Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Karski, Karol" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Najwyższy Trybunał Narodowy a osądzenie sprawców zbrodni popełnionych podczas tłumienia Powstania Warszawskiego – niewykorzystany instrument
Autorzy:
Karski, Karol
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48568702.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-11-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
crimes under international law
Supreme National Tribunal
Warsaw Uprising
Opis:
The Supreme National Tribunal, which operated in Poland between 1946 and 1948, tried 49 Hitlerite criminals who had committed crimes against Poland and Poles during World War II. It was tasked not only with bringing individual perpetrators to justice but also with publicizing these matters to the world. It was in effect the Polish equivalent of the Nuremberg Tribunal. However, the suppression of the Warsaw Uprising, including the Wola Massacre (Wola Slaughter), was not covered by these trials, even though initially The Tribunal planned to try Germans responsible for the crimes committed during the Uprising. In practice. these crimes were carefully omitted from the seven trials conducted by the Tribunal. Even when the high officials of the occupation administration in Warsaw were tried, the period of the Warsaw Uprising was not, as a rule, the subject were subsequently tried by the Polish common courts. The fact is that the then Polish authorities were not keen to publicize the martyrdom of those who had taken part in the Warsaw Uprising because this would have inevitably led to questions as to why USSR military forces did not come to the aid of the Warsaw residents being murdered by the Germans and also to what was happening to the Polish Home Army soldiers who had fought vigorously at that time and who, after the war, were subject to persecution by the new authorities installed in Poland by the Soviet Union. The Tribunal, whose task was to judge the perpetrators of the most significant German crimes, ceased its activities without even considering what was probably the largest single massacre of civilians in Europe during World War II, and the largest single act of extermination in the history of the Polish Nation: the Wola Massacre.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2022, 91; 122-145
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jurysdykcja szczególna w sprawach o naruszenie dóbr osobistych w internecie z perspektywy prawa Unii Europejskiej
Autorzy:
Karski, Karol
Oręziak, Bartłomiej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/47407156.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-10-18
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
jurysdykcja właściwa
jurysdykcja szczególna
unia europejska
internet
dobra osobiste
applicable jurisdiction
special jurisdiction
european union
personal rights
Opis:
This article aims to analyze the European Union law in terms of the jurisdiction applicable in cases of infringement of personal rights on the Internet. After a short introduction to issues of technical, technological and civilizational progress, consideration is given to the fact that the Internet has become a common platform of human activity. The role, characteristics, and specificity of this state of affairs are presented, and the consequences assessed. The paper then turns to the fact that the problem of determining the applicable jurisdiction in the European Union law is based on general terms from which there are normative exceptions. Such exceptions include a special jurisdiction mechanism that is analysed in this paper. With regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the paper proposes ways the jurisdiction of European Union Member States should be determined in cases of infringement of personal rights on the Internet. The paper also contains postulates related to the interpretation of relevant Union legislation, which are directed to legislative and judicial authorities. The discussion is closed with a brief summary of the authors’ reflections on the analysed issues, as well as some comments on the recent relevant cases.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2021, 87; 242-261
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies