Temat: judicial argumentation - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Realizacja zasady prawdy w postępowaniu cywilnym a ciężar dowodu i ciężar argumentacji
The fullfillment of the principle of truth in civil procedure and the burden of proof and the burden of argumentation
Autorzy:: Krok, Michał
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/964910.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:: burden of proof
burden of argumentation
constitutive rules
judicial truth
justification
Opis:: The purpose of the paper is to analyze, how rules of the burden of proof and rules of the burden of argumentation justify a thesis, which is found as a true statement by court. Two concepts of the truth discussed in the Polish civil procedure (the objective/material truth and the judicial truth) are compared in connection with the rules of the burden of proof and the burden of argumentation. The rules of burden of proof and the rules of the burden of argumentation are constitutive rules. They state under what conditions a thesis counts as justified. The justification of a decision of applying law based on the rules of the burden of proof or rules of the burden of argumentation is institutional, not substantial.
Źródło:: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica; 2014, 73
0208-6069
2450-2782
Pojawia się w:: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation
Autorzy:: Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1026734.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-03-30
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:: legal argumentation
judicial discourse
evaluative language
US Supreme Court
same-sex marriage
Opis:: This paper investigates the interplay between judicial argumentation and evaluative or emotive language identified in two US Supreme Court landmark cases on the right of same-sex couples to marry. The analysis of both majority and dissenting opinions leads to two main observations. First, marriage and liberty are indeed emotive words and they represent two major sites of contention between the concurring and dissenting judges. Second, there are important differences within the argumentative strategies employed by the judges. While (re)defining the concepts remains the major argumentative goal for both types of opinion, the majority opinions tacitly integrate the redefined concept of marriage into their argumentation. It is the dissenting opinions that explicitly raise the issue of (re)definition in order to defend and retain the original sense of marriage.
Źródło:: Research in Language; 2019, 17, 1; 71-91
1731-7533
Pojawia się w:: Research in Language
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Informacja