Temat: Agonism - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Should we take sides?: Girard, Mouffe, et al on graceful divisiveness
Autorzy:: Haw, Christopher Adam
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/36799953.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023-09-28
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Chrześcijańskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Warszawie
Tematy:: René Girard
Chantal Mouffe
Agonism
Division
Divisiveness
Unity
Opis:: This paper interprets the rhetoric and social phenomena of “taking sides” and “scapegoating” amidst radical societal division. Exploring the social mechanics of unity and division, I visit the work of René Girard and Chantal Mouffe, who offer a lucid ambivalence regarding the dilemma that neutrality is a practical impossibility. And in turning to implications of their shared paradox—that to be genuinely “peaceful” may require graceful divisiveness—I consider cases and theory on nonviolently fomenting conflict. In contrast with certain liberal social theories of transcending division, this paper treats the desire for politics beyond hegemony—or politics without a scapegoat—as something of an eschatological ideal, toward which Girard, Mouffe, and others offer a tension-filled, crypto-Augustinian, agonistic pluralism.
Źródło:: Studia z Teorii Wychowania; 2023, XIV(2 (43)); 97-129
2083-0998
2719-4078
Pojawia się w:: Studia z Teorii Wychowania
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: A Few Problems with Mouffe’s Agonistic Political Theory
Autorzy:: Mazur-Bubak, Monika
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/594494.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:: Agonism
antagonism
Mouffe
Freud
aggression
liberal-democracy
nature of politics
Opis:: he main goal of examining a single philosophical theory, connected with social and political disciplines, is not just to identify its incoherence or to restate the theory in a more elegant way. More important in that kind of investigation is to show its possible impact on people’s lives and the functioning of communities. Thus, it seems more reasonable to conduct a critical analysis of the possible consequences for a real society than to undertake a simple study of the argument’s logical consistency. The main aim of this paper is to introduce doubts about the thesis of Chantal Mouffe presented by her in Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically and Passion and Politics. Main hypothesis is that thinking about the “political” and “politics” with reference to enmity as well as claiming that the source of every political and social activity is antagonism, can provoke an attitude that social and political scenes are battlefields rather than an agora or the space of human interactions. First of all, the author provides the critical analysis and reconstruction of the most important claims connected with the “political”, which can have strong negative effects-i.e. brutalization and creating a negative basis for social relation. Then presents a few possible sources of thinking of “political” as a “competition” or rather “enmity”. The last part it is the critic of what Mouffe claims about reason why people get involve into politics, based on the psychological experiments and in result of this the author shows the importance of validity the high standards in politics, diplomacy and relation on the social level.
Źródło:: Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2019, 2 (48); 307-318
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:: Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Agonism" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język