Temat: prejudice - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Theoretical and methodological aspects in anthropological research of stereotypes
Autorzy:: Jonáš, Juraj
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/644589.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: stereotype
prejudice
identity
psychological approach
Opis:: The author presents a considered theoretical and methodological background of anthropological research on stereotypes and prejudice. As an ethnologist and psychologist, he deliberates on both anthropological and psychological approach to the subject and shows the gaps in current methodological concepts. He proposes the set of questions for the questionnaire survey, which, in his opinion, seems to be adequate and describes the project that he plans to realize providing an example of the Romani people in the Czech Republic.
Źródło:: Prace Etnograficzne; 2013, 41, 4; 297-307
0083-4327
2299-9558
Pojawia się w:: Prace Etnograficzne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Achebe’s weakest link: an analysis
Autorzy:: Records, Aaron
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/942440.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: Africa, arguments of intention, Chinua Achebe, comparison, Conrad’s style, cryptoracism, Heart of Darkness, intention, Joseph Conrad, Nietzsche, prejudice, racism, syntax, The Secret Sharer, The Shadow Line
Opis:: Chinua Achebe, author of Things Fall Apart, states in an interview that Joseph Conrad ensconces racism in his adjective-ridden writing style. More than that, Achebe even states that Conrad intentionally tries to confuse his readers so that they do not detect his racism. Arguments of intention are dangerous, especially when the author that is subjected to one is deceased. They cannot defend themselves. In order to see if Achebe’s claim of hidden racism in Heart of Darkness is true or not, I have read two other works by Conrad, The Secret Sharer and The Shadow Line: A Confession, and compared their writing. Using more analyses of Conrad’s works, I discover that Conrad is not too confusing for his readers; most people understand him. However, I notice that Heart of Darkness is written in a more confusing style. Adding Conrad’s philosophy and reviewing it with Nietzsche’s philosophy, we see that Conrad doesn’t seem like someone who would try to be racist and then hide it. The argument of intention would also seem to have an air of arrogance, as it appears Achebe thinks other readers are unable to comprehend Conrad’s text the way he can, or at least without his guidance. In conclusion, I surmise that arguments of intention are dangerous and that no one should make them because they are largely insupportable. If anything, an argument of intention has all the qualities of prejudice and once investigated, seems just as absurd as arguments for racism.
Źródło:: Yearbook of Conrad Studies; 2012, 7
2084-3941
Pojawia się w:: Yearbook of Conrad Studies
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "prejudice" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język