Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "iłarion" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The Role of the Bible in the Formation of Philosophical Thought in Kievan Rus’ (as Exemplified by Ilarion of Kiev, Kliment Smolatič, and Kirill of Turov)
Autorzy:
Kroczak, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682431.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Kievan Rus’
Russian philosophy
Byzantine culture
Orthodox religion
Ilarion of Kiev
Kliment Smolatič
Kirill of Turov
Opis:
The article is an attempt to critically evaluate the manifestations of the philosophical culture sprouting in Rus’. With the baptism in the Byzantine Rite, Rus’ in the 10th century joined the family of Christian nations and defined the future direction of her own cultural development. The Middle Ages in Rus’ were eminently theocentric. Literature (which was mostly translated from the Greek in Bulgarian monasteries) had a religious character. Sacral content, assimilated in Rus’ mainly through the Old Church Slavonic (due to the scarce knowledge of Greek) had a decisive influence on formation of the philosophical worldview of Rus’ intellectual elite. The Bible thus became the main reference framework for the first Rus’ thinkers-philosophers: Ilarion of Kiev († 1055), Kirill of Turov († 1183) and Kliment Smolatič († 1164). Ilarion of Kiev, the first metropolitan of the Kievan Rus’ in his rhetoric work (which postulated the superiority of the New Testament to the Old) expressed a philosophical thesis of the equality of all Christian nations before God. Kliment Smolatič, the second metropolitan of Rus’, in his Letter to Presbyter Foma, defended the allegorical method of interpretating the Bible. Kirill of Turov, in his turn, in his Parable of the human soul and body allegorically tried to answer the question about the relationship of the body and the soul. For the Rus’ thinkers the content of the Bible served as a pretext for philosophical reflection, e.g. on the role of man in the universe, on the nature of reality, on the relation between matter and spirit. In their works we find the beginnings of the theory of knowledge, metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics.
Źródło:
Studia Ceranea; 2016, 6; 61-74
2084-140X
2449-8378
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ceranea
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Древнерусская “Повесть о бражнике” в интерпретации старообрядческих полемистов
The Old Russian “Tale about a Reveller” as Interpreted by Old Believer Polemicists
Autorzy:
Пигин, Александр
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/968447.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
тарообрядчество
эсхатология
И. Г. Кабанов
'parodia sacra'
eschatology
Old Believers
Ilarion Kabanov
Opis:
„Повесть о бражнике” – памятник древнерусской «смеховой» литературы, в основе которого лежит западноевропейский «бродячий» сюжет о грешнике, сумевшем доказать, что у него не меньше прав находиться в раю, чем у апостолов и библейских царей. В 1860-е гг. Повесть обратила на себя внимание старообрядцев-поповцевбелокриницкого согласия в ходе полемики со старообрядцами-беспоповцами. Она была включена в число десяти эсхатологических и этиологических легенд, в которых поповцы усмотрели саму суть опровергаемого ими беспоповского учения об антихристе. Разбор этих сочинений был предпринят писателями белокриницкого согласия И. Г. Кабановым в 1862 г. и М. И. Бриллиантовым в 1903 г. В статье показано, как в интерпретации старообрядческих полемистов произошла перекодировка смысла литературного сочинения. Комическая новелла была прочитана в соответствии с совершенно иными идеологическими и эстетическими установками как кощунственный еретический текст.
‘Tale about a Reveller’ is a relic of Old Russian parodic literature based upon a Western European migrant theme. It deals with a sinner who was able to prove that he had as good a right to be in paradise as the Apostles or the biblical Kings. In the 1860s, the tale drew attention of the Popovtsy Old Believers (those who kept church hierarchy) of the Belokrinitsa consent in the course of polemics with Bespopovtsy Old Believers (who rejected priests and churches). The tale belonged to those eschatological and etiological legends in which the Popovtsy saw the very essence of Bespopovtsy’s teachings about Antichrist, which they refuted. Examination of these works was undertaken by the writers of the Belokrinitsa consent: Ilarion Kabanov in 1862 and Mikhail Brilliantov in 1903. The paper shows how the meaning of the literary work was recoded in the interpretation of the Old Believer polemicists. In the framework of completely different ideological and aesthetic approaches, the comic short story was read as a blasphemous heretical text.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica; 2015, Zeszyt specjalny 2015; 262-269
1427-9681
2353-4834
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies