Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "national programme" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Przyczyny i kierunki przeklasyfikowywania gruntów nieleśnych na leśne w świetle badań ankietowych
Causes and directions of reclassification of non-forest lands into forest lands according to the survey results
Autorzy:
Wysocka-Fijorek, E.
Kaliszewski, A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/973334.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Leśne
Tematy:
polityka lesna
zalesianie
grunty nielesne
zmiana klasyfikacji gruntu
polityka rolna
badania ankietowe
leśnictwo
rozwój obszarów wiejskich
afforestation
forestry policy
agricultural policy
national programme of the forest cover extension
rural development
Opis:
In Poland, there are large discrepancies between the area of forest lands recorded in land−use registers of local authorities and the actual state of forest area in the field. These discrepancies were estimated to 800,000 hectares in 2016, which is 2.5% of the land area of Poland. The diver−gences result primarily from different definitions of a forest in forest regulations and legislation concerning land−use registry and the insufficient update of land registry databases. The aim of the paper is to define the major causes of reclassification of non−forest lands into forest lands and to determine the origin of forests on those lands. The study is based on a mail questionnaire survey carried out in all local public authorities all over the country (altogether 314 rural and 66 municipal counties). The questions focused on manners lands were used in a county, including the area of artificial and natural afforestation and the area of lands reclassified into forest lands over the period 2009−2013, as well as causes of such reclassification. Altogether 232 responses were collected (61.1%), 122 of which contained data of sufficiently good quality. The results show that afforestation of non−forest lands were mostly carried out in an artificial way. Reclassification into forest lands was conducted almost exclusively within rural counties. The reclassified lands were largely regenerated by natural succession. The key factor of land reclassification were works related to forest management planning in non−state owned forests. Afforestation carried out within the Rural Development Programme, co−financed from EU funding, was the second most important factor. In case of afforestation, land reclassification is obligatory no later than in the fifth year after a new forest was planted. The paper concludes with suggestions that there are no effective legal regulations that would make land owners to reclassify their afforested lands into forest lands, except cases of agricultural lands afforestation within the Rural Development Programme. Therefore, it is recommended to seek to cover all non−state owned forests with forest management plans and to obtain the compliance of land registries with the real situation in the field.
Źródło:
Sylwan; 2017, 161, 06; 460-466
0039-7660
Pojawia się w:
Sylwan
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Cele i priorytety "Polityki leśnej państwa" w świetle porozumień procesu Forest Europe (dawniej MCPFE)
Goals and priorities of the "National Forest Policy" in the light of the Forest Europe (formerly MCPFE) commitments
Autorzy:
Kaliszewski, A.
Gil, W.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/987081.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Leśne
Tematy:
lesnictwo
polityka lesna
kierunki rozwoju
priorytety
proces Forest Europe
Ministerialny Proces Ochrony Lasow w Europie
Ministerialny Proces Ochrony Lasow w Europie zob.tez proces Forest Europe
proces Forest Europe zob.tez Ministerialny Proces Ochrony Lasow w Europie
forest policy
forest europe (mcpfe)
national forest programme
policy analysis
Opis:
The ‘National Forest Policy' (PLP), adopted by the Council of Ministers in 1997, is the main document setting out directions of forestry development in Poland. It defines goals and priorities of forest policy, describes organizational, economic and legal conditions of its implementation and specifies expected results. While the natural, social, economic, institutional and legal environ− ment has significantly changed over the last 20 years, the PLP has not been revised and updated, also in terms of Poland's international commitments resulting from the MCPFE (currently Forest Europe) process. The aim of the paper is to analyse directions of forest policy development under the Forest Europe after 1997, i.e. when the PLP came into force, and to indicate needs to update the issues contained in this document. The study focuses on goals and priorities of the MCPFE defined in resolutions and decisions adopted on conferences held from 1998 (Lisbon) to 2015 (Madrid). Overall 15 main directions on forest policy development were identified (tab. 2). They were then compared with the priorities defined in the PLP to identify issues to be updated in the context of the European forest policy change. The study shows that many of the priorities of European forest policy has not been reflected in the PLP (tab. 2). These include, among others, adapting forests to climate change and enhancing their mitigation potential, enhancing economic contribution of the sustainable forest management (SFM) into rural development, enhancing the role of the SFM in a green economy, securing participation of all stakeholders in forest−related decision−making process, improving communication in forestry and developing cross−sectoral cooperation of forestry. Many of the forest−related issues have been, however, included in numerous strategic documents of environmental protection, biodiversity conservation, rural development, economic development or energy policies after 1997. In that way many goals and priorities defined under the Forest Europe are very dispersed in Polish policy documents of different forest−related sectors and it raises reasonable concern that some inconsistencies and contradictions between them may occur. It may also indicate that the forest sector is getting more and more marginalized in socioeconomic and political space, as forest policy goals are defined and achieved within other areas. We therefore recommend to continue efforts to adopt the National Forest Programme and launch a participatory, holistic, inter−sectoral and iterative process of forest policy planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
Źródło:
Sylwan; 2017, 161, 08; 648-658
0039-7660
Pojawia się w:
Sylwan
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies