Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Instytucje Gaiusa" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Teodor Dydyński i legenda Gaiusa
Teodor Dydyński and the legend of Gaius
Autorzy:
Czech-Jezierska, Bożena Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503591.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Gaius
Instytucje Gaiusa
Theodor Dydyński
Institutiones by Gaius
Opis:
The author analyses the place of Gaius in the research of Teodor Dydyński – a Polish law historian. Gaius, though not well known, became a famous Roman jurist, recognized as a great authority. His Institutiones was a complete exposition of the elements of Roman law. Dydyński thought that Gaius and his works were significant so he devoted much research to him. Dydyński translated Institutiones from Latin into Polish and published them with his own notes. He regarded Gaius as a great teacher of Roman law, he had much reverence and admiration for him, which was reflected in Dydyński’s writings. Therefore Dydyński should be seen as a scientist who created a kind of legend – the legend of Gaius.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 21-32
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gai Institutiones według Cezarego Kunderewicza
Gaius’ “Institutiones” by Cezary Kunderewicz
Autorzy:
Jakubowski, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/956070.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Instytucje Gaiusa
polskie tłumaczenie
Cezary Kunderewicz
Institutiones by Gaius
Polish translation
Opis:
In his work the author presents the process of creating the first complete Polish translation of Gaius’s Institutiones by Cezary Kunderewicz (in the 19th c. the first two books were translated into Polish by Dydyński). The translation was published by PWN in 1982 (in 2003 another Polish edition was published by Rozwadowski). The author supposes that professor Kunderewicz probably started his translation in the early 1970s. He refers to his own memories as he is now the oldest disciple of Professor Kunderewicz. The author mentions that Kunderewicz was excellently prepared for this difficult work. Several years earlier Kunderewicz translated the treatise on Roman Aqueducts written by Frontinus. The article is clearly based on memories. This is the reason why the author is quoting only one review of Kunderewicz’s translation and why he does no try to evaluate the translation. In the end the author writes also about Kunderewicz’s another translation – Polish edition of Justinian’s Institutes, which was published in 1986.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 41-47
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawo spadkowe w systematyce „Instytucji” Gaiusa
Inheritance law in the systematics of the Gaius “Institutiones”
Autorzy:
Świrgoń-Skok, Renata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32407333.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Gaius
Instytucje Gaiusa
prawo spadkowe
systematyka
spadki
Institutiones of Gaius
inheritance law
systematics
inheritance
Opis:
The study examines the position of inheritance in the systematics of Institutiones of Gaius and discusses the significance of such approach to inheritance law in the subsequent development of private law. In Institutiones of Gaius issues related to succession account for approximately 1/3 of the entire contents. Presentation of matters connected with inheritance comprises a larger part of the second book (G. 2, 99–289) focusing on various legal aspects of testate succession (G. 2, 100–190) and the related acquisition of material benefits at the expense of the legacy, through endowments (G. 2, 192–289); additionally, the beginning of the third book comprised rules of intestate succession (G. 3, 1–87). While analysing the specific problems associated with succession, Gaius presents them as examples of property rights acquisition under general and specific terms. Similar approach to inheritance in Rome was also adopted in Institutiones of Justinian. It was only the German Pandectists that distinguished succession law as a separate segment of law. However, the nineteenth century European civil codes in their contents and systematics make reference to the three-fold distinction of law (personae – res – actiones) introduced by Gaius in his Institutiones. For instance the Civil Code of Austria (ABGB) did not treat succession law as a separate segment of law but, following the systematics in the Institutes of Gaius, as a part of property law related to acquisition of ownership rights per universitatem. Similar approach was adopted in Napoleonic Code where matters related to succession were contained in Book Three, entitled "Of the Different Modes of Acquiring Property".
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 125-134
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies