Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "conflict of law" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11
    Tytuł:
    Transgraniczne sprawy rodzinne w relacjach polsko-brytyjskich w obliczu brexitu
    Family matters in Polish-British relations
    Autorzy:
    Juryk, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030084.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Cross-border family matters
    Brexit
    conflict of law
    Opis:
    The purpose of the article is above all to show possible changes in the field of cross-border family matters as a result of Brexit. From a Polish perspective, this topic is particularly socially significant due to the numerous labor migration of Poles to the UK. It is estimated that around one million Poles live in the UK. First, the article presents current sources of law regarding cross-border family matters (EU law, international agreements, internal law). Next, possible solutions to family matters and their strengths and weaknesses were discussed after Brexit. Finally, solutions currently adopted in the UK and the biggest concerns related to them are shown.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 61-95
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prawo właściwe dla przysposobienia według polsko-ukraińskiej umowy o pomocy prawnej
    The law applicable to adoption according to the Polish-Ukrainian agreement on legal assistance
    Autorzy:
    Gnela, Bogusława
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151095.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-12-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Polish-Ukrainian Agreement
    intensive citizenship
    conflict of law convention rules
    law applicable to adoption
    Opis:
    The subject of the study is the analysis of the conflict of law rules contained in Article 30 of the Agreement between the Republic of Poland and Ukraine on legal assistance and legal relations in civil and criminal matters, made in Kiev on May 24, 1993 (Journal of Laws of 1994, No. 96, item 465) determining the jurisdiction and applicable law for establishing, amending, terminating and canceling the adoption. Before proceeding with this analysis, some differences in the substantive and procedural/technical rules relating to adoption in Polish and Ukrainian law are pointed out. Furthermore, it is emphasized that under Article 30 of the Agreement the institution of renvoi plays no part. In the event of multiple Polish and Ukrainian citizenship, the decisive factor becomes the “effective” citizenship. Article 30, on the other hand, offers no solution for stateless persons. Next, the jurisdiction designated by Article 30 sec. 5 sentence 1 of the Agreement (dealing with matters of adoption, as well as the amendment, termination or annulment of the adoption) is analyzed. Subsequently, the author takes up the questions relating to determination of the law applicable to adoption by one person and the joint adoption by spouses. The author contends that the law applicable to the adoption is fixed and so it is not subject to changes. The article assumes that the effects of a full adoption “transform” — on the confl ict-of-laws level — into relations between parents and children, and the effects of a partial adoption are governed by the law applicable to the establishment of adoption.The article shows that the law applicable to its establishment of the adoption is applicable also to the amendment, termination and annulment of adoption. The author further submits that in theory the public policy clause may be used under the Polish-Ukrainian Agreement, but in practice this should not occur too often because there are no provisions of the Ukrainian adoption law, the application of which would result in consequences contrary to the fundamental principles of the Polish legal order.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 31; 61-80
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    W poszukiwaniu prawa właściwego dla cywilnoprawnych roszczeń odszkodowawczych z tytułu naruszenia RODO (art. 82 RODO)
    In Search of a Law Applicable to Civil Law Claims for Damages for Violations of the General Data Protection Regulation (Article 82 of the GDPR)
    Autorzy:
    Jagielska, Monika
    Jagielski, Mariusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151085.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-06-19
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    GDPR
    Rome II Regulation
    personal data
    privacy
    conflict-of-law rules
    tortious liability
    Opis:
    The main purpose of this study is to determine which conflict of law rules constitute the basis for the search for the law applicable to private-law compensation claims provided for in Article 82 of the GDPR, and whether it is possible to apply the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations in this regard. The authors first set out the main features of the claim, with particular emphasis on those areas where discrepancies may arise at the level of national law. They then qualify the claim as a tortious one, which leads them to pose a question about the applicability of the Rome II Regulation in this case. Special attention is given to the relationship between privacy and personal data protection. The authors argue that these two spheres have become gradually separated from each other and finally, under GDPR, claims for damages for a breach of personal data protection being independent of claims for an infringement of personal rights. Consequently, they assume that the law applicable to a claim under Article 82 of the GDPR should be indicated on the basis of the Rome II Regulation, despite the doubts arising from the exclusion provided for in Article 1.2.g Rome II. If approach is accepted, it will have significant consequences for the harmonisation of the application of the GDPR in the EU Member States, and for achieving the harmonisation of decisions at the level of national law.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2021, 28; 51-73
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prawo właściwe dla zobowiązań deliktowych wynikających z naruszenia zasad ochrony danych osobowych przyjętych w RODO
    The law applicable to delictual obligations resulting from infringements of data protections rules adopted in GDPR
    Autorzy:
    Świerczyński, Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030076.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    GDPR
    Rome II Regulation
    privacy breach
    conflict-of-law rules
    torts
    delictual liability
    Opis:
    Disputes arising from international data breaches can be complex. Despite the introduction of new, unified EU regulation on the protection of personal data (GDPR), the European Union failed to amend the Rome II Regulation on the applicable law to non-contractual liability and to extend its scope to the infringements of privacy. GDPR only contains provisions on international civil procedure. However, there are no supplementing conflict-of-law rules. In order to determine the applicable law national courts have to apply divergent and dispersed national codifications of private international law. The aim of this study is to propose an optimal conflict-of-law model for determining the applicable law in case of infringement of the GDPR’s privacy regime.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 39-59
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Obce przepisy wymuszające swoje zastosowanie. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 18 października 2016 r. w sprawie C-135/15 Republika Grecji przeciwko Grigoriosowi Nikiforidisowi
    Third countries’ overriding mandatory rules
    Autorzy:
    Wowerka, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782432.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    conflict of law rules relating to contractual obligations
    Article 9 (3) Rome I Regulation
    foreign overriding mandatory provisions
    substantive law level consideration as a matter of fact
    Opis:
    This commentary examines the judgement of the CJEU of 18 October 2016 in case C-135/15 Republik Griechenland v. Grigorios Nikiforidis. The judgement in question concerns the issue of treatment of foreign overriding mandatory provisions under the Article 9(3) of Regulation No 593/2008. This topic is the subject to a great deal of controversy and academic discussion. The ECJ concluded that the mentioned provision must be interpreted as precluding overriding mandatory provisions other than those of the State of the forum or of the State where the obligations arising out of the contract have to be or have been performed from being applied, as legal rules, by the court of the forum, but as not precluding it from taking such other overriding mandatory provisions into account as matters of fact in so far as this is provided for by the national law that is applicable to the contract pursuant to the Regulation. This interpretation is not affected by the principle of sincere cooperation laid down in Article 4(3) TEU. In this respect the judgement of CJEU brings significant clarification on the question, whether a court of the forum can have regard to foreign overriding mandatory provisions, which do not belong to the legal system of the country of performance of the contract on the level of the applicable substantive law. However, there are still questions arising under Article 9(3) of Rome I Regulation, which need to be clarified.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 91-106
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Niejednoznaczne podstawy stosowania przepisów wymuszających swoje zastosowanie (przepisów koniecznego zastosowania)
    Inconclusive legal basis for the application of the overriding mandatory rules
    Autorzy:
    Rodziewicz, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782422.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    overriding mandatory rules
    application of foreign law
    law applicable
    first and second degree conflict of laws rules
    Opis:
    The article raises issues concerning legal basis for the application of the overriding mandatory rules. In the Polish doctrine there are two opposing concepts in terms of explanation of the legal grounds for application of overriding mandatory rules. Both theories do not have a universal dimension, in the sense that they do not sufficiently explain the basis for the application of domestic as well as foreign overriding mandatory rules, being part of lex causae or coming from a third state. The article presents arguments for and against the possibility of deriving the legal grounds for application of the overriding mandatory rules, with reference to submissions made to that effect in literature. The author makes also an attempt to formulate a concept complementary to the concept of an integrated conflict-of-law rule with the substantive law rule, boiling down to the assumption that the basis for application of overriding mandatory rule is a second degree conflict of laws rule allowing to apply a first degree conflict of laws rule integrated with the substantive rule.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 24; 169-187
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Interes w prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym. Zagadnienia węzłowe
    Interests in private international law. Fundamental questions
    Autorzy:
    Poczobut, Jerzy
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782418.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    interest in private international law
    G. Kegel
    K. Schuring
    conflict-of-laws
    interests of the parties versus interests of the states
    Opis:
    The paper examines the fundamental issues regarding the interests in private international law. The goal of the present investigation is to attempt an answer to the question whose interests does the conflict-of-laws rules (narrowly understood) protect. This question is discussed in particular in reference to the theory created in the German doctrine by G. Kegel and developed by his follower K. Schurig. The paper systematizes the conflict-of-laws interests, giving the Polish law examples of the solutions that incorporate them. To be conscious that these interests exist and how they are allocated is necessary, both when drafting and enacting private international law legislation, as well as at the time of its application.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 24; 5-20
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kolizyjnoprawna problematyka skuteczności przelewu wierzytelności wobec osób trzecich - projekt rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie prawa właściwego dla skutków przelewu wierzytelności wobec osób trzecich (COM(2018) 96 final)
    The conflict-of-laws problems regarding the third-party effects of the assignment of claims - the Proposal for a Regulation on the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignment of claims (COM(2018) 96 <i>final</i>)
    Autorzy:
    Kurowski, Witold
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782430.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    conflict of laws
    assignment
    the third-party effects of assignments
    law applicable to the proprietary effects of assignments
    contractual obligations
    Rome I Regulation
    Opis:
    The question of which law should govern the third-party effects of assignments of claims was considered during the preparation of the Rome I Regulation. The European Commission’s proposal for the Rome I Regulation admitted the law of the assignor’s habitual residence as the law that should apply to the proprietary effects of assignments of claims. Finally, EU Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations did not include the issue of the third-party effects of the assignment. However, Article 27(2) of the Rome I Regulation required the European Commission to present a report on the question of the effectiveness of assignments of claims against third parties accompanied, if appropriate, by a proposal to amend the Rome I Regulation. Proposal for a Regulation on the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims (COM(2018) 96 final) is a response to this request. This paper analyses current draft of the new EU Regulation, the rules on determination of the third-party effects of assignments of claims (law of the assignor’s habitual residence and law of the assigned claim) and "super conflict rules" in specific cases. The author argues that the law of the assignor’s habitual residence remains the appropriate conflict rule for proprietary effects of assignments of claims.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 67-90
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kolizyjnoprawna problematyka skuteczności przelewu wierzytelności wobec osób trzecich Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 9 października 2019 r. w sprawie BGL BNP Paribas SA c/a TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C‑548/18)
    The conflict of laws issues concerning the third party effects of the assignments of claims. The gloss to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 9 October 2019 in the case of BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C‑548/18)
    Autorzy:
    Kurowski, Witold
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151105.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    the conflict of laws
    the assignments
    the third-party effects of assignment
    the law applicable to the proprietary effects of assignments
    the contractual obligations
    Rome I Regulation
    Opis:
    The question of the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims is widely discussed in the doctrinal debates. In common opinion, the existing European conflict-of-laws regulations do not provide for a rule governing this issue. In the case BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C‑548/18), the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed this gape of the Rome I Regulation.The gloss presents the justification of the European Union Court’s judgment, the reasons for the lack of the uniform conflict-of-laws regulation, and the consequences of this state. It also analyses briefly the European Commission’s proposal for the EU Regulation concerning the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims (COM(2018) 96 final), as a response to this situation. Finally, it examines the appropriate conflict-of-laws rules for proprietary effects of assignments of claims (the law of the assignor’s habitual residence and the law of the assigned claim).
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 223-236
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Jewgienij Bronisławowicz Paszukanis i jego marksistowska teoria prawa — kilka refleksji krytycznych
    Critical remarks on Evgeny B. Pashukanis and his Marxist theory of law
    Autorzy:
    Zmierczak, Maria
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782550.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    inevitability of destruction of capitalism
    historical prophesy
    law as result and
    form of regulation of conflict of interests in the process of production and exchange
    rule of law
    (Rechtsstaat) as the highest form of mystification of real social relations
    disregard of political and legal ideas as pure ideology
    Opis:
    Evgeny B. Pashukanis (1891—1937) is noted as the most influential theorist of law in Soviet Russia. In his book The General Theory of law and Marxism, issued in 1924, 1925 and 1927, he defined law as a form expressing the real relation between people in process of production and exchange of goods: the form that reaches its highest level as the rule of law (Rechtsstaat), when it becomes a mirage, concealing the real and deep conflict of interests. Pashukanis was convinced that in communism any form of law would disappear because there would be no class conflict of interests. He also repeated the prophesy of Marx that capitalism would disappear, as expressed in The Communist Manifesto. That the prophesy is false and that history is not a science in the same way as physics was showed and criticised by Karl Raimund Popper. The reduction of rule of law to the expression of class interest only is false as well, because many legal regulations are not connected to economic interests. The thesis whereby law occurs only in bourgeois society surely led people ruling in Soviet Russia to contempt of any law, taking into account the fact that Pashukanis’s book was popular and used in education. Interestingly enough, the book was printed in Polish in 1985, with the commentary that provides a very instructive and important theory of law.
    Źródło:
    Z Dziejów Prawa; 2019, 12; 587-596
    1898-6986
    2353-9879
    Pojawia się w:
    Z Dziejów Prawa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Metoda unilateralna w prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym. Uwagi na marginesie orzeczenia TSUE w sprawie C-135/15 Republika Grecji przeciwko Grigoriosowi Nikiforidisowi
    The unilateral method in private international law. Some observations on the basis of the judgment of the CJEU in case C-135/15 Greece v. Nikiforidis
    Autorzy:
    Zachariasiewicz, Maria-Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20744231.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    metoda unilateralna
    prawo prywatne międzynarodowe
    Statutyści
    przepisy wymuszające swoje zastosowanie
    multilateralizm
    unilateralizm
    zakres terytorialny
    unilateralism
    unilateral method
    conflict of laws
    private international law
    statutists
    overriding mandatory rules
    Nikiforidis
    spatial scope
    Opis:
    The article confronts the unilateral and multilateral methods in private international law. The author first identifies the basic differences between the two. She then moves to describe the instruments and concepts resulting from the unilateral method: the theories of the Statutists in the period between 12th to 19th centuries, the solutions offered by the so called new American school, the method of recognition of private situations crystallized in a foreign legal system,  the rules governing the spatial scope of the EU provisions, including the regulations and the directives, and finally the paradigm of the overriding mandatory rules. The second part of the paper provides a comment to the Nikiforidis case. The author makes a number of critical remarks with respect to the restrictive and rigid interpretation of Article 9(3) adopted by the CJEU. The argument is made that the more flexible and functional approach proposed by the Attorney General Maciej Szpunar in his Opinion should be preferred. Finally, the author makes her own proposition regarding the Nikiforidis case. She advocates a unilateral methodology that rejects the distinction between the overriding mandatory rules of the legis fori, legis causae and these of a third country.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2021, 29; 125-149
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies