Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "science and society," wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
I ANLEDNING 300-ÅRSJUBILEET: JOHAN ERNST GUNNERUS OG “AGDERS GUNNERUS” – ET BIDRAG TIL Å FORSTÅ HVORFOR BISKOP GUNNERUS FORESLO ET NORSK UNIVERSITET I KRISTIANSAND I 1771
Autorzy:
Jahr, Ernst Hakon
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1047747.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Johan Ernst Gunnerus, modern science in Norway, The Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters in Trondheim, Kristiansand, the University of Agder, the Agder Academy of Sciences and Letters
Opis:
The paper is written in connection with the 2018 300th anniversary of the birth of the professor and bishop, Johan Ernst Gunnerus (1718–1773), who founded modern science in Norway and who, in 1760, also founded the first learned society in the country: The Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters in Trondheim. In 1758 Professor Gunnerus was appoined the bishop for the whole of northern Norway, as the bishop of Trondheim. In 1771 Bishop Gunnerus was called to the capital of the then Danish-Norwegian kingdom, Copenhagen, with the mission of reforming the Copenhagen university, at that time the only university in the entire dual kingdom. In his recommendation for reforms of the university, he also included a proposal for the establishment of a university in Norway. In this proposal, he argued for the city of Kristiansand as the most suitable location for that university. If the King would follow his recommendation, he would himself move to Kristiansand and also bring with him the Royal Society from Trondheim. Many people have subsequently wondered why he chose to point to Kristiansand for the establishment of the first Norwegian university, and not Oslo (where the university was finally opened in 1813) or Trondheim (where he had founded the Royal Society 11 years earlier). It has been thought that Gunnerus suggested Kristiansand mainly because the fact that the city was close to Denmark and a university there could perhaps have also recruited students from northern Jutland. Some have even suggested that Gunnerus proposed Kristiansand because he knew it would not be acceptable to Copenhagen or to the King, and then Trondheim (his “real” wish) could then emerge as a more plausible candidate, even if it was situated rather far north. In this paper, I argue that until now everybody who has discussed Gunnerus' choice of location for a Norwegian university has missed one decisive point: before Gunnerus moved from Copenhagen (where he was professor) to Trondheim (as bishop), Kristiansand was known in Norway, Denmark and the rest of Europe as the Norwegian centre for science and research. This was due to just one man, Bishop Jens Christian Spidberg (1684–1762). I show how Spidberg established himself through international publications as the leading scientist in Norway, and how everybody with a scientific question during the first half of the 18th century looked to Kristiansand and Spidberg for the answer. This, I argue, gaveKristiansand an academic and scientific reputation that Gunnerus was very well aware of and could exploit in his recommendation of Kristiansand as the location for the first Norwegian university. However, this knowledge about this reputation of Kristiansand’s in the first half of the 18th century has since been lost completely, mostly because Gunnerus’ fundamental seminal contribution in the second half of the 18th century has completely overshadowed the academic situation in Norway before his time. Finally in 2007 a university, the University of Agder, was established in Kristiansand, on the basis of a university college with academic roots going back to 1828. An academy of science, the Agder Academy of Sciences and Letters, was founded in 2002. A formal agreement of cooperation between the Royal Society and the then university college was signed 2001, and the academy joined the agreement in 2005. This agreement confirmed the long academic ties between Kristiansand and Trondheim, going all the way back to the scientific positions first held by Spidberg in Kristiansand and then by Gunnerus in Trondheim.
Źródło:
Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia; 2019, 19; 233-246
1509-4146
Pojawia się w:
Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
OECD Blue Sky Research. Koncepcja wiedzy w społeczeństwie wiedzy w świetle teorii Nico Stehra
OECD Blue Sky Research. The concept of knowledge in a knowledge society in the light of Nico Stehr’s theory
Autorzy:
Niedbalska, Grażyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1195107.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
science and technology statistics (S&T)
knowledge
knowledge society
knowledge-based economy
knowledge measurement
capitalisation of R&D
system of national accounts (SNA)
Nico Stehr
statystyka nauki i techniki
wiedza
społeczeństwo wiedzy
gospodarka oparta na wiedzy
pomiary wiedzy
„kapitalizacja" działalności B R
rachunki narodowe
Opis:
Autorka omawia przemyślenia dyskutowane podczas realizacji projektu OECD zatytułowanego Blue Sky Research, którego celem jest opracowanie nowego systemu wskaźników statystycznych na potrzeby pomiaru gospodarki opartej na wiedzy, w tym zwłaszcza koncepcję wiedzy w społeczeństwie wiedzy prof. Nico Stehra, niemieckiego socjologa specjalizującego się w problematyce transformacji współczesnych społeczeństw w społeczeństwa wiedzy. W artykule przewijają się dwa wątki. Pierwszy poświęcony jest omówieniu twórczości Nico Stehra i jego teorii wiedzy w społeczeństwie wiedzy, drugi - projektowi Blue Sky Research, w ramach którego dyskutowano nad teorią Stehra jako punktem wyjścia do prac nad rozwojem systemu wskaźników do opisu gospodarki opartej na wiedzy. Autorka podkreśla znaczenie prac metodologicznych prowadzonych przez statystyków na arenie międzynarodowej pod egidą OECD dla rozwoju wiedzy o wiedzy oraz wiedzy o funkcjonowaniu systemów innowacji. Szczególną uwagę poświęca pracom nad tzw. kapitalizacją działalności B+R w systemie rachunków narodowych. Omawia także znaczenie takich pojęć jak „społeczeństwo wiedzy” czy „społeczeństwo informacyjne”, a zwłaszcza poglądy brytyjskiego socjologa Franka Webstera, zarzucającego wymienionym koncepcjom zbyt uogólniający i ideologiczny charakter.
The paper discusses reflections discussed during the OECD Blue Sky project, aimed to develop a new set of statistical indicators for knowledge-based economy, notably the concept of knowledge in a knowledge-based society developed by prof. Nico Stehr’s, a German sociologist specialising in transformation of contemporary societies into knowledge- based societies. One part of the paper discusses Nico Stehr’s work and his theory of knowledge in the knowledge-based society whereas the second part describes the Blue Sky research project where Stehr’s theory was discussed as a point of departure for developing a set of indicators to describe knowledge-based economy. In this second part of the paper the author stresses the importance of methodological work conducted internationally by statisticians under the OECD aegis for the development of knowledge about knowledge and knowledge about innovation systems. Special attention is drawn to work aimed at capitalisation of R&D within the System of National Accounts (SNA). Stehr believes that the term “knowledge society” is a more appropriate label for the new stage of development than terms such as post-industrial society, post-capitalist society or information society. He defines knowledge as a capacity to act. The current transformation in the structure of the economy stems from another stage in transformation of the role of scientific knowledge in the society. Since the second half of the 20th century knowledge in the form or data, Computer software, operational research etc., which Stehr terms as “action knowledge”, has gradually become capable of non-manual production and has evolved into a social resource which, in some respects, is similar to human labour. This is the essence of a knowledge-based economy. In technologically advanced modern societies a growing body of work occurs at the second level of production, no longer governed by laws of naturę but, rather, by social constructs. The author also presents reflections on the futurę of the knowledge-based society, which Sterns describes as fragile, unstable and sensitive. This stems, among other reasons, from the contingency of knowledge. In her finał comments the author discusses the critique of notions such as “knowledge-based society” or “information society”, notably the views of Frank Webster, a British sociologist who criticises those notions as too generalising and ideological.
Źródło:
Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe; 2009, 1, 33; 144-159
1231-0298
Pojawia się w:
Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies