven’t an independent status and aren’t  definable. This bond between the original rhetorical practice and the ontological perspective, sketched in Int. 1, was strengthened by Alexander, who filled Aristotle’s gaps, stating that names signify things’ being, i.e. the form acquired in actuality.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2016, 7, 1; 217-228
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Syrianus on the Platonic Tradition of the Separate Existence of Numbers
    Autorzy:
    Mouzala, Melina G.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633625.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Syrianus
    Neoplatonism
    Plato
    Aristotle
    eidetic number
    mathematical number
    monadic number
    Opis:
    This paper analyzes and explains certain parts of Syrianus’s Commentary on book M of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, which details Syrianus’s response to Aristotle’s attack against the Platonic position of the separate existence of numbers. Syrianus defends the separate existence not only of eidetic but also of mathematical numbers, following a line of argumentation which involves a hylomorphic approach to the latter. He proceeds with an analysis of the mathematical number into matter and form, but his interpretation entails that form is the constituent of number, which has the status and role of a Platonic Form. This solution allows him not only to explain and justify the unity of number, but also to apply the Platonic thesis of the separate existence of numbers, to the mathematical or monadic numbers themselves. It also betrays its tendency to combine theses of the Platonic Ontology with fundamental Aristotelian doctrines. 
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2015, 6, 1; 167-194
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Platone e i “caccatori di uccelli”: la controversa eredità di un cigno incatturabile
    Plato and ‘the Birdhunters’: The Controversial Legacy of an Elusive Swan
    Autorzy:
    Motta, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938535.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Plato
    Aristotle
    Neoplatonism
    legacy
    dogma
    esoterism
    unwritten doctrines
    the Good
    Opis:
    The aim of this paper is to discuss some features of the doctrines of the agrapha dogmata in Neoplatonism, starting from the reading of an anecdote, presented in the Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy, in which Plato dreams that close to death he becomes a swan which hunters are unable to catch. In fact, the dream is an explanation of the development of the Platonic tradition, and, more precisely, it presents a story of several exegetical disagreements that have survived till the present day. Compared to modern interpretation of the Aristotelic testimony on the “so-called unwritten doctrines”, we can state that the late antique interpretations of them focus and depend on what Plato has left us in his written dialogues, which are the best living images of his oral dialogues. This conclusion is, then, a consequence of a study carried out on Ancient and Neoplatonic texts that leads to the acknowledgement of a Platonic philosophical system as well as to an overview of modern secondary bibliography produced by the esoteric interpretation of Plato and various views of scholars who are against this account.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2015, 6, 1; 93-112
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Sulla categoria aristotelica della sostanza. Variazioni esegetiche da Plotino ad Ammonio
    On Aristotelian Category of Substance. Exegetic Variations from Plotinus to Ammonius
    Autorzy:
    Cardullo, R. Loredana
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938395.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Aristotle
    substance
    commentators
    Neoplatonism
    Plotinus
    Porphyry
    Syrianus
    Ammonius
    immanent forms
    universals
    Opis:
    One of the main difficulties that Neoplatonic commentators of Aristotle face is the different treatment that the Categories and the Metaphysics offer to the question of the substance. After describing briefly the status quaestionis ousiae in Aristotle, and after tracing the main Neoplatonic interpretations of this doctrine (from Plotinus’ negative one to Porphyry’s positive and “conciliatory” one), this article attempts to demonstrate that the Neoplatonists of Athens and Alexandria, Syrianus and Ammonius, inaugurate a new interpretation of the Aristotelian doctrine. With regard to the category of substance in general and to the question of substantiality of “immanent form” in particular, this new interpretation goes beyond the positions of Plotinus and Porphyry and returns the ontological value to the Aristotelian substances. Unlike Plotinus, who recognized as ousia only that one intelligible, that is five genres of the Platonic Sophist, and unlike Porphyry, who defused the anti–Platonic fuse of the Categories, giving to this treaty a mainly semantic skopos, these philosophers, through their original study of the theory of the three states of katholou, already shed in the Porphyrian Eisagôgê, fit the immanent forms of Aristotle, recognized as substances and as a reflection of the transcendental universal, into the late antique Neoplatonic metaphysical triadic structure.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2014, 5, 1; 59-90
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Problem źródeł Tomaszowej koncepcji esse jako aktu bytu
    The Problem of Sources of Thomas’ Concept of esse as the Act of Being
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452508.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    esse
    essentia
    metafizyka egzystencjalna
    Arystoteles
    neoplatonizm
    Boecjusz
    Awicenna
    Thomas Aquinas
    existential metaphysics
    Aristotle
    Neoplatonism
    Boethius
    Avicenna
    Opis:
    While expressing his innovative theory of existence (esse) as an act of being in many his texts Thomas Aqunas recalls different historical sources to support his thesis: Aristotle’s views, Arabic philosophers’ depictions, mainly of Avicenna, Boethius’ distinction entia quo od entia quod and some theses of Liber de causis. In earlier subject literature, mainly Gilson’s influence (in Poland it was under Krąpiec’s influence) adopted a view about religious inspirations of Thomas’ thesis and that the only philosophical way to his thesis is an analysis of Avicenna’s depictions which are contained mainly in work De ente et essentia. Every other Thomas’recalls should be treated as some earlier ploy for a protection against possible reservations. The first statement which arises during the analysis of historical sources which Thomas refer to expressing his theory of existence (esse) as an act of being is ascertaining that reasoning is a crucial argument to accept esse as an act of being. It should be emphasized that in his theory of esse Thomas Aquinas does not refer to argument of Revelation. The result is that Thomas expressed this thesis only in a philosophical area within the analysis of structure of real being. The attitudes which are recalled sometimes are used by Thomas Aquinas as a background or context by which he states his view. Recalled statements sometimes are a reference to the authority. It seems that the erudition recalled by Thomas in a matter which is interesting for us appears in a different aspects. That is why it should be make a fuss of that the issue of existence (esse) did not appear with Thomas Aquinas’ metaphysics or Avicenna’s metaphysics. It seems that it was on the contrary: the issue of existence (esse) was worrying Plato and earlier philosophers, Aristotle, and Neoplatonists, Boethius and Arabic philosophers. So Thomas’ thesis about existence (esse) as an act of being is a result of the analysis of the issue which is existed in the history of philosophy
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 173-187
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Bóg jako źródło moralności. Intuicje św. Augustyna w "Wyznaniach" 7.10–11 w kontekście dyskusji z tradycją starożytną
    God as the Source of Morality. St. Augustine’s Intuitions in "Confessions" 7.10–11 in the Context of a Discussion with the Ancient Tradition
    Autorzy:
    Koszkało, Martyna Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1789191.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-09-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    Bóg
    źródło moralności
    Sokrates
    Platon
    Arystoteles
    św. Augustyn
    regio dissimilitudinis
    neoplatonizm
    God
    the source of morality
    Socrates
    Plato
    Aristotle
    St. Augustine
    region of dissimilarity
    Neoplatonism
    Opis:
    W artykule przedstawiam relacje Boga/bogów wobec moralności zarówno w greckiej religii i filozofii, jak i w poglądach św. Augustyna na podstawie rozróżnień uczynionych przez Johna Hare’a. Twierdzę, że intuicje Augustyna istotnie dopełniają koncepcję Boga jako źródła moralności obecną zarówno w starożytnej tradycji filozoficznej, jak i religijnej. W pierwszej części artykułu ukazuję relację bogów greckiej religii ludowej do moralności i stwierdzam, że bycie gwarantem moralności nie wymagało od nich posiadania wzorcowego charakteru moralnego. Następnie pokazuję, że zmiana tego zjawiska miała miejsce w epoce sokratejskiej. Bóg/bogowie Sokratesa, Platona czy Arystotelesa nabierają cech doskonałościowych i to sankcjonuje ich moc kształtowania moralności. W ramach tych koncepcji zrodziła się idea upodobnienia się do Boga/bogów i naśladowania wzorca charakterologicznego poprzez wykonywanie działań, które wykonuje Bóg (poznawanie, doskonałość moralna). Bóg, zwłaszcza rozumiany filozoficznie, był traktowany również jako cel oraz przedmiot uszczęśliwiający. W ostatniej części artykułu analizuję koncepcję św. Augustyna. Pokazuję, że oprócz tego, że Bóg jest prawodawcą oraz uszczęśliwiającym celem ostatecznym z tego powodu, że stwarza istoty do Niego podobne, jest źródłem moralności nie tylko jako wzorzec charakterologiczny, ale przede wszystkim jako istota stwórcza. Ukazuję, że zło moralne jest odwróceniem się sprawcy od Boga i załamaniem ontologicznego porządku. W artykule przedstawiam możliwe interpretacje wyrażenia regio dissimilitudinis oraz tekstualne źródła tego pojęcia. Ukazuję również te aspekty poglądów Augustyna, które istotnie uzupełniają i przekraczają model neoplatoński w Wyznaniach 7.10–11.
    In this article, I present the relationship between God/gods and morality in both the Greek religion and philosophy and in the views of St Augustine based on distinctions made by John Hare. I argue that Augustine’s intuitions are indeed complementary to the concept of God as the source of morality present both in the ancient philosophical and religious traditions. In the first part of the article, I show the relation of the gods of Greek popular religion to morality. I argue that being guarantors of morality did not require them to possess exemplary moral character. I then show that a change in this regard took place in the Socratic era. The God/gods of Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle acquire perfect qualities, which sanctions their power to shape morality. Within these concepts, the idea was born of becoming God/god-like and imitating a model of character by performing the actions carried out by God (cognition, moral perfection). God, especially the philosophical God, was also treated as an end and as a felicific object. In the last part of this article, I analyze the concept of St Augustine. I show that, in addition to being the lawgiver and the ultimate felicific end, because He creates beings like Him, God is the source of morality not only as a model of character but above all as a creative being. I show that in committing moral evil, the perpetrator turns away from God and disrupts the ontological order. I present possible interpretations of the expression region of dissimilarity and the textual sources of this concept. I also show those aspects of Augustine’s views that significantly complement and transcend the Neoplatonic model in Confessions 7.10–11.
    Źródło:
    Verbum Vitae; 2021, 39, 3; 979-994
    1644-8561
    2451-280X
    Pojawia się w:
    Verbum Vitae
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies