Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Discourse Linguistics" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Issues in cognitive discourse research: Positioning, representation, conceptualization
    Autorzy:
    Cap, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/956440.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-08
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy. Wydawnictwo Uczelniane
    Tematy:
    cognitive linguistics
    critical discourse analysis
    positioning
    discourse space
    proximization
    Opis:
    The present paper explores the current nexus between Cognitive Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), focusing on theories of conceptual positioning, distancing and perspective-taking in discourse space. It assesses the strengths, limitations, and prospects for further operationalization of positioning as a valid methodology in CDA, and political discourse studies in particular. In the first part, I review the cognitive models of positioning that have made the most significant contribution to CDA. Discussing Deictic Space Theory and Text World Theory, among others, I argue that these models reveal further theoretical potential which has not been exploited yet. While they offer a comprehensive and plausible account of how representations and ideologically charged worldviews are established, they fail to deliver a pragmatic explanation of how addressees are made to establish a worldview, in the service of speaker’s goals. The second part of the paper outlines Proximization Theory, a discursive model of crisis and conflict construction in political discourse. I argue that, unlike the other models, it fully captures the complex geopolitical and ideological positioning in political discourse space, providing a viable handle on the dynamics of conflict between the opposing ideologies of the space.
    Źródło:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne; 2020, 10; 47-66
    2084-1302
    Pojawia się w:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A note on the post-structuralist evolution of discourse analysis
    Autorzy:
    Cap, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1052544.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-15
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy. Wydawnictwo Uczelniane
    Tematy:
    discourse studies
    critical discourse studies
    social constructionism
    social theory
    linguistics
    Opis:
    This paper gives a critical overview of various analytical approaches dominating the field of discourse studies in the last three decades, from the perspective of their philosophical and formative bases: social constructionism and linguistics. It explores different conceptions and features of the theoretical nexus between these two bases leading to the emergence of three distinct yet apparently complementary strands of thought (i-iii). The paper starts with the account of (i) Laclau and Mouffe’s classical discourse theory and its idea of ‘discursive struggle’ – a struggle of particular ways of talking of and understanding the world in an attempt to achieve discursive (and social) hegemony. Laclau and Mouffe’s assumption that no discourse is a closed entity but rather transformed through contact with other discourses is then taken as the introductory premise to present a vast, complex and heterogeneous family of (ii) critical discourse studies. Critical discourse studies are characterized in the paper as a hub of text-analytical practices that work on the link between language and social reality from the perspective of power and empowerment, explaining how discourse partakes in the production, change and negotiations of ideologically-charged meanings. Most crucially, they establish a methodological link between social theory and linguistics, providing discourse analysis with text-analytical tools and methods. Finally, the paper discusses (iii) three recent discourse analytical models: Discourse Space Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis and Legitimization-Proximization Model. Originally located in the cognitive-psychological strand of critical discourse studies, these new models can now be seen as fully-fledged discourse theories with their own apparatus of analysis, involving concepts from cognitive linguistics, pragmatics and social psychology. It is argued that these three new theories make a further (and thus far final) step toward consolidation of the social-theoretical and linguistic bases in contemporary discourse studies. The empirical benefits of this consolidation are discussed in the last part of the paper, which includes a brief case study where the new models are used in the analysis of Polish anti-immigration discourse.
    Źródło:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne; 2019, 9; 109-128
    2084-1302
    Pojawia się w:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The cognitive aspects of literary communication and literary proper names: a theoretical framework for literary proprial concepts
    Autorzy:
    Rachut, Konrad
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1929477.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-14
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy. Wydawnictwo Uczelniane
    Tematy:
    literature
    cognitive linguistics
    discourse
    literary proper names
    literary proprial
    concepts
    Opis:
    In the paper, the author attempts to explore the cognitive potential of literary proper names with regard to the fundamental role of one’s cognition in writing and reading literary texts. This cognitive approach to literary onomastics is intended to focus on the notion that the three aspects: semiotics, semantics and conceptuality of literary proper names are primarily dependent on the minds of writers and readers rather than solely on literary texts. Taking this into account, the author offers a theoretical framework – literary proprial concepts. He purports that the discursive activity of the participants of literary communication allows for imagining, shaping and developing literary proprial concepts assigned to literary proper names. In fact, it should be recognised that literary proprial concepts function parallel to name-bearers, as the former entities constitute the focal point of cognitive linguistics, while the latter – of philosophy
    Źródło:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne; 2021, 11; 151-154
    2084-1302
    Pojawia się w:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Pragmatics, discourse and philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Cap, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28762701.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy. Wydawnictwo Uczelniane
    Tematy:
    philosophy of language
    philosophy of linguistics
    pragmatics
    discourse analysis
    discourse practice
    discourse data
    speech act
    macro speech act
    presupposition
    Proximization Theory
    Opis:
    Following the linguistic turn in analytical philosophy, concern for language underlies some of the most important strands of philosophical practice, making issues of mind, language and discourse virtually inseparable elements of scientific inquiry. Just as philosophy looks to language and linguistics to endorse different ontological and epistemological postulates, linguistics looks to philosophy in addressing its key questions of meaning, function and use. In this paper I argue that pragmatics and discourse analysis are areas where the relation between language, linguistics and philosophy is particularly salient. Crucially, philosophy, its conceptions and frameworks, should never be viewed as ‘external’ to discourse. Rather, discourse and discourse study involving pragmatic tools are, in themselves, areas of intense philosophical practice. Results of this practice are relevant and of interest to not only language philosophers, but also to those exploring ontological and epistemological matters of general philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne; 2022, 13; 123-141
    2084-1302
    Pojawia się w:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies