Temat: David Hume - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Dlaczego Popper nie był kryptoindukcjonistą
Autorzy:: Sajdek, Zofia
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/429115.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:: Karl Popper
David Hume
Rudolf Carnap
John Watkins
induction
verisimilitude
truthlikeness
probability
corroboration
confirmation
scepticism
Opis:: The article is an attempt to answer the question whether the result of the connection between corroboration and verisimilitude is an inductive element in the Popperian methodology. For this purpose the essay collates Karl Popper’s view with David Hume’s scepticism and inductionism of Rudolf Carnap. Further on the paper analizes the compromising”(for inductionism and critical falsificationism) proposition of Evaldas Nekraˇsas. The article also contains a presentation of Imre Lakatos’ allegation of Popper’s scepticism and the accusation of inductionism as formulated by John Watkins. The study of the disputes between the philosophers leads to the conclusion that the critical views are baseless. The final hypothesis is that these are not the right ways of proving the allegations of crypto-inductionism.
Źródło:: Semina Scientiarum; 2012, 11
1644-3365
Pojawia się w:: Semina Scientiarum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: In defense of common sense. David Hume on ‘Is’ and ‘Ought’
Autorzy:: Osmola, Szymon
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/429103.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:: Hume David
is
ought
common sense
ethical rationalism
Clarke Samuel
moral sentimentalism
Opis:: In the article the author rejects traditional, logical interpretation of the famous“Is-Ought Paragraph” from David Hume’s A Treatise of Human Nature.He argues that most of the interpreters failed to grasp the wide philosophicalbackground of the IsOP, which is, generally speaking, a passionate discussionbetween ethical rationalists and ethical anti-rationalists in the 17th and 18thcentury British philosophy. The author shows that the Hume’s main aim inthe IsOP is to strengthen his previous arguments against ethical rationalismand to reinforce (and not subvert at all) the common-sense (vulgar) systems ofmorality, likewise he did in the first book of the Treatise… in case of the theoryof knowledge. The author argues that there is no putative thesis of logic in theIsOP, which some scholars call “Hume’s Law”.
Źródło:: Semina Scientiarum; 2017, 16
1644-3365
Pojawia się w:: Semina Scientiarum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Informacja