Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Turgenev, Ivan" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Статья-автокомментарий: потенциал смыслов (И. С. Тургенев, И. А. Гончаров)
    Writers’ self-commentaries: the potential of meanings (Ivan Turgenev and Ivan Goncharov)
    Autorzy:
    Володина, Наталья
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/651288.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    статья-автокомментарий
    тип нигилиста
    замысел и воплощение
    авторское отношение
    self-commentary
    the character of a nihilist
    conception and realisation
    author’s attitude
    Opis:
    The article is devoted to two authors’ commentaries on their own works: Ivan Turgenev’s – on his novel Fathers and Sons and Ivan Goncharov’s concerning The Precipice. Both writers provided explanations in view of the fact that their works continued to arouse controversy long after they had been published. The crucial issue for critics as well as for the readership was the authors’ attitude to their nihilist characters, Evgeny Bazarov and Mark Volokhov respectively. When explaining his position, either author talks about the novel’s conception, reconstructs the process of creation, living through it again; at the same time, they already look at their creations from a distance. The clarifications offered by Turgenev and Goncharov “outside” the literary text proper are revealing in terms of which aspects of the interpretative potential were particularly important for them, how well these correlate with what is said in the literary work itself and what is “heard” by the readership.
    Статья посвящена писательскому комментарию к своим произведениям: И. С. Тургенева – к роману Отцы и дети, И. А. Гончарова – к роману Обрыв. Оба автора выступили с пояснениями к произведениям, написанным значительно раньше, ибо спор о них продолжался и десятилетие спустя. Основные вопросы критиков и читателей были связаны с авторским отношением к герою-нигилисту: Евгению Базарову и Марку Волохову. Объясняя свою позицию, каждый писатель говорит о замысле романа, реконструирует процесс создания произведения, заново переживая его; и в то же время смотрит на созданный им текст уже со стороны. Попытка Тургенева и Гончарова объясниться с критиком и читателем «вне текста» дает возможность увидеть, какие потенциалы смысла оказываются для них наиболее важными, как соотносится это с тем, что «сказано» в самом произведении и что является «услышанным» читателем.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica; 2018, 11; 89-98
    1427-9681
    2353-4834
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    “No Country for Old Men”? The Question of George Moore’s Place in the Early Twentieth-Century Literature of Ireland
    Autorzy:
    Jarząb-Napierała, Joanna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/641399.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Gaelic Revival
    George Moore
    Ivan Turgenev
    The Untilled Field
    Opis:
    The paper scrutinizes the literary output of George Moore with reference to the expectations of the new generation of Irish writers emerging at the beginning of the twentieth century. Although George Moore is considered to belong to the Anglo-Irish ascendancy writers, he began his writing career from dissociating himself from the literary achievements of his own social class. His infatuation with the ideals of the Gaelic League not only brought him back to Dublin, but also encouraged him to write short stories analogous to famous Ivan Turgenev’s The Sportsman’s Sketches. The idea of using a Russian writer as a role model went along with the Gaelic League advocating the reading of non-English European literature in search for inspiration. However the poet’s involvement in the public cause did not last long. His critical view on Ireland together with his uncompromising approach towards literature resulted in a final disillusionment with the movement. The paper focuses on this particular period of Moore’s life in order to show how this seemingly unfruitful cooperation became essential for the development of Irish literature in the twentieth century. The Untilled Field, though not translated into Irish, still marks the beginning of a new genre into Irish literature-a short story. More importantly, the collection served as a source of inspiration for Joyce’s Dubliners. These and other aspects of Moore’s literary life are supposed to draw attention to the complexity of the writer’s literary output and his underplayed role in the construction of the literary Irish identity.
    Źródło:
    Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture; 2018, 8; 25-42
    2083-2931
    2084-574X
    Pojawia się w:
    Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Эристические техники в литературной модели спора (на материале избранных романов Ивана Тургенева)
    Eristic techniques in the literary model of dispute: Ivan Turgenev’s chosen novels
    Autorzy:
    Olaszek, Barbara
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22625760.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    eristic techniques
    dispute
    subject of the dispute
    the disputing persons
    Ivan Turgenev
    Russian literature
    Opis:
    The subject of discussion in the present paper is the model of the dispute as a speech genre created by Ivan Turgenev. Special attention is paid to eristic techniques of disputation. Eristic techniques (those proposed by Schopenhauer) determine the intention of a dispute aimed not at establishing the truth, but at convincing the addressees of the validity of argumentation presented by certain disputants. An analysis of the course of the disputes in Turgenev’s novels allows us to notice the use of many eristic techniques, in particular, the shifts of emphasis from the subject of the dispute (ad rem) to the disputing persons (ad personam). It proves that the writer focuses on pointing to the forces that can lead Russia towards a better future, rather than on looking for a way of solving problems. A positive characterization of the moderate disputants, while not of the fierce ones, allows for a more precise conclusion: Turgenev was a supporter not of eternal disputes but of dialogue and compromise.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica; 2010, 3; 80-92
    1427-9681
    2353-4834
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies