Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "constitutional liability" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Zasada odpowiedzialności państwa i związków publiczno-prawnych za szkodę wyrządzoną przez ich funkcjonariuszy w projekcie Profesora W. Czachórskiego z 1946 r.
Autorzy:
Katarzyna, Królikowska,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902560.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
state liability for public officers
model of compensation for damages caused by state officers
constitutional principle of state liability
historical evolution of civil liability for acts of public authorities
Opis:
In the present article, the author presents the origin of the draft law, prepared by prof. W. Czachórski, on the civil liability of state and self-government entities for acts of political power (imperium) of their public officers, as well as the reasons for the publication of the proposal followed by an article in 1946 just after the end of the World War II. Another question that has been discussed in the article is the correctness of implementation into Polish private law of a public concept of state liability adopted in Article 121 of the 1921 Constitution (being merely a declaration not a binding norm). The article reviews the opinions of scholars concerning public character and scope of constitutional concept of state liability. An attempt also was made to determine whether the drafted rules on compensation by the state for damages caused by its officers were adequately constructed within the law of obligations. The basic aim of the article is to provide an answer to the question, whether the proposed general liability rule was based on principle of the fault of the state for the damage caused, vicarious liability for the servant’s acts or whether it was based on another non-fault principle explaining state liability for the detrimental acts committed by the state officers. The author discusses possible conditions of state liability in 1946 draft law, as well as doubts expressed by legal doctrine in this matter. Furthermore, the work contains a review of judicial decisions and scholarly opinions with respect to the well-established and undisputed state liability for damages caused by public officers exercising commercial tasks (dominium). The article includes a review of the different pre-war binding rules on that issue, based on French, German, Austrian and Polish law, as well as a review of the judicial interpretation of those civil law rules binding in this respect during the Second Republic of Poland (1918–1939). The goal was to point out the dynamic character of the interpretation delivered by courts, with special reference to a new concept of organizational fault (faute de service) developed by the French Conseil d’Etat. The article also discusses proposed concept of state co-liability with the officer in terms of joint liability or complementary subsidiary non-fault state liability, resulting from the principle of justice or social solidarity. What is more, the article highlights another interesting issues concerning the question whether the relationship between state and its officer was meant to be based on the traditional solidarity of debtors or whether it represented another legal concept adopted in favour of the injured party. Finally, the present work characterizes the influence of the draft decree on the Act of 15 November 1956 on the liability of the state for damages caused by state agents and on the corresponding provisions of the 1964 Polish Civil Code, both acts adopted during the People’s Republic of Poland. The aim was to indicate important differences between the 1946 draft law and 1956 Law which was enacted under strong influence of new concepts of the socialist state liability for acts of its employees (agents), not only for officers. In the end, the article presents the potential course of the development of the Polish law in case the drafted law would be adopted.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2016, 64; 181-211
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Impact of Human Dignity on the Principles of Criminal Liability. The Example of Guilt
Autorzy:
Krzysztof, Szczucki,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902957.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
criminal law
constitutional law
human dignity
guilt
culpability
criminal liability
Opis:
Human dignity is a well-known concept among Western countries since after World War II, when states, in an effort to create a new platform of cooperation with a view to guaranteeing peace, were looking for an axiological foundation of the new order. The findings described in the article may serve to underpin the following notions, which have to be the object of further research on relations between the human dignity principle and rules of criminal liability, guilt in particular. First, the “guilt standard” is obligatory, whenever a state intends to punish a person. Second, punishment can be meted out only to an offender with an ability to bear responsibility. In other words, only a person whose characteristic derived from the principle of dignity is fully actualized can be punished. Third, punishing should be preceded by an analysis of the degree of guilt. The more eager the perpetrator was to act against the legal system and against the values protected by it, the severer punishment should be meted out. Finally, law should provide for exclusion of culpability when the human dignity principle demands one to act in a manner that is outwardly criminal, but was committed due to a motivation that ought to be excused in the light of the dignity principle.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2016, 67; 11-31
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Między prewencyjnym a bezprawnym pozbawieniem wolności − uwagi na tle instytucji kwarantanny
Autorzy:
Wasylik, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899236.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-01-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
quarantine
criminal liability
preventive deprivation of liberty
unlawful deprivation of liberty
exclusive validity of a law
constitutional guarantees
Opis:
This article attempts to provide a partial examination of the title issue in the Polish legal order from the point of view of criminal law. The basic thesis of the article boils down to the statement that the criminal law limits of admissibility of the application of quarantine in Poland, during the Covid-19 pandemic, contradicted, inter alia, article 5(1)(e) of the ECHR, but also violated the accepted order of hierarchy of Polish legal acts as referred to in the Constitution and the rules of correct legislation. In order to demonstrate such a statement, the manner and conditions and the possibility of applying this type of measure of medical coercion, as well as the sanctions for its violation, were taken into account. Attention was paid to selected consequences resulting from this classification. In addition, a survey of the case law of the common courts, administrative courts, the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court on the violation of quarantine was carried out. It has been assumed that the court’s imputation of a criminal act the elements of which are defined by a blanket provision of the criminal act and supplementary provisions of other normative acts, requires: 1) verifying the admissibility of regulating a specific matter with regulations of a sub-statutory rank; 2) examining the compliance with the Constitution of the content of such regulations are in line with the blanket regulation, and 3) observing the scope of the authorization to issue them, placed in the law. The aforementioned matters must be regulated directly in the law, which will ensure that the standards resulting from the Constitution are met, and their enforcement should be carried out by sanitary authorities or courts. The view was expressed that in criminal procedure, preventive measures should be aimed at the prevention of crimes and not at every unlawful act. It was stressed that the public authorities should take responsibility for every unlawful violation of constitutionally protected rights. It was argued that the size of any administrative fines imposed for noncompliance with the quarantine obligation should be proportionate to the financial capacity of the majority of citizens, in accordance with the directives that follow from administrative law. Finally, a critical assessment was made of the legality of imposing quarantine in the context of international treaty obligations for the protection of human rights.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2022, 93; 257-284
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Криминализация нарушения права на защиту как средство его обеспечения (опыт национального нормотворчества)
Criminalisation of violation of the right to defence as a remedy for its enforcement (national legislative experience)
Autorzy:
Zhytnyi, Oleksandr
Spiridonov, Mykhailo
Vasyliev, Andrii
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1732308.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-04-14
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
право на защиту
обвинение
уголовное право
уголовная ответственность
конституционные принципы уголовного процесса
общеевропейские правовые ценности
криминализация
right to defence
prosecution
criminal law
criminal liability
constitutional principles of
criminal procedure
European legal values
criminalisation
Opis:
Аннотация B статье рассматривается возможность признания права на защиту самостоятельным объектом уголовно-правовой охраны с учетом процессуальных, конституционных, международно-правовых и общеевропейских аспектов его ценности. В качестве методологического инструментария для реализации исследовательской задачи выбраны системно-структурный, диалектический и компаративный методы, а также аксиологический (ценностный) подход. В результате исследования выявлены возможные модели криминализации нарушений права на защиту.
The opportunity of admission of the right to defence as an independent object of criminal law protection is analysed in this article. Such opportunity has been considered with the reference to the procedural, constitutional, international law and European aspects of the value of this right. The system-structural, dialectical and comparative methods, as well as the axiological (value) approach were chosen as a methodology for the implementation of the research task. The potential models of criminalisation of violation of the right to defence have been identified as a result.
Źródło:
Przegląd Europejski; 2021, 1; 191-199
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies