Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "International Court of Justice" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12
    Tytuł:
    Poland and the International Court of Justice—Today
    Autorzy:
    Szafarz, Renata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/43445600.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1992-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    Polska
    International Court of Justice
    jurisdiction
    environmental Protection
    Źródło:
    Droit Polonais Contemporain; 1992, 1-4(93-96); 47-51
    0070-7325
    Pojawia się w:
    Droit Polonais Contemporain
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Book review: Robert Kolb, The International Court of Justice, Hart Publishing, Oxford: 2013
    Autorzy:
    Krzan, Bartlomiej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706884.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-07-25
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    book review
    PCIJ
    ICJ
    International Court of Justice
    international law
    Opis:
    Review of a book: Robert Kolb, The International Court of Justice, Hart Publishing, Oxford: 2013
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 313-317
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Legal Obligation to Prevent Genocide: Bosnia v Serbia and Beyond
    Autorzy:
    Forlati, Serena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706756.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    genocide
    responsibility to protect
    ICJ
    International Court of Justice
    Opis:
    This article assesses the impact of legal rules aimed at preventing genocide. The specific features of the legal obligation to prevent genocide are analyzed in light of the current debate on the “responsibility to protect” and the ICJ’s stance on the issue in Bosnia v Serbia. While the content of positive obligations such as the one under discussion is usually elaborated through the case law of judicial or quasi-judicial bodies, the ICJ refrained from doing so, stating that only manifest breaches of the obligation to prevent genocide give rise to international responsibility. The author seeks an explanation for the reasons underlying such an approach, and tries to identify other ways in which legal standards in the field of genocide prevention could be developed.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2011, 31; 189-205
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    International and Municipal Law before the World Court: One or Two Legal Orders?
    Autorzy:
    Tomka, Peter
    Howley, Jessica
    Proulx, Vincent-Joël
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706919.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-07-26
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    International Court of Justice
    Permanent Court of International Justice
    international courts
    international tribunals
    international law
    domestic law
    monism
    dualism
    judicial interpretation
    sources
    evidence
    Opis:
    This article provides an overview of the approach taken by the International Court of Justice and its predecessor, the Permanent Court of International Justice, to questions of municipal law. Beginning with an outline of the theoretical framework, it discusses the conventional position that domestic law is a factual issue for the Court, before considering the ways in which the two Courts have utilised municipal law. It also considers to what extent the Court employs domestic law in ascertaining international legal rules.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 11-46
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence: Hopes, Disappointments and Its Relevance to Crimea
    Autorzy:
    Värk, René
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706830.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-07-25
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    annexation
    Crimea
    declaration of independence
    ICJ
    International Court of Justice
    Kosovo
    Russian Federation
    Ukraine
    Opis:
    The international community anxiously awaited delivery of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Kosovo’s declaration of independence, hoping it would clarify the controversial right of self-determination and the right of secession. Although it was hailed by many as a confirmation of both rights, the advisory opinion was disappointing regarding that part of the analysis which was based on general international law. The ICJ interpreted the question posed in a very narrow and formalistic way. It concluded that declarations of independence (not their consequences) are not in violation of international law, but it did not rule that they are in accordance with international law, as was requested in the posed question. The ICJ refused to examine whether there is a positive entitlement to secession under international law. Although Kosovo and its supporters claimed that the case of Kosovo is unique and will not set a precedent, Russia used the case of Kosovo and the advisory opinion to justify the so-called referendum in Crimea and the subsequent incorporation of Crimea into Russia. However, the situation in Crimea is only superficially comparable to Kosovo and the advisory opinion gives little or no support in the case of Crimea.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 115-131
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Original Sin Reaffirmed: The Nicaragua Judgement’s Impact on the Notion of Armed Attack as the Most Grave Form of the Use of Force
    Autorzy:
    Kowalski, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706871.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    aggression
    armed attack
    ICJ
    International Court of Justice
    jus ad bellum
    Nicaragua
    use of force
    Opis:
    This article is referenced to the thirtieth anniversary of the ICJ’s Nicaragua judgement on the merits of 1986. It acknowledges the significance of this much-debated judgement for the modern international law on the use of force (jus ad bellum). However the text focuses on one aspect of the judgement only, i.e. the definition of the notion of “armed attack” as the most grave form of the use of force. The impact of the judgement in this respect is critically analysed. It is argued that the introduction to the UN Charter text of undefined notions of the use of force, aggression, and armed attack may be labelled as the “original sin” of contemporary jus ad bellum, as it results in conceptual obscurity. It is also claimed that the ICJ reaffirmed this original sin in its Nicaragua judgement because it explicitly argued for the notion of “armed attack” as the most grave form of the use of armed force and, in consequence, distinguished it from the other, lesser forms of the use of force, while failing to introduce any sort of clarity in the conceptual ambiguity of jus ad bellum. The article also offers some remarks de lege ferenda and suggests abandoning the gravity criterion, which would require abandoning the well-established judicial and doctrinal interpretation approaches to jus ad bellum.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2016, 36; 37-50
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Judicial Review of Security Council Decisions – A Modern Vision of the Administration of Justice?
    Autorzy:
    Richter, Dagmar
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706707.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    Security Council
    judicial review
    denial of justice
    judicial self-restraint
    jurisdiction
    International Court of Justice
    principle of loyalty
    UN
    administration of justice
    international law
    Opis:
    The Security Council’s new activism, particularly in the field of “individualized sanctions”, gives impetus to the debate on whether, and to what extent, the most powerful organ of the UN should be subject to judicial review. This article analyses and categorizes the various strategies already employed in international courts, such as, e.g., “denial of justice”, incidental control, full review of implementing acts, the “as-long-as” rule, and various instruments of judicial self-restraint. The author suggests that “jurisdiction”, understood as encompassing the procedural aspects of the problem, should be regarded as a “door-opener” to judicial review. As regards its substantive dimension, the existence of primary responsibilities on both sides (the Security Council and the judiciary) should be taken into consideration. The author demonstrates that the principle of loyalty and cooperation means, on the one hand, respect by the Security Council for judicial review from inside of the UN system, and on the other hand, respect for Security Council prerogatives from external courts. Taking into account the evolution of a duty of loyal cooperation between different systems within the global legal order, and in expectation that the ICJ will defend the international rule of law, we may speak of a “modern vision of the administration of justice.”
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 271-297
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Krzysztof Skubiszewski and the Right to Self-determination: Past and Future
    Autorzy:
    Hilpold, Peter
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706595.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-10-26
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    Chagos Islands
    East Timor
    human rights
    ICJ
    International Court of Justice
    self-determination
    Skubiszewski
    in memoriam
    Opis:
    In 1995, Professor Krzysztof Skubiszewski added a Dissenting Opinion to the East Timor Judgment, wherein the ICJ declined jurisdiction in a proceeding started by Portugal against Australia for its having concluded the East Timor Gap treaty with Indonesia, in blatant violation of the East Timorese’s right to self-determination. Ad-hoc Judge Skubiszewski posited that the Court should have accepted jurisdiction and he presented a series of convincing arguments for this proposition. In 2019 the ICJ rendered an Opinion in the Chagos Islands case. The fact that the ICJ accepted jurisdiction in this case demonstrates that an impressive development has taken place since 1995, one whereby many of Professor Skubiszewski’s requests have been implemented. At the same time however, the Chagos Opinion is not fully satisfying as it neglects, to a considerable extent, the human rights issue. This contribution shows that Skubiszewski’s Dissenting Opinion would have provided guidance also for these questions and that it remains as topical today as it was in 1995.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2019, 39; 21-35
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Uses and Underuses of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination at the International Court of Justice
    Autorzy:
    Balcerzak, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706933.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
    International Court of Justice
    Committee on the elimination of Racial Discrimination
    provisional measures
    human rights
    Opis:
    As many as three international disputes containing allegations of infringement of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) have been brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), thus contributing to the number of cases allowing the Court to pronounce itself on the international human rights law. Even though none of the cases invoking violations of ICERD has been (yet) adjudicated on the merits, they have already provided an opportunity to clarify (at least in part) the compromissory clause enshrined in Art. 22 of ICERD, as well as to tackle some other issues related to provisional measures ordered by the Court. This article discusses the ICJ’s approaches to the application of ICERD in the three above-mentioned cases, while posing the question whether indeed the 1965 Convention can be useful as a tool for settling inter-state disputes. The author claims that ICERD and the broad definition of “racial discrimination” set out in its Art. 1 constitute cornerstones for the international protection of human rights, though the recourse to the procedures provided in Art. 22 of ICERD – vital as they are – should not necessarily be perceived as a better alternative to the inter-state procedures and the functions exercised by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD).
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 11-27
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Specyfika odpowiedzialności za naruszenia Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka związane z działalnością nieuznawanych reżimów – analiza orzecznictwa
    Autorzy:
    Zaręba, Szymon
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788174.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka
    nieuznawane reżimy
    Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
    MTS
    naruszenie prawa
    odpowiedzialność międzynarodowa
    orzecznictwo
    państwa trzecie
    European Court of Human Rights
    unrecognized regimes
    International Court of Justice
    ICJ
    infringement of the law
    international responsibility
    judicial decisions
    third state
    Opis:
    The aim of the article is to compare the way in which the issue of responsibility for violations related to the acts of unrecognized authorities claiming to be States is treated by the European Court of Human Rights and other international courts, particularly the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The article considers in detail the relations between jurisdiction and responsibility, responsibility of parent States (including the concept of “positive obligations”) and responsibility of States which provide assistance to unrecognized regimes (with emphasis put on the concept of “effective control”). The results of the study indicate that the jurisprudence of the European Court differs in several important aspects from decisions of other international courts. These differences, while undoubtedly enhancing the protection of human rights in Europe, contribute to the process of fragmentation of the law of international responsibility.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawnicze; 2016, 3 (207); 27-66
    0039-3312
    2719-4302
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The rule of law w opiniach doradczych i wyrokach Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości
    Autorzy:
    Lis, Edyta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788319.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-04-09
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    rządy prawa
    Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
    opinie doradcze
    wyroki
    rozstrzyganie sporów
    jasność prawa
    równość wobec prawa
    rule of law
    International Court of Justice
    advisory opinions
    judgement
    dispute settlement
    clarity of law
    equality before the law
    Opis:
    W artykule wykazano, że Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości, wydając orzeczenia i opinie doradcze, przyczynia się do wzmocnienia i promocji koncepcji rządów prawa. W związku z tym, po pierwsze, wyjaśniono pojęcie „rządów prawa” oraz przedstawiono teorie formalne i materialne koncepcji rządów prawa. Ustalono, że idei rządów prawa w krajowych porządkach prawnych nie należy utożsamiać z koncepcją rządów prawa w prawie międzynarodowym. Następnie dokonano analizy wybranych orzeczeń i opinii doradczych Trybunału w odniesieniu zarówno do pokojowego rozstrzygania sporów międzynarodowych, interpretacji, jednolitości stosowania, rozwoju prawa międzynarodowego, jak i zachowania zasady równości wobec prawa. Stwierdzono, że poprzez pokojowe rozstrzyganie sporów międzynarodowych pomiędzy państwami Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości przyczynia się do utrzymania międzynarodowego pokoju, przyjaznych stosunków oraz zapobiega wybuchowi konfliktów zbrojnych. Ponadto Trybunał w sposób jednolity, bezstronny stosuje, wyjaśnia i przyczynia się do rozwoju prawa międzynarodowego. Niestety, w postępowaniu doradczym dotyczącym rewizji orzeczeń trybunałów administracyjnych nie zagwarantowano jednostkom zasady równości stron. Zgodnie z art. 34 ust. 1 Statutu Trybunału jedynymi podmiotami uprawnionymi do bycia stroną w postępowaniu przed Międzynarodowym Trybunałem Sprawiedliwości są państwa. Jednostki nie mogą także uczestniczyć w postępowaniu doradczym. Jednakże w ostatniej opinii doradczej z dnia 1 lutego 2012 r. Trybunał stwierdził, że jest zobowiązany do zagwarantowania równości stron tak dalece, jak jest to możliwe.
    This paper argues that by delivering judgement and giving an advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice contributes to enhancement and promotion of the rule of law. First of all, it was necessary to explain the term ‘rule of law’ and its formal and substantive theories. It argues that the notion of rule of law in national legal systems should be distinguished from this concept in international law. Then it analyzes some judgements and advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice with regard to peaceful settlement of disputes, interpretation, uniform application and development of international law, as well as equality before the law. It was established that through peaceful settlement of disputes between States, the International Court of Justice helped maintain peace, friendly relations and prevent violent conflicts. Furthermore, the World Court consistently and impartially applies, clarifies and contributes to the development of international law. Unfortunately, individuals are not on equal footing in the advisory proceedings concerning revision of judgements of administrative tribunals. According to Article 34 paragraph 1 of the Statute of the Court, only States are entitled to appear before the International Court of Justice. What is more, there is also absence of equality of the parties in advisory proceedings because individuals are deprived of any access to the Court. But in the last advisory opinion rendered on 1 February 2012, the Court argued that it is obliged to ensure that this principle is adhered to as far as it possible.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawnicze; 2018, 2 (214); 5-33
    0039-3312
    2719-4302
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wpływ opinii doradczych Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości na postępowanie przed Trybunałami Administracyjnymi w systemie ONZ
    Autorzy:
    Lis, Edyta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788204.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
    MTS
    opinie doradcze
    ONZ
    Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych
    trybunały administracyjne
    kompetencje
    równość wobec prawa
    orzeczenie
    International Court of Justice
    ICJ
    consultative opinion
    administrative tribunal
    equality before the law
    competences
    decision
    United Nations
    UN
    Opis:
    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is a principal judicial organ of the United Nations. The main task of ICJ is to settle disputes submitted to it by the states and is also entitled to give advisory opinions which are given on the motion of some United Nations organs and specialized agencies. The expression that ICJ is a “principal judicial organ of the United Nations” doesn’t mean that it is the only one judicial organ within the framework of the United Nations. The United Nations Administrative Tribunal (UNAT) was established by the legal force of the General Assembly resolution 351 A(IV) of 9 December 1949 r. The main purpose of the UNAT was to decide legal employment disputes between United Nations staff and the Organization. In 1955 the Statute of UNAT was amended and the Committee on Application for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgement was competent to seek advisory opinion form ICJ and this opinion was binding. However Committee only in three cases requested the ICJ to give advisory opinion. Those opinions concerned inter alia the competence of ICJ to respond to the question, the right of Committee to submit such motion, the principle of equality of arms. In spite of that since of the 1st of July 2009 the new system of administration of internal justice was established – the United Nations Dispute Tribunal and the United Nations Appeal Tribunal, which consider the appeals against judgments rendered by the United Nations Dispute Tribunal, the issues discussed in advisory opinions of ICJ on the matters of appealing against a judicial decision of UNAT are still highly topical, especially in the context of the maintained in force competence of ICJ to review judgement of The Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organisation.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawnicze; 2016, 1 (205); 5-37
    0039-3312
    2719-4302
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies