Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Donald Trump" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Reconfiguration of Geopolitical Strategies in Trump’s Era: The Impact of American Political Leadership’s Idiosyncrasies on the Traditional Transatlantic Relations
    Autorzy:
    Ciot, Melania-Gabriela
    Ghidiu, Iulia-Anamaria
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1038449.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
    Tematy:
    Donald Trump;
    Idiosyncratic Leadership;
    Transatlantic Alliance;
    Geopolitical Alternatives;
    Opis:
    The International System is traversing a challenging stage in its evolution. The United States should carefully consider the risks of an idiosyncratic leadership and closely work with their European partners, securing a world order based on the norms of multilateralism and democracy. Still, the US President Donald Trump unveils an approach based on emotional and synchronous elements. As a matter of consequence, the EU is considering other geopolitical alternatives to accomplish its goals and deliver the best outcome to the people it serves and for global prosperity. The paper investigates the very specifi c psychological factors infl uencing Trumpian political thinking and justifying his corresponding foreign policy decisionmaking processes, in the current transatlantic environment. By contextual examples, the analysis reveals the sensitivities and flaws in applying a subjective, belief-based approach of international (bilateral) relations. We put things into a broader perspective, by analysing the implications of such political behaviour patterns for the international liberal order, in the circumstances of the more and more prominent geopolitical triangle: theEU–China–the US.
    Źródło:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2020, 24, 2; 25-42
    1428-149X
    2719-3780
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Doubtful Ally or Ally Full of Doubts? The Course of Transatlantic Relations under Donald Trump’s Presidency
    Autorzy:
    Mazur, Sylwia K.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/557981.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
    Tematy:
    Transatlantic Relations;
    European Union;
    United States;
    Donald Trump;
    Multilateralism;
    Opis:
    Donald Trump’s “America-first” diplomacy has undermined the foundations of many alliances, including a transatlantic relationship on which post-war liberal order would rest. Under the current American presidency, EU–US relations are facing significant challenges whose implications are still far from clear. The list of discrepancies between the allies are growing ever longer and the American administration’s decisions are antithetical to those taken by Brussels and other European capitals. Divisions, among other things, have occurred over policies towards the Paris Climate Agreement, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and the Middle East approach. The special relationship between Europe and United States can no longer be taken for granted. In this presented paper, the author has looked beyond current political disagreements in order to focus on the long term factors underlying the “special relationship”. The rationale behind this research is the dawn of great power politics that happens during the transition from uni-to-multipolar order. America’s disengagement from (and defunding of) the global scene means that the European Union will have to adjust to a world with numerous centres of power and different sources of threat. Ursula von der Leyen announced, upon assuming offi ce in December 2019, that she would lead a “geopolitical Commission” engaged in tackling global challenges. All of this in the face of the first American administration in post-war history that opposes European integration. Due to the space limit (and deservedness for sole attention), the security and defence dimension of transatlantic cooperation will only be briefly mentioned. Regardless of any comments made by former European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker that the European Union will not create an alternative model to NATO, the creation of a Permanent Structure Cooperation (PESCO) and the establishing of a European Defence Fund cannot be limitted. Enhanced European defence will be essential for a “healthy transatlantic partnership with the United States”. That partnership will, almost certainly, become more transactional.
    Źródło:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2020, 24, 2; 9-23
    1428-149X
    2719-3780
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Transatlantic “Othering”: European External Action Identity and the Trump Administration
    Autorzy:
    Hornát, Jan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/969330.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
    Tematy:
    Transatlantic Relations;
    Sovereignty;
    Multilateralism;
    Othering;
    EU External Action;
    Donald Trump;
    Opis:
    Foreign policy is not only a reaction to the world as it is, but it also attempts to build a world as it should be. The European Union, being an actor on the international scene, grounds its external action in conceptions of the necessity of multilateralism and in building postmodern (post-Westphalian) notions ofstate sovereignty. These elements are an inherent part of the Union’s “foreign policy/identity nexus”. The identity is reinforced by significant “Others”, who do not share the EU’s view of the ideal world order. The Donald Trump administration’s reluctance and even repudiation of multilateral solutions is a challenge for the operationalization of the EU’s “foreign policy/identity nexus” and thus the US is currently in the position of the Union’s constitutive “Other”. However, while we would expect that this development would reinforce the EU’s external action identity, the Trump presidency has at the same time empowered antiglobalist and sovereigntist forces in Europe, which will drive wedges into EU foreign policy and cause further incoherence, especially along the new/ old member state divide.
    Źródło:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2019, 1; 27-42
    1428-149X
    2719-3780
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Populizm a relacje międzynarodowe. Porównanie sytuacji Stanów Zjednoczonychi Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej
    Populism and International Relations. Comparison of the United States and Central and Eastern Europe
    Autorzy:
    Ilowski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/557899.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
    Tematy:
    Populism;
    Populism in Foreign Policy;
    Donald Trump;
    Central Europe;
    Minorities;
    Elites;
    Opis:
    The problem of populism is now widely discussed topic in the world. There are many analysis of this phenomenon, and the reason is the growing importance of it both in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, as well as in countries with a well-established democracy, such as the United States. Until now, this phenomenon has been treated as a problem of internal policy, often in isolation from the external situation. The problem of populism in foreign policy, its influence on state policy and international relations has not been studied extensively. This is puzzling considering the fact that such phenomena as globalization, immigration or trade relations have a transnational dimension. The victory of Donald Trump in 2016 shows that there is a possibility of changing the existing paradigms and the rules may change due to new factors, the character of which is above the national one. We can already see populist transformations, and the reason is growing support for extreme groups. That is why it is worth to consider: Is it possible to talk about populism in international politics? What influence does international affairs have on domestic politics of countries where populists rule? What impact does the populist policy of a given country have on its neighbors or in the case of the US on international principles and security? The attitude of this type of groupings to many matters over the state, such as migration, trade, international organizations, humanitarian aid and the role of armed forces is crucial. It is also important to draw attention to the similarities and differences between populism in foreign policy and populism. In addition, a comparison of populism in the US and in Central and Eastern Europe will help to indicate some universal characteristics of populism in foreign policy in the countries discussed.
    Źródło:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2019, 3; 49-67
    1428-149X
    2719-3780
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies