Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Szanciło, Tomasz" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Wstrzymanie dostaw energii elektrycznej z powodu zaległości po stronie odbiorcy a obowiązek informacyjny przedsiębiorcy
Autorzy:
Szanciło, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788172.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
wstrzymanie dostaw energii elektrycznej
obowiązek informacyjny
dostawa
energia
terminy
zapłata
przesłanki prawne
suspension of energy supply
obligation to provide information
supply; energy
supply
energy
date
payment
Opis:
The suspension of energy supply is one of the farthest-reaching powers of energy entrepreneur with whom a recipient had signed an agreement. Therefore, it is not right which can be used in every situation, but must be met certain conditions, even if the basis for suspension of supply is the lack of payment by the recipient. It may rise dispute between the trader and the recipient concerning the validity of cutting-off delivery of electricity. It is necessary to determine whether the action of the energy trader was in accordance with the law, which was preceded by all the required law actions, including whether it has been preserved obligation to provide information in relation to the contractor. It is not sufficient that the recipient is in default for a specified period of payment for energy, but must be notified in writing of its intention to terminate the contract. In addition, it must be designated an additional two-week deadline for payment of outstanding and current liabilities. It’s important to define the conditions of keeping by the operator of the energy information’s obligation, including the starting date for calculating the additional period set for payment of arrears. This raises doubt whether the principle derived from Article. 61 of the Civil Code can be applied directly to the energy law, which aims to protect recipients. This is more important that consumers more often than not are recipients of electricity, so far the weaker party of a contract for the sale and delivery of electricity.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2016, 3 (207); 129-147
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Powaga rzeczy osądzonej i prawomocność rozszerzona a kontrola wzorców umownych
Autorzy:
Szanciło, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788194.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
rzecz osądzona
klauzule niedozwolone
postępowanie cywilne
umowa
wzory umów
res judicata
abusive clauses
civil law procedure
contract
contract specimen
Opis:
Issues concerning illegal contractual provisions, as well as the extent of the effects of a judicial decision that recognizes the provision of standard contracts illegal, causes  great controversy, both theoretical and practical. This is important because this question concerns the constitutional principle of protection of consumers. The primary objective of the law concerning of illegal provisions is healing of legal relations arising from irregularities in the contracting process, related to the contractual advantage one of the parties. Due to the increasingly common practice used by entrepreneurs in standard contracts with consumers, it is necessary to their judicial review. It aims to eliminate from standard contracts such provisions that grossly violate the interests of consumers, putting them in a much worse position in relation to a person who uses such a standard contract. But the question is whether, in circumstances where the specific contractual provision will be criminalized and the court will prohibit a particular entrepreneur using it in dealings with consumers, such a decision also involves other entrepreneurs. In other words, if though they are not party to the trial, they are obliged to adhere to the judgment. We are dealing here with the opposition of the rule of law to the court for every person, including entrepreneurs, to the principle of consumer protection, which is really executed. The essence of the problem boils down to the concept of extended validity, so that the art. 47943 Civil Procedure Code, which provides for such an effect applies only to the entrepreneur who was a party (defendant) in trial for the recognition provisions of standard contracts illegal, whether it should be assumed broad interpretation, so that inscribing of a clause in the register of the President of the Trading Standard Office has certain effects also in relation to other entrepreneurs who use patterns agreement. The problem takes on added significance if we consider the possibility of punishment in antitrust proceedings businesses using abusive clauses that have been inscribed into the register.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2015, 1 (201); 81-125
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kara umowna z tytułu odstąpienia od umowy najmu w związku z nieuiszczeniem kaucji zabezpieczającej
Autorzy:
Szanciło, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788226.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-07-22
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
kara umowna
umowa najmu
kaucja zabezpieczająca
dzierżawa
contractual penalty
lease agreement
security deposit
tenancy
Opis:
The subject of consideration is the admissibility of the cessation of contractual penalties in the event of the lessor's withdrawal from a tenancy agreement, as a result of the tenant's failure to pay a security deposit against the lessor’s future rentals under the contract. Additional reser-vation of contractual penalty may relate only to non-performance or undue performance of a non-monetary obligation and therefore can’t be related to non-performance or undue perfor-mance of a monetary obligation (art. 483 § 1 k.c.). It’s important that the security deposit – in contrast to other forms of security – has a monetary nature. If you consider that this method of payment determines the nature of the security deposit as a cash payment and the tenant fails to pay the it or doesn’t restore the security to the original amount, then the provision for a contractual penalty for withdrawal from a tenancy agreement for that reason would be invalid. The question is if the nature of the rendition determines the manner in which it is fulfilled, or the purpose for which the debtor pays a specified amount of money. This issue may raise seri-ous doubts, but the automatic recognition of a security deposit as a cash rendition, although – literally speaking, possibly to consider – could lead to unlikely conclusions, given the nature and purpose of this form of warrant, especially in comparison to other forms. Consequently, in certain situations, the purpose and the essence of the rendition, its economic character, should be explored, since those elements determine the nature of the remdition within the meaning of art. 483 § 1 k.c.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2017, 2 (210); 129-152
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies