Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Wróblewski, Filip" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Brud i odraza, czyli jak się zostaje etnografem. Część 1. Brud Innego
    Dirt and disgust, or how to become an ethnographer. Part 1. The filthiness of the Other
    Autorzy:
    Wróblewski, Filip
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/694131.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-11-20
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
    Opis:
    The article highlights the importance of hygiene and sensually experienced dirt during the  ethnographic fieldwork to identify and shape the subjectivity of anthropologists. Dealing with impurities, the risk of pollution, disgust and aversion, sensing and bodily inconveniences, though anecdotal in the tales of fieldwork, seems to be one of the most important factors influencing the course of professional socialization within the framework of anthropological practice. This issue is presented in the context of anthropological theories that focus reflection on the body and the senses. In relation to them, the factors allowing to outline the historical, social and custom-related context concomitant the formation of the anthropological discourse and the hygiene regimes prevailing in the 19th and 20th centuries have also been indicated. Based on the empirical material, the author highlights the methods of conceptualizing the Other in the anthropological discourse. They are related to the category of dirt distinguished on the basis of the bourgeoisie and intelligence class distinction.
    Źródło:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia; 2018, 4; 151-189
    2392-0971
    2543-9537
    Pojawia się w:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O drodze do antropologii, badaniach terenowych i etyce z Aleksandrem Posern-Zielińskim rozmawia Filip Wróblewski
    Filip Wróblewski talks to Aleksander Posern-Zieliński about the road to anthropology, field research and ethics
    Autorzy:
    Wróblewski, Filip
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/694156.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
    Opis:
    Filip Wróblewski talks to Aleksander Posern-Zieliński about the road to anthropology, field research and ethics
    Źródło:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia; 2017, 3
    2392-0971
    2543-9537
    Pojawia się w:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Indeksy etnograficzne w polskiej praktyce badawczej XX w.
    Ethnographic indexes in Polish anthropologists’ fieldwork in the 20th century
    Autorzy:
    Wróblewski, Filip
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/694225.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-03-26
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
    Opis:
    The article presents the “archeology” of the process of shaping ethnographic research methodology in Poland. The author uses archival fieldwork materials gathered in the 20th century, created by employees of anthropological research institutions, which belonged to various universities, museums, academies of sciences and other research units. Among the extensive resources analyzed in this article there are materials from field research under the supervision of Kazimierz Moszyński (the first half of the 20th century), concerning Polish spiritual culture. Another set of resources is constituted by the Polish Ethnographic Atlas materials, a project initiated by Moszyński, but mostly continued by his follower – Józef Gajek (the second half of the 20th century). The issues in question are situated at the intersection of three theoretical perspectives. They are: the post-Foucault’s critical theory concerning the relationship of power and domination, media studies perspective, focusing on the mechanisms and tools of data administration, and, finally, the literacy theory emphasizing the  relationship between communication modes as well as thinking styles and logic of social organization. The ethnographic indexes featuring in the title of the article involve records, metrics and descriptions added to fieldnotes, surveys or conversations transcripts. The indexes contain detailed descriptions of people contacted by anthropologists. These descriptions primarily relate to the origin, education, health and wealth of the  interviewees, but also include opinions about the interlocutors’ intelligence and their usefulness for further research. This way of describing was strongly marked by convention, due to which the indexes could provide an array of profiled information about each interlocutor or the entire studied community. They have been used to create catalogs and files of “informants”, which further intensified the process of depersonalization. The author argues that this practice of anthropologists, remaining beyond their interlocutors’ knowledge and consent, allowed for schematic and objectifying description of persons encountered in field. As a result, it can be argued that this procedure, with reference to discursive legitimization, possessed the character of symbolic power. More importantly, this kind of description transformed the interlocutors into subjects of evaluations and classifications, enabling an assessment of “informants” primarily in terms of their suitability for efficient acquisition of research data.
    Źródło:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia; 2015, 1; 108-132
    2392-0971
    2543-9537
    Pojawia się w:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kwestionariusze etnograficzne i prawo zadawania pytań
    Questionnaires and the right to ask questions
    Autorzy:
    Wróblewski, Filip
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/694210.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
    Opis:
    The main topic of this paper concerns the process of shaping textual research tools, such as surveys and questionnaires. Their use in fieldwork affects the nature and type of collected data. This paper analyses this problem by using concepts from anthropology and media studies, combining Jack Goody's literacy theory, the Foucauldian concept of biopower, and the term aparatus from Vilém Flusser. Although the data has been mostly drawn from Polish Ethnographic Atlas documentary materials, this paper also relies on Polish and foreign questionnaires from the 19th and 20th centuries. This choice of material allowed to reconstruct and identify the ways in which anthropological discourse operates. The paper focuses on the executive dimension of biopower, which in the case of anthropology is based on research of selected communities, their description, and, finally, their classification. Biopower determines the degree to which these communities fit the norm and whether they should be accepted or excluded. The surveyed are to be both extracted from the general population and controlled. This aim is best achieved by means of questionnaires that not only allow for specifying the direct interest of the researchers, but also show the hidden assumptions and thinking about the Others. Questionnaires take form of lists of questions. Their composition is associated with a hierarchy of topics (subjects and their order). By highlighting some issues and ignoring others, they direct and mediate the focus of researchers. As a result, the description is distorted through (a) simplification, (b) adapting the description to the categories imposed (demanded) by the questionnaire, and (c) coercion to answer questions. As a consequence, the form of a questionnaire affects the type of collected data. The materiality of a questionnaire makes it a tool of continual influence and control over both researchers and informants. For anthropologists,  questionnaires provide psychological comfort facilitating the organisation of fieldwork. For informants, questionnaires are a “magical” mark of authority and evidence of professionalism of those who employ them. Additionally, using questionnaires is linked with methods of disciplining the anthropologists themselves by implying their responsibility to this research method and by the existence of published stigmatising lists of “bad” fieldworkers. Therefore, questionnaires serve the biopower aimed at acts of recording and supervision. They legitimise the collection of data about people and their further handling. As a kind of a census, a questionnaire is technique of social control, revealing hidden functions of anthropological discourse, such as utility, information, and justification.
    Źródło:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia; 2016, 2
    2392-0971
    2543-9537
    Pojawia się w:
    Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies