Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "filozofia religii;" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Daniel Dennett i Alvin Plantinga, Nauka i religia. Czy można je pogodzić?
Autorzy:
Kłeczek, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943998.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
filozofia nauki, filozofia religii, filozofia umysłu
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2015, 5, 2; 541-542
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geoffrey SAMUEL, The Origins of Yoga and Tantra: Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century
Autorzy:
Rostalska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943970.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
joga
tantra
filozofia indyjska
hinduizm
filozofia religii
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2011, 1, 1; 162-167
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Searching for Own Self: on the Boundary between the Ethical and Religious Stage
Autorzy:
Blažeková, Zuzana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437160.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
moment
skok
granica
jednostka
Bóg
Albo albo
egzystencjalizm
doświadczenie religijne
Kierkegaard
filozofia religii
instant
leap
boundary
individual
God
either/or
Opis:
Szukając samego siebie. Granica między etycznym a religijnym stadium. Niniejszy przyczynek jest poświęcony analizie Kierkegaardowskich kategorii skoku i momentu, które w pewien sposób wyrażają ludzką egzystencji. Ludzkie istnienie, wyjątkowe i niepowtarzalne, jest samo w sobie nieuchwytne i trudne do wyrażenia w języku. Egzystencjalistyczna filozofia Kierkegaarda oferuje metodę komunikacji niebezpośredniej. Kierkegaard sugeruje, że o ile chcemy uchwycić fenomen ludzkiej egzystencji, musimy zadowolić się jedynie pośrednim i partykularnym rozumieniem. Żadna konkretna jednostka nie jest w stanie kiedykolwiek uchwycić własnej egzystencji całościowo. Istnieje jednakże miejsce, otwierające możliwość samorozumienia i samoposiadania człowieka. Tym miejscem jest granica, czy też krawędź etycznego i religijnego stadium egzystencji. Stąd celem artykułu jest poszukiwanie odpowiedzi na pytanie: „Co dzieje się na granicy pomiędzy tym, co etyczne, a tym, co religijne?”
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2012, 2, 2; 347-361
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The phenomenological method revisited: towards comparative studies and non-theological interpretations of the religious experience
Autorzy:
Sander, Ake
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437094.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
filozofia religii;
socjologia religii;
fenomenologia religii;
religioznawstwo;
badania porównawcze;
komparatystyka;
metodologia badań porównawczych;
sekularyzacja
philosophy of religion
sociology of religion
phenomenology of religion
religious studies
comparative studies
comparative methodology
secularization
Opis:
During the last decades, two major and interrelated themes have dominated the study of religion: (a) the theme claiming that the long taken-for-granted so-called secularization thesis was all wrong, and (b) the theme of the so-called “return” or “resurgence of religion”. This global revival of religion — on micro, meso and macro levels — has been chronicled in a number of important books lately. As even a quick glance in some of the many textbooks about religious studies reveal that there are many various ways of studying religion — theologically, sociologically, psychologically, anthropologically, philosophically, etc. — and they can be tackled from many different ideological or theoretical “slants” or perspectives – gender, postcolonial, orientalism, postmodernism, inside/outside, hermeneutical, etc. And it seems to be a general rule within science that the more important, complex and controversial a subject area is perceived to be, the more heated the debate about theory, method and definitions of concepts seems to be within it. Comparative religion can, very broadly, be carried out from two types of data: texts or actual living human beings. During the last thirty or so years, and in tandem with the initially mentioned two themes, the latter – what many scholars now call “lived religion” (Hall, 1997; Orsi, 2005; Ammerman, 2007; Mcguire, 2008) – have more and more come to the fore in departments of religious studies. This can be seen as a “rejuvenation” of Friedrich Schleiermacher’s opinions that the only way to study religion adequately was in and through the religious beliefs and practices of actually living human beings and that the heart of religion was to be found, not in rules and regulations, hierarchies and hymnbooks, but in the individual’s experience of dependence upon a power infinitely greater than his own. The student of religion must, in other words, concentrate, not on what people might do, ought to do, or what the textbooks say they are supposed to do, but on what they actually do, and the ways in which they actually behave, and why they do what they do — their motives, reasons or inducements for doing what they do.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2014, 4, 1; 9-34
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dharma and religion in Tagore’s views
Autorzy:
Milewska, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437129.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
Rabindranath Tagore
religia
dharma
Religia człowieka
wiedza a wolność
badania porównawcze religii
komparatystyka
metodologia porównawcza
religioznawstwo
filozofia religii
universal religion
The religion of Man
Indian thought
freedom
comparative methodology
religious studies
philosophy of religion
Opis:
Rabindranath Tagore (1861–1941), one of the greatest contemporary Indian thinkers, discussed the problem of religion and faith on the ground of global pluralism and religious diversity. He presented his views in numerous poetical works (including Gitanjali, a collection of Song offerings translated into English, for which he was awarded with the Noble Prize in literature in 1913), but he also delivered many speeches, mostly addressed to the Western audience (e.g. The religion of Man). In his writing, Tagore often uses the terms “religion” and dharma interchangeably. This article focuses on both key terms and on the question whether they may be seen as equivalent according to him. Does he really equalize both terms? or, How was his understanding of “religion” and dharma influenced by his cultural background? The article opens with the analyse of the dictionary definitions of both key terms. Next, at the basis of dictionary explanation the main question is raised: whether “religion” and dharma could be treated as equivalents in their whole range of meanings or should their understanding be limited to a chosen definition or definitions? In the following section, Tagore’s concept of the so called “Man the Eternal” and “Divinity in Man” is briefly described. Final comments include some remarks on both terms explained in the light of Tagore’s view on comparative methodology. He claims that “religion” and dharma are close in meaning, since they both stand for the rational description of the individual experience of divinity. Therefore, they may ultimately lead to the common end, regardless their different cultural roots and various circumstances in which both concepts developed. Tagore argues for freedom as the preliminary condition for understanding of the phenomenon of transcendence of human nature towards the experience of divinity. He understands freedom as perfect harmony realized in this world but not merely through our response to it in knowing but in being. Only when such an approach is accepted the experience of “Man the Eternal” can be achieved. In this respect all human beings may meet, regardless they come from Western or Eastern culture. Such an exposition of the core of religious experience allows us to use the terms of “religion” and dharma interchangeably, and thus contribute to the comparative methodology in religious studies.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2014, 4, 1; 81-88
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rabindranath Tagore on a comparative study of religions
Autorzy:
Mukherjee, Asha
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437551.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
Rabindranath Tagore
religia człowieka
badania nad religiami
religioznawstwo
pluralizm religijny
filozofia religii
badania porównawcze
komparatystyka
hinduizm
filozofia indyjska
religia uniwersalna
uniwersalizm religijny
boskość człowieka
The religion of Man
religious studies
religious pluralism
philosophy of religion
comparative studies
Hinduism
Universal religion
Divinity of Man
Opis:
Study of religion describes, analyzes and compares how certain human beings do in fact express their faith in terms of particular scriptures, religious figures, sacred rituals, community solidarity, etc. — and how all these explicitly religious phenomena may relate to other aspects of people’s lives. It also aspires and addresses the questions to be even-handed, objective, based on evidence that may be checked by any competent inquirer, and non-committal on claims to divine revelation and authority. It is in principle comparative, not in a judgmental evaluative sense, but in terms of describing and analysing comparable elements or phenomena from various religious traditions, using the same criteria in each case. The paper begins with a brief report on the study of religion in the context of India and presents in detail Rabindranath Tagore’s (1861–1941) views on the need, an objective and philosophy behind the comparative study of religion. As Tagore observes, when studying religion one usually chooses among two alternative approaches: to do research on the secret text or to study the rituals. Tagore accepts fully none of them and instead suggests to rediscover how human aspiration for transcendence works in practice, how it sustains the individual — often marginalized by the power of institutionalised religion — and society, and how it generates new cultural forms. For Tagore, the essence of religion lies is the will to transcend the limit of the self-cantered being towards an ideal of perfection — which he calls divinity of Man. His understanding of the “religion of Man”, as he puts it, is discussed in the major part of the paper.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2014, 4, 1; 69-80
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The relevance of “givenness” for the Indian religious traditions
Autorzy:
Schmücker, Marcus
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437401.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
Jean - Luc Marion
Indian philosophy
phenomenology of religion
continental philosophy
subjectivity
Advaita Vedanta
Jean-Luc Marion
filozofia indyjska
fenomenologia religii
filozofia kontynentalna
subjektywność
podmiotowość
adwaita wedanta
Opis:
The paper focuses on a comparison by taking some of the main results of the European tradition of phenomenology of religion represented and further developed by Jean-Luc Marion. His views on the constitution of the “I” look promising for a comparison when contrasted with the views on the same phenomenon in Indian religious traditions. Marion, whose rich work is in the main part devoted to the philosophy of donation, discovered a new way that led him from the givenness of the object of knowledge/perception to the understanding of self-givenness of the subject up to a new understanding of the experience of god. The author chooses as a start¬ing point the central question in Marion’s work which refers to the constitution of the “I” and the problem of whether it is able to constitute itself or whether something exists that constitutes the “I” beforehand without leaving the concept of subjectivity. For the Indian side, he offers examples for the way in which the constitution of the “I” takes place or not and what relevance a kind of givenness has in this context not only for a concept of the subject but also for the theistic ideas in Indian traditions.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2014, 4, 1; 43-54
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies