Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "deficits" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Skuteczność programu Learning Breakthrough w terapii dysleksji rozwojowej
Effectiveness of Treatment of Developmental Dyslexia on the Basis of the Therapeutic Program Learning Breakthrough
Autorzy:
Rusiak, Patrycja
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/651491.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
dysleksja rozwojowa
terapia
deficyty móżdżkowe
developmental dyslexia
therapy
cerebellar deficits
Opis:
Developmental dyslexia is a disorder that involves reading and writing skills of young individuals. Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain its origins. One of them is the theory of cerebellar deficit, which assumes that the major factor impeding the process of learning to read and write is a dysfunction in anatomy and functioning of the cerebellum, which results in some deficits in the automation process. For several years, there have been performed studies aimed at the construction of effective therapeutic tools. Yet, at present, convincing evidence for the effectiveness of these tools is lacking. In the current study the effectiveness of the Learning Breakthrough therapeutic program was examined. There were used four reading tests to be done twice – before and after a 4-month training. An improvement on reading tests was expected in the experimental group only. However, no significant differences between pretests and posttests and between the experimental group and the control one, were observed. These findings suggest that the therapeutic intervention have not improved the level of reading in the dyslexics.
Dysleksja rozwojowa to zaburzenie związane z trudnościami w czytaniu i pisaniu. W literaturze przedmiotu istnieje wiele hipotez mających na celu wyjaśnienie jego przyczyn. Jedną z nich jest teoria deficytu móżdżkowego. Zakłada ona, że głównym czynnikiem utrudniającym proces nauki czytania i pisania są dysfunkcje w budowie oraz funkcjonowaniu móżdżku, czego konsekwencją są deficyty procesu automatyzacji. Od kilku lat prowadzi się badania zmierzające do stworzenia narzędzi terapeutycznych pomocnych w niwelowaniu trudności obserwowanych u osób dyslektycznych. W chwili obecnej brakuje jednak przekonujących dowodów na temat ich skuteczności. Celem przeprowadzonego badania była ocena efektywności programu terapeutycznego Learning Breakthrough. W tym celu posłużono się czterema testami czytania, które wykonywane były dwukrotnie – przed i po 4-miesięcznym treningu. Oczekiwano poprawy wykonania testów czytania tylko u uczestników z grupy eksperymentalnej. Jednakże analiza statystyczna nie ujawniła żadnych istotnych różnic między wynikami otrzymanymi w preteście i postteście, tak pomiędzy grupą eksperymentalną, jak też i kontrolną. Uzyskane rezultaty sugerują, że interwencja terapeutyczna nie poprawiła poziomu czytania u osób dyslektycznych.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Psychologica; 2017, 21; 49-61
2353-4842
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Psychologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Causes of deficits and ethical dilemmas in scientific research
Autorzy:
Walczak-Duraj, Danuta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/652909.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
deficits and ethical dilemmas
research
multi-paradigm approach of social sciences
Opis:
The analysis of the deficits and ethical dilemmas in research will be related to two disciplines of the social sciences: sociology and economics. Research conducted within these disciplines, because of its multi-paradigm nature, tends to be characterized by deficits, not only ethical but also ethical and methodological dilemmas and interpretation reasons. The leading thesis of this paper aims to argue that the looming deficits and ethical dilemmas of Polish researchers in the field of social sciences are two basic but very different premises. The first group of reasons primarily refers to broad ethical deficits, perceived unreliableness in terms of scientific research. It is related mainly to the structural aspects of the functioning of universities and other research units and logic parameterization. In the ethical programs (especially codes of ethics), ethical deficits are identified in three areas of “activity” of research related to the description, diagnosis and interpretation of the results relating to: bragging-e.g. the preparation, recording and publishing of the results that were not obtained; falsification-which means manipulating the research materials, equipment or method, replacing or bypassing the data in such a way that the results are not presented in a true way; plagiarism-the appropriation of other people ideas, methods, results, or terms without proper reference. Plagiarism is also the unauthorized use of information obtained through confidential review of proposals and manuscripts, or e.g. using conference presentations without permission. Its structural evidence is primarily the emphasis on “productivity” and parameterization as the basic criterion, not only of scientific but also academic success-oriented and personalized careers. The second group of reasons refers primarily to broad ethical dilemmas; to the ethical context of social research at every stage of the proceedings: conceptualization, selection of methods, techniques and research tools, conducting research (which concern, for example, the covert participant observation), analysis and interpretation of data, publishing developed and interpreted empirical material. Performing even a cursory analysis of how to present research findings in these two disciplines, you can come to the conclusion that the methodological competence of the investigator does not always go hand in hand with ethical competence. What is more, there is a tendency to downplay the principle that the social sciences should be guided by the principle of the so-called humanistic coefficient.
Źródło:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym; 2018, 21, 6; 17-31
1899-2226
2353-4869
Pojawia się w:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przyczyny deficytów i dylematów etycznych w badaniach naukowych
The Reasons of Deficits and Ethical Dilemmas in Research
Autorzy:
Walczak-Duraj, Danuta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/653047.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
-
deficits and ethical dilemmas
research
multi-paradigm approach of social sciences
Opis:
The analysis of the deficits and ethical dilemmas in research will be related to two disciplines of the social sciences: sociology and economics. Research conducted within these disciplines, because of its multi-paradigm nature, tends to be characterized by deficits, not only ethical but also ethical and methodological dilemmas and interpretation reasons. The leading thesis of this paper aims to prove that the looming deficits and ethical dilemmas of Polish researchers in the field of social sciences are two basic but very different premises. The first group of reasons primarily refer to broad ethical deficits, perceived unreliableness in terms of scientific research. It is related mainly to the structural aspects of the functioning of universities and other research units and logic parameterization. In the ethical programs (especially codes of ethics), ethical deficits are identified in three areas of ‘activity’ of research related to the description, diagnosis and interpretation of the results relating to: bragging – e.g. the preparation, recording and publishing of the results that were not obtained; falsification – which means manipulating the research materials, equipment or method, replacing or bypassing the data in such a way that the results are not presented in a true way; plagiarism – the appropriation of other people ideas, methods, results, or terms without proper reference. Plagiarism is also the unauthorized use of information obtained through confidential review of proposals and manuscripts, or e.g. using conference presentations without permission. Its structural evidence is primarily the emphasis on ‘productivity’ and parameterization as the basic criterion, not only of scientific but also academic success-oriented and personalized careers. The second group of reasons refers primarily to broad ethical dilemmas; to the ethical context of social research at every stage of the proceedings: conceptualization, selection of methods, techniques and research tools, conducting research (which concern for example the covert participant observation), analysis and inter pretation of data, publishing developed and interpreted empirical material. Performing even a cursory analysis of how to present research findings in these two disciplines, you can come to the conclusion that the methodological competence of the investigator does not always go hand in hand with ethical competence. What is more, there is a tendency to downplay the principle that the social sciences should be guided by the principle of the so-called humanistic coefficient. 
-
Źródło:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym; 2017, 20, 1
1899-2226
2353-4869
Pojawia się w:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies