Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "fizyki" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    Logiczna baza fizyki
    The Logical Foundation of Physics
    Autorzy:
    Mączka, Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965357.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1998-06-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    Whitehead’s paper „On Mathematical Concepts of the Material World” , published in 1906, is subject to the detailed analysis. In his paper Whitehead presents five quasi-axiomatic systems describing a network of relations between space, time, and objects existing in space and time. Although the systems have a purely formal character, in Whitehead’s opinion, they could be helpful in determining the structure of the real world. Some comments are made concerning the fact that it was Einstein’s operational method rather than Whitehead’s formal speculations that solved the crisis in physics at the beginning of our century. The impact of ideas expressed in this work on Whitehead’s later philosophy is also discussed.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1998, 6, 2; 95-112
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Widmo końca fizyki
    The Spectre of the End of Physics
    Autorzy:
    Tempczyk, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/966626.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010-06-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    The subject of the paper is the presentation and discussion of Lee Smolin's book The Trouble with Physics. Smolin presents in his book the history and the current state of elementary particle physics. He shows that this field of research is now in a very bad situation because no progress has been achieved for last twenty five years. Since the time of Galileo and Newton, fundamental physics has been in the process of permanent progress and the recent lack of success is considered by Smolin as ex-ceptional and dangerous. Superstring theory is, in his opinion, the main cause of this trouble with physics. The theory dominated elementary particle physics in USA, al-most completely eliminating other more fruitful approaches to elementary particles and their interactions. Smolin analyses the situation from sociological point of view and he proposes some preventive measures. He is completely concentrated on phys-ics in USA and he neglects the rest of the world.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 2010, 18, 2; 113-123
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Filozofia fizyki przed nowym millenium
    Philosophy of Physics before the New Millennium
    Autorzy:
    Heller, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965607.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1996-06-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    Physics is inseparably connected with western philosophy. From the seventieth century, physics began to play the role similar to that of ontology. Moreover, many notions and problems moved from philosophy to physics. That way it came into being something that is now called „philosophy in physics”. It means that some traditional philosophical questions, like for example the problem of individualization, emerge in physics in a new, exact and mathematical form. Therefore, physics will in the future become gradually philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1996, 4, 2; 7-15
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zwroty modalne języka fizyki
    Modal Expressions in the Language of Physical Science
    Autorzy:
    Tkaczyk, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/966944.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006-12-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    Modal concepts - among them the concepts of logical, physical (nomic) and metaphysical necessity - used to be quite important for philosophy of science during centuries. However, in the XX c. most philosophers preferred not to recognize those concepts in science (especially the concept of physical necessity). They were wrong. Some patterns from history of physics are presented, showing the concept of physical necessity playing an important role in the scientific research of nature. And the nature of physically necessary statements is different from both logically necessary statements - on the one hand - and contingent statements, on the other. Consequently three attempts to explain the nature of physical necessity are discussed. (1) Physical necessities are just relative necessities, logical consequences of physical laws. (2) Logical and physical necessities are of the same nature, although logically necessary statements are as well analytical, while those physically necessary are synthetic. Some serious difficulties arising in both theories are shown. Finally a third explanation is outlined. (3) The two kinds of necessary statements differ in their reference: they describe different kinds of real relationships (connection).
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 2006, 14, 4; 97-108
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zasada korespondencji a jedność fizyki
    The Principle of Correspondence and the Unity of Physics
    Autorzy:
    Kuisz, Aleksander
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/967300.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1997-03-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    The author analyses three aspects of the correspondence between theories: physical, methodological and philosophical.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1997, 5, 1; 127-133
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Jak Max Planck, mechanicysta, zdołał wprowadzić kwanty do fizyki?
    How Could It Happen that Max Planck, a Mechanicist, Managed to Introduce Quanta into Physis?
    Autorzy:
    Sady, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/966621.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010-03-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    Ludwik Fleck says that a thought-collective develops a thought-style which shapes the ways of perceiving the world and thinking of the world by its members. So how could it happen that at the end of 1900 Max Planck, whose thinking was determined by classical mechanics, managed to think that energy is quantized - the idea that contradicted the principles of Newton's mechanics? My answer is that Planck did not intend to think it. From 1880 Planck tried to reconcile the time reversibility of the laws of mechanics with the time irreversibility of the laws of thermodynamics. The irreversibil ity in question was expressed in 1854 by Clausius in the form of the law of the growth of entropy defined as dS = dQ/T. During 1870’s Boltzmann found the statistical interpretation of entropy as S = k ln w + const. At first Planck insisted on applying mechanics in a unrestricted way. He criticized Boltzmann statistical physics and rejected atomism as leading to Loschmidt’s paradox. For 20 years Planck did not manage to solve his central problem. From about 1897 Planck started to cope with the problem of irreversibility using experimental data for the energy distribution of black body radiation. When he failed again he started to apply some statistical techniques. Using the laws of classical thermodynamics and adjusting his formulae to experimental data he arrived at the formula for the mean entropy of resonators. When in October 7th 1900 Heinrich Rubens gave him improved data for the energy distribution for big values of λT, Planck at once corrected his expression for the average entropy of resonators and arrived at the formula for the distribution of the energy of black body radiation that was in perfect agreement with the experimental data. Just after that, trying to provide his results with „the real physical meaning” he tried statistical methods like as developed by Boltzmann - whom he criticized for twenty years - and in December 1900, using purely theoretical combinatorial methods, he arrived at the formula for the average entropy of resonators. It turned out that both formulae were identical if and only if the energy of resonators was complete multiplicity of hν. So Planck was thinking according to rules inherited from others and quanta appeared rather on paper then in his mind.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 2010, 18, 1; 91-120
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies