Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "FRENCH LAW" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Od praw Rewolucji do Kodeksu Dziedzictwa (przemiany francuskiego prawa archiwalnego)
From revolutionary Rights to the Heritage Code (changes in French law on archives)
Autorzy:
Stryjkowski, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1371339.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
francuskie prawo archiwalne
archiwa francuskie
dziedzictwo kulturowe Francji
ochrona dóbr kultury we Francji
French law on archives
French archives
French cultural heritage
protection of cultural assets in France
Opis:
Francja to kraj w którym powstały pierwsze nowoczesne archiwa. Funkcjonowanie tych placówek zostało wsparte przepisami prawnymi, które regulowały zarówno ich organizację jak i proces udostępniania zgromadzonych archiwaliów. Z rozwiązań francuskich korzystało i nadal korzysta wiele służb archiwalnych całego świata. Echa francuskich przepisów odnajdujemy również w polskiej ustawie o narodowym zasobie archiwalnym i archiwach. Obowiązujące obecnie we Francji prawo archiwalne zostało włączone do Kodeksu Dziedzictwa, w którym znalazły się i pozostałe przepisy regulujące ochronę i postępowanie z dobrami kultury.
France was the first country to establish a system of modern archives. The functioning of such facilities was supported by legal provisions to regulate both their organisation and the process of sharing the archival materials. The French solutions have been used by many archival services all around the world. The echoes of French provisions can also be found in the Polish Act on National Archival Resources and Archives. The current French law on archives was included in the Heritage Code, which encompasses other provisions regulating the protection and handling of cultural assets.
Źródło:
Archeion; 2020, 121; 151-181
0066-6041
2658-1264
Pojawia się w:
Archeion
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Le rôle des arrêtistes dans la publication des sources juridiques françaises (XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles)
The Role of Arretistes in the Publishing of the French Sources of Law, the 17th through the 18th Centuries
Autorzy:
Nélidoff, Philippe
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/924082.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
prawo francuskie, ordonans, prawo zwyczajowe, arretyści, doktryna prawnicza, orzecznictwo, adwokat, sędzia
Opis:
It is for a long time now that legal historians have been interested in the paths along which the French law used to be created. It is true that the learned law (the Roman law as well as the Canon law) played a significant role in variety of fields. However the commonly applied customary law which slowly used to emerge due to the official compilations of customs as ordered by the Royal Ordinance of Montils-les-‑Tours (1454) and materialized in the 16th century, in the same way as the teaching of law – commenced worth the ordinances inspired by the royal professors of the French law. They often were the experienced advocates or judges who appeared at the same time at which the Ordinance of Saint-Germain was issued (1679) and they considerably contributed to the erection of the edifice of law, the one that was crowned with the Napoleonic codifications. What should not fall into oblivion is the role of the decisions of parliaments and the docrine bound with it, the decisions and the doctrine being inseparable in practice. While viewing the problem through that prism it is indispensable to study the role of arretistes, i.e. the judges and the advocates, experts in the practice of law, who published the compilations of judgements. They not only presented the most important court decisions but they additionally commented on them. The compilations doubtless make up a part of a larger collection (corpus) of law literature. The latter includes also the authors of legal studies such as law dictionaries, collections of legal styles and those devoted to civil law procedure, commentaries of customs and the authors of complaints. Those sources recorded in the written form a substantial part of legal act which in its essence is oral. However hundreds of collections of that type derived from the entire France of the 17th and     18th centuries have not been identified until now. On the Parliament of Toulouse it was possible to identify sixteen arrêtistes, which puts this Parliament at the second place after that atrributed the Parliament of Paris and ahead of Parliaments of Bretagne (10) and Provence (9). This position corresponds to the time of its origin (1444), the scope of its competence and the number of cases subjected to its cognition. The aforementioned collections, fully private, were often postnumously published and therefore were remote from the time with which they were concerned. On the other hand, as regards their 17th and 18th centuries editions, they were repeatedly republished. These works were highly erudite and referred to variety of matters, apart from those that dealt with penal law. It is difficult to determine the extent to which the discussed law literature had its influence on the decisions of Parliaments. It seems that the advocates had this kind of registers of cases for their own use and exploited them while engaged in the judiciary. The editing in Toulouse in 1831 by Jean-Baptiste Laviguerie of the previously non-published decisions of the Toulouse Parliament testifies to the long-lived value of this kind of sources of law. They survived the time of the Revolution and the Napoleonic codification activities.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa; 2014, 7, 3; 433-445
2084-4115
2084-4131
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Duty to Give Reasons in the European Legal Area: a Mechanism for Transparent and Accountable Administrative Decision-Making? A Comparison of Belgian, Dutch, French and EU Administrative Law
Autorzy:
Opdebeek, Ingrid
De Somer, Stéphanie
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/680928.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
duty to give reasons, Europe, comparative perspective, transparency, accountability
Opis:
The duty to give reasons is generally thought of as an indispensable procedural guarantee that is offered to citizens in all modern European administrative law systems. The comparative analysis carried out in this article, however, reveals that important differences continue to exist between the way in which various legal systems within Europe conceive of that duty. The article furthermore argues that the duty to give reasons has an important role to play in the furtherance of transparency and accountability as principles of good governance. However, it also has its limitations as an instrument for keeping the administration accountable. Up until today, the duty to give reasons primarily has a role to play in the relationship between the administration and those individuals that are subject to its specic (mostly individual) decisions. In that context, the question arises whether the status of the duty to give reasons is evolving towards that of an individual human right
Źródło:
Rocznik Administracji Publicznej; 2016, 2
2449-7800
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Administracji Publicznej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The MS. Ludwig XIV:2 (the “Getty Gratian”) and the Old French Decretum translation
Autorzy:
Löfstedt, Leena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/638341.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
Canon Law, Gratian’s Decretum and its Old French Translation, Thomas Becket’s exile court, Thomas Becket Controversy
Opis:
The MS Ludwig XIV:2 (Getty Center, Los Angeles), from ca. 1170-1180, is a luxury manuscript containing Gratian’s Decretum. The appearance of Ludwig XIV:2 have caused art historians to compare it with a group of manuscripts prepared in Sens for members of Thomas Becket’s exile court. The present paper focuses on the three texts preserved in Ludwig XIV:2: the main text, the marginal notes, and the interlinear annotations. It detects several details proper not only to confirm the art historians’ suggestion of the manuscript’s origin, but also to link the three texts to Thomas Becket. – Also, all three texts have ties to the Old French translation of Decretum.
Źródło:
Romanica Cracoviensia; 2015, 15, 3
2084-3917
Pojawia się w:
Romanica Cracoviensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies