Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "consistent interpretation" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The Application of EU Law by Polish Courts. General Remarks on 15 Years of Experience
Autorzy:
Domańska, Monika
Miąsik, Dawid
Szwarc, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2172239.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-16
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
national courts
application of EU law
principle of primacy
direct effect
consistent interpretation
preliminary rulings
Opis:
The Court of Justice of the European Union operates on a case-by-case basis. This means that its decisions normally relate to specific problems occurring in a specific Member State. Consequently it is often hard to ‘translate’ this case law into the national legal system of a different Member State. Nevertheless the case law of the Court of Justice has consequences not only for the individual Member States. It also has harmonising effects. In this sense, the principles of primacy and of direct effect of EU provisions, as well as the obligation to interpret domestic law in conformity with EU law, operate as the minimum requirements which the legal systems of Member States must fulfil. Poland joined the European Union in May 2004. At that time the number of Member States increased to 25. The existence of avenues of judicial protection in the EU raised a number of questions from the very beginning. Now, after 15 years of experience it is time to consider the standard of application of EU law by Polish courts.
Źródło:
Contemporary Central and East European Law; 2019, 1 (133); 21-32
0070-7325
Pojawia się w:
Contemporary Central and East European Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Counter-limits doctrine in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal (until 2015)
Autorzy:
Wróbel, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788261.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-04-07
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
consistent interpretation
supranational organisation
European Union
Constitutional Tribunal
counter-limits doctrine
constitutional identity
supremacy of the constitution
supremacy of the EU-law
secondary legislation
Solange-Case law
Opis:
The analysis herein, while mainly descriptive, presents the main foundations of the Constitutional Tribunal’s jurisprudence in matters of hierarchical control of the constitutionality of laws concerning the EU. It distinguishes some principles, concepts and constitutional theories which, according to the Constitutional Tribunal, set the limits of European integration. The main thesis of the paper is that, in this context, the basic and decisive rule is the supremacy of the Constitution, which does not have exceptions or limitations. A hypothesis was also formulated that the Solange II maxim does not reflect the actual state of European constitutionalism, in which the level of protection of fundamental rights is significantly increased while possible collisions between the level of protection of fundamental rights in the EU and the Member States should be solved by means of the clauses provided in Articles 51–54 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2018, 3 (215); 7-35
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies