Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "THE COURT" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19
Tytuł:
“Historical Situations” in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
Autorzy:
Kaminski, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706650.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
EUROPEAN CONVENTION
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
THE CONVENTION
THE COURT
Opis:
This Article investigates how the European Court of Human Rights becomes competent to make decisions in cases concerning (or taking roots in) 'historical situations' preceding the ratification of the European Convention by a given Member State or even the enactment of the Convention. 'Historical situations' refer to events that occurred in the period of Second World War or shortly thereafter. In all such cases, the preliminary question arises whether the Court is competent temporally (ratione temporis) to deal with the application. This group of cases concerned usually allegations touching upon the right to life and the right to property. The Court had to decide if the allegation in question related to a temporally closed event (making the Court not competent) or rather to a continuous violation (where the Court could adjudicate). A specific set of legal questions arose vis-a-vis the right to life, first of all that of the autonomy of the procedural obligation to conduct an efficient investigation. The Strasbourg case law did not provide a clear answer. However, following two crucial judgements rendered by the Grand Chamber, the Court has established an interesting legal framework. Article analyses also two other situations having a historical dimension: bringing to justice those accused of war crimes or other crimes under international law (in light of the alleged conflict with the principle of nullum crimes sine lege) and pursuing authors of pro-Nazi statements or speech denying the reality of Nazi atrocities.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2010, 30; 9-60
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zróżnicowanie terytorialne dostępu do sądów na podstawie analizy stron internetowych sądów rejonowych
Autorzy:
Więcek-Durańska, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788437.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-07-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
strony internetowe sądów
dostęp do wymiaru sprawiedliwości
witryny sądów
badanie stron internetowych sądów rejonowych
court websites
access to justice
research the court websites
Opis:
Dostęp do sądu można pojmować na różne sposoby, jego miarą może być zarówno fizyczna odległość, jaką musi pokonać obywatel, aby dotrzeć do budynku sądu jak i pewne rozwiązania organizacyjne i techniczne związane m.in. z rozwojem nowych technologii teleinformatycznych oraz dostępem potencjalnych „klientów” do informacji wymiaru sprawiedliwości poprzez stronę internetową. Jest to temat tym istotniejszy, że w ostatnich latach w resorcie wymiaru sprawiedliwości nastąpił znaczny wzrost nakładów przeznaczonych na informatyzację sądownictwa. Podjęte działania miały na celu zarówno ułatwienie pracy oraz wsparcie dla sędziów oraz personelu sądów, a także ułatwienie komunikacji pomiędzy sądami i stronami. Jak wynika jednak z analizy międzynarodowych danych statystycznych Polska, mimo dość dużych nakładów na informatyzację wymiaru sprawiedliwości, znalazła się w dziesiątce państw Unii Europejskiej o najniższym wskaźniku dostępu do technologii teleinformatycznych w sądach. Przy czym podkreśla się, że najsłabszym ogniwem jest wykorzystanie technologii informatycznych w zakresiekomunikacji między sądem, a stronami.Artykuł składa się z dwóch części. W pierwszej omówiono wytyczne dotyczące standardówprowadzenia stron internetowych przez jednostki wymiaru sprawiedliwości. W drugiej natomiast przedstawiono zagadnienia związane z metodologią badań własnych oraz wyniki analiz empirycznych.
Access to the court can be understood on different ways. This may be the distance to the court building or some organizational and technical solutions related to the development of new information and communication technologies (ICT) and the access of potential "clients" to justice information via the website. This is a more important topic that in recent years, the Ministry of Justice has seen a significant increase in the expenditure on computerization of the judiciary. The actions taken were aimed both at facilitating work and supporting judges and court staff as well as facilitating communication between courts and clients. However, as is clear from the analysis of international statistical data, Poland, in spite of its considerable expenditure on computerization of justice, was among the ten European Union countries with the lowest ICT access rates in the courts. The weakest link is the use of information technology in the field of communication between the court and the clients.The article consists of two parts. The first part discusses the standards of conducting websites by the judicial authorities. The second part presents methodology and results of own empiricalanalyzes.
Źródło:
Biuletyn Kryminologiczny; 2017, 24; 89-105
2084-5375
Pojawia się w:
Biuletyn Kryminologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola i właściwość sądów powszechnych i administracyjnych w sprawach antymonopolowych w świetle najnowszego orzecznictwa i zmian normatywnych
Autorzy:
Błachucki, Mateusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788232.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-04-03
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
sądownictwo antymonopolowe
właściwość sądowa
prawo konkurencji
akty administracyjne Prezesa UOKiK
bezczynność Prezesa UOKiK
jurisdiction of the court
antimonopoly court
competition law
administrative acts of the President of UOKiK
inactivity of the President of UOKiK
Opis:
The article presents the latest developments in jurisprudence and the law in relation to the role and the jurisdiction of courts in the antimonopoly cases. The basic assumption of the article is that there exist parallel jurisdiction of civil and administrative courts in competition cases and sometimes it is hard to determine which court is competent to hear particular competition case. The article begins with an analysis of recent changes in the law that influenced jurisdiction of the antimonopoly court. It is followed by the discussion of the latest Supreme Court jurisprudence concerning the role of the antimonopoly court. The next analyzed issue is the identification of all administrative acts issued by the antimonopoly authority together with determination which court is competent to hear appeals against each of them. It provides a good background for a detailed analysis of non-typical acts of the antimonopoly authority with an attempt to clarify which court has jurisdiction over them. The article concludes with critical observation that parallel jurisdiction of civil and administrative courts in competition cases is a source of constant problems. Especially civil courts tend to ignore the fact that administrative court do play a role in competition cases simply because civil courts do not poses legal tools to offer judicial protection for addressees of certain types of actions of the antimonopoly authority.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2017, 3 (211); 115-147
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brak obowiązku uzasadnienia i uzasadnienie skrócone a prawo do sądu
Autorzy:
Rzucidło-Grochowska, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788200.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-09-04
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
obowiązek uzasadnienia
uzasadnienie skrócone
prawo do sądu
prawa człowieka
orzecznictwo
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
justifying a judgement
shortened justification
right to fair trial
right to access to the court
human rights
judicial decisions
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The right to fair trial and access to the court is interpreted by European Court of Human Rights in a wide manner. Amongst these rulings, there are numerous judicial opinions, where ECHR addesses the problem of giving grounds for judicial decisions (not mention explicitly in the Convention). Out of that reason we may say that there is possible to notice special element of the general right to due process – right to obtain grounds for judicial decisions. This particular right has many aspects and – at least at the first glance – seems to impose the duty to prepare justifications without exceptions. In practice the situation is yet quite different. ECHR approves some limitations of this duty, that migh arise from different sources. In other words, shortened justifications and lack of the duty to justify may be, under some conditions, compliant with standards set forth by the Convention. The clou of this matter is proportionalization of the justifying process, as well as considering of arguments pro and contra fulfilling maximum standard. Sometimes it is therefore possible that guaranteeing the right to fair trial may be overcome by another values (like promptness of receiving a decision, better governance of judges‘ time and effort, etc.). Considering this issue in a wider perspective, we, hence, cannot try to maximalize one aspects of a standard because, if it may cause obstacles in meeting another elements slocated within it the other rights’ domain.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2014, 4 (200); 61-71
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Summary Procedure before the Strasbourg Court under Article 28(1)b of the European Convention on Human Rights: Judicial Economy under Scrutiny
Autorzy:
Djajić, Sanja
Etinski, Rodoljub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706758.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
reform of the European Court of Human Rights
summary procedure
judicial economy
Article 28(1)b of the ECHR
legal remedies
socially-owned property
Opis:
This article critically evaluates the summary procedure introduced by Protocol No. 14 to the European Convention on Human Rights, adopted within the reform of the European Court of Human Rights system. The summary procedure, now set out in Art. 28(1)b of the Convention, was instituted in order to facilitate expediency and to reduce the case load of the Court. This article argues that while judicial economy is a legitimate goal, the summary procedure under Art. 28(1)b has considerable deficiencies that undermine some of the systemic goals and core values of ECHR law. There is a manifest lack of remedies vis-à-vis the choice of the procedure, choice of applicable law, and no appeals against final decisions rendered in the course of the summary procedure. Notably, the concept of “well-established case-law” seems to be neither clear nor reliable, as evidenced in the cases analysed in the article. These cases, which involve the issue of socially-owned property in Serbia, serve to demonstrate some of the significant errors in interpretation and decision-making which can result from application of the summary procedure.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 73-98
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The execution of European Arrest Warrants issued by Polish courts in the context of the CJEU Rule of Law case law
Autorzy:
Saganek, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2143033.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Court of Justice of the European Union
European Arrest Warrant
EAW
Polska
rule of law
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2020, 40; 275-295
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Patterns of Democracy in the Case Law of the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Ninatti, Stefania
Arcari, Maurizio
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706909.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
CJEU
democracy
European Union
Court of Justice of the European Union
European Convention on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
This article attempts to discover the key elements of the democratic principle, as described by the judges sitting in Luxembourg and Strasbourg, whose case law reveals the underlying idea of democracy at the supranational level. Until recently the debate on democracy was limited to the national level. But things are changing, and this article shows the gradual emergence of a process led by supranational courts, in which the application of the democratic principle finds multiple grades and variations. In this way the supranational/international courts have opened a new chapter in the process of constitutionalization of international law.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 171-192
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
EU Values and Constitutional Pluralism: The EU System of Fundamental Rights Protection
Autorzy:
Lenaerts, Koen
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706658.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights
CJEU
Court of Justice of the European Union
EU
European Union
fundamental right
Opis:
This article seeks to explore whether the EU system of fundamental rights protection allows room for constitutional pluralism. By looking at recent developments in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court of Justice), it is submitted that the Court has answered that question in the affirmative, thereby respecting the diversity of the cultures and traditions of the peoples of Europe as well as their national identities. The application of the Charter does not rule out a cumulative application of fundamental rights. That being said, pluralism is not absolute, but must be weighed against the indivisible and universal values on which the European Union is founded. Logically, the question that arises is how we order pluralism. In this regard, I shall argue that it is not for the Court of Justice to decide when an EU uniform standard of fundamental rights protection is to replace (or coexist with) national standards. That decision is for the EU political institutions to adopt, since they enjoy the necessary democratic legitimacy to determine the circumstances under which the exercise of a fundamental right is to be limited for reasons of public interest. However, this deference to the EU political branches does not mean that EU legislative decisions are immune from judicial review. On the contrary, cases such as Schwarz and Digital Rights demonstrate that the Court of Justice is firmly committed to examining whether those legislative choices comply with primary EU law, and notably with the Charter. In this regard, when interpreting the provisions of the Charter, the Court of Justice – in dialogue with national courts and, in particular, constitutional courts – operates as the guarantor of the rule of law within the EU, of which fundamental rights are part and parcel. It is thus for those courts to make sure that each and every EU citizen enjoys a sphere of individual liberty which must, as defined by the Charter, remain free from public interferences.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 135-160
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zakres związania państw członkowskich Kartą Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej w kontekście stosowania prawa karnego (uwagi na tle orzecznictwa TSUE)
Autorzy:
Szwarc, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788235.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-04-04
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej
implementacja prawa unijnego
implementation of EU law
Court of Justice of the European Union
Opis:
The article focuses on the recent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the context of the national criminal laws of the Member States, concerning the scope of application of the Charter. Drawing conclusions from this jurisprudence the Author answers the question when the Member State is 'implementing Union law' in the meaning of Article 51(1) of the Charter in the criminal law context. It is considered that Member States implement Union law when interpreting framework decisions (Lanigan, JZ, Vilkas), when assessing the conformity of the national measures with framework decisions (Jeremy F., Radu), when executing judgements in the framework of the mutual recognition (Aranyosi and Caldararu) and when assuring the effectiveness of EU law by enacting criminal sanctions (Tarrico). In addition, in some situations Member States may be considered to be implementing Union law while enacting national measures which may affect the rights derived from Union law (Delvigne). It is assumed in the article that CJEU is often called to strike the fair balance between the different (and sometimes diverging) interests of three categories of actors: interests of individuals (to have their fundamental rights protected), interests of Member States (to exercise ius puniendi) and interests of the European Union as a whole (to ensure effectivess of EU law).
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2017, 3 (211); 47-79
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Can States Withhold Information about Alleged Human Rights Abuses on National Security Grounds? Some Remarks on the ECtHr Judgments of Al-Nashiri v. Poland and Husayn (Abu-Zubaydah) v. Poland
Autorzy:
Carpanelli, Elena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/960338.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights
secret files
national security
right to the truth
duty of cooperation
Opis:
The judgments delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Nashiri v. Poland and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland highlight the potential tension that may arise between states’ broad reliance on national security grounds to withhold disclosure of secret files and compliance with their obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. The present article examines the above-mentioned judgments, focusing, in particular, on how (and to what extent) the withholding of secret information may infringe on the right to the truth and, as far as proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights are concerned, the state’s duty to cooperate with it.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 217-234
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uses and Underuses of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination at the International Court of Justice
Autorzy:
Balcerzak, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706933.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
International Court of Justice
Committee on the elimination of Racial Discrimination
provisional measures
human rights
Opis:
As many as three international disputes containing allegations of infringement of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) have been brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), thus contributing to the number of cases allowing the Court to pronounce itself on the international human rights law. Even though none of the cases invoking violations of ICERD has been (yet) adjudicated on the merits, they have already provided an opportunity to clarify (at least in part) the compromissory clause enshrined in Art. 22 of ICERD, as well as to tackle some other issues related to provisional measures ordered by the Court. This article discusses the ICJ’s approaches to the application of ICERD in the three above-mentioned cases, while posing the question whether indeed the 1965 Convention can be useful as a tool for settling inter-state disputes. The author claims that ICERD and the broad definition of “racial discrimination” set out in its Art. 1 constitute cornerstones for the international protection of human rights, though the recourse to the procedures provided in Art. 22 of ICERD – vital as they are – should not necessarily be perceived as a better alternative to the inter-state procedures and the functions exercised by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD).
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 11-27
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polityka stosowania kary konfiskaty mienia w PRL
Forfeiture of property. The policy of its imposition in Polish Peoples Republic
Autorzy:
Rzeplińska, Irena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698520.pdf
Data publikacji:
1992
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
kara konfiskaty mienia
Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa (PRL)
statystyki sądowe
forfeiture of property
the Polish People's Republic 1944-1989
court statistics
Opis:
Fofeiture of property is the most severe of all penalties affecting property that have ever been  imposed in hisiory. It consists in the convicted offender’s property being taken over – wholly or in part – by the treasury. The paper deals with the history of this particular penalty in the criminal policy of Polish People’s Republic in the years 1944–1990. The penalty of forfeiture of property was not provided for in the 1932 penal code (which remained in force till December 31, 1969). It appeared in the legislation shortly before World War II, in the act of June 23, 1939 on special criminal responsibility for desertion to the enemy or abroad. Before the passing of the 1932 penal code, the codes of the partitioning powers had been in force in the Polish territories (as until the regaining of independence in 1918, Poland was partitioned by Russia, Austria and Germany). Also those codes did not provide for forfeiture of property. It was only the legislator of People’s Poland who introduced forfeiture of property as an additionar penalty and provided for its broad adjudication. The history of forfeiture of property in postwar Poland is analyzed divided into four stages which differ from one another due to significant changes in the  legislation. The changes reflected re-orientation of criminal policy in connection with a succession of political crises. The first such stage in the history of forfeiture of property were the years 1944–1958. The data discussed in the paper that concern this period are statistics of civilians convicted by military courts from the spring of l944 till April 30, 1955 (till which date in special cases provided for in statutes, civilians fell under the jurisdiction of military courts), and statistics of convictions by common courts till 1949. The second stage began with the passing of the act of June 18, 1959 on protection of social property. Stage three was initiated by the entering into force, on January 1, 1970, of the new penal code of April 19, 1969. The fourth and last stage began with the passing of the act of May 10, 1985 on special criminal  responsability and ended with the act of February 23, 1990 which derogated the penalty of forfeiture of property. The introduction of forfeiture of property as an additional penalty is characteristic of the earliest legislative acts of the new authorities of People’s Poland, imposed from without. Its broad application and obligatory character demonstrate the importance attached by those authorities to forfeiture as an element of political game against society. The first legal acts of the Polish Committee for National Liberaltion provided for that penalty: the decree of August 31, 1944 on statutory penalties for the Nazi was criminals, the decree of September 23, 1944 – Penal Code of the Polish Army, and the decree of October 30, 1944 on protection of State. One year later, the decree of November 11,1945 was passed on offences of particular danger in the period of reconstruction of State (which quashed the former wartime decree on protection of State). It was in turn replaced with a new one under the same title, passed on June 13, 1946. The Council of Ministers justified the new decree with the need for aggravation of penalties for all activities that disturbed internal peace, order, and safety, and impaired Poland’s international position. The decree piovided for particularly severe penalties for perpetration of, incitement to, and approval of fratricide; for membership of illegal organizations and terrorist groups; for distribution of illegal literature; for illegal possession of firearms; for helping the members of terrorist groups; and in some cases of failure to inform on an offence. (The decree was generally known as the small penal code – s.p.c.). As provided for in the decree, the additional penalty of forfeiture of property was obfigatory in two cases: sentence to death or to life imprisonment, and conviction for attempt with violence or membership of an armed union. It was optional in the case of sentence to a prison term (Art. 49 para 1 and 2 of the decree). The provisions of s.p.c. extended the application of forfeiture: the court could at ail times adjudicate forfeiture of the property not only of the convicted person himself but also of his spouse or familly members (this did not concern, though, the property such persons attained themselves, inherited, or acquired gift not donated by the convicted persons). Thus forfeiture could affect a very large group of actually innocent persons. Here the decree introduced group responsability for crime. In 1953, four decrees were passed; according to the people’s legislator, they aimed at protecting social property and the interests of buyers in commercial trade. Two of them, the decree of March 4, 1953 on protection of buyers in commercial trade and another one passed on that same date on increased protection of social property, provided for the possibility of forfeiture of the offender’s property wholly or in part. In that case, forfeiture was optional. Statistical data concerning the adjudication of forfeiture were gathered since 1949. Beginning from August 15, 1944, though, forfeiture of property was also adjudicated in cases of civilians convicted by military courts which had civilians in their jurisdiction by force of the decree of October 30, 1944 on protection of State. Military courts were competent to decide in cases of persons accused of offences specified in Art. Art. 85–88 and 101 – 103 of penal code of the Polish Army, in the decree on protection of State, and – the latter quashed – in s.p.c. The jurisdiction of military courts in cases of civilians was abolished in the act of April 5, 1955 on transfer to common courts of the former competence of military courts in cases of civilians, functionaries of public security agencies, the Civic Militaria and Prison Staff. Military courts retained their competence in cases of the specified categories of civilians accused of espionage (Art. 7 s.p.c.). The passing of that act was the first manifestation of a gradual abolition of the legal and judiciary terror. Convictions of civilians tried by military courts were two or three times more frequent than convictions of military service men. Starting from as early as the latter half of 1944, civilians were convicted for membership of illegal or delegalized organizations (mainly the former Home Army) and for illegal possession of firearms (70 per cent of all convictions). Aftcr 1952, the number of persons convicted for the latter went down; instead, more persons were convicted for banditry and failure to inform on an offence. Forfeiture of property was adjudicated in about 40 to 50 per cent of cases of civilians; it  accompanied sentences to long prison terms or to death, as well as another additional penalty: deprivation of public rights. It was imposed first of all on those who opposed the newly introduced political system, but also on chance perpetrators of what was called anti-State propagande. Common courts adjudicated forfeiture of property mainly for offences specified in two decrees: the one of August 31, 1944 on statutory penalties for Nazi war criminals, and the decree of June 28,1946 on criminal responsability for repudiation of Polish nationality during the 1939-1945 war. Over 90 per cent of all forfeiture were adjudicated in such cases. During the 1959–1969 decade, the additional penalty of forfeiture of property was imposed basing on special statutes. Two statutes were passed as a novelty which provided for forfeiture while aiming at special protection of the social property. They were: the act of January 21, 1958 on increased protection of social property, and the act of June 18, 1959 on criminal responsability for offences against social property. Nearly all forfeitures in that period were adjudicated for offences specified in the act of June 18, 1959, and the actual offence concerned was appropriation of social property in practically all cases. Convictions for the offences specified in the discussed statut constituted one-fifth of all convictions; most cases, however, concerned petty or not too serious offences where forfeiture was optional only. This is why that penalty was imposed rather seldom; there were realatively few acts for which it was obligatory. Forfeiture was also most seldom adjudicated by force of ther statutes. It amounted to 1,5–2,2 per cent of all additional penalties imposed. The new penal code passed on April 19, 1969 introduced forfeiture of property to its catalogue of additional penalties. Forfeiture of the whole or part of property was obligatory on the case of conviction for the following crimes: 1) against the basic political or economic interests of Polish People’s Republic: betrayal  of the fatherland, conspiracy against Polish People’s Republic, espionage, terrorism, sabotage, abuse of confidence in foreign relations, misinformation, participation in organized crime against the economy or foreign currency regulations; and 2) appropriation of social property of considerable value. Besides, the court could adjudicate forfeiture of property wholly or in part in the case of conviction of another crime committed for material profit. The code’s regulation of application of forfeiture was clearly copied from the earlier legislation: the s.p.c. and the acts that increased the protection of social property. During the fifteen years 1970–1984, forfeiture of property was among the least frequently imposed penalties and constituted from 1,2 to 3,3 per cent of all additional penalties. It accompagnied nearly exlusively the convictions for two types of offences: appropriation of social property of considerable value, and that same offence committed by a person who availed himself of the activity of a unit of socialized economy, and acted in conspiracy with others to the detriment of that unit, its customers or contractors. Convictions for these offences constituted about 1 per cent of all convictions for offences against property. The fourth and last period discussed are the years 1985–1990 when forfeiture was again adjudicated very often, as in the 1940’s – 1950’s, to be abolished completely in the end. The entire five-year period was characterized by changes in penal law, one completely opposing another: from extension of penalization and increase of repressiveness introduced by the acts of 1985 to liberalization in 1990. Two acts were passed bearing the same date – may 10, 1985: on changing some provisions of penal law and the law on transgressions, and on special criminal responsability (the so-called provisional act in force till June 30, 1988). They introduced significant changes in the range of application of forfeiture of property, making its adjudication possible, and for some time even obligatory, for common offences. In the discussed period, that penalty was imposed mainly for offences against property. Nearly a half of them were burglaries, and the victims were usually – in two-thirds of cases – natural persons. In the period of particular intensity of convictions – 1986–1987 – forfeiture accompanied 11–12 per cent of ail convictions, the proportion going down to a mere 0,1 per cent in 1989. The imposition of that penalty was extremely broad: consequently, forfeiture  was adjudicated in cases of quite petty offences where it was inappropriate and out of all proportion to the seriousness of the act and the guilt of the offender. This made the execution of forfeiture actually ineffective as it usually proved objectless in the case of petty common offenders. Forfeiture of property evolved in a way from was practically non-existence to emergence in special statutes and then in the penal code, to its special use in the criminal policy of the eighties when grounds well known from the past were given for its broader imposition: the need for severe penal repression towards offenders against property, to a complete abolition of that penalty in 1990. Forfeiture was extensively applied in the years 1949–1958 (when common courts adjudicated 1044, and military courts – 1538 forfeitures a year on the average). The next two periods were similar as to the number of forfeitures (503 and 513 respectively). The use of forfeiture was the broadest under the provisional statute (10,345 cases a year on the average). Forfeiture is no doubt one of the most severe penalties affecting property, or penalties in general, which is why it should have been adjudicated in exceptional cases only. Its use under the provisional statute in cases of ,,ordinary” offenders violated the principle of just punishment. On the other hand, forfeiture can hardly be called a just penalty anyway as it always affects not only the offender himself but also his family. The political changes in Poland made it possible to liberalize penal law and to remove the most unjust solutions it contained, the penalty of forfeiture of property included.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 1992, XVIII; 147-167
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Propozycja wykładni zasady zakazu spożywania owoców z zatrutego drzewa – przyczynek do dyskusji
Autorzy:
Kotowski, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788191.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
teoria prawa
owoc z zatrutego drzewa
postępowanie karne
dowód
zakaz
zasady procesowe
theory of law
the fruit of the poisonous tree
criminal proceedings
proof
prohibition
principles of court proceedings
Opis:
The article presents theoretical issues related to the interposition to Polish criminal procedure rules known as „prohibition of eating the fruit of the poisonous tree”. The study addressed the following issues: 1) the interpretation of the article 168a of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the version after 1 July 2015; 2) some of the issues related to the possible problems with applicaton of this rule, and 3) axiology and theoretical legitimacy of this regulation.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2015, 2 (202); 5-36
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawo do sądu a oddalenie oczywiście bezzasadnego powództwa w świetle projektu zmian z 27.11.2017 r. do Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Autorzy:
Piaskowska, Olga M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788250.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-01-16
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
postępowanie cywilne
oddalenie powództwa
oczywista bezzasadność
prawo do sądu
civil proceedings
dismissal of the claim
obvious groundlessness
right to court
Opis:
Artykuł omawia propozycję zawartą w projekcie nowelizacji z 27.11.2017 r. do Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego, tj. wprowadzenie do postępowania cywilnego dopuszczalności oddalenia roszczenia jako oczywiście bezzasadnego na posiedzeniu niejawnym w aspekcie zapewnienia i realizacji prawa jednostki do sądu. Autorka stawia tezę, że w świetle projektowanego art. 1911 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego o „oczywistej bezzasadności” w rozumieniu tego przepisu można mówić jedynie w sytuacji, w której roszczenie powoda nie jest znane prawu. W przeciwnym razie, tj. w przypadku zbyt szerokiego zrozumienia tej instytucji, oddalenie powództwa jako „oczywiście bezzasadnego” może prowadzić do naruszenia prawa jednostki do sądu w świetle art. 6 EKPC.
The article discuss the proposal included in the draft amendment from 27.11.2017, such as introduction to the civil proceedings of the admissibility of dismissing the claim as obvious groundlessness at a closed session in the context of providing to a person the right to a court. The author puts forward the thesis that in the light of Article 1911 Code of Civil Procedure, the “obvious groundlessness” of an action is a state in which the claim made by the claimant is unknown to the law. Otherwise, i.e. in the case of a too wide understanding of this institution, the dismissal of the action may lead to violation of the right of the individual to court in the light of Article 6 ECHR.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2018, 1 (213); 29-46
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Specyfika odpowiedzialności za naruszenia Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka związane z działalnością nieuznawanych reżimów – analiza orzecznictwa
Autorzy:
Zaręba, Szymon
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788174.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka
nieuznawane reżimy
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
MTS
naruszenie prawa
odpowiedzialność międzynarodowa
orzecznictwo
państwa trzecie
European Court of Human Rights
unrecognized regimes
International Court of Justice
ICJ
infringement of the law
international responsibility
judicial decisions
third state
Opis:
The aim of the article is to compare the way in which the issue of responsibility for violations related to the acts of unrecognized authorities claiming to be States is treated by the European Court of Human Rights and other international courts, particularly the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The article considers in detail the relations between jurisdiction and responsibility, responsibility of parent States (including the concept of “positive obligations”) and responsibility of States which provide assistance to unrecognized regimes (with emphasis put on the concept of “effective control”). The results of the study indicate that the jurisprudence of the European Court differs in several important aspects from decisions of other international courts. These differences, while undoubtedly enhancing the protection of human rights in Europe, contribute to the process of fragmentation of the law of international responsibility.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2016, 3 (207); 27-66
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies