Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "protection right" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    Przerywanie ciąży – rozważania w świetle orzeczenia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w sprawie K 1/20
    Termination of pregnancy – considerations in the light of the ruling of the Constitutional Court in the case K 1/20
    Autorzy:
    Szudejko, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2143097.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-06-10
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    right to protection of life
    right to health protection
    termination of pregnancy
    Constitutional Court
    decision
    Opis:
    The article presents the issues of legal regulation of termination of pregnancy in the context of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court (CC), in particular the ruling in the case K 1/20.The discussion opens with an analysis of models of abortion practices regulations, as well as the solutions adopted in the Polish legal system, with a short historical introduction. It is emphasized how important is the issue, which results from the fundamental differences in worldviews between the supporters and opponents of the permissibility of the practice of termination of pregnancy, which is expressed in the name given to this medical practice.The right to life as an element of the human rights system is discussed, both in terms of international law and the provisions of the Polish constitution.Next, the Polish provisions on the admissibility of termination of pregnancy are presented along with a historical outline, with particular emphasis on the ruling in the case K 26/96. Based on the above discussion, the resolution in the case K 1/20 was discussed, in which the CC found the so-called embryopathological premise for termination of pregnancy to be incompatible with Polish Constitution. A polemic with the justification of the decision is presented, including the errors of interpreta-tion committed by the CC with regard to the constitutional and international form of the right to the protection of life. It is indicated that in the Polish legal system only the right to protection of life exists, not the right to life, which is referred to both by the CC and most of the doctrine.Despite the fact that this resolution does not remove the norm from the legal system, the author draws attention to the practical consequences of issuing it, in particular the occurrence of the so-called ‘chilling effect’ and unjustified activity of the law enforcement authorities.The final part of the article presents conclusions on how to legally regulate the termination of pregnancy.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2022, 1 (37); 61-83
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Lex coronavirus. Włoskie prawo w walce z pandemią
    Lex Coronavirus. Italian Law In Fight With The Pandemy
    Autorzy:
    Urbaniak, Monika
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/911110.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-03-15
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Italy
    right to health protection
    coronavirus
    Constitution
    Opis:
    An epidemic caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has been existed in Europe and worldwide for several weeks now. On 11 March 2020, the WHO declared it a global pandemic. At the time of writing, Europe, in particular Italy, is the largest outbreak of coronavirus. Italy is attempting to tackle the virus with increasingly drastic legal measures. On 31 January 2020, its Council of Ministers declared a state of emergency related to the sanitary risk of coronavirus infection. Italy has started the fight against the virus using two legal instruments: the first is the Council of Ministers’ declaration of a six-month state of emergency on 31 January 2020, and the second is a decree-law (decreto legge) issued by the Prime Minister temporarily restricting the freedom of movement throughout the state. In exceptional cases, the Italian Government has the right to issue normative legal acts. Recent legislative acts issued in Italy have undoubtedly limited the fundamental rights granted by the Constitution of 1947. These limited rights include the right of movement, but also freedom of assembly, the right to work, freedom of economic activity and freedom of conscience and religion. As a result of the legal solutions introduced, fundamental human rights are subject to justifiable restrictions in order to protect the constitutionally guaranteed right of the community to health care. In situations of epidemiological threats, protecting the lives and health of citizens is essential. Any restrictions on rights and freedoms are intended to protect these goods. However extensive these restrictions may be, in a democratic state this must be introduced under strict control and for a specified period of time linked to the duration of an epidemic.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2020, 1, 29; 9-26
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prawo do bycia zapomnianym w perspektywie przetwarzania danych osobowych
    The right to be forgotten from the perspective of processing personal data
    Autorzy:
    Nasiadka, Łukasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28409258.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    personal data processing
    right to be forgotten
    data protection
    Opis:
    Nowadays, effective protection of personal data is one of the fundamental issues of a democratic state under the rule of law. Therefore, the legislator should be very precise about the principles and standards of data processing. In the last few decades, in particular, the development of new technologies, digitalisation and the increase in the need for electronic communication has become evident, which leads to the adoption of appropriate regulations for the handling of personal data. In addition, the EU legislator has introduced the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in order to harmonise the regulations of EU Member States regarding the protection of personal data. This provides a framework for the proper functioning of legal provisions across the European Union regarding the handling of personal data of its citizens.The aim of the article is to identify the legal changes resulting from the Personal Data Protection Regulation, with a particular focus on the persons to which they apply and then to analyse the regulation of ‘the right to be forgotten’. In the first part of the article, attention is drawn to the way personal data are processed and the scope of obligations incumbent on data controllers. This is because data controllers are, together with the personal data protection officer, responsible for recording data processing activities, including ongoing monitoring and responding to situations of inaccurate data processing. The second part focuses on the right to be forgotten and the assessment of this entitlement in the perspective of Regulation 2016/679. The research methods include an analysis of legal acts, at the same time using the subject literature.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2023, 2 (42); 77-94
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Nieukierunkowana inwigilacja elektroniczna w świetle aktualnego orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
    Bulk electronic surveillance in the light of current European Court of Human Rights case law
    Autorzy:
    Rojszczak, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28409236.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    electronic surveillance
    bulk surveillance
    personal data protection
    right to privacy
    Opis:
    In 2016, while testifying before a UK parliamentary committee, William Binney, former technical director of the US National Security Agency, stated that by implementing bulk surveillance programmes, “your government and my government has permitted what terrorists have wanted all along but could never achieve. That is to cause us to restrict our freedoms while also tripping up our efforts to stop them”.Despite the passage of years, controversy about the proportionality of the use of surveillance programmes involving indiscriminate and bulk data collection continues unabated. There are numerous arguments that such measures should not be used in democratic states. Despite the recurring reports of abuse and questionable usefulness of such solutions, there is also no shortage of arguments put forward by proponents of the use of untargeted measures proving the need (or even necessity) for their use for public security purposes.The issue presented here is also the subject of ongoing interest on the part of legislators and the judiciary. The article aims to provide an overview of the evolution of the ECtHR’s position on the use of electronic surveillance, in particular its untargeted forms. However, the article is intended not only to recapitulate the reasoning as set out in recent case law – including the 2021 judgments of the Grand Chamber in Big Brother Watch et al. v. United Kingdom and Centrum för rättvisa v Sweden – but also to prompt further discussion on the relevance of the Court’s position as set out in relation to the most important legal issues relating to mass surveillance. It is the author’s intention that in this way it will be possible to answer the question of whether the current standard set by the ECtHR can be considered sufficient to protect against the risk associated with the spread of modern surveillance measures and their increasing use by public authorities.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2022, 4 (40); 111-142
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kryteria „kosztowe” kwalifikowania świadczeń opieki zdrowotnej jako gwarantowanych a prawo do ochrony zdrowia
    The criteria of ‘cost’ used in the qualification of guaranteed healthcare services and the right to health care
    Autorzy:
    Lach, Daniel E.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/693782.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    guaranteed services of the healthcare
    cost criteria of qualifying the guaranteed services
    right to protection of health
    gwarantowane świadczenia opieki zdrowotnej
    kryteria kosztowe kwalifikowania świadczeń gwarantowanych
    prawo do ochrony zdrowia
    Opis:
    The subject of this paper is the legal criteria for the procedure of qualifying healthcare services as guaranteed and subsequent reimbursement decisions, as well as the assessment of the admissibility of the exclusion of certain services or drugs from the catalogue of guaranteed services because of the financial implications for the healthcare system or the cost of obtaining an additional year of life. The latter cost is adjusted by the quality against the background of the constitutional regulations concerning the right to health care and the duty of the public authority to secure the citizens equal access to health care services financed from public funds in a frame of a healthcare system as an instrument for the realisation of ‘the right to protection of health’ in its individual and service-concerning meaning. The question of the limitation of the scope of the catalogue of guaranteed services as the violation of the right to protection of health and the possibility of giving a rise for a claim for the financing of services beyond the legal guaranty based on the right to protection of health is also discussed.
    Przedmiotem opracowania jest przedstawienie kryteriów przewidzianych ustawowo na potrzeby procedury kwalifikowania świadczeń opieki zdrowotnej jako gwarantowanych oraz wydawania decyzji refundacyjnych, a także ocena dopuszczalności wyłączania z katalogu świadczeń gwarantowanych określonych świadczeń lub leków z uwagi na skutki finansowe dla systemu opieki zdrowotnej lub koszt uzyskania dodatkowego roku życia skorygowanego o jakość w świetle konstytucyjnoprawnych regulacji dotyczących prawa do ochrony zdrowia oraz obowiązku władzy publicznej zapewnienia obywatelom równego dostępu do świadczeń opieki zdrowotnej finansowanej ze środków publicznych w ramach systemu opieki zdrowotnej, jako instrumentu służącego realizacji prawa do ochrony zdrowia w jego indywidualnym i świadczeniowym wymiarze. W artykule omówiono kwestię ograniczenia zakresu ustawowej gwarancji jako naruszenie prawa do ochrony zdrowia oraz możliwość konstruowania roszczenia o udzielenie/sfinansowanie świadczeń nieobjętych systemową gwarancją na podstawie prawa do ochrony zdrowia.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny; 2017, 79, 2; 73-85
    0035-9629
    2543-9170
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    European Court of Human Rights Case Law on Genetic Information in the Scope of International Biomedical Law
    Autorzy:
    Kwiatkowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1831451.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    genetic data protection
    the right to respect for private life
    international biomedical law
    European Court of Human Rights case law
    Opis:
    The aim of the study is to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on genetic information in the scope of international biomedical law, as expressed in the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data and the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Human Dignity in the Field of Application of Biology and Medicine. The Court held that the genetic information is protected under the law of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The model of the right to respect for private life is reflected in its shape, as the Court noted in the Van der Velden v. The Netherlands and S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom cases. It leads to the conclusion that the provision of Article 8 of the Convention provides the protection of genetic information, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”. Such conclusion is in compliance with art. 12, art. 17 (b) art. 21 (c) of the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, and art. 11 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine.
    Źródło:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2020, 11; 119-137
    2450-0976
    Pojawia się w:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies