Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "public authorities," wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Czy „Król może czynić źle”? Odpowiedzialność cywilna za wykonywanie władzy publicznej w prawie angielskim
    Autorzy:
    Paweł, Słup,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903023.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-01-18
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    civil liability
    public authorities
    tort law
    administrative law
    Crown proceedings
    odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza
    władze publiczne
    prawo deliktów
    prawo administracyjne
    postępowania z udziałem Korony
    Opis:
    The principle of state liability has been widely recognised in 20th century and codified in certain jurisdictions. English law, however, has been traditionally reluctant to recognise the liability of Crown distinct from the of its servants. According to the long-standing principle of rule of law, servants of the Crown should be liable for torts committed in their official capacity just as individuals. The principle has been allegedly designed to protect the individuals from arbitrary decisions of public authorities, which fall in their actions under jurisdiction of common courts. It was not until the advance of Crown Proceedings Act 1974 when the Crown took material liability for torts committed by its servants. The nature of tortious liability of the public bodies, however, remained peculiar. The aim of this article is to indicate that the underlying concept of individual liability of servants, once designed to protect the individuals, now restricts the scope of civil liability of public bodies in English law.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2018, 76; 341-362
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Иcпοлнение требοваний в οтнοшении казны РФ: гражданcкο-правοвοй режим и прοблемные аcпекты
    Autorzy:
    Iwan, Korolew,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902657.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-11-07
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    civil liabilitу
    civil procedure
    public authorities
    the requirements for the Treasurу
    pursuant to propertу claims
    compensation for harm
    the harm caused to the state authorities and local authorities
    public law regime
    civil regime
    Opis:
    Introduction: The article deals with civil runtime requirements for the Treasurу of the Russian Federation for the unlawful actions of preliminarу investigation, prosecution and trial. Objective: To analуze the institution of protection of rights and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations in the course of the investigation, consideration and resolution of cases in the judicial and administrative authorities, as well as the Institute for compensation for damage caused bу bodies of inquirу, preliminarу investigation, the police, prosecutors and courts in the implementation of state and municipal functions. Methods: When writing this article the author used the following methods: general scientific dialectical analуsis and sуnthesis, induction and deduction, abstraction and concretization, formal logic, comparative legal, sуstem, technical and legal. Results: The author analуzes the legal regulation and the procedure for compensation for damage caused bу unlawful actions (inaction) of inquest, preliminarу investigation, prosecution and trial. Particular attention is given to a subject that meets the relevant requirements, and which is obliged to compensate the damage. It is noted that the use of recourse liabilitу to the official who committed offenses in the performance of public functions bу or on behalf of the Russian Federation does not exclude the possibilitу of bringing him to disciplinarу, administrative, criminal and other forms of legal liabilitу, the combination of which should be directed to the full satisfaction of both public interest and the interests of the victim. For the recoverу of funds bу the Treasurу of the Russian Federation on behalf of the Ministrу of Finance should act in the face of the Russian Federation Main Department of the Federal Treasurу. Execution of judicial decisions at the expense of the appropriations provided for this purpose the law (decision) on the budget. Conclusion: civil legal regime of propertу claims against the Treasurу of the Russian Federation, a subject of the Russian Federation, the municipalitу is interdisciplinarу and consists of (1) a public law regime mediated bу the rules of budgetarу law (Articles 158, 242.2 BC Code) and legislation on enforcement proceedings, and (2) the civil law (Articles 125, 170, 1071 of the Civil Code). The latter is expressed in a civil law features a set of reimbursement (compensation) of the harm caused to public legal education.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2017, 70; 103-110
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zasada odpowiedzialności państwa i związków publiczno-prawnych za szkodę wyrządzoną przez ich funkcjonariuszy w projekcie Profesora W. Czachórskiego z 1946 r.
    Autorzy:
    Katarzyna, Królikowska,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902560.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    state liability for public officers
    model of compensation for damages caused by state officers
    constitutional principle of state liability
    historical evolution of civil liability for acts of public authorities
    Opis:
    In the present article, the author presents the origin of the draft law, prepared by prof. W. Czachórski, on the civil liability of state and self-government entities for acts of political power (imperium) of their public officers, as well as the reasons for the publication of the proposal followed by an article in 1946 just after the end of the World War II. Another question that has been discussed in the article is the correctness of implementation into Polish private law of a public concept of state liability adopted in Article 121 of the 1921 Constitution (being merely a declaration not a binding norm). The article reviews the opinions of scholars concerning public character and scope of constitutional concept of state liability. An attempt also was made to determine whether the drafted rules on compensation by the state for damages caused by its officers were adequately constructed within the law of obligations. The basic aim of the article is to provide an answer to the question, whether the proposed general liability rule was based on principle of the fault of the state for the damage caused, vicarious liability for the servant’s acts or whether it was based on another non-fault principle explaining state liability for the detrimental acts committed by the state officers. The author discusses possible conditions of state liability in 1946 draft law, as well as doubts expressed by legal doctrine in this matter. Furthermore, the work contains a review of judicial decisions and scholarly opinions with respect to the well-established and undisputed state liability for damages caused by public officers exercising commercial tasks (dominium). The article includes a review of the different pre-war binding rules on that issue, based on French, German, Austrian and Polish law, as well as a review of the judicial interpretation of those civil law rules binding in this respect during the Second Republic of Poland (1918–1939). The goal was to point out the dynamic character of the interpretation delivered by courts, with special reference to a new concept of organizational fault (faute de service) developed by the French Conseil d’Etat. The article also discusses proposed concept of state co-liability with the officer in terms of joint liability or complementary subsidiary non-fault state liability, resulting from the principle of justice or social solidarity. What is more, the article highlights another interesting issues concerning the question whether the relationship between state and its officer was meant to be based on the traditional solidarity of debtors or whether it represented another legal concept adopted in favour of the injured party. Finally, the present work characterizes the influence of the draft decree on the Act of 15 November 1956 on the liability of the state for damages caused by state agents and on the corresponding provisions of the 1964 Polish Civil Code, both acts adopted during the People’s Republic of Poland. The aim was to indicate important differences between the 1946 draft law and 1956 Law which was enacted under strong influence of new concepts of the socialist state liability for acts of its employees (agents), not only for officers. In the end, the article presents the potential course of the development of the Polish law in case the drafted law would be adopted.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 64; 181-211
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zmiana przepisów wyznaniowych Konstytucji RP z 1997 r.
    Autorzy:
    Paweł, Borecki,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902718.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-04-13
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Constitution change
    state relations – church
    freedom of thought
    conscience and religion
    impartiality of public authorities
    unbelievers
    worldview organizations
    zmiana Konstytucji RP
    stosunki państwo–kościół
    wolność myśli
    sumienia i wyznania
    bezstronność władz publicznych
    niewierzący
    organizacje światopoglądowe
    Opis:
    Possible change of religious regulations of the Constitution should take place in cooperation with churches and world-wide organizations. The legislator limits Poland’s international obligations to protect freedom and human rights in religious matters. The Concordat of 1997 is also a limitation. At present there is an unfavorable political situation for liberal changes. The most important changes should be to increase the protection of non-believers and philosophical organizations. The neutrality of public authorities in religious matters must also be better guaranteed. The beginning of the constitutional debate on religious issues, however, risks the change for the worse. This debate does not start.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2017, 72; 71-86
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies